簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郭洧棋
WEI - CHI GUO
論文名稱: 主管支持一定造就滿意員工?從「不確定管理理論」探討員工不確定性回應傾向的調節式中介效果
Does Supervisor Support Facilitate Employees Satisfaction? Using Uncertainty Management Theory to Explore the Moderated Mediation of Employees Uncertainty Response Orientation
指導教授: 吳宗祐
Tsung-Yu Wu
口試委員: 葉穎蓉
none
楊君琦
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 86
中文關鍵詞: 主管支持程序公平分配公平員工不確定性回應傾向員工滿意度不確定管理理論
外文關鍵詞: supervisor support, procedural Justice, distributive justice, uncertainty response orientation, employees satisfaction, uncertainty management theory
相關次數: 點閱:558下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究以不確定管理理論為基礎,探討主管支持是「如何」以及「何時」影響員工滿意度,並區分為二個研究進行之,研究一旨在探討程序公平在主管支持與員工職涯滿意度的中介歷程,以及員工不確定性回應傾向在程序公平與員工職涯滿意度之間所扮演的調節角色,最後探討員工不確定性回應傾向的調節式中介效果;研究二除了再次驗證員工不確定性回應傾向的調節式中介效果外,並探討了程序公平與分配公平的區分效果。研究者透過問卷調查法針對台灣地區全職工作者進行研究,研究一共計回收210份有效問卷,研究二採兩個時間點的方式施測問卷,共計回收111有效問卷。研究結果顯示,在控制了員工年齡、性別、年資、正向情感後,主管支持會透過程序公平,以預測員工職涯滿意度,其次,當員工不確定性回應傾向越高(不確定性高),則程序公平與員工職涯滿意度之間的關係會越強,最後,當員工不確定性回應傾向越高時(不確定性高),程序公平對主管支持與員工滿意度的中介效果越強,但是分配公平則不會有此效果存在。


The thesis, on the basis of uncertainty management theory, explored how and when supervisor supports influence employees’ satisfaction and was divided into two studies: Study I and Study II. Study I investigated that procedural justice mediates the relationship between supervisor supports and career satisfaction. Next, the moderation of uncertainty response orientation between procedural justice and career satisfaction was explored in Study I. Also, Study I explored the moderated mediation of employees’ uncertainty response orientation. Study II not only confirmed moderated mediation of employees’ uncertainty response orientation but explored discriminant effect between procedural justice and distributive justice. Both studies, based on questionnaire survey method, surveyed full-time workers in Taiwan. Study I collected 210 validated questionnaires and then Study II collected 111 validated ones within two different times. The results revealed that, under controlled employees’ ages, genders, seniority, and positive affect, supervisor support predicted employees’ career satisfaction through procedural justice. In addition, the higher employees’ uncertainty response orientation is, the stronger relationship between procedural justice and employees’ career satisfaction is. Finally, the higher employees’ uncertainty response orientation is, the stronger moderated mediation procedural justice toward supervisor support and employees’ satisfaction is. However, no moderated mediation existed under distributive justice.

目錄 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………………………….……..1 第二章 研究一……………………………………………………………………………………….…….4 第一節:文獻探討與假設………………………………………………..……………….….……..4 一、 不確定管理理論……………………………………………………………….….……..4 二、 程序公平的中介效果………………………………………………………………….8 三、 員工不確定性回應傾向的調節效果…………………………….…………..11 四、 員工不確定性回應傾向的調節式中介效果…………………………….13 五、 研究架構…………………………………………………………………………………..15 第二節:研究方法………………………………………………………………………………………16 一、 研究對象與程序…………………………………………………………………….…16 二、 研究工具…………………………………………………………………………………..18 三、 資料分析方法……………………………………………………………………………22 第三節:研究結果…………………………………………………………………………………… 27 一、 驗證性因素分析………………………………………………………..................27 二、 相關分析…………………………………………………………………………………..29 三、 研究假設之驗證……………………………………………………………………….31 第四節:小結……………………………………………………………………………………………..40 第三章 研究二…………………………………………………………………………………………..41 第一節:文獻探討與假設…………………………………………………………………………..42 一、 員工不確定性回應傾向的調節式中介效果:分配與程 序公平之區分效果………………………………………………………………………42 二、 研究架構……………………………………………………………………………………44 第二節:研究方法………………………………..…………………………………………………45 一、 研究對象與程序………………….………………………………......................45 二、 研究工具……………………………………………………………………………………48 三、 資料分析方法……………………………………………………………………………51 第三節:研究結果………………………………………………………………………………………52 一、 驗證性因素分析……………………………………………………………………52 二、 相關分析…………………………………………………………………………………54 三、 研究假設之驗證………………………………………………………………………56 第四節:小結………………………………………………………………………………………………60 第四章 結論與建議………….…………………………………………………………...............61 第一節:研究結果與討論…………..……………………………………………………………61 第二節:理論意涵………………………………………………………………………………………63 第三節:實務意涵………………………………………………………………………………………65 第四節:研究限制……………………………………………………………………………………66 第五節:未來研究方向………………………………………………………………………………68 第六節:結論………………………………………………………………………………………………70 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………………………………71 附錄……………………………………………………………………………………………………………82 附錄一 研究一問卷………………………………………………………………………………82 附錄二 研究二問卷(第一時點)………………………………………………………………84 附錄三 研究二問卷(第二時點)………………………………………………………………86 圖目錄 圖2-1 (研究一)研究架構圖……………………………………………………………………………………………15 圖2-2 (研究一)調節式中介效果圖形概念…………………………….………………………………………25 圖2-3 (研究一)程序公平與員工不確定性回應傾向之交互作用圖………………………………35 圖3-1 (研究二)研究架構圖………………………………………………………………………………………44 表目錄 表2-1 (研究一)樣本背景組成…………………………………………………………………………………………17 表2-2 (研究一)四種測量模型之配適度指標…………………………………………………………………28 表2-3 (研究一)各變項之相關係數表……………………………………………………………………………30 表2-4 (研究一)程序公平之中介效果驗證……………………………………………………………………32 表2-5 (研究一)員工不確定性回應傾向之調節效果驗證………………………………………………34 表2-6 (研究一)員工不確定性回應傾向之調節式中介效果驗證(條件一)……………………37 表2-7 (研究一)員工不確定性回應傾向之調節式中介效果驗證(條件二)……………………38 表2-8 (研究一)員工不確定性回應傾向之調節式中介效果驗證(條件三)…………………39 表3-1 (研究二)樣本背景組成…………………………………………………………………………………………47 表3-2 (研究二)五種測量模型之配適度指標…………………………………………………………………53 表3-3 (研究二)各變項之相關係數表……………………………………………………………………………55 表3-4 (研究二)員工不確定性回應傾向之調節式中介效果驗證(條件一)……………………57 表3-5 (研究二)員工不確定性回應傾向之調節式中介效果驗證(條件二)……………………58 表3-6 (研究二)員工不確定性回應傾向之調節式中介效果驗證(條件三)……………………59 表4-1 研究結果整理表.…………………………………………………………………………………………………61

