簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉國達
Luu - Quoc Dat
論文名稱: Improved ranking approaches for fuzzy numbers and their applications to multi-criteria decision making problems
Improved ranking approaches for fuzzy numbers and their applications to multi-criteria decision making problems
指導教授: 周碩彥
Shuo-Yan Chou
喻奉天
Vincent F. Yu
口試委員: Kung-Jen Wang
Kung-Jen Wang
Sheng-Lin Chang
Sheng-Lin Chang
Jen-Ming Chen
Jen-Ming Chen
Ta-Chung Chu
Ta-Chung Chu
Chung-Chi Hsieh
Chung-Chi Hsieh
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 101
中文關鍵詞: Ranking fuzzy numbersMulti-criteria decision makingMedical provider selectionCentroid-indexIntegral valuesMaximizing set and minimizing setMagnitude concept.
外文關鍵詞: Ranking fuzzy numbers, Multi-criteria decision making, Medical provider selection, Centroid-index, Integral values, Maximizing set and minimizing set, Magnitude concept.
相關次數: 點閱:1453下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 模糊數排序在決策分析與應用上佔有重要的地位,故近數十年來,專家學者提出了許多模糊數排序方法,例如最大集合與最小集合、積分值、中心點、距離、偏離程度及尺度等觀念。然而這些方法之中,有些並不符合直覺,甚至有不一致的情形。因此,本研究指出這些既有方法中的缺陷,並且提出能改善這些缺陷的模糊排序方法。
    本研究進一步利用所提出的模糊數排序方法,發展模糊多準則決策模型以支援醫療服務提供者的評估及選擇。在此模型中,醫療服務提供者的評分及準則的重要程度先以語意項目表示,接著再建立最終模糊評估值的成員函數。為了使本模型更加實用及易於應用,本研究應用所提出的模糊排序方法,將正規化後的加權評分解模糊化,得到明確數值,以建立醫療服務提供者的排序。本研究還採用了數值例子,以證明所提出的多準則決策模型的適用性和優點。


    Ranking fuzzy numbers plays an important role in decision analysis and applications. The last few decades have seen a large number of approaches investigated for ranking fuzzy numbers such as maximizing set and minimizing set concept, integral value, centroid point, distance approach, deviation degree, and magnitude concepts. Nevertheless, some of these approaches are non-intuitive and even inconsistent. Therefore, this study indicates the shortcomings of several existing ranking approaches and proposes improved ranking approaches for fuzzy numbers to overcome their shortcomings.
    Based on the proposed ranking approaches, an extension of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making is developed for supporting the medical provider selection and evaluation selection process. In the proposed fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model, the ratings of alternatives and importance weight of criteria for medical providers are expressed in linguistic terms. This study then can also obtain the membership functions of the final fuzzy evaluation value in the proposed model. To make the procedure easier and more practical, the normalized weighted ratings are defuzzified into crisp values by using the improved ranking approaches to determine the ranking order of alternatives. This study also uses a numerical example to demonstrate the applicability and advantages of the proposed multi-criteria decision making model.

    摘 要I ABSTRACTII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSIII TABLE OF CONTENTSIV LIST OF TABLESVII LIST OF FIGURESIX CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION1 1. 1 Research background and motivation1 1.2 Research objectives and contributions3 1.3 Research framework4 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW AND FUNDAMENTALS6 2.1 Fuzzy Set Theory6 2.1.1 Fuzzy sets6 2.1.2 Fuzzy Numbers6 2.1.3 α-cuts10 2.1.4 Fuzzy operations for fuzzy numbers10 2.1.5 Linguistic variable and fuzzy numbers11 2.2 Ranking methods for fuzzy numbers12 2.2.1 A review method for ranking fuzzy numbers using maximizing set and minimizing set13 2.2.2 A review of Liou and Wang’s ranking approach15 2.2.3 A review of ranking methods based on centroid index16 2.2.4 A review of ranking methods for fuzzy numbers with parametric form19 CHAPTER THREE PROPOSED RANKING METHODS FOR FUZZY NUMBERS21 3.1 A revised method for ranking fuzzy numbers using maximizing set and minimizing set21 3.1.1 Shortcomings with Chen’s method21 3.1.2 The proposed revised ranking method based on maximizing set and minimizing set23 3.1.3 Comparison of proposed maximizing set and minimizing set ranking approach and other existing ranking approaches29 3.2 A revised method for ranking fuzzy numbers using integral value34 3.2.1 Shortcomings of Liou and Wang’s ranking approach34 3.2.2 Proposed method for ranking fuzzy numbers based on integral values38 3.2.3 Comparative examples for integral value ranking approach43 3.3 A revised method for ranking fuzzy numbers using centroid index46 3.3.1 Shortcomings of ranking methods based on centroid index.46 3.3.2 Improved Ranking Method Based on the Centroid-index