簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 傅淳偉
CHUN-WEI FU
論文名稱: 會考英聽測驗對國中英語聽力教學之回沖效應
Investigating the Washback Effect of Comprehensive Assessment Program Listening Test on EFL Instruction in Junior High Schools
指導教授: 鄧慧君
Huei-Chun Teng
口試委員: 葉錫南
Hsi-Nan Yeh
謝育芬
Yu-Fen Hsieh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 應用外語系
Department of Applied Foreign Languages
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 168
中文關鍵詞: 回沖效應國中教育會考聽力測驗
外文關鍵詞: washbcak effects, CAP, listening assessment
相關次數: 點閱:345下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 國中基本學力測驗及國中教育會考已實施數年,其相關研究不計其數,然而國中教育會考英語聽力測驗對國中英語教學之影響卻鮮少被剖析。本篇研究旨在探討會考英語聽力測驗對國中英語聽力教學及學生英語聽力學習之回沖效應。本研究受測對象為來自台北市、新北市及基隆市三間公立國中的30位英語教師和298位學生。此研究採用問卷與訪談方式,問卷目的用來了解受試者對於會考加考英語聽力測驗後的看法、公平性、教師之教學與影響、及學生之學習及考試準備。研究者並訪談受試教師及學生,探討其面對國中教育會考增加英語聽力測驗後的看法、需求及建議。研究結果顯示,教師及學生對於國中會考增加英語聽力測驗給予肯定的看法。此外,會考改革對於教學者帶來正面的回沖效應,大部份的教師表示若學生需要或課堂時間許可,他們願意調整聽力教學方式、安排課堂活動或提供多樣化的學習教材。另外,學生對英語學習的興趣及動機因此增加但同時也為他們帶來負面的回沖效應,參與者表示加考英語聽力測驗可能使入學壓力及考試焦慮提升。至於建議方面,兩組受測對象皆表示他們在乎的是練習英語聽力及口說的時間、不同口音的聽力測驗、及更好的設備。此外,受訪對象提出因為臺灣教育資源不平等的問題仍然存在,所以不宜調整目前會考聽力測驗的試題難度及分數採計方式。最後,本研究結果期盼能對會考英語聽力測驗之回沖效應有所瞭解,進而能為國中英語聽力教學提供建議。


    The Basic Competence Test and Comprehensive Assessment Program have been researched for several years, but very few studies have focused on the incorporation of the CAP English listening assessment. The current study aims to explore the washback effects of incorporating English listening in the CAP on junior high school students and English teachers. Thirty English teachers and 298 students from the three public junior high schools in Keelung City, Taipei City, and New Taipei City were the participants of the present study. The two instruments in the study consisted of a questionnaire and an interview guide. The questionnaire was conducted to investigate the participants’ perceptions of the CAP reform and fairness of the English listening assessment, instructions and influence, and students’ learning activities and test preparation. A semi-structured interview was used to probe specific information of participants’ perceptions of the CAP reform, and their needs and suggestions. Results revealed that teachers and students had positive perceptions of the incorporation of the CAP listening assessment. Moreover, the CAP reform generated positive washback effects to the instructors. Most of them were willing to change their teaching approaches, arrange some teaching activities, or provide diverse learning materials if students need and class time allows. In addition, the results indicated that students’ English learning interests and learning motivation increased due to the incorporation of the English listening assessment, but it also generated negative washback effects for them. The participating students expressed that their high-school-entrance stress and test anxiety may increase. As for the suggestions, participants of both groups signified that they cared about the time for practicing listening and speaking, listening assessment of different accents, and better equipment. Moreover, because the inequality of educational resources still exists in Taiwan, most of the participants pointed out the difficulty and score evaluation of the CAP listening assessment should not be adjusted. The findings of the present study are expected to contribute to an understanding of the field of the washback effects of incorporating English listening in the CAP. Practical implications for enhancing pedagogy of EFL listening in junior high schools were further proposed.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT……………………...………………………………………i ENGLISH ABSTRACT……………………...………………………………………ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………...………………….………………iv TABLE OF CONTENTS……………..……...………………….……………….…..v LIST OF TABLES……………..……...………..……….……………….………….vii LIST OF FIGURES……………..……...………………….……………….………..ix CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION……………………...……………………….1 Background and Motivation……………………………………………………….1 Purpose of the Study and Research Questions…………………………………….4 Definition of Terms………………………………………………………………..4 Significance of the Study…………………………………………………….…....5 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW…………………….…….…………7 Introduction to Assessment…………………………………..…………….….....7 Introduction to Theory of Tests and Assessment…………….…..……………8 Needs and Advantages of the Assessment…………………........……………9 Overview of Washback………………………………………..……………...…10 Alderson and Wall’s Washback Hypothesis……………….………………...10 The Hughes Trichotomy Framework………….