簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 傅仰龍
Charles - Arista Poegoeh
論文名稱: Reduction Factors of Seismic Capacity for Earthquake-Damaged Reinforced Concrete Columns
Reduction Factors of Seismic Capacity for Earthquake-Damaged Reinforced Concrete Columns
指導教授: 邱建國
Chien-Kuo Chiu
口試委員: 廖國偉
Guo-Wei Liao
張惠雲
Hui-Yun Chang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 107
中文關鍵詞: RC ColumnFailure mechanismDamage evaluationResidual seismic capacityReduction factors of seismic capacityResidual crack width.
外文關鍵詞: RC Column, Failure mechanism, Damage evaluation, Residual seismic capacity, Reduction factors of seismic capacity, Residual crack width.
相關次數: 點閱:309下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • After an earthquake, the major concerns to damaged buildings are their safety to aftershocks, quantitative damage assessment to evaluate their residual seismic capacity, and as soon as possible define necessary action on the damaged buildings. Therefore, this research tries to define the reduction factors of seismic capacity for earthquake-damaged RC columns based on the description of damage state in the Damage Evaluation Guideline (JBDPA 2001). For this purpose, several experimental data of columns with various failure mechanisms are used to observe the damage state, to define the limitation of each damage state, and to measure the reduction factors for RC columns. In this study, the seismic capacity reduction factor representing residual seismic capacity is defined as the ratio of residual energy dissipation capacity to the total energy dissipation capacity. Afterward, the relationships between reduction factors and three other factors including damage class, maximum residual crack widths, and drift ratio of residual displacement were obtained from analyses will be compared with the Japanese guideline. Analytical results from experimental data show that reduction factor from guideline generally give conservative value, although some of results are lower than values in guideline. Therefore, this research suggests the new reduction factors of seismic capacity for reinforced concrete columns with various failure mechanisms. Moreover, the validations of reduction factors through calibration with nonlinear dynamic analyses of a SDOF system represent that value of reduction factors are suggested more conservative.


    After an earthquake, the major concerns to damaged buildings are their safety to aftershocks, quantitative damage assessment to evaluate their residual seismic capacity, and as soon as possible define necessary action on the damaged buildings. Therefore, this research tries to define the reduction factors of seismic capacity for earthquake-damaged RC columns based on the description of damage state in the Damage Evaluation Guideline (JBDPA 2001). For this purpose, several experimental data of columns with various failure mechanisms are used to observe the damage state, to define the limitation of each damage state, and to measure the reduction factors for RC columns. In this study, the seismic capacity reduction factor representing residual seismic capacity is defined as the ratio of residual energy dissipation capacity to the total energy dissipation capacity. Afterward, the relationships between reduction factors and three other factors including damage class, maximum residual crack widths, and drift ratio of residual displacement were obtained from analyses will be compared with the Japanese guideline. Analytical results from experimental data show that reduction factor from guideline generally give conservative value, although some of results are lower than values in guideline. Therefore, this research suggests the new reduction factors of seismic capacity for reinforced concrete columns with various failure mechanisms. Moreover, the validations of reduction factors through calibration with nonlinear dynamic analyses of a SDOF system represent that value of reduction factors are suggested more conservative.