of fuzzy numbers47 3.3.3 Comparison of proposed centroid-index ranking approach and other existing ranking approaches49 3.4 A revised ranking approach for fuzzy numbers in parametric form54 3.4.1 Shortcomings of existing ranking approaches for fuzzy numbers in parametric form and the proposed ranking method54 3.4.2 Comparative examples for fuzzy numbers in parametric form58 CHAPTER FOUR FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH BASED ON MAXIMIZING SET AND MINIMIZING SET63 4.1 Review of multi-criteria decision making approaches63 4.2 The proposed fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach64 4.3 Numerical example68 CHAPTER FIVE MEDICAL PROVIDER SELECTION USING THE PROPOSED FUZZY MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH72 5.1 Medical provider selection and evaluation72 5.2 Application to the selection and evaluation of medical provider74 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION78 6.1 Conclusion of Research78 6.2 Suggestions for Further Research79 REFERENCES80

    [1] Abbasbandy, S. and Asady, B. Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance. Information Sciences, 176, 2405-2416, 2006.
    [2] Abbasbandy S. and Hajjari, T. A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Computers and Mathematics with Application, 57, 3, 413-419, 2009.
    [3] Asady, B. The revised method of ranking LR fuzzy number based on deviation degree. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7, 5056-5060, 2010.
    [4] Asady, B. and Zendehnam, A. Ranking fuzzy numbers by distance minimization. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 31, 11, 2589-2598, 2007.
    [5] Athanasopoulos, G., Riba, C. R., Athanasopoulou, C. A decision support system for coating selection based on fuzzy logic and multi-criteria decision making. Expert Systems with Application, 36, 10848-10853, 2009.
    [6] Bies, W. and Zacharia, L. Medical tourism: Outsourcing surgery. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46, 1144-1159, 2007.
    [7] Chen, S. H. Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 113-129, 1985.
    [8] Chen, C.T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision‐making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1‐9, 2000.
    [9] Chen, S. J. and Chen, S.M. A new method for handling multi-criteria fuzzy decision making problems using FN-IOWA operators. Cybernatics and Systems, 34, 109-137, 2003.
    [10] Chen, S. J. and Chen, S. M. Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Applied Intelligence, 26, 1-11, 2007.
    [11] Chen, S. M. and Chen, J. H. Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different heights and different spreads. Expert Systems with Application, 36, 6833-6842, 2009.
    [12] Chen, S. M., Munif, A., Chen, G. S., Liu, H. C., Kuo, B. C. Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 6320-6334, 2012.
    [13] Chen, S. M. and Sanguansat, K. Analyzing fuzzy risk based on a new fuzzy ranking method between generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 2163-2171, 2011.
    [14] Chen, S. J. and Hwang, C. L. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Method and Applications, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
    [15] Chen, C.C. and Tang, H.C. Ranking non-normal p-norm trapezoidal fuzzy numbers with integral value. Computers and Mathematics with Application, 56, 2340-2346, 2008.
    [16] Chen, Y. C., Lien, H. P., Tzeng, G. H. Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 926-938, 2010.
    [17] Cheng, C. H. A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 95, 307-317, 1998.
    [18] Chou, S.Y., Dat, L.Q., Yu, V.F. A revised method for ranking fuzzy numbers using maximizing set and minimizing set. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 61, 1342-1348, 2011.
    [19] Chu, T.C. Ranking alternatives via maximizing set and minimizing set based fuzzy MCDM approach. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 27, 153-159, 2004.
    [20] Chu, T. C., Lin, Y. C. An extension to fuzzy MCDM. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 57, 445-454, 2009.
    [21] Chu, T. C. and Tsao, C. T. Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point. Computers and Mathematics with Application, 43, 111-117, 2002.
    [22] Chu, T.C., Varma, R. Evaluating suppliers via a multiple levels multiple criteria decision making method under fuzzy environment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 62, 653-660, 2012.
    [23] Connell, J. Medical tourism: Sea, sun, sand and … surgery. Tourism Management, 27, 1093-1100, 2006.
    [24] Connell, J. Contemporary medical tourism: Conceptualisation, culture and commodification. Tourism Management, 34, 1-13. 2013.
    [25] Crooks, V. A., Turner, L., Snyder, J., Johnston, R., Kingsbury, P. Promoting medical tourism to India: Messages, images, and the marketing of international patient travel. Social Science and Medicine, 72, 726-732, 2011.
    [26] Dat, L. Q., Vincent, F. Y., Chou, S. Y. An improved ranking method for fuzzy numbers based on the centroid-index. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 14, 413-419, 2012.
    [27] Deery, M., Jago, L., Fredline, L. Rethinking social impacts of tourism research: A new research agenda. Tourism Management, 33, 64-73, 2012.
    [28] Deep, K., Kansal, M.L., Singh, K.P. Ranking of alternatives in fuzzy environment using integral value. Journal of Mathematics, Statistics and Allied Fields 1, 1-13, 2007.
    [29] Dubois, D., and Prade, H. Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9, 613-626, 1978.
    [30] Dubois, D. and Prade, H. Ranking fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory. Information Sciences, 30, 183-224, 1983.
    [31] Ezzati, R., Allahviranloo, T., Khezerloo, S., Khezerloo, M. An approach for ranking of fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 690-695, 2012.
    [32] Garcia, M.S., Lamata, M.T. A modification of the index of Liou and Wang for ranking fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based System, 14, 411-424, 2007.
    [33] Goetsche, R., Voxman, W. Elementary calculas. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18, 31-43, 1986.
    [34] Hadi-Vencheh, A., Mokhtarian, M. N. A new fuzzy MCDM approach based on centroid of fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 5226-5230, 2011.
    [35] Heung, V. C. S., Kucukusta, D., Song, H. Medical tourism development in Hong Kong: An assessment of the barriers. Tourism Management, 32, 995-1005, 2011.
    [36] Hung, Y. H., Chou, S. C. T., Tzeng, G. H. Knowledge management adoption and assessment for SMEs by a novel MCDM approach. Decision Support Systems, 51, 270-291, 2011.
    [37] Jain, R. Decision-making in the presence of fuzzy variables. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cynernetics, 6, 698-703, 1976.
    [38] Kao, C., Liu, S.T. A mathematical programming approach to fuzzy efficiency ranking. International Journal of Production and Economics, 86, 145-154, 2003.
    [39] Kaufmann, A. and Gupta, M. M. Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Application. VanNostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991.
    [40] Kim, K., Park, K. S. Ranking fuzzy numbers with index of optimism. Fuzzy Set and Systems, 35, 143-150, 1990.
    [41] Kumar, D. N. Ranking multi-criterion river basin planning alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 100, 89-99, 1998.
    [42] Kumar, A., Singh, P., Kaur, A. Ranking of generalized exponential fuzzy numbers using integral value approach. International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and Its Applications, 2, 221-230, 2010.
    [43] Kumar, A., Singh, P., Kaur, P., Kaur, A. A new approach for ranking of L-R type generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Application, 38, 10906-10910, 2011.
    [44] Lenhart, M. 1.6 Million Americans Expected to Head Overseas for Healthcare in 2012, Travel market, 2012. http://www.travelmarketreport.com.
    [45] Liao, T.W. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for material selection. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 15, 1-12, 1996.
    [46] Lee E. S. and Li, R. L. A method for ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 7, 6, 677-685, 1988.
    [47] Liou T.S. and Wang, M.J. Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50, 247-255,1992.
    [48] Liu, S.T. Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach. International Journal of Production Research, 43, 497-513, 2005.
    [49] Ma, M., Friedman, M., Kandel, A. A new fuzzy arithmetic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 108, 83-90, 1999.
    [50] Matarazzo, B. and Munda, G. New approaches for the comparison of L-R fuzzy numbers: A theoretical and operational analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 407-418, 2001.
    [51] Moghimehfar, F. and Nasr-Esfahani, M. H. Decisive factors in medical tourism destination choice: A case study of Isfahan, Iran and fertility treatments. Tourism Management, 32, 1431-1434, 2011.
    [52] Murakami, S., Maeda, H. and Imamura, S. Fuzzy decision analysis on the development of centralized regional energy control system. Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium Marseille, 363-368, 1983.