參考文獻

中文部分
吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2002)。怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲:華人企業主管威權領導與部屬憤怒反應。本土心理學研究,18,頁3-49。
吳宗祐、廖紘億(2013)。華人威權領導總是導致部屬負面結果嗎?由「不確定 管理理論」探討威權領導對分配不公平與程序不公平之交互作用與部屬工作滿意度之關係的調節效果。中華心理學刊,55,頁1-22。
林楊貴(2012)。賦權、組織公平對工作滿意度影響之研究-以職涯不確定性為調節變項。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系。
梁娟、馬紅宇、高記(2013)。自我不確定感對程序公正效應的調節作用:回顧與展望。心理科學進展,21,頁530-538。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23,頁77-98。

英文部分
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 1402 -1420.
Allen, D. G., Weeks, K. P., & Moffitt, K. R. (2005). Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 980-990.
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191-201.
Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S. (1996). The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72, 57-75.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Bies, R. J. (2005). Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.). Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 85-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brislin, R. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.). Handbook of cross-culture psychology (pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan Ann Arber, MI.
Clark, A. E. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics, 4, 341-372.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
Colquitt, J. A. (2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 633-646.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2005). Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 157-173.
De Cremer, D., Brebels, L., & Sedikides, C. (2008). Being uncertain about what? Procedural fairness effects as a function of general uncertainty and belongingness uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1520-1525.

De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Fishman, A., van Dijke, M., van Olffen, W., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). When do procedural fainress and outcome fairness interact to influence employees’ work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 291-304.
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580-590.
Desai, S. D., Sondak, H., & Diekmann, K. A. (2011). When fairness neither satisfies nor motivates: The role of risk aversion and uncertainty reduction in attenuating and reversing the fair process effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 32-45.
De Vellis R. F. (1991). Scale development:Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Diekmann, K. A., Barsness, Z. I., & Sondak, H. (2004). Uncertainty, fairness perceptions, and job satisfaction: A field study. Social Justice Research, 17, 237-255.
Ding, C. G., & Lin, C. P. (2006). Comparing the effects of determinants of turnover intentions between Taiwanese and U.S. hospital employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17, 403-421.
Dittrich, J. E., & Carrell, M. R. (1979). Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover rates. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 29-40.
Dormann, C., & Zapf, D. (2001). Job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of stabilities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 483-504.
Edwards, J. R., & L. S. Lambert. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22.
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565-573.

Elovainio, M., Kivimaki. M., & Helkama, K. (2001). Organizational justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 418-424.
Elovainio, M., Van den Bos, K., Linna, A., Kivimaki, M., Ala-Mursula, L., Pentti, J., & Vahtera, J. (2005). Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: Testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 2501-2512.
Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985).Factors predicting satisfaction judgments: A comparative examination. Social Indicators Research, 16, 157-167.
Fields, D., Pang, M., & Chiu, C. (2000). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of employee outcomes in Hong Kong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 547-562.
Fisher, C. D., & Locke, E. A. (1992). The new look in job satisfaction research and theory. In C. J. Cranny, P. C. Smith, & E. F. Stone (Eds.). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their job and how it affects their performance (pp. 165–194). New York: Lexington Books.
Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.). Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 141–183). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268-273.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253-2261.

