時尚產業的風格潮流更新極快，設計的評選因此成為競爭的重要關鍵。本研究的目的在制定評估時裝設計方案的多準則決策分析模式，並且在模式中考量評估準則之間的相依性及交互作用。本研究提出了兩個複合式多準則決策分析模式。第一個模式結合了決策實驗室分析法（DEMATEL）、分析網路程序法（ANP）以及VIKOR 以分析時裝設計準則集群之間的相互關係、計算權重並找出最接近理想解的的最佳設計。第二個模式則透過鑽石成對比較法（diamond pairwise comparison method ）同時擷取專家對於準則間的相對重要性及交互作用程度的看法，並透過Choquet 積分整合所得之模糊測度以評估並決定最佳設計。本論文提出的方法可以做為時尚設計領域的決策分析的工具，由於它修正過去研究中的一些限制，能夠充分考慮準則集群之間相互的關係、或者清楚擷取專家對於準則間交互作用程度的看法，因此更能夠協助管理者獲取重要的管理意涵。

Various multiple-attribute decision analysis approaches have been developed to choose the best fashion design among alternatives, but none of them consider interdependence among their criteria. The purpose of this study is to develop comprehensive criteria for evaluating fashion design schemes and used integrated models which consider the interrelation between the criteria for evaluating alternative fashion design schemes.

Two hybrid methods were implemented in this study. The first hybrid method integrated the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) that can be used to analyze the interrelations between the major clusters of fashion design evaluation, the analytical network process (ANP) that can calculate the criterion weight that is adjusted based on the influence between different elements in the decision framework, and the Visekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) that determines the best fashion design by ranking a set of designs by using conflicting criteria. The second hybrid model used the diamond pairwise comparison method to elicit the weights and interaction degrees of a set of criteria and the Choquet integral method for aggregating the evaluation to identify the best design based on the fuzzy measure which represents the decision-makers’ preferences and prospects.

The proposed approaches can be used as a decision analysis tool in fashion design and other fields and has various advantages (e.g. considering interrelations between clusters and influences between criteria, and ranking a set of alternatives), and therefore, is appropriate for practical circumstances. By implementing the hybrid method in case examples, the efficacy of the proposed approaches for evaluating fashion designs is demonstrated.

