簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 宋珞菱
Lo-Ling Sung
論文名稱: 結合同儕互評策略之機器人數位說故事學習模式對於英語口說表現、學習動機、反思及批判性思考傾向之影響
Effects of peer assessment-based robot-mediated digital storytelling on students’ English speaking performance, learning motivation, reflection, and critical thinking tendency
指導教授: 黃國禎
Gwo-Jen Hwang
口試委員: 陳秀玲
Hsiu-Ling Chen
宋涵鈺
HAN-YU SUNG
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 120
中文關鍵詞: 機器人輔助語言學習教育機器人英語口說數位說故事同儕互評
外文關鍵詞: Robot assisted language learning (RALL), Educational robots, English speaking, Digital storytelling, Peer assessment
相關次數: 點閱:540下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 英語是國際化的語言,對於非英語系的國家,學習英語口說是重要且具挑戰性的目標。數位說故事被視一種有效幫助學生學習語言的方法,在數位說故事活動中,學生可以運用學習到的語言,搭配多樣化的多媒體素材,來表達自身想法。然而,傳統的數位故事大多缺乏互動性,並且僅能透過單一且固定的觀看角度來呈現故事內容。因此,有學者將機器人與數位說故事結合,並證實多模態數位故事的形式能夠提升學生的英語口說表達。然而,若缺乏學習過程的認知衝突,將難以讓學生對學習表現和所學內容進行反思。為此,本研究提出結合同儕互評策略之機器人數位說故事學習模式。為檢驗所提出之模式的有效性,本研究採用準實驗設計,並於小學英語課程中進行實驗。實驗對象為臺灣北部一所小學兩個班級的六年級學生:一個班24人為實驗組,以結合同儕互評之機器人數位說故事學習模式學習;另一個班25人則為控制組,以一般機器人數位說故事學習模式學習。研究結果顯示,結合同儕互評策略之機器人數位說故事學習模式,能夠提升學生的英語口說表現及反思性思維的理解與反思,並且該模式下的學生具有更好的機器人數位故事作品表現。然而,在學習動機和批判性思考傾向上,兩組沒有顯著差異。


    English is an international language, and learning to speak English is an important and challenging goal for non-English speaking countries. Digital storytelling (DST) is seen as an effective way to help students learn language. In the DST activity, students can use the language they have learned to express their ideas with various multimedia materials. However, most traditional digital stories lack interactivity and can only present story content through a single and fixed viewing angle. Therefore, some scholars combined robots with DST and verified that the multimodal form of digital stories can enhance students' English oral expression. However, without cognitive conflict in the learning process, it is difficult for students to reflect on their learning performance and content. Therefore, a robotic digital storytelling with peer assessment (R-DST-PA) approach has been proposed in this study. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a quasi-experiment was conducted within an English class for two sixth-grade classes in an elementary school in northern Taiwan. Two classes were assigned into the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG). The EG consists of 24 students, learning with the R-DST-PA approach, while the CG consists of 25 students, learning with the R-DST approach. The result shows that the proposed approach improves students' English speaking performance, and promoted the understanding and reflection of reflective thinking. Moreover, the students learning with the proposed approach had better performance in their robotic digital storytelling works. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of learning motivation and critical thinking tendency.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 5 第三節 名詞釋義 6 (一)同儕互評(Peer Assessment) 7 (二)機器人數位說故事(Robotic Digital Storytelling) 7 (三)英語口說表現(English Speaking Performance) 8 (四)學習動機(Learning Motivation) 8 (五)反思性思維(Reflective Thinking) 8 (六)批判性思考傾向(Critical Thinking Tendency) 9 第四節 論文架構 9 第貳章 文獻回顧 11 第一節 機器人輔助語言學習(RALL) 11 第二節 數位說故事與機器人數位說故事 15 第三節 同儕互評 19 第參章 結合同儕互評之機器人數位說故事模式 23 第一節 機器人數位說故事活動內容規劃 23 第二節 機器人數位故事同儕互評評分規準 27 第三節 機器人數位說故事開發工具 29 第肆章 實驗設計 35 第一節 實驗架構 35 第二節 實驗對象 37 第三節 實驗流程 37 第四節 研究工具 39 (一)英語口說測驗與評分規準 39 (二)學習動機量表 41 (三)反思性思維量表 42 (四)批判性思考傾向量表 43 (五)機器人數位故事作品評分規準 43 (六)訪談大綱 45 第五節 分析方法 45 第伍章 研究結果 47 第一節 英語口說表現 47 第二節 學習動機 52 第三節 反思性思維 54 第四節 批判性思考傾向 57 第五節 機器人數位故事作品表現 58 第六節 師生作品評分相關性 60 第七節 質性訪談結果 61 (一)實驗組訪談結果 62 (二)控制組訪談結果 65 (三)整體訪談結果與其他建議 68 第陸章 結論與建議 70 第一節 結論與討論 70 (一)英語口說表現 70 (二)學習動機 71 (三)反思性思維 72 (四)批判性思考傾向 74 (五)機器人數位故事作品表現 74 (六)師生評分相關性 75 第二節 研究限制 76 第三節 研究建議 77 參考文獻 78 附錄一 機器人數位說故事活動故事創作學習單 94 附錄二 機器人數位說故事活動同儕互評學習單 97 附錄三 機器人數位說故事活動教師講評評分單 100 附錄四 英語口說表現測驗(前測) 102 附錄五 英語口說表現測驗(後測) 103 附錄六 學習動機量表(前問卷) 104 附錄七 學習動機量表(後問卷) 105 附錄八 反思性思維量表(前問卷) 106 附錄九 反思性思維量表(後問卷) 108 附錄十 批判性思考傾向量表(前問卷) 110 附錄十一 批判性思考傾向量表(後問卷) 111 附錄十二 訪談大綱 112 附錄十三 實驗組訪談結果 113 附錄十四 控制組訪談結果 118

    Abderrahim, L., & Gutiérrez-Colón Plana, M. (2021). A theoretical journey from social constructivism to digital storytelling. The EUROCALL Review, 29(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2021.12853
    Aidinlou, N. A., Alemi, M., Farjami, F., & Makhdoumi, M. (2014). Applications of robot assisted language learning (RALL) in language learning and teaching. International Journal of Language & Linguistics, 2(3-1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12
    Alemi, M., & Haeri, N. S. (2020). Robot-Assisted Instruction of L2 Pragmatics: Effects on Young EFL Learners’ Speech Act Performance. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 86-103. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44727
    Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2015). The impact of social robotics on L2 learners’ anxiety and attitude in English vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0286-y
    Al-Qallaf, C. L., & Al-Mutairi, A. S. R. (2016). Digital literacy and digital content supports learning: The impact of blogs on teaching English as a foreign language. The Electronic Library, 34(3), 522-547. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2015-0076
