今天，我們生活在一個瞬息萬變的時代，隨著技術的發展，這一切都在改變。這種情況迫使我們個人或組織對更新更加熟悉。對於供應鏈領域，需要創新來創建信息流程，並使用技術和流程創新來創新所有供應鏈活動，以提供滿足消費者需求的解決方案，並找到新方法來增強流程並提高風險管理能力和公司績效，
在本研究中，已使用調查表開發了現有研究中採用的理論模型，該調查表已分發給印度尼西亞的與供應鏈有關的公司。為了分析獲得的數據，我們使用SmartPLS 3.0，該工具提供了用於驗證因子分析的工具以及方程模型的結構以驗證所提出的模型。這項研究是通過進行全面研究而開發的現有模型，從而為供應鏈創新領域的理論做出了貢獻。
在這項研究中，它在重組能力對供應鏈適應性與供應鏈可重構性以增強供應鏈創新之間產生了積極影響。這通過已執行的大量數據處理來表明。這些發現表明管理者可以使用它來幫助他們從重組能力中擴展對重要事物的理解。從外部提高能力和能力的公司並將其重組將是更大的優勢，並為公司提供了獲得供應鏈創新的機會。如果他們需要數據和通過與供應鏈合作夥伴的重組能力更好地交換
信息的建議，以增強他們的供應鏈創新。

Today we live in fast changing era, which is everything changing as soon as technology developed. This condition push us individual or organization to more familiar with the update. For Supply chain area need innovation for creating process of information and innovative all supply chain activities using technology and process innovation to provide solutions for consumer needs and find new ways to enhance processes and to improve risk management capabilities and company performance,
In this study, theoretical model adopted from an existing study has been developed using a questionnaire that is spread to companies in Indonesia related to supply chains. To analyzed the data was obtained we use SmartPLS 3.0 that provide tools to confirmatory factor analysis and the structure of the equation model to validate the proposed model. This research is the development of existing models by conducting a comprehensive study, resulting in a contribution to theory in the area of supply chain innovation.
In this study, it produces a positively influence between recombination capabilities to supply chain adaptability and supply chain reconfigurability to enhance supply chain innovation. This is indicated by the significant level of data processing that has been carried out. These findings suggest that the manager can use this to help them expand their understanding of the important thing from recombination capabilities. Improving capability and capacity firm from external and recombining it will be a greater advantage and offer an opportunity for companies to gain their supply chain innovation. It is recommended if they need data and better information exchange through recombine capability with its supply chain partners to enhance their supply chain innovation.

Aitken, J., Christopher, M., & Towill, D. J. I. j. o. L. (2002). Understanding,
implementing and exploiting agility and leanness. 5(1), 59-74.
Arthur, W. B. J. R. p. (2007). The structure of invention. 36(2), 274-287.
Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. J. S. m. j. (2000). Don't go it alone:
Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian
biotechnology. 21(3), 267-294.
Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). Building an ambidextrous organisation.
Advanced Institute of Management Research Paper(003).
Bondarouk, T. V. (2006). Action-oriented group learning in the implementation of
information technologies: results from three case studies. European Journal of
Information Systems, 15(1), 42-53.
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative
framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization
SCinnovence, 15(5), 555-568.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17):
Sage publications.
Carnabuci, G., & Operti, E. J. S. m. j. (2013). Where do firms' recombinant capabilities
come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to
innovate through technological recombination. 34(13), 1591-1613.
Chandra, C., Grabis, J. J. S. C. C. C., Solutions,, & Applications. (2007).
Reconfigurable supply chains: an integrated framework. 81-99.
Cheung, R., Vogel, D. J. C., & education. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of
collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model
for e-learning. 63, 160-175.
Child, J. J. O. s. (1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure,
organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. 18(1), 43-76.
Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., & Kang, S. J. H. a. S. (2017). Partnership strength and diversity
with suppliers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management, Vol. 30 No. 3, 2018, pp. 1526-1544.