…………………………….12 Bailey’s Model of Washback…………………………….………………..…12 Previous Research on Washback Effect……………………..….………………13 Positive Washback…………………………………………………….….…14 Negative Washback…………………………….…………………………....16 The Feature of Washback and Context………………….…………………..18 Comprehensive Assessment Program (CAP)…………………..…………...…..21 Impact of Comprehensive Assessment Program (CAP)……….……………25 Related Studies on CAP and English Listening Assessment of the CAP washback……….……..………………………...……………………….….26 Summary………………………………….……………………..…………...…30 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY………………………………………....31 Participants…………………………………………………………………….....31 Instruments……………………………………………………………………….33 Questionnaire and Interview for Teachers…………………….……..……....34 Questionnaire and Interview for Students…………………………...…....….36 Procedures of the Study……………………………………………….………….37 Data Analysis……………………………………………………………………..40 Pilot Study………………………………………………………………………..41 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS……………………………………….....................44 Results of Teachers’ Questionnaire ………………………………………...........44 Results of Students’ Questionnaire……………………………………….............52 Results of Teachers’ Interview………………………………………...................61 Results of Students’ Interview………………………………………....................72 CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION……………………...…82 Summary of the Study………………………………………........................……82 Discussion of the Results……………………………………….......................…83 Implications of the Study……………………………………….......................…94 Limitations of the Study……………………………………….......................…..95 Conclusion……………………………………….......................….. ……………97 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………...99 APPENDICES…………………………………………………......……………....105 Appendix A: Teachers’ Questionnaire……………………………..…………....105 Appendix B: Teachers’ Interview………………...……………..……………....108 Appendix C: Students’ Questionnaire….……………...………………..……....109 Appendix D: Students’ Interview……...………………...………………..….....112 Appendix E: Transcript of Teachers’ Interview…………... .…….…………......113 Appendix F: Transcript of Students’ Interview ……………………...………....134

    Alderson, J. C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13, 280-297.
    Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.
    Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 257-279.
    Barnes, M. (2016). The washback of the TOEFL iBT in Vietnam. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7), 158-174.
    Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education.
    Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs: Cambridge University Press.
    Capan, S. A., & Karaca, M. (2013). A comparative study of listening anxiety and reading anxiety. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1360-1373.
    Chang, C. M. (2015). 國中英語會考加考英語聽力之研究 (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kang Ning University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Chang, W. (2006). 台灣的英語教育: 現況與省思. 教育資料與研究,(69), 129-144.
    Cheng, L. (1997). How Does Washback Influence Teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38-54.
    Cheng, L. (1998). Impact of a public English examination change on students’ perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24(3), 279-301.
    Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback in language testing: Research Contexts and Methods. New Jersey: Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Chou, M. H. (2017). Impacts of the test of English listening comprehension (TELC) on teachers and teaching in Taiwan. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2, 1-14. doi: 10.1186/s40862-017-0028-9
    Comprehensive Assessment Program. (2017). The Background of the Comprehensive Assessment Program. Retrieved from https://cap.nace.edu.tw/background.html
    Comprehensive Assessment Program. (2017). Test content for English Comprehensive Assessment. Retrieved from https://cap.nace.edu.tw/test_4_3.html
    EF educational organization website. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.ef.com.tw/epi/analysis/ef-epi-trends/
    Ferman, I. (2004). The washback of an EFL national oral matriculation test to teaching and learning. In L. Cheng & Y. Watanabe (wIth A. Curtis) (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. pp. 191-210). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Fu, C. Y. (2007). 學生、家長、國中教育人員對國中基本學力測驗態度及改進意見之研究 (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction: Pearson.
