簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 白蕙瑜
Hui-Yu Pai
論文名稱: 細胞式網路具有預留與重傳的未決興趣表評估
Evaluation of the Pending Interest Table with Reservation and Retrials in the Cellular Network
指導教授: 鍾順平
Shun-Ping Chung
口試委員: 林永松
王乃堅
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電資學院 - 電機工程系
Department of Electrical Engineering
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 226
中文關鍵詞: 以內容為中心的網路未決興趣表聚合逾時交遞預留
外文關鍵詞: CCN, PIT, aggregation, timeout, handoff, reservation
相關次數: 點閱:240下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 預計未來五年全球IP的使用流量將增長五倍以上。當前以主機為中心的網際網路架構受到IP位址使用效率不彰的困擾。在以內容為中心的網路(CCN)中,IP位址被替換為內容名稱,並且在每個路由器上使用快取記憶體來暫時儲存數據。因此,只要可以知道內容名稱,客戶端就不需要知道所請求數據的IP位址。CCN由內容儲存器(CS),轉發訊息庫(FIB)和未決興趣表(PIT)所組成。當興趣到達CCN節點時,它將檢查CS中是否有所請求的數據塊的副本,也就是節點在PIT的條目中搜索相同的請求或命名的數據塊。如果答案是否定的,則節點在PIT中搜索空閒的條目並發送請求;如果沒有空閒的條目,則請求會被阻塞。如果答案是肯定的,則執行聚合機制,亦即聚合興趣並且不發送請求。為了防止請求變成過期,我們將採用逾時機制。也就是說,如果超過逾時時間,則興趣將停止服務並離開伺服器。在這項研究中,我們專注於細胞式網路中PIT的效能評估。細胞式網路中有多個細胞,其中所有的節點都是可移動的。因此,系統有兩種興趣,新興趣和交遞興趣。為了提供差異化服務,我們採用了預留機制,亦即系統給交遞興趣保留了數個伺服器。當興趣抵達PIT時,如果遇到伺服器擁塞,則興趣會被阻塞。我們研究了PIT佔用的兩種情境:具有新與交遞興趣但不允許重傳的情境,與具有新與交遞興趣且允許重傳的情境。在具有新與交遞興趣但不允許重傳的情境,系統立即清除被阻塞的興趣。在具有新與交遞興趣且允許重傳的情境,被阻塞的興趣有可能進入重傳佇列並等待稍後重傳。首先,我們推導出所考慮系統的解析模型。我們利用了疊代演算法求得穩態機率分佈和感興趣的效能指標。接著我們研究了各種系統參數對效能指標的影響,其中系統參數包括興趣抵達速率、興趣服務速率、興趣逾時時間、興趣聚合機率、興趣重傳速率與興趣重傳機率。效能指標包含興趣阻塞機率、平均興趣封包數、平均興趣系統延遲、成功送達率和未完成率。最後,我們自行撰寫電腦模擬程式以驗證解析結果的正確性。


    The global IP traffic is predicted to grow more than five times in the next five years. The current host-centric Internet architectures suffer from insufficient use of IP addresses. In Content-Centric Networking (CCN) the IP address is replaced with the content name and the cache memory is used to store data temporarily on each router. Therefore, as long as the content name can be known, the client does not need to know the IP address of the requested data. CCN consists of content store (CS), forwarding information base (FIB), and pending interest table (PIT). When an interest arrives at a CCN node, it will check whether there is a copy of the requested data chunk in the CS, i.e., the node searches the PIT entries for the same requested or named data chunk. If no, the node searches the PIT for an idle entry and a request is sent. If there is no idle entry, the request is blocked. If yes, the aggregation mechanism is performed, i.e., the interest is aggregated and no request is sent. To prevent the request from becoming out-of-date, the timeout mechanism is adopted. That is, a request in service will leave the server if the timeout time is exceeded. In this work, we focus on the performance evaluation of PIT in the cellular network. There are multiple cells in the cellular network and all nodes are mobile. Therefore, there are two classes of interests, new interests and handoff interests. To provide service differentiation, a reservation mechanism is adopted, i.e., there are servers reserved for handoff interests. Upon arrival, an interest is blocked if it encounters server congestion. We study two scenarios for PIT occupancy: new and handoff interests without retrials, and new and handoff interests with retrials. In the scenario with new and handoff interests without retrials, a blocked interest is cleared form the system immediately. In the scenario with new and handoff interests with retrials, a blocked interest is put into the retrial queue and wait to retry later. First, we derived the analytical models for the system considered. An iterative algorithm is developed to find the steady state probability distribution and the performance measures of interest. Second, the impact of various system parameters on the performance measures is studied. The system parameters include interest arrival rate, interest service rate, interest timeout time, interest aggregation probability, interest dwell rate, interest retrial rate, and interest retrial probability. The performance measures of interest are interest blocking probability, average number in service, average system delay, throughput, and incomplete rate. Last but not least, the computer simulation is written to verify the accuracy of the analytical results.

    1. Introduction 1 2. System model 3 2.1 New and handoff interests without retrials 4 2.2 New and handoff interests with retrials 4 3. Analytical model 5 3.1 New and handoff interests without retrials 5 3.1.1 Model diagram 5 3.1.2 State balance equations 6 3.1.3 Iterative algorithm 11 3.1.4 Performance measures 12 3.2 New and handoff interests with retrials 14 3.2.1 Model diagram 14 3.2.2 State balance equations 16 3.2.3 Iterative algorithm 52 3.2.4 Performance measures 53 4. Simulation model 55 4.1 New and handoff interests without retrials 55 4.1.1 Main program 55 4.1.2 New arrival subprogram 57 4.1.3 Handoff arrival subprogram 59 4.1.4 New timeout subprogram. 61 4.1.5 Handoff timeout subprogram 62 4.1.6 New dwell subprogram. 63 4.1.7 Handoff dwell subprogram. 64 4.1.8 New departure subprogram. 65 4.1.9 Handoff departure subprogram. 66 4.1.10 Performance measures 67 4.2 New and handoff interests with retrials .70 4.2.1 Main program 70 4.2.2 New arrival subprogram. 72 4.2.3 Handoff arrival subprogram 74 4.2.4 New timeout subprogram 76 4.2.5 Handoff timeout subprogram. 78 4.2.6 New dwell subprogram. 80 4.2.7 Handoff dwell subprogram. 81 4.2.8 New departure subprogram.. 82 4.2.9 Handoff departure subprogram. 83 4.2.10 New retrial dwell subprogram 84 4.2.11 Handoff retrial dwell subprogram 85 4.2.12 New retrial subprogram.. 86 4.2.13 Handoff retrial subprogram. 88 4.2.14 Performance measures. 90 5. Numerical results. 93 5.1 New and handoff interests without retrials 93 5.1.1 New interest arrival rate 93 5.1.2 New interest service rate 98 5.1.3 New interest timeout time 103 5.1.4 New interest aggregation probability 108 5.1.5 New interest dwell rate 113 5.1.6 Handoff interest arrival rate 118 5.1.7 Handoff interest service rate. 123 5.1.8 Handoff interest timeout time. 128 5.1.9 Handoff interest aggregation probability 133 5.1.10 Handoff interest dwell rate. 138 5.2 New and handoff interests with retrials 143 5.2.1 New interest arrival rate 143 5.2.2 New interest service rate. 148 5.2.3 New interest timeout time. 153 5.2.4 New interest aggregation probability 158 5.2.5 New interest dwell rate. 163 5.2.6 New interest retrial rate 168 5.2.7 New interest retrial probability. 173 5.2.8 Handoff interest arrival rate 178 5.2.9 Handoff interest service rate. 183 5.2.10 Handoff interest timeout time. 188 5.2.11 Handoff interest aggregation probability 193 5.2.12 Handoff interest dwell rate. 198 5.2.13 Handoff interest retrial rate 203 5.2.14 Handoff interest retrial probability. 208 5.3 Performance Comparison 213 5.3.1 New interest arrival rate 213 5.3.2 Handoff interest arrival rate. 218 6. Conclusions 223 References 225

    [1] Yueping Cai, Jun Liu, Xinwei Fan, Ya Qiu, and Bing Tan, “Software defined status aware routing in content-centric networking,” 2018 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pp. 283–288, April 2018.
