本論文對新穎顯示器的影像色彩品質進行研究，更進一步探討視覺評價的結
果。研究分成三個實驗，實驗一為針對壁紙式有機二極體顯示器(簡稱 OWP)與桌
上型曲面量子點顯示器(簡稱 QD LCD)這兩台新穎顯示器進行心理物理評價實驗，
實驗二與實驗三則分別針對顯示器色域及顯示器色彩特性做深入的研究。

實驗一為新式顯示器評價，第一部分先以分光輻射儀量測 OWP 與 QD LCD
顯示器，取得亮度、色域、階調等色彩特性，第二部分則在不同觀察角度、不同
環境照度下評價兩台顯示器得影像品質、功能感受、情緒感受與總體感受。由兩
部份的實驗結果整理發現，雖然兩顯示器色域相近，但因安裝類型、顯示技術、
螢幕形狀不同，造成評價的差異，OWP 的高對比度及極薄的壁紙式螢幕等特點，
使 OWP 的整體評價分數比 QD LCD 高，唯在「穩固度」這項是 QD LCD 分數較
高，在視覺評價中，桌上型看起來還是比壁紙式來的穩固一些。

實驗二為顯示色域最佳化，以國際組織推薦的標準顯示色域做為最佳化色域
的設計參考，並蒐集市場上廣色域顯示器的色域資料，用來判斷現今顯示科技可
行性的依據與色域優化的方向，因此，本研究以 DCI-P3的紅色色度座標為依據，
選擇大於 DCI-P3但小於 Rec.2020色域的藍色與綠色色度座標，做為色域的三原色
色度座標建立了新色域，並以 Pointer 色域 與 SOCS 物體色頻譜資料庫進行色域色
彩再現能力的評估。評估結果顯示優化後所建立的色域表現比 DCI-P3優異，且其
色彩再現能力與 Rec.2020相差不遠，但還是無法完全涵蓋較低明度的 SOCS 物體
色色域，仍有進步的空間。

實驗三為顯示色彩與階調特性最佳化，以可調式顯示器設置了三種色溫，三
種階調，兩種亮度，共18種顯示模式進行人因評價，探討顯示模式對自然影像與
文字圖表的評價影響，結果顯示自然影像的影像品質在色溫、階調與亮度有顯著
影響，文字與圖表的顯著變因則是亮度與色溫。綜合本研究的三個實驗結果，可
做為顯示器色彩特性設置的參考，依需求進行調整及優化。

　　The image quality of novel display is evaluated in this study. There are three experiments: Experiment 1 (Exp-1) analyzed the color characteristics, physical characteristics and perceptual image quality for the OLED wall-paper display (termed OWP) and a curved quantum-dot LCD (termed QD-LCD) which are popular on the market. Experiments 2 (Exp-2) and Experiments 3 (Exp-3) are to study ideal color gamut and preferred color characteristics of the displays respectively.
　　Exp-1 is called “Evaluation of OWP and QD-LCD”. The measurement results of color characteristics showed that the color gamuts of the two displays are similar. In the full screen mode, QD-LCD’s white luminance is 3 times higher than that of the OWP. However, using International Committee for Display Metrology (ICDM) recommended APL-fixed test patterns, both OWP and QD-LCD showed similar Tone Reproduction Curve (TRCs) and luminance levels. OWP's high contrast and extremely thin wall-mounted screens make OWP's overall evaluation score higher than QD-LCD, except for ‘steady’ item. The possible reason is that the desktop setup looks more stable than the wall-mounted type in the visual assessment.
　　Exp-2 named “Display gamut optimization”. The optimized color gamut was established by using DCI-P3 color gamut as reference prototype. The Pointer’s gamut and SOCS database of the object color were used to evaluate the optimized color gamut’s color reproduction capability. The evaluation results show that the optimized color gamut has better performance than the DCI-P3, but slightly worse than the Rec.2020. Although optimized color gamut can cover Pointer’s gamut completely, but still can’t cover SOCS completely.
　　Besides, Exp-3 named “Preference of display color and tone curve”. Eighteen patterns were designed for visual evaluation with three color temperatures, three TRCs and two brightness levels. The results showed that the image quality of natural images has a significant effect on color temperature, TRC and lumiance. The significant causes of text and graphics are lumiance and color temperature.The three experimental results of this thesis can be used as a reference to set the color parameters of the display, and to optimize its visual performance according to requirements.