Allahi S, Mobin M, Vafadarnikjoo A, et al. An integrated AHP-GIS-MCLP method to locate bank branches. Paper presented at the 2015 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference (ISERC), Tennessee, 2015: 1104–1114.
Bellman, R. E., and Zadeh L. A. Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment. Management Science 1970: 17(4): B – 141 – B – 164.
Dadashian F, Monfared MAS and Nasrabadi HG. Design of a new quality assessment system for textile products. J Text I 2009; 100 (7): 640-648.
Easey, M. Fashion Marketing. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. 2009
Elahi A and Babamir SM. Evaluating software architectural styles based on quality features through hierarchical analysis and fuzzy integral (FAHP). Paper presented at the meeting of 7th Conference on Information and Knowledge Technology (IKT), Urmia, 2015: 1-6.
Goncu G and Bayazit N. An application of AHP in the selection of fashion trends for specific target groups. Design Principles & Practices 2007; 1 (3): 573-584.
Grabisch, M. A New Algorithm for Identifying Fuzzy Measures and Its Application to Pattern Recognition. International Joint Conference of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and The Second International Fuzzy Engineering Symposium, 1995a: 145–50.
Grabisch M. Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1995; 69 (3): 279-298.
Grabisch M. The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. Eur J Oper Res 1996; 89 (3): 445-456.
Grabisch M and Labreuche C. Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (pp. 563–608). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2004: 563-608.
Haar SJ. Development of assessment rubrics for fashion design projects. Paper presented at the meeting of 61st Annual Meeting of the International Textile and Apparel Association, Portland; 2004.
Hsu, PF, and Kuo MH. Applying the ANP Model for Selecting the Optimal Full-Service Advertising Agency. International Journal of Operations Research 2011; 8(4): 48–58.
Indonesian Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy. Fashion trend forecasting 2015/2016. Jakarta: Indonesian Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy, 2015.
Jones SJ. Fashion design. New York: Watson-Guptill, 2002.
Kidd LK and Workman JE. Assessment of creativity in apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 1999; 17 (1): 58-64.
Labreuche C and Grabisch M. The choquet integral for the aggregation of interval scales in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2003; 137: 11–26.
Lin C. Application of Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to criteria weights for fashion design scheme evaluation. Int J Cloth Sci Tech 2013; 25 (3): 171-183.
Lin C and Twu C. Combination of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for fashion design scheme evaluation. Text Res J 2012a; 82 (10): 1065-1074.
Lin C. Application of Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to criteria weights for fashion design scheme evaluation. Int J Cloth Sci Tech 2013; 25 (3): 171-183.
Lin C. Application of CFPR to fashion design scheme selection. Int J Cloth Sci Tech 2014; 26 (4): 316-329.
Lin C and Twu CH. Fuzzy MCDM for evaluating fashion trend alternatives. Int J Cloth Sci Tech 2012b; 24 (2/3): 141-153.
Lin JJ, Sun PT, Chen JJR, et al. Applying gray model to predicting trend of textile fashion colors. J Text I 2010; 101 (4): 360-368.
Marichal JL. An axiomatic approach of the discrete Sugeno integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria in a qualitative framework. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 2001; 9 (1): 164-172.
Mobin M, Roshani A, Saeedpoor M, et al . Integrating FAHP with COPRAS-G method for supplier selection (case study: An Iranian manufacturing company). Paper presented at the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015 (ASEM 2015), Indiana, 2015: 423–432.
Mobin M and Roshani A. An integrated approach for ranking supplier evaluation criteria (case study a construction project-based company ). Paper presented at the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2016 (ASEM 2016), Alabama, 2016: 1–9.
Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.-H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 2004;Vol. 156 No. 2, pp.445–455.
Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.-H. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research 2007; Vol. 178 No. 2, pp.514–529.
Saaty, TL. Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process. Proceedings of the ISAHP 1999; 1–14.
Saeedpoor M, Vafadarnikjoo A, Mobin M, et al. A servqual model approach integrated with fuzzy AHP and fuzzy topsis methodologies to rank life insurance firms. Paper presented at the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015 (ASEM 2015), Indiana, 2015: 605–614.
Saunders M, Lewis P, and Thornhill A. Research methods for business students. 7th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2016, p. 296-300.
Steele, V. Encyclopedia of Clothing and Fashion. 1st ed. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale, 2005.
Strokes, BM. Clothing Need of Teen Girls With Disabilities. Washington State University, Department of Apparel, Merchandising, Design, and Textiles, 2010.
Takahagi E. A fuzzy measure identification method using diamond pairwise comparisons. Paper presented at the meeting of Joint 3rd International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems and 7th International Symposium on advanced Intelligent Systems, Tokyo, 2006: 1408-1413.
Takahagi E. A fuzzy measure identification method by diamond pairwise comparisons: AHP scales and grabish’ s graphical. Symposium A Quarterly Journal In Modern Foreign Literatures 2007: 316-324.
Takahagi E. A fuzzy measure identification method by diamond pairwise comparisons and øs transformation. Fuzzy Optim Decis Ma 2008; 7 (3): 219-232.
Thomas, ML, Linda GM, and Michael McD. 2009. The thomas shop : A boutique business case study. In Proceedings of the International Academy for Case Studies, New Orleans: Allied Academies International Conference, 35–40.
Tseng ML, Chiang JH, and Lan LW. Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral. Comput Ind Eng 2009; 57 (1): 330-340.
Tzeng GH, Yang YPO, Lin CT, et al. Hierarchical MADM with fuzzy integral for evaluating enterprise intranet web sites. Inform Sciences 2005; 169 (3-4): 409-426.
Tzeng GH and Huang JJ. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Florida: CRC Press, 2011, p.15-29.
Vafadarnikjoo A, Mobin M, Allahi S, et al. A hybrid approach of intuitionistic fuzzy set theory and dematel method to prioritize selection criteria of bank branches locations. Paper presented at the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015 (ASEM 2015), Indiana, 2015.
Vafadarnikjoo A, Mobin M, Salmon C, et al. An integrated gray-fuzzy cause and effect approach to determine the most significant categories of project risks. Paper presented at the 2015 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference (ISERC), Tennessee, 2015.
Wind Y and Saaty TL. Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Manage Sci 1980; 26 (7): 641-658.
Wu JZ and Zhang Q. 2-order additive fuzzy measure identification method based on diamond pairwise comparison and maximum entropy principle. Fuzzy Optim Decis Ma 2010; 9 (4): 435-453.
Wu J, Yang S, Zhang Q, et al. 2-additive capacity identification methods from multicriteria correlation preference information. 2094 IEEE T on Fuzzy Syst 2015; 23 (6): 2094–2106.
Yang, YPO., Shieh HM., and Tzeng GH. A VIKOR Technique Based on DEMATEL and ANP for Information Security Risk Control Assessment. Information Sciences 2013; 232: 482–500.