Christopher, M. (2005). Creating Value-Adding Networks LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY
CHAIN MANAGEMENT Third Edition. Book.
Christopher, M., & Holweg, M. (2011). " Supply Chain 2.0": managing supply chains
in the era of turbulence. International journal of physical distribution &
logistics management, 41(1), 63-82.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on
learning and innovation. Administrative SCinnovence quarterly, 128-152.47
Cui, T., Ye, H. J., Teo, H. H., & Li, J. (2015). Information technology and open
innovation: A strategic alignment perspective. Information & Management,
52(3), 348-358.
Davis, J. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. J. A. S. Q. (2011). Rotating leadership and
collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships.
56(2), 159-201.
Engelhardt-Nowitzki, C. (2012). Improving value chain flexibility and adaptability in
build-to-order environments. International Journal of Physical Distribution &
Logistics Management, 42(4), 318-337.
Fang, E. (2011). The Effect of Strategic Alliance Knowledge Complementarity on New
Product Innovativeness in China. Organization SCinnovence, 22(1), 158-172.
doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0512
Fleming, L. J. M. s. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. 47(1),
117-132.
Flint, D. J., Larsson, E., & Gammelgaard, B. (2008a). Exploring processes for customer
value insights, supply chain learning and innovation: an international study.
Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 257-281.
Flint, D. J., Larsson, E., & Gammelgaard, B. J. J. o. B. L. (2008b). Exploring processes
for customer value insights, supply chain learning and innovation: an
international study. 29(1), 257-281.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. J. J. o. m. r. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models
with unobservable variables and measurement error. 18(1), 39-50.
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. J. C. o. t. a. f. i. s. (2000). Structural equation
modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. 4(1), 7.
Golgeci, I., & Ponomarov, S. Y. (2013). Does firm innovativeness enable effective
responses to supply chain disruptions? An empirical study. Supply Chain
Management: An International Journal.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic
management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal
analysis. Administrative SCinnovence quarterly, 619-652.
Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). External sources of innovative capabilities: the
preferences for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. Journal of
management studies, 39(2), 167-188.
Hansen, M. T. J. A. s. q. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in
sharing knowledge across organization subunits. 44(1), 82-111.48
Hazen, B. T., Overstreet, R. E., & Cegielski, C. G. (2012). Supply chain innovation
diffusion: going beyond adoption. The international journal of logistics
management.
Hazen, B. T., Overstreet, R. E., & Cegielski, C. G. J. T. i. j. o. l. m. (2012). Supply
chain innovation diffusion: going beyond adoption.
Hines, T. (2004). Supply chain strategies: Customer driven and customer focused:
Routledge.
Kim, Y., Choi, T. Y., & Skilton, P. F. (2015). Buyer-supplier embeddedness and
patterns of innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management.
Kim, Y., Choi, T. Y., Skilton, P. F. J. I. J. o. O., & Management, P. (2015). Buyersupplier embeddedness and patterns of innovation.
Kraatz, M. S. J. A. o. m. j. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational
networks and adaptation to environmental change. 41(6), 621-643.
Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. J. S. C. M. A. I. J. (2020).
Learning orientation and innovation performance: the mediating role of
operations strategy and supply chain integration.
Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard business review, 82(10), 102-
113.
Lee, S. M., Lee, D., & Schniederjans, M. J. (2011). Supply chain innovation and
organizational performance in the healthcare industry. International Journal of
Operations & Production Management.
Li, Q., Maggitti, P. G., Smith, K. G., Tesluk, P. E., & Katila, R. (2013). Top
management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity
in new product introductions. Academy of management journal, 56(3), 893-916.
Li, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. J. T. (2009). The effects of inter-industry and country
difference in supplier relationships on pioneering innovations. 29(12), 843-858.
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & Sawy, O. A. E. (2005a). Absorptive capacity configurations
in supply chains: gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS
quarterly, 145-187.
Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & Sawy, O. A. E. J. M. q. (2005b). Absorptive capacity
configurations in supply chains: gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge
creation. 145-187.