[1] 胡國瑞、孫沛立、徐道義、陳鴻興、黃日鋒、詹文鑫、羅梅君, 台北市, 顯示色彩工程學: 全華圖書 (2011)
[2]　魏碩廷、陳鴻興、徐明景、李文淵、謝翠如、吳瑞卿、孫沛立, 色彩新論: 從心理設計到科學應用: 五南圖書 (2018)
[3] 　 Finding the Best Gamma From a Data Set. Available: http://www.brucelindbloom.com/, 上網日期:2018-07-23
[4]　P. W. Brazis, Jr. PhD, “Quantum dots and their potential impact on lighting and display applications,” Underwriters Laboratories (2017)
[5]　 H. Chen, J. He, and S. T. Wu, “Recent Advances on Quantum-Dot-Enhanced Liquid Crystal Displays,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. In press (2017)
[6]　B. Geffroy, P. Roy, C. Prat, “Review: Organic light-emitting diode (OLED) technology: materials, devices and display technologies” (2006)
[7]　M. Stokes, M. Anderson, S. Chandrasekar, R. Motta, “A standard default color space for the internet – sRGB” (1996)
[8]　 ITU-R Recommendation RBT.709-6, “Parameter values for the HDTV standards for production and international programme exchange” (2015)
[9]　Adobe Systems Incorporated, “Adobe RGB (1998) Color Image Encoding,” (2005)
[10]　SMPTE EG 432-1:2010 “Digital Source Processing - Color Processing for D-Cinema,” SMPTE (2010)
[11]　SMPTE RP 431-2, “D-Cinema Quality - Reference Projector and Environment” (2011)
[12]　International Color Consortium (ICC) Technical Secretary. Available: http://www.color.org/chardata/rgb/DCIP3.xalter/, 上網日期:2018-07-23
[13]　ITU-R Recommendation BT.2020–1, “Parameter values for ultra-high definition television systems for production and international programme exchange” (2014)
[14]　M. R. Pointer, “The gamut of real surface colours,” Color Research & Application, Vol. 5, pp. 145-155 (1980)
[15]　J. Tajima, et al., “Development and standardization of a spectral characteristics data base for evaluating color reproduction in image input devices,” Proc.SPIE, Vol.3409, pp.42-50 (1998)
[16]　JIS TR X0012:1998, “Standard object colour spectra database for colour　reproduction evaluation (SOCS)” (1998)
[17]　J. Tajima, H. Haneishi, N. Ojima, M. Tsukada, “Representative data selection for standard object colour spectra database (SOCS),” 10th Color Imaging Conference, pp.155-160 (2002)
[18]　ISO/TR 16066-2003, Graphic technology: Standard object colour spectra database for colour reproduction evaluation (SOCS)
[19]　M. Inui, T. Hirokawa, Y. Azuma, J. Tajima, “Color gamut of SOCS and its comparison to Pointer's gamut,” (2014)
[20]　K. Jansen, “The coverage of real surface colors by RGB color spaces and wide gamut displays,” (2014)
[21]　Phil Service, “Pointer’s gamut, MacAdam limits, and wide-gamut displays,” (2016)
[22]　Y. J. Kim, J. Yoo, M. R. Luo, P. Rhodes, V. Cheung, S. Westland, et al., “Image colour-quality modelling for mobile LCDs,” Color and Imaging Conference, pp. 159-164 (2006)
[23]　Y. J. Kim, M. R. Luo, P. Rhodes, V. Cheung, S. Westland, et al., “Image-colour quality modelling under various surround conditions for a 2-inch mobile transmissive LCD,” J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 15, 1–8 (2007)
[24]　Y. J. Kim, M. R. Luo, W. Choe, H. S. Kim, S. O. Park, et al., “Factors affecting the psychophysical image quality evaluation of mobile phone displays: the case of transmissive liquid-crystal displays,” OSA, Vol. 25, No. 9 (2008)
[25]　R. Gong, H. Xu, “Modeling Image Quality attributes based on Image Parameters for Mobile Displays,” ACA (2013)
[26]　Z. Luo, Y. Chen, and S. T. Wu, “Wide color gamut LCD with a quantum dot backlight,” Opt Express, Vol. 21, pp. 26269-84 (2013)
[27]　Z. Luo, Y. Chen, D. Xu, and S. T. Wu, “Is Quantum-Dot LCD Ready for Prime Time,” IPC (2014)
[28]　J. Chen, S. Kan, E. Lee, S. Gensler, J. Hartlove, “Quantum dot enabled high color gamut LCDs,” SPIE OPTO (2015)
[29]　C. W. Hsu, J. Y. Huang, H. S. Chen, P. L. Sun and R. Luo, “Image quality assessment of large UHD LCDs using Quantum dot and RGBW technologies,” SID, Vol. 46, pp.234-237 (2015)　
[30]　S. Okutani, M. Kobayashi, N. Ibaraki, “Quantitative evaluation of display characteristics of AMOLED displays,” SID, Vol. 14, pp.1119-1125 (2006)　
[31]　O. Y. Lee, J. O. Kim, “APL-Aware contrast enhancement for OLED-TV,” ICEIC (2014)　
[32]　J. Y. Huang, H. S. Chen, P. L. Sun, R. Luo, “Image qualities of the curved OLED displays with different picture setting modes, ” IDW (2014)　
[33]　J. B. Phillips and H. Eliasson, Camera Image Quality Benchmarking, Hoboken, NJ, USA:Wiley, pp. 27-61 (2018)
[34]　劉俞志、陳櫻芳、陳君彥，「影像色溫之視覺效應」，光學工程期刊第72期頁58-65 (2000)
[35]　J. A. J. Roufs and A. M. J. Goossens, “The effect of gamma on perceived image quality,” Proc. 1988 mt. Display Conf San Diego, CA JDRC Digest 1988, IEEE, pp. 27-31 (1988)
[36]　唐大崙、徐明景和許國基，「 人眼具有偏好的伽瑪值嗎?」，人因工程學刊,8(1), pp. 1-8 (2006)
[37]　R. W. G. Hunt, THE REPRODUCTION OF COLOUR, 6th ed, Jown Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York (2004)
[38]　S. R. Fernandez and M. D. Fairchild, “Observer Preferences and Cultural Differences in Color Reproduction of Scenic Images,” IS&T/SID 10th Color Imaging Conference, pp. 66-72 (2002)