研究生: |
朱麗蓉 Li-jung Chu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
「發言規則」應用於網路支援合作學習之研究:以國中輔導課程為例 The Application of Discussion Rules to the study of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: An Example of Junior High School Integrative Activities Curriculum |
指導教授: |
陳秀玲
Shirley Chen |
口試委員: |
蔡孟蓉
Meng-Jung Tsai 黃國禎 Gwo-Jen Hwang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 146 |
中文關鍵詞: | 網路支援合作學習(CSCL) 、合作策略 、MSCL |
外文關鍵詞: | CSCL (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning), collaborative strategies, MSCL(Multiple Strategy Collaborative Learning) |
相關次數: | 點閱:949 下載:4 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究整合「網路支援合作學習(CSCL)」與「合作策略」之原則,建置三種「發言規則」之「MSCL(Miltiple Strategy Collaborative Learning)」線上討論環境,實地應用於國中輔導課程的小組討論中。本研究立意取樣北縣某國中六個七年級班級,以準實驗研究方式探討「自由發言」、「發言點數」與「輪流發言」討論機制,對學習者「討論參與度」、「合作學習成果」與「滿意度自評」之影響。
經實驗驗證可知,「自由發言組」的學習者,其各次討論裡的「發言句數」顯著高於其他兩種討論機制;而「輪流發言」、「發言點數」機制下的明確發言規則,雖侷限了成員的發言次數,卻可增進學習者討論過程裡的「平均發言字數」。發言規則設置與否雖對成員的合作學習成果無顯著影響;然學習者在有具體發言額度和討論秩序的環境中,對自己和所屬團體表現均給予較高的滿意評價。此外,具體討論機制可增進「高、低網路溝通效能者」的討論參與度和自我滿意度;「女學習者」在明確發言額度與結構化討論秩序的輔助下,其在討論對話記錄裡的「平均發言字數」高於男學習者;「輪流發言」機制裡的女學習者,由於具體發言規則的導引,於團體討論過程裡貢獻較詳細豐富的觀點,在以文字描述的個人作業單表現上,獲得評分者的肯定並顯著優於其他男學習者。本研究於討論課程結束後,利用線上問卷收集使用心得與感受,所得建議可做為MSCL教學應用與系統修正之參考。
This study attempted to enhance the effectiveness of computer-supported collaborative learning by MSCL (Multiple Strategy Collaborative Learning) system, a semi-structured communication interface. The MSCL system contained three synchronous discussion patterns: ”Free-talk”, “Time-token”, and “Take-turn”. The study employed a quasi-experimental method to investigate whether well-defined discussion patterns could promote constructive participation, peer cooperation, and group satisfaction. Six classes of seventh-grade junior high school in Taipei County were selected as the participants for this study. The total number of participants was 201, including 104 males and 97 females.
Multiple dimensional approaches were utilized to analyze interactions and effectiveness of collaborative learning, including t-test, one-way ANOVA, repeated design one-way ANOVA, and content analysis. The results of the study showed that free collaboration didn’t systematically achieve productive learning. Students in “take-turn” discussion pattern contributed more information content than “Free-talk”. Female and novice learners benefitted more in the concrete communication order environment.
Based on the results from this study, some recommendations for the future educational administrations, schools and teachers were suggested. Teachers should respect learners’ individual differences and preferences, and endeavor to design an appropriate CSCL (computer-supported collaborative learning) environment to foster on-line discussion and peer-interaction.
王淳平 (2004)。網路學習中班級互動與群組互動之研究。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
王彥程 (2000)。臺灣企業員工人際溝通能力之衡量及其量表發展之研究。長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南縣。
王國棟 (2005)。促進學習者有效進行網路合作學習之操作策略。國立臺南大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
方俞喬 (2007)。網路合作學習中教師提升學生參與度之研究。國立臺南大學數位學習科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
朱敬先 (1995)。教學心理學。台北:五南。
任萬萍 (2000)。網路合作設計學習策略之研究。國立交通大學資訊科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
李畇龍 (2007)。引導合作學習對國小學童學習LOGO程式設計之影響。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育在職進修碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
李坤崇 (2001)。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。台北:心理。
吳泰毅 (2006)。線上/線下溝通恐懼以及自我揭露話題之比較研究-以即時通訊
為例。世新大學口語傳播學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
林建名 (2002)。網路合作學習成效之探索性研究。南華大學資訊管理研究所碩
士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
林生傳 (2004)。教育心理學。台北:五南。
林清山 (1994)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華。
邱明星 (2006)。認知發展理論在教學應用之探討。網路社會通訊期刊。56。
邱愛鈴 (2006)。綜合活動學習領域課程與教學。台北:高等教育。
邱皓政 (2006)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
柯明月 (2002)。網路合作學習 實施之整體性策略。國立交通大學電資學院學程研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷 (2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究─以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報,52(2),49-71。
梁家玉 (2002)。自我效能對網路合作學習之影響。國立交通大學電資學院學程研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
孫春在、林珊如 (2007)。網路合作學習:數位時代的互動學習環境、教學與評
量。台北:心理。
許智超 (2002)。網路合作學習系統之發展與應用。國立臺南大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
許信德 (2007)。異質分組之合作學習對高職學生技術創造力之影響。國立台灣科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
教育部 (2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北:教育部。
黃政傑、林佩璇 (1996)。合作學習。台北:五南。
黃國禎、朱蕙君、陳佐霖、王姿婷、曾秋蓉、黃國豪 (2007)。線上自律學習輔
助系統之研究與實證。科學教育學刊。15(3)。317-334。
陳三億 (2002)。網路合作學習活動中的小組團體歷程對國小學童之影響。國立臺南大學資訊教育在職進修碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
陳登吉、賴阿福 (2005)。網路與教育。台北:國立空中大學。
郭生玉 (2000)。心理與教育測驗。臺北:精華。
郭金龍 (2002)。探索教育課程對企業員工人際溝通效果之影響研究。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺中縣。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
張新仁 (2003)。學習與教學新趨勢。台北:心理。
廖偉智 (2004)。網路中介模擬環境中學習任務對引導良性合作學習的影響。國立交通大學資訊科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
潘正德 (1999)。團體動力學。台北:心理。
潘慧玲 (2003)。教育研究的取徑:概念與應用。台北:高等教育。
劉孟珊 (2004)。人際溝通能力量表之發展。國立雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,雲林縣。
謝雅慧 (2008)。學習輔助者涉入網路合作學習情境中對學生學習的影響。國立台灣科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
蕭謝芬 (2005)。國小學童使用電腦中界溝通機制進行合作學習之群集樣式。國立臺南大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
顏榮泉、陳明溥 (2006)。知識擷取與社群參與導向的網路專題學習成效與互動探討。師大學報,51(2),67-89。
Andrews, T. & Schwarz, G. (2002). Preparing students for the virtual
organization: an evaluation of learning with virtual learning
technologies. Educational Technology & Society, 5(3), 1-10 .
Arend, R. I. (2007). Learning To Teach.(7th.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., & Ravid, G. (2003). Cohesion and roles: network
analysis of CSCL communities. The 3rd IEEE international conference
on advanced learning technologies.
Barros, B., & Verdejo, M. F. (2000). Analysing student interaction
processes in order to improve collaboration. The DEGREE approach.
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11,
221-241.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). The case for constructivist
classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
Caspi, A., Chajut, E., & Saporta, K.(2008). Participation in class and
in online discussions: gender differences. Computers and Education,
50(3), 718–724.
Chiu, C. H., Huang, C. C., & Chang, W. T. (2000). The evaluation and
influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept
mapping. Computers & Education, 34, 17-25.
Chiu, C. H. (2004). Evaluating system-based strategies for managing
conflict in collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, 20, 124-132.
Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks,
communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community.
Computers & Education, 49, 309-329.
Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: the case of collaborative
learning. Computers & Education, 30(3), 237-247.
Dembo, M. H. (1994). Applying educational psychology(5thed.). Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Dillenbourge, P. (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: cognitive and
computational approaches. (pp. 1-99). Oxford: Elserier.
Grendler, M. E. (2005). Learning and Instruction: theory into practice(5th
ed.). Columbus, Phio: Person Education, Inc.
Gress, C. L. Z., Fior, M., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2008). Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior (2008), dio: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.012.
