簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾崇倫
Chung-Lun Tseng
論文名稱: 遞迴調整控制參數來達成比例式延遲差別
Achievement of Proportional Delay Differentiation with Iteratively Adjusting Control Parameters
指導教授: 賴源正
Yuan-Cheng Lai
口試委員: 陳正綱
Cheng-Kang Chen
洪政煌
Cheng-Huang Hung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 資訊管理系
Department of Information Management
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 26
中文關鍵詞: 控制參數
外文關鍵詞: Proportional Delay Differentiation
相關次數: 點閱:237下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 比例式延遲差異模型因具有可預測性和可控制性的特性,故引起眾多的討論和研究。針對各式各樣不同的條件限制,許多研究結果已提出來實現此一模型,然而這些研究方法均只能運行於某些特定的系統負載或訊務分佈。對於比例式延遲差異模型其可預測性的特性而言,提供一個確實可行的方案使其在各種環境之下都能達成是非常重要的。在此篇論文中,我們提出了一個演算法稱為可行延遲差異參數演算法(FDDP)來達成此一目標,此演算法的核心想法是藉由讓控制參數永遠保持正值的原則下調整原本不可行的目標延遲差異參數(DDP),使其成為可行。經由模擬結果數據的觀察,FDDP不僅能夠得到一組可行的DDP,同時也是一組相當理想的DDP。為了更進一步提高FDDP的效率,我們分別修改了 Leung’s和Feng’s 式子,從而提出二種新的函數評估式稱為modified Lueng’s operator (ML) 與 modified Feng’s operator (MF)。模擬數據結果證明,相較於Leung’s和Feng’s 式子而言ML和MF確實減少了遞迴次數,這意謂著在效能上後者皆比前者來的理想。


    The proportional delay differentiation model attracts much attention because of its “predictable” and “controllable” characteristics. Many researches have been proposed to yield this model under various conditions. However, they can only work under certain system utilization or traffic load distribution. Providing a proper approach to achieve the proportional delay differentiation model under all circumstances is very important for the predictable characteristic. In this thesis, we propose the feasible delay differentiation parameter algorithm (FDDP) to conquer this problem. The main idea is to adjust the infeasible desired delay differentiation parameters (DDP) to the feasible DDPs by letting the control parameters always be positive. Observed from numerical results, FDDP not only obtains the feasible DDPs, but also quite perfect DDPs. Further, for enhancing the efficiency of FDDP, we also propose two new functional evaluation operators, modified Lueng’s operator (ML) and modified Feng’s operator (MF), which are modified from the Leung’s and the Feng’s operators, respectively. Numerical results demonstrate that, compared with Lueng’s and Feng’s operators, ML and MF actually reduce the number of iterations, implying the latter is more efficient than the former.

    摘要 I Abstract II Table of Contents III List of Figures IV List of Tables V Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Background 4 2.1 WTP Scheduler 4 2.2 Leung’s Algorithm 4 2.3 Feng’s Algorithm 7 Chapter 3. Feasible DDP Algorithm 8 3.1 FDDP Algorithm 8 3.2 Deduction of for different 13 3.2.1 ML Algorithm 13 3.2.2 MF Algorithm 14 3.3 An illustrative Example 14 Chapter 4. Experimental Results 16 4.1 Optimal Feasible DDPs 16 4.2 Numerical Parameters 16 4.3 Efficiency 18 Case I 18 Case II 19 Case III 19 Case IV 20 4.3 Accuracy 20 Case I 21 Case II 22 Case III 22 Case IV 23 Chapter 5. Conclusions 24 References 25

    [1] R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker, Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: an Overview. IETF RFC 1633, (1994).
    [2] S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, W. Weiss, An Architecture for Differentiated Services, IETF RFC 2475, (1998).
    [3] K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, D. L. Black, Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers, IETF RFC 2474, (1998).
    [4] C. Dovrolis, D. Stiliadis, P. Ramanathan, Proportional Differentiated Services: Delay Differentiation and Packet Scheduling, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29 (4) (1999) 109-120.
    [5] C. Dovrolis, D. Stiliadis, and P. Ramanathan, Proportional Differentiated Services: Delay Differentiation and Packet Scheduling, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 10 (1) (2002) 12-26.
    [6] M. K. H, Leung, J. C. S. Lui, D. K. Y. Yau, Adaptive Proportional Delay Differentiated Services: Characterization and Performance Evaluation, IEEE/ ACM Transactions on Networking, 9 (6) (2001) 801-817.
    [7] C. Feng, P. Fan, Y. Wang, N. Ge, An Efficient Approach for The Selection of Priority Control Parameters in, Adaptive Proportional Delay Differentiated Services, Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003. 14th IEEE Proceedings, 1 (2003) 99- 104
    [8] Y. Moret, S. Fdida, A Proportional Queue Control Mechanism to Provide Differentiated Services, Symp. ISCIS, Ankara, Turkey, (1998) 17-24.
    [9] C. C. Li, S. L. Tsao, M. C. Chen, Y. Sun, Y. M. Huang, Proportional Delay Differentiation Service Based on Weight Fair Queeing, Conf. IEEE ICCCN, Las Vegas, USA, (2000) 418-423.
    [10] H. Saito, C. Lukovszki, I. Moldovan, Local Optimal Proportional Differentiation Scheduler for Relative Differentiated Services, Proc. IEEE ICCCN, (2000) 544-550.
    [11] T. Nandagopal, N. Venkitaraman, R. Sivakumar, V. Bharghavan, Delay Differentiation and Adaptation in Core Stateless Networks, IEEE INFOCOM, Urbana, USA, (2000) 421-430.
    [12] H. Ngin, C, Tham, Achieving Proportional Delay Differentiation Efficiently, Proc. IEEE International Conference on Networks, Singapore, (2002) 27-30.
    [13] Y. C. Lai, W. H. Li, A Novel Scheduler for the Proportional Differentiation Model by Considering Packet Transmission Time, ICOIN (1), 2343 (2002) 527-538.
    [14] Y. C. Lai, Packet Schedulers to Provide Proportional Delay Differentiation and Reduce Packet Queueing Delay Simultaneously, IEEE, (2004) 1968-1972.
    [15] J. Wei, Q. Li, C. Z. Xu, VirtualLength, A New Packet Scheduling Algorithm for Proportional Delay Differentiation, Proc. of ICCCN, Dallas, TX, (2003) 3311-336.
    [16] J. Wei, C. Z. Xu, X. Zbou, A Robust Packet Scheduling Algorithm for Proportional Delay Differentiation Services, Proc. of GLOBECOM, Dallas, TX, (2004) 697-701.
    [17] L. Kleinrock, Queueing Systems, Volume 2: Computer Applications. Wiley- Interscience, (1976).

    QR CODE