研究生: |
陳韻珊 Yuhn-Shan Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
區塊鏈應用與聯合行為關係之研究 Research on the Relationship Between Blockchain Application and Cartel |
指導教授: |
羅乃維
Nai-Wei Lo 陳曉慧 Hsiao-Hui Chen |
口試委員: |
查士朝
Shi-Cho Cha 朱宇倩 Yu-Qian Zhu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 資訊管理系 Department of Information Management |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 68 |
中文關鍵詞: | 區塊鏈 、智能合約 、去中心化 、競爭法 、聯合行為 、卡特爾 、寬恕政策 |
外文關鍵詞: | blockchain, smart contract, decentralized, competition law, concerted action, cartel, leniency policy |
相關次數: | 點閱:256 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
區塊鏈技術具有去中心化、匿名與不可竄改等特性,參與者都持有一份完全相同的交易紀錄,彼此監視並強化信任,使交易有效進行。而競爭法規範的聯合行為通常都是秘密進行,為使聯合行為的協議能夠實施,卡特爾組織除要求成員遵守協議內容,也要防範成員悖離協議,甚至要有處罰違背協議者的機制。因此卡特爾協議利用區塊鏈技術進行運作,則會強化卡特爾的監督機制,成員身分不易被識別且不會悖離協議,甚至透過智能合約調整誘因設計,鞏固共謀協議的穩定性。對執法面的影響則是會使執法機關調查的難度增加,同時降低卡特爾成員申請寬恕政策的意願。因此執法機關可增進區塊鏈技術知識並深入瞭解區塊鏈衍生的問題根源,以強化監管能力;同時加強主動偵測與監督,並提高舉報區塊鏈聯合行為的檢舉獎金,增加卡特爾成員申請寬恕政策的意願。
Blockchain technology has the characteristics of decentralization, anonymity and immutability. All blockchain users hold an identical transaction record, monitor each other and strengthen trust, so that transactions can be carried out effectively. Cartels regulated by competition law are usually conducted in secret. In order to effectively implement the collusion agreement, cartel organizations require members to abide by the content of the agreement, and must prevent members from violating the agreement and punish those who violate the agreement. The operation of the cartel agreement using blockchain technology will strengthen the supervision mechanism of the cartel. The identities of the members are not easily identified and will not deviate from the agreement. Adjusting the incentive design through smart contracts can consolidate the stability of the collusion agreement. Therefore, it will increase the difficulty of investigation and supervision, and reduce the willingness of members to apply for a leniency policy. The competition authorities can improve the knowledge of blockchain and understanding of the root causes of blockchain-derived problems. The authorities also can strengthen detection and supervision, increase the whistleblower bonus for reporting blockchain cartel, and increase the willingness of cartel members to apply for a leniency policy.
中文文獻
1.王立達 (2021)。聯合行為合意之概念、認定與證明方法:理論與實務的交互辯證」。全國律師月刊2021年10月號,頁18~44。
2.石世豪 (2021)。從司法審查實務論聯合行為「合意」要件再修正。公平交易季刊第29卷第1期,頁1~64。
3.何之邁 (1999)。歐洲共同體競爭法論。三民書局股份有限公司。
4.吳秀明 (2014)。競爭法制之發軔與展開。元照出版有限公司。
5.余采霏 (2020年8月21日)。區塊鏈實驗拚智慧醫療-結合產官學力促商轉。網管人。
https://www.netadmin.com.tw/netadmin/zhtw/trend/BA725241B8BD43F4A3C4291B59522AD8
6.高敬原 (2021年9月23日)。用區塊鏈解決國際貿易痛點、獲金管會核准試辦!國泰如何讓7家同業點頭合作。數位時代。
https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/65180/cathay-holdings-blockchain
7.陳志民 (2010)。美國及歐盟反托拉斯法對國際卡特爾行為之規範。貿易政策論叢 ,頁37~61。
8.陳志民 (2019)。支付系統競爭議題及規範架構之建立。公平交易季刊第27卷第3期,頁1~40。
9.張庭瑜 (2020年8月21日)。音樂人的希望!台灣首個區塊鏈音樂發行平台Soundscape上線。數位時代。
https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/47772/kkfarm-soundscape-blockchain/
10.財團法人中技社專題報告 (2019)。區塊鏈+時代的社經變革與創新思維。
11.華為區塊鏈技術開發團隊編著,陳恭審定(2020)。區塊鏈技術與應用。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
12.廖義男、黃銘傑、石世豪、王立達、楊宏暉、顏雅倫 (2019)。公平交易法國內重要案例分析-以聯合行為為例。公平交易委員會:公平交易法學會。
13.顏廷棟 (2017)。各國競爭法寬恕政策實施成效之研究。公平交易委員會:銘傳大學。
14.顏雅倫 (2019)。聯合行為之合意推定-美國反托拉斯法之比較法研究。公平交易季刊第27卷第1期,頁51~112。
15.Candy Her (2019年11月25日)。深入解讀︱中國信託和 7 家國際銀行的「Voltron貿易金融區塊鏈」是怎麼運作的?。動區動趨。
https://www.blocktempo.com/ctbc-r3-voltron-blockchain-letter-of-credit/
16.Filippi, P. D. & Wright, A. 原著。王延川譯,徐珮菱校訂 (2019)。區塊鏈與法律:程式碼之治 (Blockchain and the Law: the Rule of Code)」。元照出版有限公司。
17.Swan, M. 原著。沈佩誼譯 (2018)。區塊鏈-未來經濟的藍圖 (Blockchain:Blueprint for a New Economy)。碁峯資訊股份有限公司。
18.Waldman, D. E. & Jensen, E. J. 原著。許景翔、潘明如合譯 (2013)。產業經濟學理論與實務(Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, 4th edition)。雙葉書廊。
英文文獻
1.American Bar Association (ABA). Section of Antitrust Law. (2006). Criminal Antitrust Litigation Handbook, 2nd Edition.