    ABSTRACT i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii TABLE OF CONTENTS iii LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES viii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Background and Research Motivation 1 1.2. Objectives and Scopes 3 1.3. Outline 3 2. LITERATURES REVIEW 5 2.1. Previous Research 5 2.2. Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation and Rehabilitation (JBDPA 2001) 5 2.2.1. Residual Seismic Capacity Ratio Index R 6 2.2.2. Damage Classification of Structural Members 6 2.2.3. Relationship between Lateral Force–Deflection Curve and Damage Class 8 2.2.4. Seismic Capacity Reduction Factor 9 2.2.5. Estimation of Lateral Strength and Ductility 11 2.3. Basic Concept to Evaluate Residual Seismic Capacity 13 2.4. Relation of Residual Crack Width and Residual Deformation 14 2.4.1. Residual Flexural Deformation of RC Column 14 2.4.2. Residual Shear Deformation of RC Column 15 2.4.3. Total Residual Deformation of RC Column 15 2.5. Estimation of Residual Deformation by Experimental Result 16 2.6. Calibration of R index with Seismic Response of SDF Systems 19 2.6.1. Residual Seismic Capacity Ratio Based on Seismic Response 19 2.6.2. Hysteresis Model of RC Column for Earthquake Response Analysis 20 2.6.3. Method of Analyses to Define Residual Seismic Capacity Ratio 22 3. DATA RESOURCES AND TEST RESULTS OF RC COLUMNS 23 3.1. Column Properties 23 3.2. Time History Acceleration of Earthquakes 33 3.3. Testing Results from Experimental Study 35 4. ANALYTICAL STUDY TO CALCULATE REDUCTION FACTOR 40 4.1. Lateral Force-Displacement Curve 40 4.2. Residual Displacement and Maximum Residual Crack Widths of Earthquake- Damaged RC Columns 41 4.3. Damage Level Classification of Columns 43 4.4. Reduction Factors of Seismic Capacity for Earthquake-Damaged RC Columns 43 4.5. Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of a SDOF System for RC Columns 44 4.5.1. Time History Acceleration of Earthquakes 45 4.5.2. Hysteresis Model of RC Columns for Earthquake Response Analysis 46 4.5.3. Moment-Curvature Analysis to Define Ultimate Deformation 48 4.5.4. Method to Define Reduction Factors of Seismic Capacity from Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis 57 4.6. Step-by-Step Procedure of Method 60 5. ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 61 5.1. Flexural-Controlled RC Columns 61 5.2. Flexural-Shear-Controlled Columns 75 5.3. Shear-Controlled Columns 89 5.4. Suggested Value of Reduction Factors for RC Columns 99 5.5. Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Results for Flexural-Controlled RC Columns 99 6. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 102 6.1. Conclusions 102 6.2. Suggestions 103 REFERENCE 104 APPENDIX 106

    Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ). (2004). Guidelines for Performance Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings (Draft).(in Japanese)
    Chiu, C. K., Jean, W. Y., & Chuang, Y. T. (2012). Optimal Design Base Shear Forces for Reinforced Concrete Buildings Considering Seismic Reliability and Life-cycle Costs. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers.
    Choi, H., Nakano, Y., & Takahashi, N. (2006). Residual Seismic Capacity of RC Frames with Unreinforced Block Wall Based on Their Crack Widths. Bulletin of ERS, No.39.
    Datta, D., & Siddhartha, G. (2008). Estimating Park-Ang Damage Index Using Equivalent System. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (p. 2). Beijing.
    JBDPA (The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association). (2001a). Guideline for Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation and Rehabilitation of RC Buildings. (in Japanese)
    JBDPA (The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association). (2001b). Standard for Seismic Evaluation of Existing RC Buildings. (in Japanese)
    Kang, D., Maeda, M., & Yi, W.-H. (2004). Post-Earthquake Capacity Evaluation Of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Based On Seismic Response Analysis. The 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver.
    Kurniawan, D. P. (2011). Shear Behavior of Concrete Columns with High Strength Steel and Concrete under Low Axial Load. Taipei.
    Maeda, M., & Bunno, M. (2001). Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation for RC Buildings Based on Residual Seismic Capacity in Structural Members. The Third US-Japan Workshop on Performance Based Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, (pp. 157-169). Seattle.
    Maeda, M., & Kang, D. E. (2009). Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol.7, No.3, 327-335.
    Maeda, M., Kang, D.-e., & Nakano, Y. (2003). Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment for R/C Buildings. The fifth U.S- Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, pp. 195-207.
    Maeda, M., Nakano, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2004). Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation for R/C Buildings Based on Residual Seismic Capacity. The 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver.
    Mander, J., Priestley, M., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1807.
    Mander, J., Priestley, M., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering.
    Nakano, Y., Maeda, M., Kuramoto, H., & Murakami, M. (2004). Guideline for Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation and Rehabilitation of RC Buildings in Japan. The 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver.
    Razvi, S., & aatcioglu, M. (1999). Confinement Model for High-Strength Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering.
    Razvi, S., & Saatcioglu, M. (1999). Confinement Model for High-Strength Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering , 281.
    Shunsuke Otani: Hysteresis Models of Reinforced Concrete for Earthquake Response Analysis, Journal (B), The Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Vol. XXXVI, No. 2, 1981, pp. 125 - 159.
    Takeda, T., Mete, A., Sozen, M., & Norby Nielsen, N. (1970). Reinforced Concrete Response to Simulated Earthquakes. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol.96, No.12, 2557-2573.
    Ou, Y-C. (2012). Seismic Resistant Design. Lecture note. Construction Engineering. National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.

    QR CODE