供應鏈管理的課題，是近二十餘年來企業提升營運績效的重點，而供應鏈領域中，最佳化的供應商評選對採購效益帶來最直接的影響，然而，企業決策上的多變性及策略思考的不同，建立一個適合的供應商評選模式是非常重要的。
面板成本佔電視整機採購成本約高達50 ~70%，TFT-LCD面板選擇的成敗，主宰電視整機的研發與量產，本研究以台灣大尺寸(55吋以上)電視製造廠商業者，選擇策略面板供應商的評估模式，主要從品管、採購、設計、製造四個領域著手，以提升新產品開發績效。
本研究以層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)，經過專家訪談及文獻探討評估出要素後，歸納出大尺寸電視製造商在TFT-LCD面板供應商的評選系統，應考量到的五個構面，分別為技術、品質、交期、價格及營運管理，以及其下一階的12個準則，再針對專家進行訪談與問卷調查、彙整專家意見，歸納出各構面及準則之權重高低，以求取替代方案的優先向量，選擇最適合自己公司的供應商評估策略。

The topic of supply chain management has been the key point for enterprises to upgrade their business performance for these past twenty years. In this field, the optimal evaluation of best supplier has brought the direct impact on cost. However, doe to the difference of the variety of company decision to strategy thinking, to establish a proper supplier evaluation model is very important.
The cost of panels takes 50~70% cost of TV sets. The success or failure to choose TFT-LCD panel has dominated the development and mass production of TV sets. This research is to study the evaluation model of selecting a strategy panel supplier based on TV manufacturers of big size (above 55 inches) LCD TV, undertaking in the four fields, Quality Control, Procurement, Design, and Manufacturing, to improve the development performance of new products.
After assessing the factors through experts interview and documents study, by using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), this research has concluded that an evaluation system of TFT-LCD panel supplier for big size LCD TV manufacturers should consider five criteria: Technology, Quality, Delivery, Price, Operation Management, and its twelve attributes for the next phase. In addition, conducting interviews and surveys to the experts, summarizing their opinions, and generalizing the weight of each criteria and attribute to obtain the priority of substitute plans and choose the supplier evaluation strategy that is most suitable for the company.

中文文獻
1. 李正文，林麗蘭，「供應商管理對採購風險、技術能力與績效之影響」，風險管理學報，第八卷，第二期，第263-291頁（2006）。
2. 翁振益、周瑛琪、張保隆，決策分析方法與應用，華泰文化事業股份有限公司，台北 (2007)。
3. 許振邦，採購與供應管理，智勝文化事業有限公司，台北（2005）。
4. 曾國雄、鄧振源，層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」，中國統計學報，第二十七卷，第六期，第5-22頁(1989)。
5. 曾國雄、鄧振源，「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)」，中國統計學報，第二十七卷第七期，第1-20頁 (1989)。
6. 鄧振源，計畫評估 - 方法與應用，第二版，運籌規劃與管理研究中心，松崗，台北 (2005)。
7. 張順教(2010)，「高科技產業與策略分析」，華泰文化事業股份有限公司，台北。
8. 李煥仁、魏志賓(2006)，「我國TFT-LCD產業發展情境與策略分析」，科技發展政策報導 SR9502
9. 何敬之、藍筱蘋、劉仁智，「多準則決策 – 分析層級程序法尺度之研究」，管理科學學報，第十二卷第一期，第127-152頁 (1995)。
10. 洪敘峰，「運用系統性觀點整合決策科學方法以建構供應商評選模式」，資訊管理展望，第十卷，第一期，第1-22頁 (2008)。
11. 徐燕娟，「以AHP 法探討供應商遴選關鍵決定因素權重之研究-以筆記型電腦週邊配件為例」，，碩士論文，國立中央大學 (1998)。
12. 林冠州，「TFT-LCD面板廠商對供應商選擇之研究」，碩士論文，國立成功大學文，台南 (1994)。

英文文獻
1. Leenders, M.R., Fearon, H.E. “Developing purchasing's foundation”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 44, No.2, pp. 17-27 (2008).
2. Manuj, I., Mentzer, J.T. “Global supply chain risk management strategies”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol.38 ,No. 3, pp.192-223 (2008)
3. Seuring, S.A. “Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management”, Supply Chain Management, vol. 13 (2), pp. 128-137(2008).
4. Thomas L. Saaty “Decision Making For Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process For Decision In A Complex World” RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2001).
5. Dickson, Gary W., ”An Analysis of Supplier Selection Systems and Decisions”, Journal of Purchasing, Vol.2, pp.5-17 (1966)
6. Charles A. Weber, John R. Current and W.C. Benton “Vendor selection criteria and methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 50, pp. 2-18(1991)
7. Omkarprasad S. Vaidya, Sushil Kumar, “Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.169, pp. 1–29(2006).
8. Elizabeth J. Wilson, “The Relative Importance of Suppliers Selection Criteria: A Review and Update”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp.35-41 (1994).
9. Donald R. Lehmann and John O’Shaughnessy, “Decision criteria used buying different categories of products”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol.18, No. 1, pp. 9-14 (1982).
10. Donald R. Lehmann and John O’Shaughnessy, “Difference in Attribute Importance for Different Industrial Products”, Journal of Marketing,Vol.38, pp.36-42 (1974) .
11. Rohit Verma, Madeleine E Pullman “An analysis of the supplier selection process”, Omega International Journal Management Sci, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 739-750 (1998).
12. Maggie C.Y. Tama, V.M. Rao Tummalab, “An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system”, Omega 29 (The International Journal of Management Science), pp. 171-182 (2001).
13. S Gary Teng, Hector Jaramillo, "A model for evaluation and selection of suppliers in global textile and apparel supply chains", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. . Vol. 35, No.7, pp. 503-523 (2005).
14. Shin-Chan Ting, Danny I. Cho,”An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13/2, pp. 116–127 (2008).
15. Yoon, K. and C. L. Hwang. “Manufacturing Plant Location Analysis by Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Part I–Single-Plant Strategy”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol.23, No.2, pp345-359 (1985).

參考網站
1. 電子時報 www.digitimes.com.tw
2. 韓商三星電子 www.samsung.com
3. 友達光電 www.auo.com.tw
4. 奇美光電 www.chimei-innolux.com
5. Sharp Corporation (夏普) sharp-world.com/products/index.html
6. LG Display (樂金) www.lgdisplay.com
7. 電子工程專輯 www.eettaiwan.com
8. 經濟部產業技術資訊服務推廣計畫www.itis.org.tw
9. Display Search (美商顯像資訊管理顧問有限公司)http://www.displaysearch.com