簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Mohamad Ikhwan
Mohamad - Ikhwan
論文名稱: Flow Diagram: A Model of Implementing Barrier for Electrocution in Construction Industry
Flow Diagram: A Model of Implementing Barrier for Electrocution in Construction Industry
指導教授: 紀佳芬
Chia-Fen Chi
口試委員: 顧家華
Chia-Hua Ku
Kong-King Shieh
Kong-King Shieh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 95
外文關鍵詞: Electrocution, CHAID, Flow Diagram
相關次數: 點閱:275下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

  • Electrical fatality accounted for 14.6% of all fatal accidents and was the second leading cause of occupational fatality in Taiwan following the fall fatalities. A model is needed to represents the scenario of real electrocution case and can be used as a tool for implement prevention measures. The current study reanalyzed 250 work-related single fatalities of electrocution in construction industry from 1996 to 2002. Using the coding scheme from Chi, et al. (2009), each fatality was coded in terms of age, company size, experience, performing tasks, source of injury, accident cause and hazard pattern. The Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) was applied to the coded data of the fatal electrocution to search through the selected predictor variables and find a subset of predictors that might derive meaningful classifications or accidents patterns. Sources of injury being identified as the “best” or most critical predictor which merged total population in the format of hazard pattern into the nine different groups (nodes). A series of Flow Diagrams constructed based on CHAID result to illustrate the flow of electricity travelling from electrical source to human body. The flow could be through an intermediary object or directly to human body part. Cause of accident incorporated into the diagram by adopting the failure in reliability block diagram. The Flow Diagram can then be used to implementing barriers by cutting the trace between electrical source and victim.

    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………….….…..1 1.1. Research Background……………………………………………………….……….……..1 1.2. Research Objective…………………………………………………………………………3 1.3 Research Scope and Constrain……………………………………………………….….…..3 1.4 Research Framework………………………………………………………………………..4 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE STUDY……………………….…………………………….…..5 2.1 Occupational Electrical Fatality……………………………………...………………….…..5 2.2 Overview of Electrical Hazard………………………….…………...………………….…..5 2.3 Electrocution in Construction Industry…………………………….……………………….7 2.4 Electrocution Attributes and Classification Scheme…………….…………………….……8 2.4.1 Age, Company Size, and Work Experience…………….………………………...8 2.4.2 Work Classification…………….…………………………………………………9 2.4.3 Source of Injury…………….……………………………………………………10 2.4.4 Causes…………….…………………………………………..………………….12 2.4.5 Hazard Pattern…………….…………………………………….……………….12 2.5 Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection…………………….……………………….15 2.6 The Flow Diagram…………….…………………………………………………………...17 2.7 Safety Barrier…………….………………………………………………………..……….22 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY…………….…….………………………….25 3.1 Reanalyzing Accident Database with CHAID Analysis …………...………………….…..25 3.2 Construct Flow Diagram.………………………….…………...………………….……….30 3.3 Barrier Analysis……………………...…………………………….…………………...….31 CHAPTER 4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION…….……………………………..………...….33 4.1 Descriptive Statistics …………...……………………………………..……………….…..33 4.2 CHAID Result and Flow Diagram ……….…………...………………….……………….36 4.2.1 AP-1: Direct contact with high voltages power lines……………………………40 4.2.2 AP-2: Direct contact with energized equipment, light wire and heater or cooler.42 4.2.3 AP-3: Metal bar or pipe contact with energized power lines.…………………...44 4.2.4 AP-4: Metal bar or pipe contact with energized equipment………….………….45 4.2.5 AP-5: Metal bar or pipe contact with energized equipment……………….…….46 4.2.6 AP-6: Boomed Vehicle contact with Power lines………………………….……47 4.2.7 AP-7: Direct Worker Contact with Energized Wire and Welder………….…….48 4.2.8 AP-8: Direct Worker Contact with Damaged Wire and Welder………….……..50 4.2.9 AP-9: Power hand tool contact with an energized power lines…….……………52 4.2.10 AP-10: Direct worker contact with Damaged Light Fixture, Hand Tool or Machinery.…………………………………...………….……...……………….53 4.2.11 AP-11: Direct worker contact with Energized Light Fixture, Hand Tool or Machinery……………………………………………………………….……..54 4.2.12 AP-12: In-direct worker contact with Energized wire through Crusher Machine ……………………………………………………...………………………………….56 4.2.13 AP-13: Direct Worker Contact with Damaged Equipment, Hand Tool and Machinery……………………………………………………………………...57 4.2.14 AP-14: In-direct worker contact with damaged equipment or tool through conductive material…………………………………………………………...58 4.2.15 AP-15: In-direct worker contact with Energized equipment or tool through other conductive material…………………………………………………………...60 4.2.16 AP-16 : Indirect worker contact with Damaged Wire or Tool through Job Ladder …………………………………………………………………………………………61 4.2.17 AP-17: In-direct worker contact with Energized Wire through Job Ladder…...63 4.3 Barrier Analysis……………………...…………………………….…………………...….64 4.3.1 Barrier Analysis for Accident Pattern 1 (AP-1)……………….…………………64 4.3.2 Barrier Analysis for Accident Pattern 2 (AP-2)………………….………………66 4.3.3 Barrier Analysis for Accident Pattern 3 (AP-3)……………………………...…..67 4.3.4 Barrier Analysis for Accident Pattern 6 (AP-6)………………………………….68 4.3.5 Barrier Analysis for Accident Pattern 13 (AP-13)……………………………….69 4.3.6 Barrier Analysis for Accident Pattern 14 (AP-14)……………………………….70 4.3.7 Barrier Analysis for Accident Pattern 17 (AP-17)……………………………….71 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION……………………….………………………………………..72 APPENDIX A……………..………………….………………………………………………..75 REFERENCES……………………………….………………………………………………..79

    1.Mosby, 2009. Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th Edition. Elsevier Inc. New York. US.
    2.Tuominen, E., Saari, J., 1982. A model for the analysis of accidents and its application. Journal of Occupational Accidents 4, 263–273.
    3.Jones, J.E., C.W. Armstrong, C.D. Woolard and G.B. Miller, 1991. Fatal Occupational Electrical Injuries in Virginia. Journal of Occupational Medicine 3, 57-63.
    4.NTOF, 19991. National Traumatic Occupational Fatality Database. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Morgantown. VW.
    5.Casini, V.J., 1993. Occupational electrocutions: investigation and prevention. Professional Safety, January, 34–39.
    6.Chi, Chia-Fen, Wu, M.-L., 1997. Fatal occupational injuries in Taiwan relationship between fatality rate and age. Safety Science 27, 1–17.
    7.Chi, C.-F., Yang, C.-C., Chen, Z.-L., 2009. In-depth Accident Analysis of Electrical Fatalities in The Construction Industry, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39, 635–644.
    8.Drury, C.G., Brill, M., 1983. Human factors in consumer product accident investigation. Human Factors 25 (3), 329–342.
    9.Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2002. Controlling Electrical Hazards. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
    10.Chi, C.-F., Chang, T.-C., Ting, H.-I., 2005. Accident patterns and prevention measures for fatal occupational falls in the construction industry. Applied Ergonomics 36, 391–400.
    11.Paques, J.-J., 1993. Crane accidents by contact with power lines. Safety Science 16, 129–142.
    12.Hamalainen, P., Takala, J. and Saarela, K., 2006. Global Estimates of Occupational Accidents. Safety Science 44, 137-156.
    13.Haddon, W. J., 1980. The basic strategies for reducing damage from hazards of all kinds. Hazard Prevention September–October, 8–12.

    14.Pineault, M., Rossignal, M., Barr, R.G., 1994. Inter-rater analysis of a classification scheme of occupational fatalities by electrocution. Journal of Safety Research 25 (2), 107–115.
    15.Kisner, S., Casini, V., 1998. Epidemiology of electrocution fatalities in Worker Death by Electrocution: a summary of NIOSH surveillance and investigative findings. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Cincinnati, OH, pp. 9–19
    16.Buskin, S.E., Paulozzi, L.J., 1987. Fatal injuries in the construction industry in Washington State. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 11, 453–460.
    17.Brown, B. David, (1976). SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN FOR SAFETY. PRENTICE-HALL., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
    18.McCann, M., Hunting, K.L., Murawski, J., Chowdhury, R., Welch, L., 2003. Causes of electrical deaths and injuries among construction workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 43, 398–406.
    19.Suruda, A., 1988. Electrocution at work. Professional Safety, July, 27–32.
    20.Rossignol M, Pineault M.,1994. Classification of fatal occupational electrocutions. Can J Public Health 85, 322–325.
    21.Oleske, D.M., Brewer, R.D., Doan, P., Jerome, H., 1989. An epidemiologic evaluation of the injury experience of a cohort of automotive parts workers: A model for surveillance in small industries. Journal of Occupational Accidents 10, 239–253.
    22.Bernstein, T., 1991. Electrical Shock Hazards and Safety Standards. IEEE Transaction on Education 34. No. 3, 216-222.
    23.Amin et al., 2009. Monitoring of Leakage Current For Composite Insulator and Electrical Devices. Review of Advance Material Science 21, 75-89.
    24.Hinze, J., Pedersen, C., Fredley, J., 1998. Identifying root causes of construction injuries. Journal of Construction and Management 124, 67–71.
    25.SPSS Inc, 2004. SPSS Classification Trees™ 13.0. SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL 60606-6412.
    26.Magidson, J. 1997. SPSS for Windows. CHAID Release 6.0. SPSS Inc., pp. 1–45.
    27.Perreault, W.D., Barksdale, H.C., 1980. A model-free approach for analysis of complex contingency data in survey research. Journal of Marketing Research XVII (November), 503–515.
    28.Kass, G., 1980. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics 29, 119–127.
    29.MAGIDSON, J., 1993. The use of the new ordinal algorithm in CHAID to target profitable segments, The Journal of Database Marketing 1, 29–48.
    30.Vermunt, J.K., and Magidson, J., 2007. An Extension of the CHAID Tree-based Segmentation Algorithm to Multiple Dependent Variables.
    31.A. Malvino, 1999. Electronic Principle Sixth Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York.
    32.G.M. Masters, 2004. Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems. ISBN 0-471-28060-7. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    33.Leplat, J., 1978. Accident analyses and work analyses. J Occup Acc 1, 331-340.
    34.Willem A. Wagenaar and Jop Groeneweg, 1987. Accidents at Sea: Multiple Causes and Impossible Consequences. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 27(5-6), 587-598.
    35.W.R. Blischke and D.N.P. Murthy, 2000. Reliability: Modeling, Prediction and Optimization. Wiley. New York
    36.Salvatore Distefano, Antonio Puliafito, 2007. DFT and DRBD in Computing Systems Dependability Analysis. SAFECOMP: 423-429.
    37.Sklet S., 2005. Safety barriers: definition, classification, and performance. J Loss Prevent Process Industry 19(5), 494–506.
    38.Holand, P., 1997. Offshore blowouts: Causes and control. Houston, Tex: Gulf Publ. Co.
    39.Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2003. Assessing safety functions—Results from a case study at an industrial workplace. Safety Science 41(8), 701–720.
    40.Johnson, W. G., 1980. MORT safety assurance systems. Marcel Dekker. New York.
    41.Duijm N.J., 2009. Safety-barrier diagrams as a safety management tool. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 94, 332– 341.
    42.Construction Safety Council, 1996. Managing Power Line Hazards. Hillside, Illinois.
    43.Janicak CA., 1997. Occupational fatalities caused by contact with overhead power lines in the construction industry. J Occup Environ Med 39, 328–332.
    44.NIOSH ALERT, 1995. Preventing Electrocutions of Crane Operators and Crew Members Working Near Overhead Power Lines, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 95-108. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Pittsburgh, PA.
    45.NIOSH ALERT, 1987. Preventing Electrocutions by Undetected Feedback Electrical Energy Present in Power Lines, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 88-104. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Pittsburgh, PA.
    46.NIOSH ALERT, 1985. Preventing Electrocutions from Contact Between Cranes and Power Lines DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 85-111. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Pittsburgh, PA.
    47.H.M.O Pratt, 2007. High Strength Insulator. International Conference on Solid Dielectrics, Winchester, UK, July 8-13, 2007.
    48.G. T. Homce, J. C. Cawley, 2002. An Alarm to Warn of Overhead Power Line Contact by Mobile Equipment. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Pittsburgh, PA.

    QR CODE