    Al-Seghayer, K. (2015). Salient Key Features of Actual English Instructional Practices in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p89
    Anderson, J., C Hung, Y. C., & Macleroy, V. (2018). Creative and critical approaches to language learning and digital technology: Findings from a multilingual digital storytelling project. Language and Education, 32(3), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1430151
    Andrade, H. L., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7275/g367-ye94
    Arroba, J., & Acosta, H. (2021). Authentic digital storytelling as alternative teaching strategy to develop speaking skills in EFL classes. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 317-343. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/issue/view/16658
    Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy-practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9
    Benmayor, R. (2008). Digital Storytelling as a Signature Pedagogy for the New Humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022208088648
    Bensley, D. A., & Spero, R. A. (2014). Improving critical thinking skills and metacognitive monitoring through direct infusion. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.001
    Berggren, J. (2015). Learning from giving feedback: A study of secondary-level students. ELT Journal, 69(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu036
    Bloch, J. (2018). Digital Storytelling in the Multilingual Academic Writing Classroom: Expanding the Possibilities. Dialogues: An Interdisciplinary Journal of English Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.30617/dialogues.2.1.6
    Boccanfuso, L., Scarborough, S., Abramson, R. K., Hall, A. V., Wright, H. H., & O’Kane, J. M. (2017). A low-cost socially assistive robot and robot-assisted intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: Field trials and lessons learned. Autonomous Robots, 41, 637-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-016-9554-4
    Boon, S. I. (2014). Increasing the uptake of peer feedback in primary school writing: findings from an action research enquiry. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 44(2), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2014.901984
    Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240405
    Bravo, F. A., Hurtado, J. A., & González, E. (2021). Using Robots with Storytelling and Drama Activities in Science Education. Education Sciences, 11(7), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070329
    Cambridge Assessment English (2021). Cambridge English Qualifications Handbook for teachers. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/357180-starters-movers-and-flyers-handbook-for-teachers-2021.pdf
    Carbonaro, M., Cutumisu, M., Duff, H., Gillis, S., Onuczko, C., Siegel, J., Schaeffer, J., Schumacher, A., Szafron, D., & Waugh, K. (2008). Interactive story authoring: A viable form of creative expression for the classroom. Computers & Education, 51(2), 687-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.07.007
    Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9379-4
    Chang, C., & Lin, H. K. (2020). Effects of a mobile-based peer-assessment approach on enhancing language-learners’ oral proficiency. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 668-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1612264
    Chang, S. C., Hsu, T. C., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science. Computers & Education, 146, 103758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103758
    Chekol, A. D. (2020). Investigating the Influence of Using Peer Feedback on EFL Students’ Speaking Achievement and Their Perceptions Towards Peer Feedback. The Arabic Language and Literature, 5(3), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.allc.20200503.11
    Chen, C. H. (2010). The Implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-feedback system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008
    Cheng, Y. W., Wang, Y., Yang, Y. F., Yang, Z. K., & Chen, N. S. (2020). Designing an authoring system of robots and IoT-based toys for EFL teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1-2), 6-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799823
    Chubko, N., Morris, J. E., McKinnon, D. H., Slater, E. V., & Lummis, G. W. (2020). Digital storytelling as a disciplinary literacy enhancement tool for EFL students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3587-3604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09833-x
    Concina, E. (2022) The Relationship between Self- and Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Trends in Higher Education, 1(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu1010004
    de Haas, M., Vogt, P., & Krahmer, E. (2020) The Effects of Feedback on Children’s Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Second Language Learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 101. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00101
    Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. D.C. Heath & Co Publishers.
    Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
    Engwall, O., & Lopes, J. (2020). Interaction and collaboration in robot-assisted language learning for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5-6), 1273-1309. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799821
