新創科技公司面對創業環境的不穩定與不確定性時，往往會先將手上的資源全部投入至技術研發中，待等技術成熟後，再逐步地切入各產業應用。由於新創企業規模較小、資源有限，且產品與服務多屬前瞻創新，因此難以依靠組織本身站穩市場，而是要透過與外部組織合作，以維持自身的競爭優勢，同時必須與外部組織交換雙方之所需關鍵資源，以彌補組織內部資源缺乏之情況，透過多方的資源合作，形成穩固的商業生態圈，以利於在競爭激烈的市場上生存。

本研究透過個案研究方式，觀察新創公司在創立初期，面對組織內部資源缺乏和市場需求快速變動之情形，如何透過跨界管理，提出資源受限之解決辦法；新創企業面臨外在環境所產生之不確定性時，便會向外部尋找相關利益者，並且與其建立關係，藉由雙方交換關鍵資源，來補足自身的競爭力，並由所有的參與者共創借力使力的槓桿生態圈。

本研究探討對象為獵戶科技、翔探科技與東詣科技，觀察三間科技新創公司跨界管理發展順序之過程，並將其跨界分為三個層面討論；探討新創企業面對不同的資源限制與環境因素，如何以跨界管理提出資源受限之解決辦法，並藉由與相關利益組織形成相互依存之關係，來逐步完成借力使力的槓桿型態生態圈。經由分析後，本研究提出一套「槓桿生態圈的跨界管理機制」之架構，作為其他資訊公司對於相同情況下的策略參考。

When IT company face the instability and uncertainty of the entrepreneurial environment, they often use all their resources in technology research and development first, after the technology development is stable, it will gradually enter into various industrial applications. Startups are small and have limited resources, and their products and services are mostly forward-looking innovations. Therefore, it is difficult to rely on the organization itself to stabilize the market. Instead, it must collaborate and communicate with external organizations to maintain its competitive advantage. The key resources required by both parties can make up for the lack of internal resources of the organization, and through multi-party resource cooperation, a stable business ecosystem will be formed to facilitate survival in the fiercely competitive market.

The research objects of this study are Orion go, Aeroprobing and MMXtion Petzzo. Observe the development sequence of the boundary spanning management of the three technology start-up companies, and divide their boundary spanning discussions into three levels; Discuss how new startups face different resource constraints and environmental factors, how to propose solutions to resource constraints through boundary spanning management, and gradually complete a leveraged ecosystem by forming interdependent relationships with relevant interest organizations. After analysis, this study proposes a framework of "Boundary Spanning Management Mechanisms For Leveraged Ecosystems" as a strategic reference for other IT companies in the same situation.

中文部分
1. 張智傑(2013)。IT資源配置決策分析，國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理研究EMBA碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
2. 黃振皓(2016)。組織轉型之主導邏輯轉換及跨界管理─以神基科技為例。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
3. 郭彥廷(2021)。數位化服務之生態的制定歷程＿以東詣科技Petzzo為例。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
4. 陳詠君(2021)。公益知識平台賦能社會包容之研究 — 以賦權理論為觀點。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
5. 楊子賢(2020)。實現數位創新跨界靈巧能力之多重個案比較 — 以臺北智慧城市專案 空氣盒子、WeMo Scooter 威摩科技與 UnaBiz 優納比為例。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
6. 楊坤木(2012) 。商業生態資源模組化管理之研究。國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
7. 郭文良、林素甘(2001)。質化與量化研究方法之比較與分析。資訊傳播與圖書管學，7(4)，頁1-14。

 
英文部分
1. Samuel G. Dawa (2018). Resource constraints and sustainable entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa: An effectual view.
2. Wenwen An & Yuehua Xu & Jianqi Zhang (2018). Resource constraints, innovation capability and corporate financial fraud in entrepreneurial firms.
3. Wenyu (Derek) Du & Shan L. Pan (2013). Boundary Spanning by Design: Toward Aligning Boundary-Spanning Capacity and Strategy in IT Outsourcing.
4. Jie Wu & Zefu Wu (2014). Local and international knowledge search and product innovation: The moderating role of technology boundary spanning.
5. Nima Jafari Navimipour & Yeganeh Charband (2016). Knowledge sharing mechanisms and techniques in project teams: Literature review, classification, and current trends.
6. Neeraj Parolia & James J. Jiang & Gary Klein & Tsong Shin Sheu (2011). The contribution of resource interdependence to IT program performance: A social interdependence perspective.
7. Matthew A. Hawkins & Mohammad H. Rezazade M (2012). Knowledge boundary spanning process: synthesizing four spanning mechanisms.
8. Shi Guanfeng & Lin Zhiyang (2010). A Study on Boundary Management of Team.
9. Martin Lundin (2007), Explaining Cooperation: How Resource Interdependence, Goal Congruence, and Trust Affect Joint Actions in Policy Implementation.
10. Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic management journal, 9(1), 31-41.
11. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
12. Ernst, C., & Chrobot-Mason, D. (2010). Boundary spanning leadership: Six practices for solving problems, driving innovation, and transforming organizations. McGraw Hill Professional.
13. Ghemawat, P. (2007), Managing Differences: The Central Challenge, Harvard Business Review, March 2007.
14. Epstein, C. F. (1989). Workplace Boundaries: Conceptions and Creations, Social Research, 56(3), 571-590.
15. Paulsen N. and Hernes T. (2003). Managing Boundaries in Organizations: Multiple Perspectives.
16. Birger Wernerfelt (1984). A Resource-based View of the Firm.
17. Joseph T. Mahoney ＆ J Rajendran Pandian (1992). The Resource-Based View Within The Conversation of Strategic Management.
18. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor (2009). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations
19. K. Laursen, A. Salter(2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms.
20. A. Leiponen, C.E. Helfat (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth.
21. H.G. Barkema, F. Vermeulen (1998). International expansion through start up or acquisition: A learning perspective.
22. Bob Hinings, Thomas Gegenhuber, Royston Greenwood (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective.
23. Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu MJ, Newell S (2017). Growing on steroids: rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation.
24. Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010). Research commentary – the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research.
25. Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013). The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts.
26. de Reuver M, Sørensen C, Basole RC (2018). The digital platform: a research agenda.
27. Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010). Research commentary – the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research.
28. Tumbas S, Berente N, Seidel S, vom Brocke J (2015). The “digital façade”of rapidly growing entrepreneurial organizations.
29. Raffaele Fabio Ciriello, Alexander Richter, Gerhard Schwabe (2018). Digital Innovation.
30. Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world.
31. Joseph B. Skipper, Christopher W. Craighead, Terry Anthony Byrd, R. Kelly Rainer (2008). Towards a theoretical foundation of supply network interdependence and technology‐enabled coordination strategies
32. Mirva Peltoniemi, Elisa Vuori MEGIN (2008). Business Ecosystem as the New Approach to Complex Adaptive Business Environments.
33. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
34. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.

 
網站部分
1. 獵戶官方網站，(2021年12月瀏覽)，https://oriongo.me/
2. 翔探官方網站，(2021年12月瀏覽)，https://aeroprobing.com/
3. 東詣科技官方網站，(2021年12月瀏覽)，https://www.mmxtion.com.tw/
4. Petzzo好好寵官網，(2021年12月瀏覽)，https://www.petzzo.com.tw/
5. 東詣科技官網，(2021年12月瀏覽)，https://www.mmxtion.com.tw/
6. 盛宇創新股份有限公司官網，(2021年12月瀏覽)，https://rainmaking.io/
7. 盛宇創新股份有限公司104人力平台公司介紹，(2021年12月瀏覽)，https://www.104.com.tw/company/1a2x6bkzft
8. 中華民國寵物食品及用品商業同業公會官網，(2021年11月瀏覽)， http://www.cpfaa.org.tw
9. 寵物險一鍵申辦、理賠 PETZZO App打造毛孩健康生活圈聯合新聞網，(2021年11月瀏覽)，https://udn.com/news/story/7239/5110086
10. PETZZO 好好寵飼主的強力後盾連結獸醫院病歷系統及寵物險服務 建立新型態寵物健康管理平台，(2021年12月瀏覽)，https://www.thenewslens.com/article/145035
11. 結合雲端寵物險三天內即理賠工商時報，(2021年11月瀏覽)，https://ctee.com.tw/news/insurance/396703.html
12. 新創企業為何活不下去？天下雜誌，(2022年1月瀏覽)，https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5063950
13. 台灣新創生態圈大調查，(2022年1月瀏覽)，https://sme.moeasmea.gov.tw/startup/upload/downloads/20210518030159pjd.pdf
14. 新創陣亡率超過90% 失敗是創業必修課，(2022年1月瀏覽)，https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=158&cat1=20&id=0000574712_esd8d7mb0bdg1r3bv9zhf
15. 海峽交流基金會，(2022年1月瀏覽)，建立台灣友善環境，https://reurl.cc/6EyreM