摘 要
資訊科技與網際網路的發展，為學習提供了一個新舞台，數位學習的發展讓企業有了一個可以降低訓練成本的最佳方案。政府有鑑於E-Learning的成長潛力，也提出國家型計畫來輔導數位學習產業的發展，調查報告預估國內數位學習產業的產值2007年將達150億台幣，似乎E-Learning的前景一片欣欣向榮。
然而調查分析也指出國內企業在導入E-Learning時，面臨到的最大困難是使用者接受度不高，使用者對 E-Learning的學習效果存疑。另一方面，學界對於E-Learning的研究結論至今仍然莫衷一是，有提倡E-Learning比傳統學習接受度高的，也有持中立看法的，更有持反對意見的。本研究認為要提高E-Learning的使用者接受度應該在於重視E-Learning的「Learning」，而不是著重在「E」，因此本研究以學習的觀點，對於影響學習者心理、學習成效的教學設計以及近三年實務界開始風行的Rapid E-Learning開發方式進行探討。本研究以實務界資訊技術訓練做為研究背景，研究當使用E-Learning對成人進行資訊技術訓練時，有哪些因素會提高他的接受度。
學界對於E-Learning使用者接受度的相關研究並不多見，因此本研究使用質化研究方法，作探索性的分析，分析結果再與本研究的文獻資料做綜合比較，找出國內實務界與文獻研究結果不同的現象，提出研究結果。本研究結果發現實務界採用教學設計方式來開發E-Learning平台，對使用者的學習會有正面的幫助，發揮網際網路科技個人化與連結特色的平台功能、混合式的教學與提供實體的服務等都會讓使用者接受度增加，實務界若是有專業的行銷活動，對於E-Learning平台的接受度也會有正面的影響。

ABSTRACT
The development of Internet and information technology not only flattens the world but also acts an important role in learning field. Given that, businesses benefit from the training cost reduction by the implementation of E-Learning. In addition, government recognized the potential of E-Learning platform and included it in National Plan: Challenge 2008 as one of the goals. Adding to that, a national promotion plan has conducted for digital learning development. The estimated value generated by E-Learning business will reach 15 billion in 2007 which implies the success of E-Learning future in Taiwan market.
However, the major difficulty that companies encountered while implementing E-Learning is the low degree of user acceptance. And how much users are able to gain from E-Learning is still a question. It is also arguable about learning outcome of E-Learning in comparison of traditional learning methods from various researches.
It is strongly recommended in this study that to raise user acceptance of E-Learning we need to focus on learning itself such as content and design rather than the technology of delivering it. Therefore, based on learning perspective, this study will look into instructional design which has positive impact on learning outcome as well as the scheme of rapidly developing E-Learning platform in real business cases in the past three years. The possible factors to improve user acceptance in information technology skill training will also be covered as well.
Studies on E-Learning user acceptance are limited. To find out what our user acceptance is, a qualitative analysis will be applied. Given the result, a multiple comparison with existing studies and researches will be carried out for this study conclusion which demonstrates the difference between real business cases and the existing studies and researches. It will also be seen that developing E-Learning platform under instructional design helps generate users’ interests as well as meet general expectation on personalized internet information technology. With the method of blending-learning, substantial support together with effective of professional promotion work, to accelerate the use of E-Learning and raise user acceptance are feasible.

英文部分
1. Adams, G.L., “Why Interactive?” Multimedia & Videodisc Monitor, pp.10, 20 (1992).
2. Alavi, M., “Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation.” MIS Quarterly 18, No. 2, pp. 150-74 (1994).
3. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E., “Research Commentary: Technology-mediated Learning - A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research.” Information Systems Research, Vol.12, No. 1, pp. 1-10(2001).
4. Alliger, G. M. and Janak, E. A.,“Kirkpatrick’s Level of Training Criteria：Thirty Years Later,” Personnel Psychology, pp.331-342(1989).
