簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許馨方
Hsin-fang Hsu
論文名稱: 運用「一般化雙鑽石模型」對台灣與韓國之競爭力比較
An International Comparison Of Empirical Generalized Double Diamond Model Approaches To Taiwan And Korea
指導教授: 劉代洋
Day-Yang Liu
口試委員: 張保隆
Pao Long Chang
林進財
CHIN-TSAI LIN
劉祥熹
Hsiang-His Liu
徐偉初
Steve Waicho Tsui
王健全
Jiann-Chyuan Wang
張琬喻
Woan-yuh Jang
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 73
中文關鍵詞: 競爭力一般化雙鑽石模型台灣韓國
外文關鍵詞: generalized double diamond mode
相關次數: 點閱:215下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文主要係以2000年至2004年的相關資料,運用「一般化雙鑽石模型」對台灣與韓國,這兩個小型開放經濟體系進行分析,進而比較其國家競爭力。本論文對於變數的選擇主要係根據文獻推導所決定,與傳統統計方法不同,且因考慮資料收集的可行性,目前只強調量化變數,而非質性研究,此亦為本研究限制之一。論文研究結果顯示台灣在國內鑽石方面,除了在需求情況不如韓國外,其餘三方面皆優於韓國。而差異的主要原因是因為韓國人口約為台灣的兩倍,在高等教育學生占總人口之比例高於台灣,所以在國內市場需求上,台灣相對較小;至於國際鑽石方面,台灣在要素情況、需求情況、相關及支援產業、與企業策略、結構和競爭對手等四方面皆享有較高的國際競爭力。


    The purpose of this paper is to compare the competitiveness of the economies of Taiwan and Korea. It applies a generalized double diamond model approach to analyse the overall competitiveness of these two small open economies. The choice of variables is based upon literature reviews which are not similar to traditionally statistical methodology and the choice of variables also only emphasizes on the quantitative variables instead of qualitative variables. This is for the purpose of the feasibility of data collections, whereas there exists severe difficulty and complexity in the qualitative variables. This is one of the limitations of this research. The empirical results of this research, Taiwan surpasses Korea in all decisive factors with the exception of the demand condition in the domestic diamond in the years 2000–2004, which is due to Korea’s population being more than double Taiwan’s, and the average percentage of population that has attained at least tertiary education, Taiwan is less than Korea. As to the international diamond, Taiwan enjoys comparatively high competitiveness, and its international diamond is better than Korea’s in all four parts.

    Chapter 1 Introduction……………………………………….…………...1 1.1 Background of the research……………………………….….….1 1.2 Motives of the research…………………………………………2 1.3 Purpose of the research…………………………………….……4 1.4 Organization of the research…………………………………..…5 1.5 Contribution of the research……………………………………...6 Chapter 2 Literature review………………………………….….……….7 2.1 Porter’s diamond model…………………………….…………..7 2.2 The critical comments on diamond model.…………..…………...11 2.3 Generalized double diamond model……………………….…….28 Chapter 3 The analysis of the generalized double diamond model….….32 3.1 Data source……………………….…………………………..33 3.2 The choice of variables………….…………………….…….....36 3.2.1 Factor conditions………….………………..……........37 3.2.1.1 Domestic factor conditions………….…....….…..37 3.2.1.2 International factor conditions…………….….…..40 3.2.2 Demand conditions…….……….……………….….…43 3.2.2.1 Domestic demand conditions.……...……...……..43 3.2.2.2 International demand conditions……..….…...…...45 3.2.3 Related and supporting industries…….….….…..….…..47 3.2.3.1 Domestic related and supporting industries…...…...47 3.2.3.2 International related and supporting industries......…49 3.2.4 Firm strategy, structure and rivalry………….…...….…..52 3.2.4.1 Domestic firm strategy, structure and rivalry…..…..52 3.2.4.2 International firm strategy, structure and rivalry…....53 3.2.5 Government and chance……..………...………….…...54 Chapter 4 Empirical result…….…………………….…………….….…55 Chapter 5 Summary and conclusions…….………….…………….…....63 5.1 Conclusions…….……………………………………….……63 5.2 Implications…….……………………………………….……66 Reference…….…………………….……………………….……….…..68

    Bellak, C. J. & Weiss, A., 1993, A note on the Austrian “Diamond, Management International Review, Vol.33, p.109-118.
