簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳慕珊
Mu-shan Chen
論文名稱: 研究生專業能力養成輔助系統建置之研究
A Study on Professional Capabilities Building by Using a Learning-Career Planning System for Graduate Students
指導教授: 李國光
Gwo-guang Lee
口試委員: 陳正綱
Cheng-kang Chen
周子銓
Tzu-chuan Chou
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 99
中文關鍵詞: 知識、知識盤點、知識資產、網路化學習歷程檔案
外文關鍵詞: Web-based Learning portfolio
相關次數: 點閱:306下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在失業率攀升的現代社會,對於即將進入職場的學生而言,無疑即將面對的是更加劇烈的競爭,也因此許多人會在大學畢業後繼續升學,以期更高的學歷能夠換取更理想的待遇;然而,高學歷並不代表更容易就業,也因此在有限的學習生涯中,學生更應該把握時間,並加強自身的專業競爭力,而在這知識經濟的時代,知識已成為不可或缺的個人競爭工具,故如何衡量自己是否有足夠的專業知識能力以及如何對於不足之處能即時學習與加強,成為個人重要的課題。

    本研究以知識盤點的理論概念為基礎,並使用系統展示法來建置研究生專業能力養成輔助系統,主要目的是讓學生首先透過知識盤點,來了解自身與未來願景職業的職能知識現況與缺口,再輔以系統其他功能來幫助學生進行學習狀況的反思以及調整學習方式。

    系統實施以台灣科技大學資管所的學生為主要對象,並根據UCAN對各職涯職類的職業分類,讓學生透過系統進行知識盤點,以幫助學生定期的檢視自我知識現況以及了解願景職業所需具備之職能知識,再透過系統其他功能來進行調整以及彌補知識缺口。

    最後以問卷調查以及個別訪談的方式,驗證本研究之雛型系統的可行性以及實用性。並整理歸納本研究之研究貢獻:(1) 透過系統化的專業職能知識盤點,幫助學生對於產業內容以及相關職能進行初步的認識,並檢視自己的知識資產現況(2) 提升學生對於知識盤點的重視程度,並定期檢視自我知識現況(3) 能幫助學生記錄學習之過程,並提供學習生涯規劃之參考建議(4)幫助學生尋找學習夥伴,讓志同道合的夥伴一起學習成長。


    As the unemployment rate increase in modern society, the competitiveness for students who are going to enter the workplace is no doubt to be dramatically increased. That's why many of them will choose to continue their studies after graduating from college. However, highly educated does not mean much easier to get a job. Thus students should be more careful to take their time to enhance their professional competitiveness in their limited learning career. In addition, in such a knowledge-based economy era, knowledge is becoming an indispensable competitive tool for individuals. That's why how students can improve their insufficient immediately is becoming an important issue for them.

    This study is based on the concept of knowledge audit, and use system development to build up an assistant system for developing the professional abilities of graduate students. The main purpose for this system is allowing students to understand the current state of knowledge of their expected career as well as the gap between their expected career and themselves. Moreover, students used other functions of the system to think of their learning condition and try to adjust their learning behavior.

    Students of the department of Information Management of NTUST are the target group for implementing this system. This group of students was allowed to do knowledge auditing through the system by the classification of occupations of UCAN, in order to help them to view their current status of knowledge and to understand the knowledge that their expected career need.

    At last, we used questionnaires and individual interviews to verify the feasibility and practicality for the prototype system of this study. Organized and summarized the contributions of this study: First, helped students to have a preliminary understanding of the contents and related functions of the career, and view the current status of their knowledge assets regularly. Second, enhanced the degree of attention for knowledge audit of the students, and view the current status of their knowledge assets regularly. Third, helped students to record their learning process, and provide reference proposal for their learning career. Finally, helped students to find learning partners, so that like-minded partners can learn and grow together.

    摘 要I AbstractII 誌 謝III 目 錄IV 表目錄VII 圖目錄VIII 第一章緒論1 1.1研究背景與動機1 1.2研究目的2 1.3論文架構3 1.4研究限制5 第二章文獻探討6 2.1知識的定義與分類6 2.1.1知識的定義6 2.1.2知識的分類9 2.2知識資產12 2.3知識盤點13 2.3.1知識盤點的定義14 2.3.2知識盤點的方法與流程16 2.4學習歷程檔案19 2.4.1學習歷程檔案的定義19 2.4.2學習歷程檔案的特性21 2.4.3學習歷程檔案的效益21 2.5網路化學習歷程檔案23 2.5.1網路化學習歷程檔案的定義與特性23 2.5.2網路化學習歷程檔案的建構程序24 2.6知識網絡26 2.6.1知識網絡的定義26 2.6.2知識網絡的結構特徵27 2.7結語27 第三章研究設計與系統架構29 3.1研究方法29 3.1.1文獻分析法29 3.1.2系統展示法29 3.2研究流程與步驟31 3.3系統概念32 3.4系統架構分析33 3.4.1職涯類型分類33 3.4.2系統架構35 3.4.3系統流程36 3.4.4系統建置環境38 3.5系統設計38 3.5.1帳號權限設計38 3.5.2系統模組設計39 3.5.3資料庫設計43 3.6結語46 第四章系統實施與驗證48 4.1系統實作48 4.1.1個人資料管理模組48 4.1.2知識盤點模組 56 4.1.3歷程記錄與學習曲線模組59 4.1.4修課建議與成績紀錄模組66 4.1.5知識網絡模組69 4.1.6系統管理模組75 4.2系統驗證79 4.2.1選擇個案79 4.2.2擬定資料收集的方式79 4.2.3系統驗證問卷資料與討論81 4.3結語87 第五章結論與建議89 5.1研究貢獻89 5.2後續研究建議90 參考資料92 附錄一系統實施成效驗證問卷98

    中文文獻
    1. 江雪齡,「教學成效的依據-教學檔案的建立」,成人教育,24,41-44頁,1995。
    2. 朱智荻,「員工知識分佈圖系統雛形之建立-以A公司為例」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,2001。
    3. 何明勇,「知識創造,知識資產,與資訊科技的整合模式」,國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,2003。
    4. 吳思華,「知識經濟、知識資本與知識管理」,台灣產業研究,第四期,第11-50頁,2001。
    5. 吳清山,「知識管理與學校效能」,台北市立師範學院學報,第三十二期,第1-16頁,2001。
    6. 李沛穎,「大學生學習生涯社群系統建置之研究」國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文,2005。
    7. 陳永隆、莊宜昌,《知識價值鏈》,台北:中國生產力中心,2003。
    8. 陳銘煌,「關鍵知識盤點系統建置之研究」,國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文,2005。
    9. 陳郁慧,「資管系學生關鍵知識盤點系統建置之研究」,國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文,2012。
    10. 張吉成,「高科技產業組織知識創新模式建構之研究」,國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文,2001。
    11. 張裕莉,「企業導入知識管理的稽核模式初探」,國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文,2003。
    12. 張基成,「實習教師的教育實習歷程檔案-教學與學習檔案」,國立台北科技大學教育學程中心通訊,25,頁2,2002b。
    13. 張基成、童宜慧,「一個架構於全球資訊網上電子化學習歷程檔案」,教學科技與媒體,51,頁37-45,2000。
    14. 梁定澎,「資訊管理研究方法總論」,資訊管理學抱,4(1),1997。
    15. 陳聖謨,「檔案在師資培育上的應用」,教育研究資訊,6(2),頁150-156,1998。
    16. 陳得利,「網路化歷程檔案系統之設計與實作」,國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文,2002。
    17. 馮元甫,「運用知識稽核分析企業內員工之知識-以A公司為例」,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,2001。
    18. 湯清二,「另一種評量工作的選擇-學習檔案」,教育研究月刊,3(1),1997。
    19. 童宜慧,「網路化學習歷程檔案系統之建構與實施」,淡江大學教育科技學系碩士論文,1999。
    20. 黃耿鐘,「網路學習檔案評量系統及學習檔案成效指標之研究」,國立台南師範學院教師在職進修資訊碩士學位班碩士論文,2002。
    21. 楊忠智,「論知識資產投資決策的分析方法、戰略與風險防範」,財經論叢,第一期,第54-58,68頁,2000。

    22. 翁榮銅,「技專校院知識資產指標建構之研究」,國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系博士論文,2002。
    23. 蔡旻芳,「網路學習之學習歷程分析系統」,國立中山大學碩士學位論文,2001。
    24. 蔡宜玲,「政府農業研發機構知識盤點之個案研究」,世新大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文,2004。
    25. 劉京偉,《知識管理的第一本書》,台北:商周出版社,2000。
    26. 劉常勇,「知識管理與企業發展」,智慧財產權管理興專利應用研討會,高雄:國立中山大學管理學院主辦,第1-10頁,1999。
    27. 鄧輝,「論知識資產的產權安排」,財經理論與實踐(雙月刊),第二十一卷,第一百零六期,第117-119頁,2000。
    28. 歐用生,「從課程統整的概念評九年一貫課程」,教育研究資訊,7(1),頁22-32,1999。
    29. 蘇政宏,「知識管理績效指標之建構與衡量:跨功能之量表設計與實證研究」,義守大學管理研究所碩士論文,2002。
    30. 辜輝趁,「企業電子化知識管理策略研究」,國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系博士論文,2000。

    英文文獻
    1. Arter, J & Spandel, V. "Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment", Educational Measurement : Issues and Practice , 11(1),pp.36-44(1992).
    2. Berman, S. L., Down, J, & Hill, C.W., Tacit Knowledge As A Source of Competitive Advantage in the NBA, Academy of Management Journal,45(1),13-31(2002).
    3. Bechmann, M., Economic Models of Knowledge Networks, Networks in Action, New York(1995).
    4. Bird ,T., The school teacher's portfolio :An essay on possibility in J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond(Eds.)",Handbook of teacher evaluation : Elementary and Secondary Personnel,2nd.Newbury Park, CA : Sage(1990).
    5. Barrett, H. C. Feature article-Learning leading with technology strategic questions-what to consider when planning for electronic portfolios(1998a).
    6. http://transition.alaska.edu/www/portfolios/LLTOct98.html
    7. Barrett, H. C. "Create your Own Electronic portfolio (using off-the shelf software)",Learning & Leading with Technology. Retrieved April 27,2002 (2000)b
    8. http://transition.alaska.edu/www/portfolios/toolsarticle.html
    9. Black, S. "Portfolios assessment", in J. Noblitt (Ed.),Student Portfolios : A collection of articles, Arlington Height lllinois :IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing ,Inc(1993).
    10. Burt, R.S., Structural Holes : The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge : Harvard University Press(1992).
    11. Conways, S and Sligar, C., "Unlocking knowledge assets", Richmand, Washington : Microsoft Press(2002)
    12. Collins, A. "Portfolios in science education : Issue in purpose, tructure , and authenicity". Science Education,76(4),pp.451-463(1992).
    13. Danielson, C."Performance Assessment : A Collection of Tasks Princeton", N.T Eye On Education(2001).
    14. Davenport, T.H. and Pursak, L., Working Knowledge : How Organizations Manage What They Know ,Harvard Business School Press(1998).
    15. David, N."The Digital portfolio: A Richer Picture of Student Performance", Introduction and Observations. Retrieved March 27,2002.
    http://www.essentoalschools.org/pubs/exhib_schdes/dp/intro.htm
    16. Debenham, J. and Clark, J., "The knowledge audit", Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.11,No.3,pp201-211(1994).
    17. Desoua , K.C., “Facilitating tacit knowledge exchange.” ,Communication of the ACM ,Vol.46,No.6, pp.85-88(2003).
    18. Driessen, E. Portfolio's Noordhoff Publishers, Grobibgen(2002).
    19. Drucker , P.F., The Age of Discontinuity : Guidelines to Our Changing Society, New York : Harper & Row (1969).
    20. Eisenhardt, K., “Building theories from case study research.” ,Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, pp. 523-550(1989).
    21. Fischer, C.F. &King, R.M. Authentic assessment :A guide to implementation, California:Corwin Press,Inc(1995).
    22. Galbraith, J.K., The New Industrial State, Harmondsworth : Penguin(1969).
    23. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T., “What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? ” ,Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.106-116(1999).
    24. Hedlund, G., “A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation.” ,Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, pp.73-90. (1994).
    25. Hewitt, G. A portfolio primer : Teaching, collecting and assessing student writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann(1995).
    26. Hill, B.C. & Ruptic, C., Practice aspects of authentic assessment: Putting the pieces together. Norwood, MA : Christopher-Gorden(1994).
    27. Hylton, A., “Measuring & Assessing Knowledge-Value & the Pivotal Role of the Knowledge Audit”(2002).
    [Web]. Retrieved June 15, 2012 from the World Wide Web:
    http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/
    Measuring_%26_Assessing_K-Value_%26_Pivotal_Role_of_K-Audit.pdf

    28. Lankes, A. M. D. Electronic portfolios :A new idea in assessment. ERIC Digest EDO-IR-95-9(1995).
    29. http://ericir,syr.edu/ithome/digests/portfolios.html
    30. Marja Kankaanranta. "Constructing Digital Portfolios : teachers evolving capabilitis in the use of information and communications technology", Teacher Development,5(2),pp.259-276(2001).
    31. Marsden, P. V., Network Diversity, Substructures, & Opportunities for Contact. pp397-410 in Structure of Power &Constraint, edited by Calhoun, C., Meyer, M. &Richard, S. New York : Cambridge(1990).
    32. Michael, M., Social networks and economic sociology : a proposed research agenda for a more complete social , Science American Journal of Economics and Sociology,56(3),282-302(1997).
    33. MIT Careers Handbook. Design portfolio. Retrieved March 20,2002(1998).
    34. http://web.mit.edu/career/www/comments.html
    35. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action, Harvard Business School Press(1996).
    36. Liebowitz, J., Building organizational intelligence : a knowledge management primer, Florida : CRC Press(2000).
    37. Malhotra, Y., "Knowledge assets in the global economy : Assessment of national intellectual capital", Journal of Global Information Management , VOL.8, No.3,PP.5-15(2000).
    38. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge-Creating Company : How Japanese Companies foster Creativity and Innovation for Competitive Advantage, New York : Oxford University Press(1995).
    39. Nonaka, I. Toyama, R. and Konno ,N., "SECI, Ba and Leadership : A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Ceartion", Long Range Planning ,Vol.33,pp5-34(2000).
    40. Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P. and Finkelsein, S., "Managing Professional Intellect : Making the Most of the Best", Harvard Business Review ,Vol.30,No.3,pp.71-80(1996)
    41. Polanyi, M., “ The tacit dimension.” ,New York:Doubleday(1967).
    42. Purser, R.E. and Pasmore ,W.A., "Organizing for Learning", Research in Organizational Change and Development ,Vol.6,pp.37-114(1992).
    43. Russell, J., &Butcher, C. "Using Portfolio in Educational Technology Courses", J. Of Technology and Teacher Education(1999).
    44. Sternberg, R.J., “ Successful intelligent” ,Penguin Putnam, New York, NY(1997).
    45. Sullivan, P.H., Profiting from intellectual capital, New York : John Wiley & Sons(1998).
    46. Susan, Henczel, "The information audit as a first step towards effective knowledge management: An opportunity for the special librarian" ,INSPEL 34 3/4pp.210-226(2000). "
    47. Sternberg,Rolf., Innovation networks and regional development-Evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS) :Theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue ,European Planning Studies 8 ,398-407(2000).
    48. Sveiby, K, The new organizational wealth : Managing and measuring knowledge based assets, San Francisco : Berrett-Koehler Publishers (1997).
    49. Tiwana, A., The Knowledge Management Toolkit : Practice Techniques For Building A Knowledge Management System, New Jersey :PHPTR(2000).
    50. Tiwana, A. , “ The knowledge management toolkit: orchestrating IT, strategy, and knowledge platforms” ,2nd ed., N.J.: Prentice Hall(2002).
    51. Uzzi, B., Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly , 42,35-67(1997).
    52. Vavrus, L., "Put portfolios to the test",Instructor,100,pp.48-53(1990).
    53. Wiig, K.M., Knowledge Management Methods : Practical Approaches to managing Knowledge, Texas: SCHEMA PRESS(1995).
    54. Winsor, P., & Ellsfson, B. "Professional portfolios in teacher education: An exploration of their value and potential" The Teacher Educator,31(1),pp.68-91(1995).
    55. Zack, M.H., "Developing a Knowledge Strategy" California Management Review,Vol.41,No3,soring,pp.125-143(1999).
    56. Zack, M.H., "Managing codified knowledge" Sloan Management Review,Vol.40.4,pp.45-58(1999).

    QR CODE