5. Bandura, A., “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychological Review, 84(2), pp.191-215(1977).
6. Big Dog’s ISD Page, Available: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/sat.html
7. Cahoon, B. “Adult Learning and the Internet: Themes and Things To Come,” Material from Adult Learning and the Internet, Available: http://www.georgiacenter.uga.edu/idl/internet/things.html (1998).
8. Brown, B. M., “Digital Classrooms; Some Myths About Developing New Educational Programs Using the Internet,” T H E Journal, Vol. 26, Issue 5, pp.56-65(1998).
9. Brown, J. S.,. Collins, A., and Duguid, P., “Situated cognition and the culture of learning,” Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42(1988).
10. Bryant, K., Campbell, J., and Kerr, D., “Impact of web based flexible learning on academic performance in information systems,” Journal of Information Systems Education, 141, pp. 41-50 (2003).
11. Reigeluth, C. M. “Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory,” Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates(1999).
12. Chute, A.B., Thompson, M.M. and Hancock, B.W. “The handbook of distance learning.” NY: MeGraw-Hill (1999).
13. Perkins, D. “Smart Schools: Better Thinking and Learning for Every Child.” Free Press, pp.45(1992).
14. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R., “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, 35(8), pp.982-1003 (1989).
15. DeSimone, R.L. and Harris D.M., “Human resource development.” The Dryden Press, HaRcourt Brace College Publishers(1994).
16. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., and Pearson, P. D., “Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction.” Review of Educational Research, 61(2), pp. 239-264(1991).
17. Graves, N. B. and Graves, T. D., “Creating a cooperative environment: An ecological approach.” In R. Salvin., S. Sharan., S. Kagan., R. H., Lazarowitz., C. Webb & R. Schmuck(Eds.), “Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn,” (pp.409-436). New York: Plenum(1985).
18. Hall, B., “E-Learning across the Enterprise.” E-Learning, pp. 27-34 (2000).
19. Hareton K.N. Leung., “Evaluation the Effectiveness of E-Learning”, Computer Science Education, Vol. 13, No 2. pp. 123-136(2003).
20. Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T., “Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.).” Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon (1994).
21. Bersin, J. “The Four Types of E-Learning: When should you use PowerPoint or Rapid E-Learning Tools?” Available: http://www.bersin.com/tips_techniques/Breeze2.asp (2003).
22. Keefe, J, W., “Profiling and Utilizing Learning Style,” Reston, Va: NASSP(1988).
23. Kirkpatrick, D. L., “Evaluating Training Program,” Wis：American Society For Training and Development, Madison (1975).
24. Leidner, D. E., and Jarvenpaa, S. L., “The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp.265-92(1995).
25. Rosenberg, M. J., “E-Learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age,” McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc (2001).
26. Mannaz, M., “An expert teacher’s thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles: An Ethnographic study.” Educational Technology Research and Development , 46(2), pp.37-64 (1999).
27. Marki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M. and Whittaker, P. D., “Evaluation of a Web-based Introductory Psychology Course: I. Learning and Satisfaction in On-line Versus Lecture Courses,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, Vol.32, No.2, pp.230-239(2000).
28. Martocchio, J. J., and Webster, J., “Effect of Feedback and Cognitive Playfulness on Performance in Microcomputer Software Training,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 45, pp.553-78(1992).
29. Mayer, R. E., “Educational psychology: a cognitive approach.” Boston: Little, Brown and company(1987).
30. McKeachie, W. J., “The need for study strategy training.” In C: E. Weinstein, & E. T. Goetz (Eds.). Learning and study strategies. New York: Academic Press, pp. 7-8(1988).
31. Miller, B., “Comparison of Large-Class Instruction Versus Online Instruction: Age does make a difference.” TCC 2000 Online Conference, Kapiolani Community College University of Hawaii Honolulu. Retrieved 2/25/2004, from http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcon2k/paper/paper_millerb.html (2000).
32. Mohan, M. and Hull, R. E., “Individualized instruction and tearning.” Chicago, Hlinois: Nelson-Hall Company(1974).
33. Pamphlet, “United States Department of Defense Training Document.” pp. 350-30 (1975).
34. Perelman, L. J., “Kanban to Kanbrain,” Forbes ASAP, pp.84-95(1994).
35. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., and Lves, B., “Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training,” MIS Quarterly, 25 4, pp. 401-425 (2001).
36. Ponzurick, T. G., France, R. F., and Logar, C. M., “Delivering graduate marketing education: An analysis of face-to-face versus distance education,” Journal of Marketing Education, 22 3, pp.180-187 (2000).
37. Ryan, S., "Is Online Learning Right for You?" American Agent & Broker, 73:6, pp. 54-58(2001).
38. Schutte, J.G., “Virtual Teaching in Higher Education: The New Intellectual Superhighway or Just Another Traffic Jam,” California State Univerity, CA, Available: http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm(1997).
39. Urdan, T. C., “Achievement goal theory: past results, future directions” in M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich(Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, JAI Press Inc.: CT, Greenwich (1997).
40. Ward, J. and G. LaBranche., "Blended Learning: The Convergence of E-Learning and Meetings," Franchising World, 35:4, pp. 22-23(2003).
中文部分
41. 朱彩馨，「以科技中介架構探討線上學習成效之詮釋研究」，國立中山大學資訊管理學系，博士論文，民國九十一年。
42. 朱湘吉，教學科技的發展：理論與方法，台北：五南圖書出版社，民國八十三年。
43. 吳美美，「數位學習現況與未來發展」，圖書館學與資訊科學，第92-106頁，民國九十三年。
44. 林建平，學習輔導—理論與實務，台北：五南圖書出版社，民國八十七年。
45. 洪榮昭，「E-Learning 的發展與運用」，臺灣教育，第2-10頁，民國九十四年二月。
46. 財團法人資訊工業策進會，「數位學習產值調查報告」，經濟部工業局九十五年度專案計畫，數位學習產業推動與發展計畫，學習產業輔導分項計畫，民國九十五年十一月三十日。
47. 莊菁怡，「電子化學習環境中學習策略對學習滿意度之影響」，國立中正大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文，民國九十四年。
48. 莫慕貞，鄭燕祥，「網絡化環境下的自我學習」，教育研究月刊，民國九十五年五月。
49. 程之碩，「從體驗經濟之觀點探討線上氛圍與互動性設計對體驗元素與學習滿意度影響之研究─以線上學習為例」，輔仁大學管理學研究所，在職專班碩士論文，民國九十四年。
50. 楊玉麟，「數位學習教學策略在學習成效上之研究」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文，民國九十五年。
51. 鄒景平，「訓練關鍵時刻是第三階段」，數位學習產業推動與發展計畫，民國九十四年二月。
52. 翟永麗，「成人教育師資培訓方案成效評估－以家庭教育講師團為例」，國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所，碩士論文，民國九十三年七月。
53. 劉建宏，「網際虛擬學習環境中學習效果之研究」，國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理系，碩士論文，民國九十三年。
54. 樂為良譯，Bill Gates著，數位神經系統－與思想等快的明日世界，台北：商周出版社，民國八十八年。
55. 樂為良譯，Marc J. Rosenberg著，提昇個人競爭力、強化企業優勢的終極學習策略，台北：美商麥格爾.希爾國際股份有限公司台灣分公司出版，民國九十一年。
56. 蔡敦浩、藍紫堂，「C9新興產業發展的複雜調適系統觀點-以台灣E-Learning產業為例」，管理學報，21卷，6期，第715-732頁，民國九十三年五月。
57. 賴佳賢，「營造學習者為中心的合作學習環境」，視聽教育雙月刊，台北，第41卷，第1期，第20-29頁，民國八十八年。
58. 戴淑媛，「中高齡者職業訓練成效評估之研究」，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所，碩士論文，民國九十年六月。
59. 顏榮泉，「全球資訊網在教學與學習上之應用探討」，教學科技與媒體，第25期，第33-41頁，民國八十五年。