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Published in Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
Greco, V., & Roger, D. (2001). Coping with uncertainty: The construction and validation of a new measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 519-534.
Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes ( pp. 235-256). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64-86.
Griffin, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & West, M. A.(2001). Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 537-550.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable moderation, mediation, and conditional process modeling. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hellman, C. M. (1997). Job satisfaction and intent to leave. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 677-689.
Hiro, H. (2001). Stress prevention and supervisor training (in Japanese). Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi, 43, 1-6.
Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). Self-categorization and subjective uncertainty resolution: Cognitive and motivational facets of social identity and group membership. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & L. Wheeler (Eds.), The social mind: Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior (pp. 323-349). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 70-126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). London, UK: Sage.
Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 1206-1217.
Isen, A. M., & Levin, P. F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 384-388.
Isen, A. M. (1970). Success, failure, attention and reaction to others: The warm glow of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 294-301.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Kawakami, N., Kobayashi, Y., Takao, S., & Tsutsumi, A. (2005). Effect of web-based supervisor training on supervisor support and psychological distress among workers: A randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 41, 471-478.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Kuijpers, M. C. T., Schyns, B., & Scheerens, J. (2006). Career competencies for career success. The Career Development Quarterly, 55, 168-178.
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L & Barton, S. M. (2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: A test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers. The Social Science Journal, 38, 233-250.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181-223.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Loi, R., & Ngo, H. Y. (2010). Mobility norms, risk aversion, and career satisfaction of Chinese employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27, 237-255.
Lord, R. G., & Hohenfeld, J. A. (1979). Longitudinal assessment of equity effects on the performance of major league baseball players. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 19-26.
Martins, L. L., Eddleston, J. A., & Veiga, J. F. (2002). Moderators of the relationship between work-family conflict and career satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 399-409.
McFarlin, D. B & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131-141.
Nautal, A., van Vianen, A., van der Heijden, B., Van Dam, K., & Willemsen, M. (2009). Understanding the factors that promote employability orientation: The impact of employability culture, career satisfaction, and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 233-251.
Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408.
Ngo, H. Y., Foley, S., Ji, M. S., & Loi, R. (in press). Work satisfaction of chinese employees: A social exchange and gender-based view. Social Indicators Research.

Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York : McGraw-Hill.
Oldham, G. R., & Miller, H. E. (1979). The effect of significant other's job complexity on employee reactions to work. Human Relations, 32, 247-260.
Organ, D.W & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology , 48, 775-802.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Poon, J. M. L. (2012). Distributive justice, procedural justice, affective commitment, and turnover intention: A mediation–moderation framework. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1505-1532.
Scott, K. D., & Taylor, G. S. (1985). An examination of conflicting findings on the relationship between job satisfaction and absenteeism: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 599-612.
Seashore, S. E., & Tabor, T. D. (1975). Satisfaction and their correlation. American Behavior and Scientist, 18, 346.
Seo, Y., Ko J., & Price J. L. (2004). The determinants of job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A model estimation in Korea. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 437-46.
Siefert, K., Jayaratne, S., & Chess, W. A. (1991). Job satisfaction, burnout and turnover in health care social workers. Health and Social Work, 16, 193-202.
Tangirala, S., & Alge, B. J., (2006). Reactions to unfair events in computer mediated groups: A test of uncertainty management theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 1-20.

Tepper, B. J., & Taylor, E. C. (2003). Relationships among supervisors' and subordinates' procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 97-105.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190.
Thau, S., Aquino, K., & Wittek, R. (2007). An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: The relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 250-258.
Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 79-92.
Thibaut. J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trembla, M., Sire, B., & Balkin, D. B. (2000). The role of organizational justice in pay and employee benefit satisfaction , and its effects on work attitudes. Group & Organization Management, 25, 269- 290.
Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981a). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.
Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981b). The role of distributional and procedural fairness in the endorsement of formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.
Van de Bos, K., Euwema, M. C., Poortvliet, P. M., & Mass, M. (2007). Uncertainty management and social issues: Uncertainty as an important determinant of reactions to socially deviating people. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1726-1756.
Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1-60.

Van den Bos, K., & Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 355-366.
Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931-941.
Van den Bos, K., Ham, J., Lind, E. A., Simonis, M., van Essen, W. J., & Rijpkema, M. (2008). Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 201-219.
Van den Bos, K., Heuven, E., Burger, E., & Van Veldhuizen, M.F. (2006). Uncertainty management after reorganizations: The ameliorative effect of outcome fairness on job uncertainty. International Review of Social Psychology, 19, 75-86.
Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95-104.
Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A., & Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1493-1503.
Van Prooijen, J. W., Van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2002). Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1353-1361.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Williams, L. J., & O'Boyle Jr., E. H. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 233-242.

Wu, T. Y., & Hu, C. (2009). Abusive supervision and employee emotional exhaustion: Dispositional antecedents and boundaries. Group & Organization Management, 34, 143-169.
Yukl, G. (1989). Leadership in organizations (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2018/06/19 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE