2015年 2月 28日，前央視記者柴靜發表了一篇控訴空氣汙染霾害的紀錄影片－＂
穹頂之下＂，瞬間在大陸及世界各國引起一陣騷動，讓世人更加注意空氣品質及生活
環境的關切，片中對於傳統燃油汽車排放廢氣的嚴重性大幅的報導，也引發電動車產
業高度的眼光關注，而大陸政府也知道電動車不若傳統汽車需有長期的技術累積支持,
亟欲藉由電動車的發展追上美日德國家的技術水準。
Tesla 推出性能版電動車，電動車瞬間成為高尚的交通工具，然電動車的先天限制
條件－充電時間與續駛里程，使電動車在基礎設施充電樁尚未普遍的情況下，讓消費
者對其實用性抱持著懷疑的態度，間接造成接受度有著一定的距離．綜觀現行市售電
動車中，單次充電行駛里程可以達到四百公里的，仍只有 Tesla單一品牌，其他品牌普
遍行駛里程均約在兩百餘公里，這樣的里程僅僅在一般都會內通勤能夠滿足需求，若
然超過都會內行駛，則將造成駕駛者對行駛里程的恐懼，形成所謂里程焦慮症；投入
電動車研發及生產是需要極大的資本，並不是每間車廠都可以像 Tesla般取得大量的資
金，故在廠商投入生產之時必須要有其獨特的營運模式，方得避免坐吃山空，在歐美
及中國大陸均有許多車廠藉策略聯盟共同推動分時租賃模式進行電動車體驗推廣，然
而電動車租賃不同於共享單車，先天上有其特有的限制條件， 在電動車關鍵技術上，
電池、電機及電控等三電系統主宰了電動車性能的好壞，在電動車研發過程中，電動
車生產企業仍必須有營業收入支持研發費用，在消費者接受度有限的情況下，電動車
分時租賃成為一重要的出海口解套方式，一方面藉分時租賃增加車輛銷量及配套措施
的建設，一方面讓民眾在低廉的成本下體驗電動車的環保。
本文個案公司為新能源汽車企業與國際代工大廠策略聯盟下產物，車廠以電動車
推廣用戶體驗以增大銷量，代工大廠則希望由此取得電動車進入門票﹐本研究以推廣
電動車為前提下，從分析電動車整體產業發展及新興的分時租賃運營模式，亦從經營
模式探討分時租賃經營策略，探討其推動所遭遇問題及需克服難關。

In February 28,2015, formal CCTV journalist Chia, Jing published a documentary " Under the Dome", a focus on the complaint around the air pollution haze. Instantly, this issue raised attention to the air pollution and live environmental concerns; not only to the mainland China but the whole world. This documentary focused on the severe problem of air pollution caused by traditional vehicle emission, also leading to a high degree of attention in the electric car industry. The China government understood the importance of the electric car industry in which technology is not like the fuel using car. These need the long term accumulation of the technology support and the wish to catch up the technology of the electric car with the US, Japan and Germany countries.

When Tesla launched the performance version of electric vehicles, the electric car instantly become a noble means of transport. However, the limitation of the charge time and driving distance concerned lots of customers. In most areas of the world, there are not enough charge stations which means there are little numbers of the population which own an electric car confidently. In the electric car market, only Tesla can reach 400 mileage by single charge. Other brands can only reach around 200 mileage. By this mileage, it can only meet the demand of local commuters. If over the range, the driver could be afraid of the mileage, which is commonly known as "mileage anxiety disorder".

To research, develop and go on with the production of the electric car, the business requires lots of funds. Not many brands like Tesla can get the support from government or business. These manufacturers need the united operation model to get the funds to support their production of electric car. In Europe, China and the United States there are some depots introducing the electric car by strategic alliances of the time sharing leasing mode. However, unlike shared bicycle rental, there are restrictions on electric car unique inherent. There are three key technologies involved with the electric car: battery, motor and electrical control which is the main focus that helps the performance quality of the electrical car. In the procession of the research and development of the electric car, the manufacturers needs funds to support it. The time sharing leasing mode will help the electric car manufacturer not just get some finance support but also improve the acceptance by customers on the lower cost.