    Bloch, E., 1988, Basic research: the key to economic competitiveness, International Journal Technology management, Vol. 3(4), p. 393-404
    Calori R. & Noel, R., 1986, Successful Strategies in French High Technology Companies, Long Range Planning, Vol. 19, No. 6, p.54-65.
    Cartwright, W. R., 1993, Multiple Linked “Diamonds” and the International Competitiveness of Export-Dependent Industries: The New Zealand Experience, Management International Review, Vol.33, p.55-70.
    Cho, D. S., & Moon, H. C., 2000, From Adam Smith to Michael Porter, Singapore: World Scientific.
    Clancy, P., O’Malley, E., O’Connel, L. & Van Egeraat, C., 2001, Industry clusters in Ireland: An application of porter’s model of national competitive advantage to three sectors, European Planning Studies, Vol. 9 (1), Jan
    Cohen S. S. & Zysman J., 1988, Manufacturing Innovation and American Industrial Competitiveness, Science, Vol. 239(4844), p.1110-1115.
    Crookell, H. 1987, Achieving International Competitiveness, Business Quarterly, Vol. 52(1), p.110-115.
    Daly, D. J., 1993, Porter’s Diamond and Exchange Rates, Management international Review, Vol.33, p.119-134.
    Dunning, J. H. 1992, The Competitive Advantage of Countries and the Activities of Transnational Corporations, Transnational Corporations, Vol. 1(1), p.135-168.
    Dunning, J. H. 1993, Internationalizing Porter’s Diamond, Management International Review, Vol.33, p.7-15.
    Dunning, J. H. 2003, The role of foreign direct investment in upgrading China’s competitiveness, Journal of International Business and Economy, Vol. 4(1), p.1-13.
    D’Cruz, J. R. & Rugman, A. M., 1993, Developing International Competitiveness: The Five Partners Model, Business Quarterly, winter, p.61-72.
    Duffey, J., 1988, Competitiveness and Human Resource, California Management Review, Vol. 30(3), p.92-100.
    Dufour P. & Gingras,Y., 1988, Development of Canadian Science and Technology Policy, Science and Policy, Vol. 15(1), p.13-18.
    Edmondson, H. E. & Wheelwright, S. C., 1989, Outstanding Manufacturing in the Coming Decade, California Management Review, Vol. 15(1), p. 70-90.
    Fransman, M. & Tanaka, S., 1995, Government, Globalization, and Universities in Japanese biotechnology, Research Policy, Vol. 24(1), p. 13-49.
    Freemantle, M., 1996, Top UK Science Adviser Pushes Program to Boost Competitiveness, Chemical and Engineering News, Vol. 74(6), p.33-34.
    Gardner, M., 1990, Boosting International Competitiveness, Industry & Higher Education, Vol. 4(2), p.113-118.
    Grant, R. M., 1991, Porter’s Competitive Advantage of Nations: An Assessment, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.12(7), 535-548.
    Grayson, L. P., 1989, America’s Economic Competitiveness, Industry & Higher Education, Vol. 3(4), p.195-199.
    Hodgetts, R. M., 1993, Porter’s Diamond Framework in a Mexican Context, Management International Review, Vol.33, p.41-54.
    Hong, I. Seng, 1997, “Human Resource on National Competitiveness”, Taiwan Economic Research Monthly, Vol. 20(4), p.53-60.
    Hsu, Bi Su, 1997, “A Study of Increasing National Competitiveness via Industrial Manpower Training,” Taiwan Economic Research Monthly, Vol. 20(3), p.25-28.
    Jo, Jung De, 1997, “A Correlation of National Competitiveness and Economic Growth,” Taiwan Economic Research Monthly, Vol. 20(4), p. 15-21.
    Kurth, W., 1990, Competitiveness through Technology, The OECD Observer, Vol. 164, p.19-21.
    Lex, M., 1995, Promoting the Competitiveness of Biotechnology in Europe, Trends in Biotechnology, Vol. 13(2), p. 39-45.
    Liang, Wen Zong, 2005, “An Analysis on Foreign Trade Dependency Ratio in Taiwan, “ e-Focus on Global Taiwanese Firms,Vol.27.
    Liu, X. & Song, H., 1997, China and the Multinationals-A winning combination, Long Range Planning, Vol.30, No.1, p.74-83.