    [53] Raj, P.A., and Kumar, D.N. Ranking alternatives with fuzzy weights using maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 105, 365-375, 1999.
    [54] Peter, C. R. and Sauer, K. M. A survey of medical tourism service providers. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 5, 117-126, 2011.
    [55] Pollard, K. Medical tourism: Key facts, Treatment Abroad, 2012. www.treatmentabroad.com
    [56] Ramli, N. and Mohamad, D. A comparative analysis of centroid methods in ranking fuzzy numbers. European Journal of Science Research, 28, 3, 492-501, 2009.
    [57] RNCOS, Asian medical tourism analysis (2008-2012). India: RNCOS, 2008.
    [58] Saeidifar, A. Application of weighting functions to the ranking of fuzzy numbers. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 62, 2246-2258, 2011.
    [59] Sayili, M., Akca, H., Duman, T., Esengun, K. Psoriasis treatment via doctor fishes as part of health tourism: A case study of Kangal Fish Spring, Turkey. Tourism Management, 28, 625-629, 2007.
    [60] Shaout, A. and Al-Shammari, M. Fuzzy logic modeling for performance appraisal systems: a framework for empirical evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 14, 323-328, 1998.
    [61] Shieh, B. S. An approach to centroids of fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9, 1, 51-54, 2007.
    [62] Smith, R., Álvarez, M. M., Chanda, R. Medical tourism: A review of the literature and analysis of a role for bi-lateral trade. Health Policy, 103, 276-282, 2011.
    [63] Tsai, C.Y., Lo, C.C., Chang, A.C. Using fuzzy QFD to enhance manufacturing strategic planning. Journal of Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 18, 33-41, 2003.
    [64] Tsao, C.T., Chu, T.C. An improved fuzzy MCDM model based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 45, 185-197, 2002.
    [65] Wang, Y.M. Centroid defuzzification and the maximizing set and minimizing set ranking based on alpha level sets. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 57, 228-236, 2009.
    [66] Wang, Y. J. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on positive and negative extreme solutions. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35, 1994-2004, 2011.
    [67] Wang, X., Kerre, E.E. Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities I. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 375-385, 2001a.
    [68] Wang, X., Kerre, E.E. Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities II, Fuzzy Sets and Systems,118, 387-405, 2001b.
    [69] Wang, Y. J. and Lee, H. S. The revised method of ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid and original points. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 55, 9, 2033-2042, 2008.
    [70] Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. Area ranking of fuzzy numbers based on positive and negative ideal points. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 58, 1769-1779, 2009.
    [71] Wang, Z. X., Li, J., Gao, S. L. The method for ranking fuzzy numbers based on the centroid index and the fuzziness degree. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 2, 1335-1342, 2009.
    [72] Wang, Z. X., Liu, Y. J., Fan, Z. P., Feng, B. Ranking L-R fuzzy number based on deviation degree. Information Sciences, 179, 13, 2070-2077, 2009.
    [73] Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., Xu, D. L, Chin, K. S. On centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 919-926, 2006.
    [74] Wei, C.C., Liang, G.S., Wang, M.J. A comprehensive supply chain management project selection framework under fuzzy environment, International Journal of Project Management. 25, 627-636, 2007.
    [75] Yager, R. R. On a general class of fuzzy connectives, Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 4, 6, 235-242, 1980.
    [76] Yalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., Kahraman, C. Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 350-364, 2012.
    [77] Yao, J., Wu, K. Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition principle and signed distance. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 116, 275-288, 2000.
    [78] Yamashiro, M. The median for a trapezoidal fuzzy number. Microelectronics Reliability, 34, 1509-1511, 1994.
    [79] Yamashiro, M. The median for a L-R fuzzy number. Microelectronics Reliability, 35, 269-271, 1995.
    [80] Yu, J. Y. and Ko, T. G. A cross-cultural study of perceptions of medical tourism among Chinese, Japanese and Korean tourist in Korea. Tourism Management, 33, 80-88, 2012.
    [81] Zadeh, L. A. Fuzzy set. Information and control, 8, 338-353, 1965.
    [82] Zimmermann, H. J. Fuzzy Set Theory And Its Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, 1991.
    [83] Zouggari, A., and Benyoucef, L. Simulation based fuzzy TOPSIS approach for group multi-criteria supplier selection problem. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25, 507-519, 2012.

    QR CODE