近年來電子商務改變了全球消費者的購物習慣，據此引發兩岸電子商務相關專利申請數量大增，各廠商積極布局兩岸市場的獨占性優勢。
初步觀察兩岸專利專責管理機構，對於電子商務相關專利之審查結果有重大差異。電子商務專利通常涉及商業方法和軟體技術，但目前對於電子商務相關研究多以軟體技術可專利性作為題目，尚未有研究以量化分析的角度。
本研究以布局於兩岸之電子商務專利為研究範疇，蒐集兩岸專利資料庫申請於2012年~2019年之專利案件作為分析的依據，取得台灣專利家族共527件、中國大陸專利家族共1092件，本研究以核准率、審查結果、專利範圍及核駁理由等作為分析項目，主要產生的結果如下：
1確認兩岸專利審查機關案件審查結果之差異。
2確認兩岸專利申請人應注意之不予專利之規定。
3依據綜合分析結果給予我國電子商務企業布局兩岸專利之建議。

E-commerce changed worldwide customers' consumption habits in recent years. Accordingly, the number of patent applications related to e-commerce in China and Taiwan has increased greatly, and various manufacturers have actively deployed the exclusive advantages of the Cross-Strait market.

Preliminary observations on the Cross-Strait patent management agencies have significant differences in the examination results of e-commerce related patents. E-commerce patents usually involve business methods and software technology, but for the current research on e-commerce, the patentability of software technology is often the subject, and there is no research to quantify the angle of analysis.

This research takes the e-commerce patents distributed on cross-strait as the research area and collects the database of patents case from 2012 to 2019 as a basis for analysis. Obtained 527 patent families in Taiwan and 1092 patent families in China, taking the approval rate, examination results, claims, and rejection as analysis items, the main results are as follows:

1.Confirm the difference in the results of the case examination by the patent examination authorities in Cross-Straits.
2.Identify the provisions that patent applicants on both sides of the strait should pay attention to not granting patents.
3.According to the results of comprehensive analysis, give suggestions on the layout of patents for e-commerce companies in Cross-Strait.

1.趙守香，徐天宇，劉蓓琳(2008)，電子商務業務處理技術，航空工業出版社，頁1-2。
2.行政院主計總處(2020)，107年電子商務統計結果-新聞稿。
3.牟萍、國家知識產權局人事司(2012)，專利情報檢索與分析，北京市：知識產權出版社，頁80-83。
4.智慧財產局(108/05/15)，107年報專利統計資料。
5.智慧財產局曾耀德(2014)，電子商務專利趨勢分析報告。
6.智慧財產局(2019/05/15)，107年報專利統計。
7.智慧財產局(2018)，我國金融機構專利布局分析與建議報告。