Gunn, C., McSporran, M., Macleod, H., & French, S. (2003). Dominant or
different? Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 14-30,
Hakkarainen, K., & Palonen, T. (2003). Patterns of female and male
students' participation in peer interaction in computer-supported
learning. Computers & Education, 40, 327-342.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in
asychronous discussion: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers
& Education, 51, 1111-1124.
Hwang, G. J.(2003). A conceptual map model for developing intelligent tutoring systems. Computers & Education, 40, 217-235.
Hwang, G. J., Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C.,& Tseng, J. C. R. (2008). A novel approach for assisting teachers in analyzing student web-searching behaviors. Computers & Education, 51, 926-938.
Johnson, S. D., Suriya, C., Yoon, S. W., Berrett, J. V., & Fleur, J. L.
(2002). Team development and group processes of virtual learning
teams. Computers & Education, 39, 379-393.
Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44, 395-408.
Kao, G. Y.-M., Lin, S. S. J., & Sun, C.-T. (2008). Beyond sharing: engaging
students in cooperative and competitive active learning. Education
Technology & Society, 11(3), 82-96.
Kaplan, S. (2002). Building communities-strategies for collaborative learning. Retrieved in Aug. 29, 2008. from
http://www.astd.org/LC/2002/0802_kaplan.htm.
Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Fidas, C. (2002). Computer-supported
collaborative concept mapping:study of synchronous peerinteraction.
Education and Information Technologies, 7(2), 169-188.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., & Ootes, S.A.W. (2003). Using sentence
openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning
environments. Computers & Education, 41, 291–308.
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and
learner attitudes toward e-learning, Computers & Education, 49(4),
1066-1080.
Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E., & Fuente, P. d-l. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41, 353-368.
Mehlenbacher, B., Miller, C. R., Covington, D., & Larsen, J. (2000).
Active and interactive learning online: a comparison of web-based and
conventional writing Classes. IEEE Transactions on Professional
Communication, 43, 166–184.
Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2008). Face-to-face at the midpoint of an
online collaboration: its impact on the patterns of participation,
interaction, affect and behavior over time. Computers & Education,
50, 1540-1557.
Mortenson, S. T. (2002). Sex, communication values, and cultural values:
individualism-collectivism as a mediator of sex differences in
communication values in two cultures. Communication Reports, 15,
57-70.
Nulden, U. (2001). E-ducation: research and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 363-375.
Orvis, K. L., & Lassiter, A-L. R. (2007). Computer-supported collaborative learning: best practice and principle for instructor. Hershey, PA : Information Science Pub.
Pozzi, F., & Sugliano, A. M. (2006).Using collaborative strategies and
techniques in CSCL environments. Current Developments in Technology- Assisted Education, 703-709.
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
Robert, T. S. (2003). Online collaborative learning: theory and practice. Hershey Pa. : Information Science Pub.
Salovaara, H. (2005). An exploration of students' strategy use in
inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 39-52.
Sherman, L. W. (2001). Cooperative learning and computer-suported
intentional learning experiences. In C. R. Wolfe (2001), Learning and
Teaching on the World Wide Web (pp.113-127). San Diego, Calif. :
Academic Press.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement:
what we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 21, 43-69.
Soller, A., Jermann, P., Muhlenbrock, M., & Martinez, A. (2004). Designing computational models of collaborative learning interaction: introduction to the workshop proceedings. ITS2004 Workshop on computational models of collaborative learning, 5-12.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: six steps to designing computer-supported group- based learning. Computers & Education, 42, 403-424.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2006)。電腦中介傳播:人際互動與網際網路 (Computer mediated communication: social interaction online) (謝光萍、吳怡萱譯)。台北:韋伯文化。(原作2004年)
Virvou, M., Katsionis, G., & Manos, K. (2005). Combining software games
with education: evaluation of its educational effectiveness.
Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 54-65.
Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and
social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning.
Instructional Sciences, 33, 1-30.
Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.
Wolfe, C. R. (2001). Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web. SanDiego, Calif. : Academic Press.
Zafeiriou, G., Nunes, J. M. B., & Ford, N. (2001). Using students'
perceptions of participation in collaborative learning activities in
the design of online learning environments. Education for
Information,19, 83-106.
Zhang, W., & Storck, J.(2001). Peripheral members in online communities.
Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Boston, MA, p.7.
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer-supported collaborative
Learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers.
Computers & Education, 42, 289-314.