    [2] Nidhi Lal, Shishupal Kunar, and Vijay Kumar Chaurasiya, “An Efficient Update Strategy for Content Synchronization in Content-Centric Networking (CCN),” China Communications, vol. 16, Issue. 1, pp. 108–118, Jan. 2019.
    [3] Dima Mansour, Claudio Marxer, and Christian Tschudin, “On Eventually- Available Data in Content-Centric Networking,” 2018 9th International Conference on the Network of the Future (NOF), pp. 83–87, Nov. 2018.
    [4] Tabinda Salam, Waheed Ur Rehman, and Xiaofeng Tao, “Data Aggregation in Massive Machine Type Communication: Challenges and Solutions,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 41921–41946, April 2019.
    [5]Mingfeng Hsuang, Wei Liu, Tian Wang, Houbing Song, Xiong Li, and Anfeng Liu, “A Queuing Delay Utilization Scheme for On-Path Service Aggregation in Services-Oriented Computing Networks,” IEEE Access, pp. 23816–23833, 2019.
    [6] Lianwu Chen, Meng Yu, Dan Su, and Dong Yu, “Multi-band PIT and Model Integration for Improved Multi-channel Speech Separation,” ICASSP 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 705–709, May 2019.
    [7] Safdar Hussain Bouk, Syed Hassan Ahmed, Dongkyun Kim, Kyung-Joon Park, Yongsoon Eun, and Jaime Lloret, “DPEL: Dynamic PIT Entry Lifetime in Vehicular Named Data Networks,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 20, pp. 336–339, Feb. 2016.
    [8] Jinho Choi, “On the Stability of Fast Retrial Multichannel ALOHA With Rate Control for MTC,” IEEE Communication Letters, vol. 22, pp. 360–363, Feb. 2018.
    [9] Yu Zhang, Jinting Wang, and Wei Wayne Li, “Optimal Pricing Strategies in Cognitive Radio Networks With Heterogeneous Secondary Users and Retrials,” IEEE Access, pp. 30937–30950, 2019.
    [10] Jinho Choi, “Low-Latency Multichannel ALOHA With Fast Retrial for Machine-Type Communications, ”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, Issue. 2, pp. 3175-3185, April 2019.
    [11] Jau-Chuan Ke, Tzu-Hsin Liu, and Dong-Yuh Yang, “Retrial Queues with Starting Failure and Service Interruption,” IET Communications vol. 12, pp. 1431–1437, 2018.
    [12] Amuda James Abu, Brahim Bensaou, and Ahmed M. Abdelmoniem, “A Markov Model of CCN Pending Interest Table Occupancy with Interest Timeout and Retries,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6, 2016.
    [13] M. Marsan, G. de Carolis, E. Leonardi, R. Lo Cigno, and M. Meo, “Efficient Estimation of Call Blocking Probabilities in Cellular Mobile Telephony Networks with Customer Retrials,” IEEE Journal, vol. 19, pp. 332-346, Feb. 2001.
    [14] Chia-Hsin Lin, Performance Evaluation of the Pending Interest Table with Timeout and Retrial in the Cellular Network, Master Thesis, NTUST, 2018.
    [15] I Gusti Bagus Baskara Nugraha, Felix Riady Tanamas, ” Off-street Prking Space Allocation and Reservation System Using Event-driven Algorithm,“ 2017 6th International Conference on Eletrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI), DOI: 10.1109/ICEEI.2017.8312456, 2017.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2024/08/01 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/08/01 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 2024/08/01 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE