數位時代中，不僅公眾對著作之使用逐漸轉向數位利用，文化與教育機關也已將其館藏進行數位典藏。但依目前我國著作權法與主管機關解釋，文化與教育機構並無法提供數位典藏品讓公眾利用。而在歐盟2001/29/EC著作權指令第5條第3項第n款規定，已允許文化與教育機構，在機構現場以終端設備提供館藏著作給公眾利用，藉以平衡數位時代下的使用者與權利人的權益。此項權利限制規定也已由多個歐盟會員國轉化為內國法後實施。更有部份會員國將法定寄存的利用同時納入利用範圍，實現數位法定寄存著作提供公眾近用的目標。雖然亦可以合理使用之解釋推動此項利用，但如要落實提升公民學識涵養、資訊能力與學術研究環境之目的，仍需明文立法。
本文從歐盟指令出發，探討歐盟2001/29/EC著作權指令第五條第3項n款，文化與教育機構提供館藏數位利用規定之立法理由與原則，檢視歐盟會員國內國法轉化情形，並比較構成要件與實務作法後，發現歐盟與會員國基於文化與教育機構教育與知識散布功能，允許文化機構提供館藏數位利用，是從培育公民媒體能力、文化素養與優惠學術研究環境的角度出發，以平衡權利人與利用人的利益。由原指令之架構，加上德國館藏從屬性限制，可使得此項權利限制符合三步測試。而丹麥、法國與芬蘭亦利用此項規定，解決法定寄存著作數位利用之問題。本文建議應參酌歐盟會員國的經驗，於著作權法中立法，以歐盟指令之架構，加上德國館藏從屬性限制，也納入法定寄存利用，並擴張允許館外線上利用等利用方式，可在不損害著作權人的正常權益下，解決文化與教育機構數位典藏利用的問題，同時可提升公民資訊素養，塑造學術研究優惠環境與減少數位落差，有助於我國資訊社會之整體發展。

The collections of cultural and educational establishments have been digitized for preservation and accessibility. However, subject to the Taiwan's Copyright Act and the interpretation of the authority in charge, the digital archives can not be made available to the public. By contrast, under the Article 5(3)(n) of EU Directive 2001/29/EC, the publicly accessible culture and educational establishments might communicate the works contained in their collections to the public by terminals on the premises of the establishments. Many Member States of the EU have implemented the exploitation under the Article 5(3)(n) of EU Directive 2001/29/EC.
Hence, this study started out from studying the Article 5(3)(n) of EU Directive 2001/29/EC and its legislative, judiciary in Member States, and found that the goal of this Article is the fair balance of the rights and interests between the right holders and users in new electronic environment. The Member States advance the nationwide media and information literacy and academic research competitiveness through the implementation of the Article. Furthermore, Denmark and Finland converted the Article to resolve the dilemma of digital access to legal deposit.
This study suggests that although this model of digital exploitation can be advanced by the interpretation of fair use in Taiwan's Copyright Act, it needs to legislate to fulfill the goal of enhancing the public’s media and information literacy and academic research environment. The digital exploitation suggested by this study is based on the Article 5(3)(n) of EU Directive 2001/29/EC but with a slight modification : making available online, applying the limitation of available works number and prohibition against digital copy of digital reproduction. Furthermore, the available works shall include the works of legal deposit. Under this exploitation model, the legitimate interests of the right holders would not be unreasonably prejudiced. The dilemma of digital access to collections and legal deposit in culture and educational establishments can be settled and public’ media and information literacy and academic research competitiveness would advance.

中文參考文獻
一、書籍(含書面研究報告)
1.曾淑賢，全國圖書館發展政策及推動策略，國家圖書館，2011年11月
2.漢寶德，我國國立博物館組織定位與經營模式之研究，行政院研究發展考核委員會委託報告，行政院研究發展考核委員會，2011年2月
3.蔡義昌，數位出版與閱覽服務跨業合作模式之研究，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，資策會，2011年6月
二、期刊論文
1.陳昭珍，電子資源的法定寄存政策，國家圖書館館訊，2002年第2期,頁1-7，2002年
2.陳昭珍，電子政府出版品寄存制度之規劃，研考雙月刊，第28卷3期，頁71-87，2004年6月
3.陳曉慧，數位典藏之權利盤點，台灣科技法律與政策論叢，第7卷第2期，頁42-80，2010年12月
4.陳曉慧，黃雯琦，典藏機構設置電子閱覽區向公眾提供館藏著作之研究，政大法學評論，第？期（於本論文發表日（2013年7月），此文已為政大法學評論接受刊登，惟刊登期別尚未確定，故於期別暫以問號(？)記載）
5.簡耀東，淺談我國出版品法定送存制度，全國新書資訊月刊，2001年2月號，頁16-17，2001年
6.薛理桂，我國公共檔案館建置芻議，檔案季刊，第9卷2期，頁68-79，2010年6月
7.薛理桂，吳宇凡，三種文化典藏機構進行跨機構合作館藏發展初探，台灣圖書館管理季刊，第6卷3期，頁66-74，2010年7月
三、網路資料
1.數位典藏國家型科技計畫─計畫網站，載於：http://www.ndap.org.tw/1_intro/sub_content.php
2.數位典藏與數位學習，國家型科技計畫，載於：http://teldap.tw/Introduction/introduction_1.html
德文參考文獻
一、書籍
1.Dreier/Schulze, Urheberrechtsgesetz, 3. Aufl., 2008
2.Johannes Reschke, Die verfassungs- und dreistufentestkonforme Auslegung der Schranken des Urheberrechts – zugleich eine Uberprufung von § 52b UrhG, 2010
3.Wandtke/Bullinger(Hrsg.), Urheberrecht, 3. Aufl., 2009
4.Schricker/Loewenheim(Hrsg.), Urheberrecht, 4.Aufl., 2010
二、期刊論文
1.Anja Steinbeck, Kopieren an elektronischen Leseplatzen in Bibliotheken, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2010, S.2852-2856
2.Christian Berger, Die offentliche Wiedergabe von urheberrechtlichen Werken an elektronischen Leseplatzen in Bibliotheken, Museen und Archiven Urheberrechtliche, verfassungsrechtliche und europarechtliche Aspekte des geplanten § 52b UrhG, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2007, S.754-760
3.Gerald Spindler. Reform des Urheberrechts im „Zweiten Korb”, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2008, S.9-16
4.Helge Langhoff/Pascal Oberndorfer/ Ole Jani. Ein Uberblick uber die Anderungen des Urheberrechts nach der zweiten und dritten Lesung im Bundestag, Zeitschrift fur Urheber- und Medienrecht 2007, S.593-603
5.Helena Schowerling. Anmerkung zu LG Frankfurt am Main, Urteil vom 13. Mai 2009 – 2-06 O172/09. Zeitschrift fur Urheber- und Medienrecht 2009, S.665-667
6.Thomas Hoeren, Der Zweite Korb – Eine Ubersicht zu den geplanten Anderungen im Urheberrechtsgesetz, Multimedia und Recht Zeitschrift fur Informations-, Telekommunikations- und Medienrecht 2007, S.615-620
三、法院判決
1.LG Frankfurt a.M., Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Rechtsprechungs-Report 2009, S.330-332 – Elektronische Leseplatze
2.OLG Frankfurt a.M., Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2010, S.2890-2893– Elektronische Leseplatze
四、網路資料
1.Gesetz uber Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte, Verfugbar unter http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/BJNR012730965.html#BJNR012730965BJNG000101377
2.Pressestelle des Bundesgerichtshofs, Bundesgerichtshof legt EuGH Fragen zur Zulassigkeit elektronischer Leseplatze in Bibliotheken vor. Verfugbar unter http://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de/cgi-bin/rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bgh&Art=pm&Datum=2012&Sort=3&nr=61634&pos=0&anz=154
3.Rahmenvertrag zur Vergutung von Anspruchen nach § 52b UrhG. Verfugbar unter http://www.bibliotheksverband.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DBV/vereinbarungen/2012-01-30_Gesamtvertrag_Bibliothekstantieme_52b.pdf
英文參考文獻
一、書籍(含書面研究報告)
1.Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed.2007)
2.Communication from the Commission - Copyright in the Knowledge Economy, , COM(2009) 532 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0532:FIN:EN:PDF
3.Esa-Pekka Keskitalo, Web Archiving in Finland (2010), Retrieved from http://cdnl.info/2010/Web%20Archiving%20in%20Finland,%20%20E-P%20Keskitalo%20-%20December%202010.pdf
4.Green Paper- Copyright in the Knowledge Economy, COM(2008) 466/3
5.Guidelines for legal deposit legislation (2000), Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/webworld/publications/legaldeposit.rtf
6.Guido Westkamp, Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, university of London, Study on the implementation and effect in member states’laws of directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Part II- The implementation of directive 2001/29/EC in the member states (2007), Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/infosoc-study-annex_en.pdf
7.Ingeborg Verheul, Networking for Digital Preservation: Current Practice in 15 National Libraries (2006), Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-publications-series-119
8.Lazinger, Susan S. Digital preservation and metadata : history, theory, practice . Englewood, Colo. : Libraries Unlimited (2001)
9.Report of the Panel on United States – Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, WT/DS160/R, 33-34 (2000)
二、期刊論文
1.Jonathan Griffiths, Unsticking the centre-piece – the liberation of European copyright law? JIPITEC , Vol. 1, Iss.2, 87-95(2010), Retrieved from http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-1-2-2010
2.Reto M. Hilty, SebastianKrujatz, BenjaminBajon, AlfredFruh, AnnetteKur, JosefDrexl, ChristopheGeiger, NadineKlass, European Commission – Green Paper: Copyright in the Knowledge Economy –Comments by the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2009 (2009), 309-327
三、網路資源
1.European Copyright Code, Retrieved from http://www.copyrightcode.eu/
2.The Consolidated Act on Copyright 2010, Consolidated Act No. 202 of February 27th (丹麥著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=191420
3.Copyright Act, 1992, as last amended on 07.Dec.2011(愛沙尼亞著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=258141
4.Copyright Act (Act No. 404 of July 8, 1961, as amended up to April 30, 2010) (芬蘭著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=208099
5.Act of 6 July 2004 amending the Copyright Act (Wet van 23 september 1912, houdende nieuwe regeling van het Auteursrecht) (荷蘭著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.ivir.nl/legislation/nl/copyrightact1912_unofficial.pdf
6.Act No. LXXVI of 1999 on Copyright (consolidated text as of January 1, 2007) (匈牙利著作權法), Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/39703/12519733393hu_copyright1999_Conso2007_en.pdf/hu_copyright1999_Conso2007_en.pdf
7.Law for the Protection of Copyright and Neighbouring Rights (Law No. 633 of April 22, 1941, as last amended by Legislative Decree No. 68, of April 9, 2003) (義大利著作權法), Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/30289/11419173013it_copyright_2003_en.pdf/it_copyright_2003_en.pdf
8.Copyright Law, as amended of 6 December 2007 (拉托維亞著作權法), Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/39650/12512838073la_copyright2007_en.pdf/la_copyright2007_en.pdf
9.Republic of Lithuania Law on Copyright and Related rights, 18 May 1999 No VIII-1185 Vilnius (As new version of 5 March 2005 – No IX-1355) (Last amended of 13 March 2008 – No X-1454) (立陶宛著作權法), Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/39651/12512889683lt_copyright_1996_2008_en.pdf/lt_copyright_1996_2008_en.pdf
10.Copyright Act, ACT XIII of 2000, as amended by Acts VI of 2001, IX of 2003, IX of 2009 and VIII of 2011(馬爾他著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8881&l=1
11.Act no. 2 of 12 may 1961 Relating to Copyright in Literary, Scientific and Artistic works, etc., with subsequent amendments, latest of 22 december 2006(挪威著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.kopinor.no/en/copyright/copyright-act
12.Copyright and Related Rights Code (Decree-Law 63/85, as amended by Law 16/2008) (葡萄牙著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=199767
13.Act of February 4, 1994, on Copyright and Neighboring Rights, amended by Copyright Law, 28 October 2002 and the Copyright Law (波蘭著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=129378
14.The Intellectual Property Act (西班牙智慧財產權法), Retrieved from http://www.mjusticia.gob.es/cs/Satellite/MJusticia/1292387331898?blobheader=application/pdf&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue1=attachment;+filename=The_Intellectual_Property_Act_(Ley_de_Propiedad_Intelectual).PDF
15.Act No. 618/2003 of 4th December 2003 on Copyright and Rights Related to Copyright, last amendment by 453/2008 Coll (斯洛伐克著作權法), Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=189474