「火災安全性能」是住宅性能時代的首要參考指標，但是現況依照條文式法規改善性能的效果不佳，尤其多戶集居的集合住宅更是窒礙難行，在火災發生時造成他人安全的問題必須重視。
本研究參考國外以「安全風險」觀點建立之評估系統架構，建立針對集合住宅之「火災安全風險評比系統」，並試圖將「他人安全」觀點納入評估範圍，以綜合評估火災發生時的風險程度。
本研究參考我國「住宅性能評估制度」的內涵予以整合，嘗試利用相關文獻中的經驗公式評估「火災危害結果」，並利用波松分配機率模式分析「火災發生機率」，再將兩者結合「可接受風險基準」的研究，構成「火災安全風險評比」的系統架構，最後以實際操作案例之火災安全的性能等級與改善對策，以檢驗本系統之適用性。
1. 本研究後段透過實際操作得到以下結論：住宅火災安全風險性能呈現明顯的群集現象落差，所以每一風險等級區別之間，便代表在安全性能上的絕對差異。
2. 將「他人安全風險」與「本身安全風險」同時作為「防火安全性能」的內容時，可以更清楚區別評估住宅的安全風險等級之差異。
3. 利用個別案例之風險評比矩陣圖，可以清楚且快速提供改善對策，以及此類型建築規劃之風險等級趨勢。
4. 「防煙安全梯」並未如學理上明顯補償不足性能之效果，但「住戶大門構造」的「防煙門」則具有相當的替代補償效果。

' the safe performance of the fire ' is primary reference index of times of the performance of the house, but the present situation is not good according to the clause type result of improving performance of regulation, it is all right that especially many families collect the set house occupied and stop up finding it difficult especially, the problem causing others to be safe while taking place in fire must be paid attention to.
This research is consulted with the systematic structure of assessment set up of the view of ' the safe risk ' abroad, set up ' fire safe risk compare and assess system ' to set house , attempt ' others safe ' view include in the range of assessing, risk degree while taking place with the comprehensive assessment fire .
1. This intension of consulting our country ' the performance appraisal system of the house ' of research is combined, ' the fire endanger the result ' to try to utilize the experience formula in relevant documents to assess, utilize wave loose allocation probability way analyze ' fire take place probability ' , and then research that the two combine, form systematic structure that ' the safe risk of fire is compared and assess ', with the grade of performance with safe fire of the practical operation case and countermeasure of improving finally, in order to examine the suitability of this system.
2. This research back segment gets the following conclusion through practical operation: Obvious trooping the phenomenon drop appears in the safe risk performance of the fire of the house, so every risk grade between distinguishing , represent the absolute difference at safe performance.
3. ' risk others safe ' is with ' itself risk not safe ' is at the same time as ' fire prevention performance not safe ' content at, can distinguish the difference of grades of security risk of assessing house more clearly even more .
4. Utilize the risk of the specific case to compare and assess the matrix picture, can offer improving the countermeasure , and the trend of grade of risk of this type building planning clearly and fast .
Result of the obvious insufficient performance of compensation that ' defend the cigarette emergency staircase ' not to studied the science , but the one that construct in household's gate ' defends the cigarette door ' has suitable substitution to compensate the result.

【 】楊逸詠，建立住宅性能評估制度之研究（二），內政部建研所，2003
【 】何明錦，舊有建築物防火安全評估與改善技術之開發，內政部建研所，1999
【 】潘德倉，住宅火災人命安全評估方法之研究，中央警察大學碩士論文，1996
【 】 S. G. Reid, ”risk assessment”, school of civil and Mining Engineering, The university of Sydney, Australia, Research report NO. R591, 1989.
【 】簡賢文，既有建築物消防安全設備改善之研究，內政部消防署研究計畫，2002
【 】T. F. Barry, ”An introduction to Quantitative Risk Assessment in Chemical Process Industries”, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering,2nd ed.NFPA,1995,p5-102.
【 】Sven Erik Magnusson, ”Fire Safety Design Based on Calculations: Uncertainty Analysis and Safety Verification”, fire safety journal 27 1996,p305-334.
【 】鄭志強，建築物火災危險度評估電腦化應用之研究，中央警察大學消防科學研究所碩士論文，1998年6月。
【 】G. Ramachandran, “Probability-Base Building Design for Fire Safety: Part I” , Fire Technology , Third Quarter 1995, p265-275
【 】林元祥，建築物火災發生機率預測模式之研究，中央警察大學學報第32期，1998
【 】David C. Spielberg, “Statistical Decomposition Analysis and Claim Distributions for Industrial Fire Losses ”, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Norwood, MA, USA, June 1975.
【 】簡賢文，建築物火災避難安全及煙控性能式設計法之研究（二），內政部建研所研究計畫，2001.
【 】林慶元，建築與都市防災 火災安全計畫講義錄，大境研究室出版
【 】中野美奈，荻原一郎，避難安全性能の檢證に用いる避難開始時間の設定に関する考察，日本建築學會大會學術講演梗概集，2001
【 】日本建築學會，建築物の火災安全設計指針，2002.
【 】海老原 學，日本消防法規定化之修訂，第二十四屆中日工程技術研討會（二），2004.
【 】 黃清賢，危害分析與風險評估操作手冊，新文京開發出版股份有限公司，2003.
【 】 林元祥，建築物火災危險度評估與實證調查研究，中央警察大學出版社，2000.
【 】T. T. Lie, ”Optimal Fire Resistance of Structures”, Journal of the structure division, proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineering, Vol.98,No.ST1,1973
【 】吳宗儒，從建築火災案例探討建築火災人命安全因素之研究，成大建研所碩論，2002.