    Green, A. (2013). Washback in language assessment. IJES, 13(2), 39-51.
    Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact, and validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing, 14, 295-303
    Her, T. C. (2006). 國中基本學力測驗英語科加考聽力測驗:問卷調查研究 (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Heeren, K. D. (2012). The effect of an unfamiliar accents on Taiwanese students’ listening comprehension (Unpublished doctor’s thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Hsu, Y. T. (2015). An Exploration of Taiwanese Senior High School Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of the Test of English Listening Comprehension (TELC) (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
    Huang, S. C. (2004). Washback effects of the basic competence English test on EFL teaching in junior high school in Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan.
    Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hughes, A. (1993). Backwash and TOEFL 2000. University of Reading, England.
    Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Khodabakhshzadeh, H., Zardkanloo, R. & Alipoor, I. (2017). The effect of mock tests on Iranian EFL learners’ test scores. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 5(3), 47-51.
    Li, Y. C. (2017). A Comparison of English Reading Comprehension Questions on the BCT and the CAP Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Lin, Y. Z. (2010). A study on the washback effect of the basic competence english test (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    LIU, M. Z. (2016). Analysis and Comparison of the BCT and CAP English Test Trends from 2012 to 2015 (Unpublished master’s thesis). Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
    Madaus, G. F. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. N. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in curriculum: Eighty- seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 83-121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Matsuda, A. (2012). Incorporating world Englishes in teaching English as an international language. Tesol Quarterly, 37(4), 719-729.
    Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research: Sage Publications.
    Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241-256.
    MOE. (2008). General guidelines of grade 1-9 curriculum of elementary and junior high school education [國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要]. Taipei, Taiwan.
    MOE. (2018.). Statics for junior high schools in school year 2015-2017 [一百零五學年度國民中學校別資料]. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=NQA0AA2
    Mousavi, S. A. (2009). An encyclopedic dictionary of language testing (4th ed.): Tehran: Rahnama Publications.
    Peng, J. S. (2017, June 28). The new era of Comprhensive Assesssment Program; The way of surviving for students with low and intermediate proficiency levels. Udn News Net. Retrieved from https://udn.com/news/story/6887/2551742
    Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum: SIU Press.
    Qi, L. (2005). Stakeholers' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of high-stakes test. Language Testing, 22(2), 142-173.
    Qi, L. (2007). Is testing an efficient agent for pedagogical change? Examining the intended washback of the writing task in a high- stakes English test in China. Assessment in Education, 14, 51-74.
    Sah, K. P. (2012). Assessment and test in teaching and learning. Academic Voices, 2(1), 28-32.
    Saif, S. (2006). Aiming for positive washback: a case study of international teaching assistants. Language Testing, 23(1), 1-34.
    Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods: Oxford University Press.
    Shohamy, E. (1992). Beyond proficiency testing: A diagnostic feedback testing model for assessing foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 513-521.
    Shohamy, E, & Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language Testing, 13(3), 298-317.
    Shohamy, E. (2001). The Power of Tests: a Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. New York, USA: Pearson Education Limited.
    Spolsky, B. (1995). The examination- classroom backwash cycle: Some historical cases. In D. Nunan, R. Berry & V. Berry (Eds.), Bringing about change in language education (pp. 55-66): Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
    Turner, C. E. (2001). The need for impact studies of L2 performance testing and rating: identifying areas of potential consequences at all levels of the testing cycle. In C. Elder, Brown, A., Grove, E., Hill, K., Iwashita, N., Lumley, T., McNamara, T., & O’Loughlin, K. (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: essays in honour of Alan Davies. (pp. 138-149): Cambridge University Press.
    Wall, D., & Alderson, J. C. (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10, 41-69.
    Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C. Clapham, & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language in education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (pp. 291-302): Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
    Wang, S. M. (2015). The washback effect of comprehensive assessment program on junior high school students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
    Watanabe, Y. (2004). Teacher factors mediating washback. In L. Cheng& Y. Watanabe (with A. Curtis) (Eds.), Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods (pp. 129-146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    QR CODE