    Moon, H. C. Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A. 1995, The Generalized Double Diamond Approach to International Competitiveness, Research in Global Strategic Management, Vol. 5, p.97-114.
    Moon, H. C., Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A., 1998, A Generalized Double Diamond Approach to the Global Competitiveness of Korea and Singapore, International Business Review 7 p.135-150.
    Murray, L. W., 1986, Learning to Compete, Business Horizon, p.2-12.
    Niefer, W., 1990, Technological Expertise and International Competitiveness: Why New Strategies are Needed, Siemens Review, Vol. 57(9), p.4-9.
    Pavitt, K. and P. Patel, 1991, Competitiveness: Technological and Strategies of the World Larger Companies, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 18(6), p. 363-368.
    Porter, M. E., 1980, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press.
    Porter, M. E., 1985, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
    Porter, M. E., 1990, Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
    Press, F., 1990, The Roe of Education in Technological Competitiveness, Siemens Review, Vol. 57(2), p. 4-7.
    Roessnger, J. D., Porter, A.L., Newman, N. & Cauffiel, D., 1996, Anticipating the Future High-Tech Competitiveness of Nations: Indicators for Twenty-Eight Countries, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 51(2), p.133-149.
    Roth, K, Schweiger, D. M. & Morrison, A. J. 1991, Global Strategy Implementation at the Business Unit Level: Operational Capability and Administrative Mechanism, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 22(3), p. 369-402.
    Rugman, A. M., 1987, Strategies for National Competitiveness, Long Range Planning, Vol. 20(3), p.92-97.
    Rugman, A. M. & D’Cruz, J. R., 1991, Fast Forward: Improving Canada’s International Competitiveness. Toronto: Kodak Canada Inc.

    Rugman, A. M. & D’Cruz, J. R., 1993, The “Double Diamond” Model of International Competitiveness: The Canadian Experience, Management International review, Vol.33, p.17-39.
    Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke,A., 1993, Foreign Subsidiaries and Multinational Strategic Management: An Extension and Correction of Porter’s Single Diamond Framework, Management International Review, Vol.33, p.71-84.
    Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A., 1995, Transnational networks and global competition: An organizing framework, Research in Global Strategic Management, Vol. 5, p. 3-23.
    Sapienza, A., 1989, R&D Collaboration as a Global Competitiveness Tactic Biotechnology and the Ethical Pharmaceutical Industry, R&D Management, Vol. 19(4), p.285-295.
    Scoot, B. R., 1989, Competitiveness: Self-Help for a Worsening Problem, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89(4), p.115-121.
    Seh, Me Chang, 1993, “The Determinants of American Competitiveness: A Theoretical Model. China Administration Review, Vol. 2(4), p.73-118.
    Stata, R., 1988, The Role of University Based Research in International Competitiveness, Polymer News, Vol. 13, p. 162-173.
    Tassey, G., 1990, Structural Change and Competitiveness The U.S. Semiconductor Industry, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 37, p. 85-93.
    Tam, D. D.C. 1998, A Study of the Measurement of Industrial Competitiveness: -A Case Study of Model Establishment and Empirical Studies on Porter Diamond Model, Ph. D Dissertation, National Cheng Kung University.
    Tummala, V. M. R., Lee, H. Y. H. & Yam, R. C.M., 2000, Strategic Alliances of China and Hong Kong in manufacturing and their impact on global competitiveness of Hong Kong manufacturing industries, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11/6, p.370-384.
    Tyson, L. A., 1990, Why a National Competitiveness Policy is Needed, Siemens Review, Vol. 56(2), p.36-41.
    Van Den Bulcke, D., 1995, The Strategic management of Multinationals in a Triad-Based World Economy, Research in Global Strategic Management, Vol. 5, p25-63.
    Vice, D. G., 1987, Higher Education: The Key to Competitiveness, Business Quarterly, Vol. 52(1), p. 85-90.
    Wang, G. S. 1996, “National Competitiveness and Infrastructure,” Taiwan Economic Research Monthly, Vol. 19(12), p.17-20.
    Wu, R. I. & Lin, H.Y., 2002, A Study on Industrial Technology Competitiveness in Taiwan, The Measurement of Industrial Technological Competitiveness in the Knowledge-Based Economy in Taipei on August 23-24.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2012/12/21 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE