台灣公共基礎建設的發展從民國60年代的十大建設開始一連串的公共建設計畫，帶動了台灣的整體國家競爭力與經濟發展，但隨著台灣都市的發展，公共基礎建設面臨者興建與維護交替的反覆循環階段，如何在有限的預算資源下進行每一項公共建設計畫的汰舊更新或興建，又必須有效的控管整體公共建設計畫的進度與品質管理，是當今推動公共基礎建設之規劃、執行部門地需面對的課題。
現今之公共基礎建設從計畫之可行性、綜合規劃、基本設計、細部設計、工程發包、履約管理至工程驗收點交乃至維護管理等所謂的全生命週期公共工程，是一個繁瑣而龐大的系統，再加以現今永續公共工程之必要，如何藉由有系統的分析歸納，將過去各類案例發生之經驗，作系統的累積並建立可參考使用之指標，必須透過知識分析將有效之指標建立。

The development of public infrastructure in Taiwan began with the construction of ten big public infrastructure projects, which led to the overall national competitiveness and economic development in Taiwan. However, with the development of Taiwan’s big cities, there are new problems regarding the construction and maintenance of public infrastructure, such as the repeated cycle stage and the way to renew or to demolish the old structures with the limited budget and meet the project schedule and quality control.
The current public infrastructure starts from the feasibility study, comprehensive planning, basic design, detail design, project contract, performance management up to the project acceptance and even maintenance management, so called life-cycle public work, which is a complicated and huge system. In addition, nowadays the public works needs to be sustainable, analyzed and summarized systematically through many cases and experiences, and to establish system to be used for future target. The results of this study are presented as follow: 1. Risk analysis of the implementation plan in the public infrastructure project 2. Promoting the assessment standard for the public infrastructure building plan.

1.行政院經濟建設委員會，地方氣候變遷調適計畫規劃作業指引，行政院經濟建設委員會，台北市(2012)。
2.行政院經濟建設委員會，台灣二十一世紀議程-國家永續發展與策略綱領，行政院經濟建設委員會，台北市(2004)。
3.葉俊榮，「轉型與發展：台灣21世紀議程-國家永續發展願景與策略綱領」，研考雙月刊，29(5)，6-18 (2005)。
4.行政院環境保護署，「永續發展基本法」草案，行政院環境保護署，台北市(2010)。
5.黃榮堯、許維庭，「建立台灣永續營建評估指標之研究」，2007 台灣環境資源永續發展之研討會論文集，35-63 (2007)。
6.賴杉桂，「創新、成長、競爭力~環境變動下的經營管理」，品質月刊，49，7-11 (2013)。
7.行政院國家永續發展委員會，2012永續發展指標系統評量結果，行政院國家永續發展委員會，台北市(2013)。
8.行政院國家永續發展委員會，9 8 年 國 家 永 續 發 展 年 報，行政院國家永續發展委員會，20~27，台北市(2009)。
9.王福慶，「航空城產業發展對地方經濟影響之研究-以桃園生活圈為例」，碩士論文，國立台北大學都市計畫研究所，台北市(1996)。
10.鄭伉妙、邱英嘉、劉偉麟、吳瑞賢、陳慶和，「機場建設與區域永續發展關係之研究-以台灣桃園國際機場為例」，2011 區域與環境資源永續發展研討會論文集，107-120 (2011)。
11.行政院，國際機場園區發展條例，行政院，台北市(2014)。
12.行政院經濟建設委員會，「愛台12建設」總體計畫，行政院經濟建設委員會，台北市(2009)。
13.中華民國內政部，擬定桃園國際機場園區及附近地區特定區計畫書，中華民國內政部，台北市(2013)。
14.桃園縣政府，桃園縣區域計畫(草案)，桃園縣政府，桃園縣(2010)。
15.中華民國內政部，新訂桃園國際機場園區及附近地區特定區禁建說明書，中華民國內政部，台北市(2013)。
16.王勇、方志達(2004), 項目可行性研究與評估, 北京, 中國建築出版社。
17.王克強(2013), 他山之石可以攻錯-軟體品質知識體系, 品質月刊, 49(7), pp.14。
18.毛治國、陳添宇(2011), 生命週期工程規劃管理之概念, 研考雙月刊, 3, pp.106-112。
19.內政部營建署(2012), 各機關洽請內政部營建署專業代辦建築工程採購注意事項,內政部營建署, 台北市, 台灣。
20.內政部建築研究所(2008), 生態城市綠建築推動方案, 中華民國內政部, 台北市, 台灣。
1.omiyama, H., & Takeuchi K. “Sustainability science: building a new discipline,” Sustainability Science, 1(3), 1-6 (2006).
2.Spangenberg, J. H., “Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons,” Environmental Conservation, 8(3), 275-287 (2011).
3.European Commission, “Europe 2020: A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth,” Report COM 202fin, Brussels: European Commission (2010).
4.Eckersley, R., “Progress, sustainability and human well-being: is a new worldview emerging?” International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1(4), 304-317 (2006).
5.Weinstein, M. P., “Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the ecology of cities,” Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 6(1), 1-5 (2010).
6.Meppem, T., Bourke S., “Different ways of knowing: a communicative turn to sustainability,” Ecological Economics, 30(3), 389-404 (1999).
7.Nullis, C., “Record arctic sea ice melt, multiple extremes and high temperatures,” Press Release, Communications and Public Affairs, World Meteorological Organization, 966(28), (2012).
http://www.wmo.int/pages/mediacentre/press_releases/pr_966_en.html (Retrieved: 2014/4/5).
8.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), “Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press”, (2007).
9.Eriksen, S., Aldunce, P., Bahinipati, C. S., Martins, R. D., Molefe, J. I., Nhemachena, C., O’brien, K., Olorunfemi, F., Park, J., Sygna, L, & Ulsrud, K., “When not every response to climate change is a good one: Identifying principles for sustainable adaptation to climate change,” Sustainable Adaption to Climate Change: Prioritising Social Equity and Environmental Integrity, 3(1), 7-20 (2011).
10.Pradhan, N. S., Khadgi, V. R., Schipper, L., Kaur, N., & Geoghegan, T., “Role of Policy and Institutions in Local Adaptation to Climate Change – Case studies on responses to too much and too little water in the Hindu Kush Himalayas”, Kathmandu: ICIMOD (2012).
11.Yohe, G. W., Lasco, R. D., Ahmad, Q. K., Arnell, N. W., Cohen, S. J., Hope, C., Janetos, A. C., & Perez, R. T., “Perspectives on climate change and sustainability. Climate Change 2007: Impacts,” UK: Cambridge University Press, 811-841 (2007).
12.Commission on Climate Change and Development (CCCD), “Closing the Gaps: Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation to Climate Change in Developing Countries.” Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden (2009).
13.Eriksen, S., & Brown, K., “Sustainable adaptation to climate change,” Sustainable Adaption to Climate Change: Prioritising Social Equity and Environmental Integrity, 3(1), 3-6 (2011).
14.Buzan T., “The Buzan Study Skills Handbook (Pearson Education),” Harlow, England (2007).
15.Artto K., Kujala J., Dietrich P. & Martinsuo M, “International Journal of Project Management,” 26, 4–12 (2008).
16.Buzan T. “The Buzan Study Skills Handbook (Pearson Education),” Harlow, England, (2007).
17.Berlin S., Raz T., Glezer C., Zviran M., “Comparison of estimation methods of cost and durations in IT projects,” Information and Software Technology, 51(4), 738–748 (2009).
18.Connor J.T., Vickroy C.G., “Control of construction project scope, SD-6,” Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Texas, USA, (1986).
19.Cho C.S. Construction Industry Institute Research Team, “Pre-Project Planning Handbook, special Publication39-2,” Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Texas, USA. (1995).
20.Gibson G.E., “Building Project Scope Definition Using Project Definition,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, 12, 115-125 (2001).
21.Construction Industry Institute Research Team, “Front End Planning: Break the Rules. Pay the Price,” Research Summary 213-1, Construction Industry Institute, Austin. Texas, USA. (2006).
22.Construction Industry Institute Research Team, “Project Definition Rating Index-Building Projects,” version 3.2, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Texas, USA, (2009a).