March, J. G. J. O. s. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.
2(1), 71-87.
Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. J. A. S. Q. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their
performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. 51(2), 262-
292.49
Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy:
Princeton University Press.
Moreira, A. C., Ferreira, L., & Zimmermann, R. A. J. C. S. I. P. (2018). Innovation and
Supply Chain Management.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. The
American Economic Review, 72(1), 114-132.
Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E: Tata McGraw-hill education.
Panayides, P. M., & So, M. (2005). Logistics service provider–client relationships.
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(3),
179-200.
Paton, R. A., & McLaughlin, S. (2008). Services innovation:: Knowledge transfer and
the supply chain. European Management Journal, 26(2), 77-83.
Paton, R. A., & McLaughlin, S. J. E. M. J. (2008). Services innovation:: Knowledge
transfer and the supply chain. 26(2), 77-83.
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. J. I. j. o. m. r. (2007). University–industry relationships
and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. 9(4), 259-280.
Raghunathan, S. J. D. S. (1999). Interorganizational collaborative forecasting and
replenishment systems and supply chain implications. 30(4), 1053-1071.
Rockart, S. F., & Dutt, N. J. S. M. J. (2015). The rate and potential of capability
development trajectories. 36(1), 53-75.
Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations; a crosscultural approach.
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001a). Beyond local search: boundary-spanning,
exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. 22(4), 287-306.
doi:10.1002/smj.160
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001b). Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning,
exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic management
journal, 22(4), 287-306.
Rothaermel, F. T. J. S. m. j. (2001). Incumbent's advantage through exploiting
complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. 22(6‐7), 687-699.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. J. S. m. j. (2000). Redundant governance
structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel
and semiconductor industries. 21(3), 369-386.
Roy, S., Sivakumar, K., & Wilkinson, I. F. (2004). Innovation generation in supply
chain relationships: a conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of
the Academy of marketing SCinnovence, 32(1), 61-79.50
Seo, Y.-J., Dinwoodie, J., & Kwak, D.-W. (2014). The impact of innovativeness on
supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link? Supply
Chain Management: An International Journal.
Simon, H. A. J. T. A. e. r. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought.
68(2), 1-16.
Suarez, F. F. J. A. o. M. J. (2005). Network effects revisited: the role of strong ties in
technology selection. 48(4), 710-720.
Sukati, I., Hamid, A. B. A., Baharun, R., Tat, H. H., Said, F. J. I. J. o. B., & SCinnovence,
S. (2011). A study of supply chain management practices: An empirical
investigation on consumer goods industry in Malaysia. 2(17), 166-176.
Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. N. (2006). A framework for assessing value
chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for
integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. 15, 67-88.
Thornton, S. C., Henneberg, S. C., Leischnig, A., & Naudé, P. J. J. o. P. I. M. (2019).
It’s in the mix: How firms configure resource mobilization for new product
success. 36(4), 513-531.
Trantopoulos, K., von Krogh, G., Wallin, M. W., & Woerter, M. (2017). External
knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation
performance. MIS quarterly, 41(1), 287-300.
Van Hoek, R. I. J. S. C. M. A. I. J. (1999). Postponement and the reconfiguration
challenge for food supply chains.
Waller, M., Johnson, M. E., & Davis, T. J. J. o. b. l. (1999). Vendor-managed inventory
in the retail supply chain. 20, 183-204.
Wei, H.-L., & Wang, E. T. J. E. J. o. I. S. (2010). The strategic value of supply chain
visibility: increasing the ability to reconfigure. 19(2), 238-249.
Whitten, G. D., Green, K. W., & Zelbst, P. J. (2012). Triple‐A supply chain
performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
Yao, Z., Yang, Z., Fisher, G. J., Ma, C., & Fang, E. E. J. I. B. R. (2013). Knowledge
complementarity, knowledge absorption effectiveness, and new product
performance: The exploration of international joint ventures in China. 22(1),
216-227