    Fauzan, U. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability of EFL Students through Debate and Peer Assessment. EFL JOURNAL, 1(1), 49-57. http://doi.org/10.21462/eflj.v1i1.8
    Fu, J. S., Yang, S. H., & Yeh, H. C. (2021). Exploring the impacts of digital storytelling on English as a foreign language learners’ speaking competence. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(5), 679-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1911008
    Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational Variables in Second Language Acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 266-272. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0083787
    Gibbs, G. R. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In Bryan, C. & Clegg, K. (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. (1st ed., pp. 23-36). Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969670
    Gimeno-Sanz, A. (2015). Digital storytelling as an innovative element in English for specific purposes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 178, 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.163
    Gonzalez, P. F., Ochoa, C. A., Cabrera, P. A., Castillo, L. M., Quinonez, A. L., Solano, L. M., & Geberew, T. M. (2014). EFL Classroom Assessment: Teachers Practice and Teaching Techniques Adjustment in Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(20), 1071-1089. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2014.1857
    Graddol, D. (2006). English Next. Latimer Trend & Company, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl050
    Gregori-Signes, C. (2014). Digital storytelling and multimodal literacy in education. Porta Linguarum, 22, 237–250. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.53745
    Hasell, D., & Lee, K. Y. (2019). Evaluation of Self and Peer Assessments in a Second Year Engineering Module. IAFOR Journal of Education, 7(2), 105-130 https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.2.06
    Hava, K. (2021). Exploring the role of digital storytelling in student motivation and satisfaction in EFL education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 958-978. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650071
    Hong, Z. W., Huang, Y. M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W. W. (2016). Authoring Robot-Assisted Instructional Materials for Improving Learning Performance and Motivation in EFL Classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 337-349. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.1.337
    Hosni, S. A. (2014). Speaking difficulties encountered by young EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(6), 22-30. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijsell/v2-i6/4.pdf
    Hsieh, J. C. & Lee, J. S. (2021). Digital storytelling outcomes, emotions, grit, and perceptions among EFL middle school learners: robot-assisted versus PowerPoint-assisted presentations, Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1969410
    Hsu, T. C., & Liang, Y. S. (2021). Simultaneously Improving Computational Thinking and Foreign Language Learning: Interdisciplinary Media With Plugged and Unplugged Approaches. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(6), 1184-1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121992480
    Hsu, T. C., Chang, C., Wu, L. K., & Looi, C. K. (2022). Effects of a Pair Programming Educational Robot-Based Approach on Students’ Interdisciplinary Learning of Computational Thinking and Language Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 888215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888215
    Hung, S. T. A. (2019). Creating Digital Stories: EFL Learners’ Engagement, Cognitive and Metacognitive Skills. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 26-37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26819615
    Hung, Y. J., Chen, S. C., & Samuelson, B. L. (2016). Elementary EFL Students' Practice of Peer Assessment of Oral Classroom Activities. TESOL Journal, 7(2), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.245
    Hwang, G. J., Yang, T. C., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments. Computers & Education, 53(2), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.016
    Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J. L., Huang, Y. M., Hsu, G. L., & Lin, Y. C. (2016). Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using Web-based multimedia system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 215-241. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.927367
    Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
    Iio, T., Maeda, R., Ogawa, K., Yoshikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H., Suzuki, K., Aoki, T., Maesaki, M., & Hama, M. (2018). Improvement of Japanese adults' English speaking skills via experiences speaking to a robot. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12325
    Jeffery, D., Yankulov, K., Crerar, A., & Ritchie, K. L. (2016). How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.987721
    Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1994). The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom and School. Virginia: Association for Supervision Curriculum Development.
    Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D. A., Tolentino, L., & Koziupa, T. (2014). Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: Two science studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034008
    Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F. K. Y., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381-395. http://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
    Khalifa, A., Kato, T., & Yamamoto, S. (2019). Learning Effect of Implicit Learning in Joining-in-type Robot-assisted Language Learning System. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(2). 105-123. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i02.9212
    Klimova, B. (2015). The Role of Feedback in EFL Classes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199(3), 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.502
    Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2020). Robot tutor and pupils' educational ability: Teaching the times tables. Computers & Education, 157, 103970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103970
    Kuyyogsuy, S. (2019). Promoting Peer Feedback in Developing Students’ English Writing Ability in L2 Writing Class. International Education Studies, 12(9), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n9p76
    Lee, Y. F., Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., Fu, Q. K., & Tseng, W. H. (2021). Effects of a mobile-based progressive peer-feedback scaffolding strategy on students’ creative thinking performance, metacognitive awareness, and learning attitude. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1916763
    Leong, L. M., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Learners’ English Speaking Skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34-41. http://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.1.34
    Lin, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Hsu, Y. D. (2019). Effects of ASQ-based flipped learning on nurse practitioner learners' nursing skills, learning achievement and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 139, 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.014
    Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
    Lin, V., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2022). A Systematic Review on Oral Interactions in Robot-Assisted Language Learning. Electronics, 11(2), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11020290
    Liu, C. C., Wu, L.Y., Chen, Z. M., Tsai, C. C., & Lin, H. M. (2014). The effect of story grammars on creative self-efficacy and digital storytelling. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 450-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12059
    Liu, H. J., & Chen, T. H. (2013). Foreign Language Anxiety in Young Learners: How It Relates to Multiple Intelligences, Learner Attitudes, and Perceived Competence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4, 932-938. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.5.932-938
    Malita, L., & Martin, C. (2010). Digital storytelling as web passport to success in the 21st century. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3060-3064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.465
    Mall-Amiri, B., & Askarzadeh, H. (2018). The Comparative Effect of Portfolio Assessment and Peer-Assessment on EFL Learners' Critical Thinking and Speaking Achievement. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 6(2), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2018.542576
    Marin, M., & Pava, L. (2017). Conceptions of critical thinking from university EFL teachers. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 78-88. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p78
    Mazzoni, E., & Benvenuti, M. (2015). A Robot-Partner for Preschool Children Learning English Using Socio-Cognitive Conflict Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 474-485. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.4.474
    Nam, C. W. (2017). The effects of digital storytelling on student achievement, social presence, and attitude in online collaborative learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1135173
    Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
    Nilsson, M. (2019). Foreign language anxiety: The case of young learners of English in Swedish primary classrooms. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 13(2), 1-21. http://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201902191584
    Nunan, D. (1995). Language Teaching Technology: A Textbook for Teachers. Phoenix ELT.