This case is focusing on the strategic alliance by new energy car businesses and OEM manufacturers. For the new energy car business, they would like to increase the sales of electric cars with more customer driving experience; the OEM manufacture would like to have the ticket to enter this market. This study is based on the promote of the electric car, to evaluate the industry development and the strangely alliance with timing sharing leasing mode. It also discusses the difficulties and challenge of the time sharing leasing mode in the operation system.

一、中文部分 1、 .鍾憲瑞，2012，商業模式：創新與管理，初版，新北市，前程文化，P25-45。
2、 王秀傑，2013，我國電動汽車商業模式創新 SWOT分析，科技管理研究，2013 年第 8期。
3、 王欣、鄭贇、全亮，2017，2018 年中國汽車共享出行市場分析報告預測，思與
行。
4、 沈軍、舒暢，2016，分時租賃本土化思考，埃森哲，成就卓越績效。
5、 林清河，策略管理，科學發展，399期，2006.03。
6、 洪德俊、薛義誠、陳玉蕙、劉惠美，2014，台灣電動車產業商業模式之研究， 創業管理研究，第九卷第一期，P27-58。
7、 殷正遠，陳詰，2013，基於消費者偏好的中國電動汽車商業模式，上海管理科
學，上海，第 35卷第六期，2013.12。
8、 彭波、閆芳、白宇，2017，汽車分時租賃發展趨勢、商業模式及解決方案，普 華永道，思略特。
9、 詹子瑢，2015，公司營合夥發展模式之特色以中國大陸杭州電動車發展模式為
例，台北市，台灣科技大學管理研究所論文。
10、 劉昱寰，2014，亞洲電動車推動政策與法制研究，台北市，台灣科技大學科技 管理研究所論文。
11、 劉穎奇、黃勇，2009，多件分時段租賃系統構想及其實現，計算機技術與發展，
廣東廣州，第 19卷第 11期。
12、 鄭贇、陸盛贇，2016，汽車分時租賃如何在中國獲得成功，思與行。

60
二、英文部分
1、Amit, R. and Zott, C., 2000, “Value Drivers of e-Commerce Business Models”, INSEAD Working Papers. No. 2000-2006.
2、Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M. and Kagermann, H., 2008, “Reinventing Your Business Model”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.86(12), 50-59.
3、Schmid, B., Alt, R., Zimmermann, H. and Buchet, B., 2001, “Anniversary Edition: Business Models”, Electronic Markets, Vo.11(1), 3-9.
4、 Timmers, P., 1998, “Business Models for Electronic Markets”, Electronic Markets, Vol.8(2), 3-8.
5、Voelpel, S. C., Leibold, M. and Tekie, E. B., 2004, "The Wheel of Business Model Reinvention: How to Reshape Your Business Model to Leapfrog Competitors", Journal of Change Management, Vol.4(3), 259-277.
6、Zott, C., Amit, R. and Massa, L., 2011, “The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research”, Journal of Management, Vol.37(4), 1019-1042.
三、網站部分 １、IT烽火台，2017，共享出行：遭遇”滴滴式“困局，愛”拼“才會贏，
http://www.yidianzixun.com/article/0G6kDNLa，2017.4.15
２、王正健、高銘汶、劉芳欣財團法人車輛研究測試中心 ARTC，2013，台灣智慧
電動車產業推展與瞻望，
https://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=2556 ３、叮咚出行，2017，全球電動汽車分時租賃商業運營模式分析， http://www.yidianzixun.com/article/0GCMumsD ４、財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心 科技產業資訊室，2015，鴻
海集團的電動汽車夢與佈局，
http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=10905 ５、餘振綱、謝新州、張婧，2014，德國新能源電動汽車發展動態及其經驗啟示，
中國科技論文在線 http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201406-303