2.Catalini, C., & Tucker, C. (2018). Antitrust and Costless Verification: An Optimistic and a Pessimistic View of the Implications of Blockchain Technology. Mass. Inst. of Tech. Sloan, Research Paper No. 5523-18.
3.European Union Blockchain Observatory & Forum. (2019). Legal and Regulatory Framework of Blockchains and Smart Contracts.
https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/reports/report_legal_v1.0.pdf
4.Gavil, A. I., Kovacic, W. E. & Baker, J. B. (2002). Antitrust Law in Perspective: Cases, Concept and Problems in Competition Policy. 275-277, 307-308. West Grou, St. Paul, MN.
5.Harrington, J. E. Jr. (2017). The Theory of Collusion and Competition Policy. The MIT Press.
6.Jaspers, J. D. (2017). Managing Cartels: How Cartel Participants Create Stability in the Absence of Law. 23 Eur. J. on Crim. Policy & Res. 319. 321-22.
7.Kovacic, W. E. (1993). The Identification and Proof of Horizontal Agreements under the Antitrust Laws. 38 Antitrust Bull. 16.
8.Levenstein, M. C. & Suslow, V. Y. (2006). What Determines Cartel Success? Journal of Economic Literature, 44.1: 43-95.
9.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2012). Unilateral Disclosure of Information with Anticompetitive Effects, DAF/COMP(2012)17, OECD.
10.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2013), Ex Officio Cartel Investigations and the Use of Screens to Detect Cartels. DAF/COMP(2013)27, OECD.
11.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2017), Algorithms and Collusion - Note from the European Union. DAF/COMP/WD(2017)12, OECD.
12.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2022). OECD Handbook on Competition Policy in the Digital Age. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.
13.Pike, C. & Capobianco, A. (2020). Antitrust and the Trust Machine. OECD.
http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/antitrust-and-the-trust-machine-2020.pdf
14.Posner, R. A. (1968). Oligopoly and the Antitrust Laws: A Suggested Approach, 21 Stan. L. Rev.
15.Schrepel, T. (2019a). Collusion by Blockchain and Smart Contracts. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology (33 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 117).
16.Schrepel, T. (2019b). Is Blockchain the Death of Antitrust Law? The Blockchain Antitrust Paradox. 3 Geo. L. Tech. Rev. 281.
17.Schrepel, T. (2021). Blockchain + Antitrust-The Decentralization Formula. Edward Elgar Publishing.
18.chrepel, T. (2022). An Overview of Blockchain-related Litigation (USA – 2010 to 2021). Concurrentialiste.
https://leconcurrentialiste.com/blockchainlitigation/?mc_cid=053cd26155&mc_eid=1efa5025dd
19.Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum.
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Building-Blockchains.pdf
20.Stigler, G. (1964). A Theory of Oligopoly, Journal of Political Economy ,72,44-61.
21.The Economist (2015). The Trust Machine: How the technology behind bitcoin could change the world.
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2015/10/31/the-trust-machine
22.Yaga, D., Mell, P., Roby, N. & Scarfone, K. (2018). Blockchain Technology Overview. NIST, Department of Commerce.
https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8202
23.Ysewyn, J. & Kahmann, S. (2018). The Decline and Fall of the Leniency Pro-gramme in Europe. 1 COMP. L. REV. 44, 45.
24.Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X. & Wang, H. (2017). An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends. IEEE 6th International Congress on Big Data.