    Ohler, J. (2013). Digital Storytelling in the Classroom: New Media Pathways to Literacy, Learning, and Creativity. (2nd ed.). Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452277479
    Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1253-1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186
    Papinczak, T., Young, L., & Groves, M. (2007). Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6
    Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Phuong Bui, L. T. (2020). Electronic Peer Feedback, EFL Academic Writing and Reflective Thinking: Evidence From a Confucian Context. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914554
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
    Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099219
    Randall, N. (2019). A Survey of Robot-Assisted Language Learning (RALL). ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 9(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345506
    Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital Storytelling: A Powerful Technology Tool for the 21st Century Classroom. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153916
    Robin, B. R. (2016). The Power of Digital Storytelling to Support Teaching and Learning. Digital Education Review, 30, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2016.30.17-29
    Roth, A. M., Reig, S., Bhatt, U., Shulgach, J., Amin, T., Doryab, A., Fang, F., & Veloso, M. (2019). A Robot’s Expressive Language Affects Human Strategy and Perceptions in a Competitive Game. 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956412
    Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: a meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
    Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170234
    Shen, M. Y., & Chiu, T. Y. (2019). EFL Learners’ English Speaking Difficulties and Strategy Use. Education and Linguistics Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v5i2.15333
    Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K.M. (2021). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: a New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 171-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
    Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: A comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0006-3
    Stork, M. G. (2020). Supporting Twenty-First Century Competencies Using Robots and Digital Storytelling. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 4(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-019-00039-w
    Sudarmo, S. (2021). The importance of speaking in English as a foreign language between skillful and thoughtful competencies: studying sociolinguistics perspectives. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1321
    Tahriri, A., Tous, M. D., & Movahedfar, S. (2015). The Impact of Digital Storytelling on EFL Learners' Oracy Skills and Motivation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(3), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.3p.144
    Tanaka, F., & Matsuzoe, S. (2012). Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: Field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Tanaka
    Taniguchi, T., Nagai, T., Nakamura, T., Iwahashi, N., Ogata, T., & Asoh, H. (2016). Symbol emergence in robotics: A survey. Advanced Robotics, 30(11-12), 706-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2016.1164622
    Tatlı, Z., Uğur, N., & Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2018). Peer assessment through digital storytelling: experiences of pre-service IT teachers. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(3), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2017-0105
    Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170598
    Topping, K. J. (2018). Using Peer Assessment to Inspire Reflection and Learning. (1st Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256889
    Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03
    Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. J. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00069-0
    Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Lin, R. A. (2015). Exploring the effects of student-centered project-based learning with initiation on students’ computing skills: A quasi-experimental study of digital storytelling. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 11(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2015010102
    Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
    Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching. Practice and Theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732928
    Vogt, P., de Haas, M., de Jong, C., Baxter, P., & Krahmer, E. (2017). Child-Robot Interactions for Second Language Tutoring to Preschool Children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00073
    Wang, J., Abdullah, R., & Leong, L. M. (2022). Studies of Teaching and Learning English-Speaking Skills: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Education, 7, 880990. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.880990
    Wang, L. C., & Chen, M. P. (2010). The effects of game strategy and preference‐matching on flow experience and programming performance in game‐based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525838
    Wang, Y. H., Young, S. S. C., & Jang, R. J. S. (2013). Using Tangible Companions for Enhancing Learning English Conversation. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 296-309. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.2.296
    Wenny, S. J., & Fajar, R. (2019). THE EFFECT OF PEER ASSESSMENT TOWARDS STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL AT SEMESTER II OF STIE MUHAMMADIYAH JAMBI 2018-2019. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 6(2), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v6i2.9886
    Wu, J., & Chen, D. T. V. (2020). A systematic review of educational digital storytelling. Computers & Education, 147, 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103786
    Wu, W. C. V., Wang, R. J., & Chen, N. S. (2015). Instructional design using an in-house built teaching assistant robot to enhance elementary school English-as-a-foreign-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 696-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.792844
    Yang, Y. F. D. (2012). Multimodal composing in digital storytelling. Computers and Composition, 29(3), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.07.001
    Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012
    Yang, Y. T. C., Chen, Y. C., & Hung, H. T. (2020). Digital storytelling as an interdisciplinary project to improve students’ English speaking and creative thinking. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35, 840-862. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1750431
    Zakaria, N., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). A Review of Affective Strategy and Social Strategy in Developing Students’ Speaking Skills. Creative Education, 10(12), 3082-3090. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012232
    Zhang, S. (2009). The role of input, interaction, and output in the development of oral fluency. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n4p91

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/07/14 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/07/14 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2025/07/14 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE