現今瞬息萬變的社會環境，除了專業知識和專業技術外，工作態度、職業道德、應對進退、社交禮儀等「軟技能」的素質，在未來職場發展上更是決勝的關鍵。過去傳統的教學方式過於強調以技能和知識為基礎的硬技能訓練，能充分運用這些硬技能的軟技能卻相對較少提及。本研究透過系統思考的方式，利用系統動力學建構就業力模型，模擬學生畢業後之就業競爭力，並在模型模擬與方案測試中，找出較佳的學習模式和策略。模型中使用的軟性變數是連結各線流圖的關鍵，雖因衡量不易而不容易察覺，但卻是在學生畢業後面臨就業的重點。本研究嘗試在就業力模型的建模過程中，找出關鍵變數與其相互關係，從中探討各項核心就業力對整體就業力結構的影響。
模型中主要的就業力內涵可分為：一般技能、專業知能、專業態度、職涯規劃，而與之有連動關係的有自我效能與生活壓力。本研究進行就業力相關的資料蒐集與分析，建立就業力的系統動力學模型，藉由模型進行模擬、測試及分析，最後提出本研究的結論。
本研究主要的研究貢獻為：
1.彙整與就業力相關因素間的因果關係，以系統化思考來觀察整體脈絡。
2.建構大學生就業力模擬之雛型，模擬未來就業力趨勢作為學生調整學習方向與策略之參考。
3.模擬所蒐集的相關資料與模擬結果，可提供給導師或輔導人員，作為學生與輔導人員的中介資訊，協助輔導人員能夠快速掌握學生的狀況。
4.提供學校進行課程改善方案的模擬，經由模擬的成效結果，作為具體可行的參考方向。

In this thesis, we try to understand the dynamic and complicated problems during operating the employability for higher education students by building up a system dynamics model, and figure out the relation among the key variables. Through simulating the model and testing current policies, we can find out a better way to learn and learning strategy. Compared to the traditional learning methods, it emphasis on hard skills training, the soft skills that less frequently to refer. Although these soft variables are difficult to measure and detecting, they are the main connections between the streams. Especially, it is not possible to ignore them while the students face with employment after graduation. The key variables in this model are: general skills, disciplinary knowledge and skills, professional attitudes, career planning,self-efficacy, and life stress.
Our research adopted System Dynamics as the research method. We collected the information about employability of higher education students, and constructed the system dynamics model. According to this model, we operate the simulation, test and
analysis. Finally, we proposed the conclusion.
The author concludes three contributions which are summarized as follows.
(1)Compilation and employability causal relationship between relevant factors, systems thinking to observe the overall context.
(2)Construction of the students for future employment force simulation prototype provides students with learning styles and strategies adjusted basis.
(3)The module provides students information for counselors and teachers.
(4)The simulation provides a specific and feasible reference direction to school to improvement curriculum program.

中文文獻參考
1.王如哲 (2008)，〈評鑑大學績效的一項新指標-就業力〉，《評鑑雙月刊電子報》。
2.王秀槐(2002)，人我之際：臺灣大學生的生涯建構歷程。本土心理學研究，17：165-242。
3.王琳雅 (2006)，四技大學生生活壓力、自我效能與因應策略之探討。中國醫藥大學護理學研究所碩士論文，臺中市。
4.任蕙玲(2005)，研究生生涯決策自我效能暨生涯阻礙對未來職業選擇適配性之研究。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。
5.行政院青年輔導委員會 (2006)，在正式教育中提升就業力：大專畢業生就業力調查報告。台北：行政院青年輔導委員會。
6.行政院青年輔導委員會 (2009)，98年大專畢業生就業力調查報告。台北：行政院青年輔導委員會。
7.呂岳霖 (2005)，國立臺中師範學院學生生活壓力與因應策略之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
8.宋廣英(2008)，大專生工讀參與動機及工作表現對就業力影響之研究-以暑期社區產業工讀為例。國立臺灣師範大學公教所碩士論文。
9.卓立芬 (2011)，管理教練技能、自我效能與工作滿意關聯性之研究。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
10.施建矗(2008)，從專上青年人力供需談提升就業力及就業率。臺灣勞工雙月刊，14：82-89。
11.秦夢群、莊清寶 (2010)，大專生求學經歷與就業力關係。教育資料與研究雙月刊，94：85-112。
12.屠益民、張良政(2010)，系統動力學：理論與應用。台北：智勝文化。
13.許家銘(2009)，軟性變數為主的系統動力學建模方法之研究：以某些標竿企業為例。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所博士論文。
14.許龍君 (2003)，大學生社團參與及其人際關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系行政管理研究所碩士論文。
15.郭進隆譯 (1994)，Peter Senge原著，第五項修練－學習型組織的藝術與實務（The Fifth Discipline : The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization）。台北市：天下。
16.陳曉伶(2008)，以系統動力學探討美語補習班之經營模式。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
17.曾芳代、胡均立、陳韻宇 (2011)，〈人力資本或是信心資產？自我效能對大學畢業生的學習經驗與就業力間之中介效果〉，《長庚人文社會學報》 (THCI)，4(2)：335-356。
18.黃秀穗 (2007)，以台灣高等教育資料庫探討大學生生涯決定之轉變。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
19.黃毓華、鄭英耀 (1996)，「一般性自我效能量表之修訂」。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，43：279-286。
20.楊朝仲、張良正、葉欣誠、陳昶憲、葉昭憲(2007)，系統動力學-思維與應用。台北：五南。
21.楊銘煇(2006)，以系統動力學探討卓越的企業信念對組織變革過程的影響-以美國奇異公司為例。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
22.蔡翠娉(2006)，台灣大專畢業青年就業力之調查分析。國立交通大學經營管理研究所。
23.羅世輝 (1999)，以系統動態學探討競爭性技術主流突現之動態性過程。國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
英文文獻參考
1.Atkinson, J. (1984). “Manpower Strategies for Flexible Organizations,” Personnel Management, 16, 28-31.
2.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy：Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review,84(2),191-215.
3.Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
4.Bandura, A. (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: Freeman.
5.Beveridge, W. H. (1909), Unemployment: A Problem of Industry, London: Longmans, Green and Co.
6.Commonwealth of Australia (2002). Employability Skills for the Future. Canberra: AusInfo.
7.De Grip, A., van Loo, J. and Sanders, J. (2004). “The Industry Employability Index: Taking Account of Supply and Demand Characteristics,” International Labour Review, 143, 211-233.
8.Ebbinhaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experience psychology. New York: Dover.
9.Einhorn, H., McCoach, W. (1977). "A Simple Multiattribute Utility Procedure for Evaluation," in S.Zionts (eds.), Multiple Criteria Problem Solving, Proceedings of a Conference, Buffalo, NY.
10.Feintuch, A. 1955. Improving the Employability and Attitudes of ‘Difficult to Place’ Persons. Psychological Monographs Series, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics, Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
12.Forrester, J. W. (1994). “System Dynamics, Systems Thinking, and Soft OR,” System Dynamics Review, vol. 10, No.2-3, pp.245-256.
13.Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development ofwomen. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339.
14.Harvey, L., Locke, W., & Morey, A. (2002). Enhancing Employability, Recognising Diversity. London: Universities UK.
15.Hillage, J., Pollard, E. (1998). “Employability: developing a framework for policy analysis,” DFEE Research Report, RR85.
16.Hoyt, K. B. (1978). “Employability: Are the Schools Responsible?” New Directions for Education and Work: Reassessing the Link between Work and Education, 1, 29-33.
17.Knight, P. T., M. Yorke. (2006).Employability: judging and communicating achievements. Higher Education Academy.York,UK.
18.Moreland, N. (2006). Entrepreneurship and higher education: An employability perspective-Learning and employability series 1. NY: Higher Education Academy.
19.Rotter, J. B. (1960). Some implications of a social learning theory for the prediction of goal directed behavior from testing procedures. Psychological Review, 67,301-316.
20.Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E. (1982). The Self –Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-771.
21.Soloff, A., Bolton, B. F. (1969). “The Validity of the CJVS-Scale of Employability for Older Clients in a Vocational Adjustment Workshop,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 993-998.
22.Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competency at Work, New York: John Wiely & Sons.
23.Sterman J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, New York.
24.Stillwell, W. G., Seaver, D. A., Edwards, W.(1981). "A Comparison of Weight ApproximationTechniques in Multiattribute Utility Decision Making," Organizational Behavior and HumanPerformance,28, 62-77.
25.Tseng, M. S. (1972). “Self-perception and Employability: a Vocational Rehabilitation Problem,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 314-317.
26.Weinert, F.E.(1999). Definition and selection of competencies: Concepts of competence. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.