簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林勝利
Vinsensius Viktor Limas
論文名稱: 以3D有限元素分析驗證開挖與鄰房互致之解耦分析方法
Validation of Decoupled Analysis Method on Excavation and Adjacent Building Interaction using 3D Finite Element Analysis
指導教授: 林宏達
Horn-Da Lin
口試委員: 歐章煜
Chang-Yu Ou
陳正誠
Cheng-Cheng Chen
謝佑明
Yo-Ming Hsieh
林宏達
Horn-Da Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 114
中文關鍵詞: deep excavationsoil-structure interactiondecoupled analysismethod validationexisting building
外文關鍵詞: deep excavation, soil-structure interaction, decoupled analysis, method validation, existing building
相關次數: 點閱:267下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Deep excavations are very common in urban areas to develop underground spaces and the wall deformations and ground movements cannot be avoided. When the excavation is close to adjacent buildings, the excavation-induced displacement may lead to potential damage to the buildings. Thus, 2D and 3D analyses have been extensively used in engineering practice to design and observe the excavation and structural performance. In practice, geotechnical and structural engineers utilize their special software such as PLAXIS, SAP2000, etc. These software features are optimized for their applications. Thus, decoupled analysis concept to “connect” the geotechnical and structural part has been developed by using iterations. The decoupled method developed by Truong (2013) and Mendy (2014) was used in this study. However, the validity of this method to describe all the complex soil-structure interactions has not been fully verified. Therefore, coupled analysis, where the soil and structure are modeled together were used in this study to validate the decoupled method by utilizing a well-known general finite element program called Abaqus. The results show that although there are some deviations between decoupled analysis and coupled analysis result, the deviations are considered small and acceptable. Therefore, the decoupled analysis method is valid to be used in engineering practice and the method might be improved by considering the bending moment and rotational displacement.


    Deep excavations are very common in urban areas to develop underground spaces and the wall deformations and ground movements cannot be avoided. When the excavation is close to adjacent buildings, the excavation-induced displacement may lead to potential damage to the buildings. Thus, 2D and 3D analyses have been extensively used in engineering practice to design and observe the excavation and structural performance. In practice, geotechnical and structural engineers utilize their special software such as PLAXIS, SAP2000, etc. These software features are optimized for their applications. Thus, decoupled analysis concept to “connect” the geotechnical and structural part has been developed by using iterations. The decoupled method developed by Truong (2013) and Mendy (2014) was used in this study. However, the validity of this method to describe all the complex soil-structure interactions has not been fully verified. Therefore, coupled analysis, where the soil and structure are modeled together were used in this study to validate the decoupled method by utilizing a well-known general finite element program called Abaqus. The results show that although there are some deviations between decoupled analysis and coupled analysis result, the deviations are considered small and acceptable. Therefore, the decoupled analysis method is valid to be used in engineering practice and the method might be improved by considering the bending moment and rotational displacement.

    ABSTRACT 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 LIST OF FIGURES 5 LIST OF TABLES 9 LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS 11 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 14 1.1. Background 14 1.2. Objectives 15 1.3. Thesis outline 15 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 17 2.1. Development of decoupled analysis model 17 2.2. Introduction of Mohr-Coulomb model 20 2.3. Deformation-pore pressure coupled analysis concept 21 2.4. Characteristic of wall deformation and ground settlement induced by excavation 22 2.4.1. Wall deformation 22 2.4.2. Ground Movement 24 2.5. Allowable settlement of buildings 26 2.5.1. Allowable settlement under the building weight 26 2.5.2. Excavation-induced allowable settlement 30 CHAPTER 3 EXCAVATION CASE DESCRIPTION AND DETERMINATION OF PARAMETERS 32 3.1. Introduction of TNEC excavation project 32 3.2. Soil condition 33 3.3. Soil investigation results 36 3.3.1. Field test 36 3.3.2. Laboratory test 37 3.4. Stratigraphic profile 40 3.5. Parameters of soils 41 3.5.1. Unit Weight 41 3.5.2. Undrained shear strength 41 3.5.3. Effective friction angle 42 3.5.4. Young’s modulus 43 3.5.5. Poisson’s ratio 44 3.5.6. Summary of soil parameters 45 3.6. Excavation layout 45 3.7. Construction sequence 47 3.8. Parameters of retaining structure 48 3.9. Existing building property 49 CHAPTER 4 EXCAVATION AND BUILDING MODELING IN ABAQUS 51 4.1. Analysis Concept 51 4.1.1. Coupled analysis 51 4.1.2. Decoupled analysis 52 4.2. Simulation procedure 56 4.2.1. Parts 56 4.2.2. Materials 56 4.2.3. Sections & Profiles 57 4.2.4. Mesh 57 4.2.5. Assembly 62 4.2.6. Steps 62 4.2.7. Interactions 68 4.2.8. Loads 74 4.2.9. Boundary conditions 74 4.2.10. Predefined fields 74 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 75 5.1. Verification of the input parameters – greenfield condition 75 5.2. Validation of decoupled analysis method 77 5.2.1. Wall deflection and ground settlement 78 5.2.2. Diaphragm wall performance 83 5.2.3. Building damage assessment 84 5.2.4. Building internal forces 89 5.3. Improvement for the decoupled analysis method 94 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 96 6.1. Conclusions 96 6.2. Recommendations 97 REFERENCES 98 APPENDIX A 101 APPENDIX B 102

    ABAQUS (2014) ABAQUS Documentation, Dassault Systèmes, Providence, RI, USA.

    ACI Committee 318 & American Concrete Institute. (2014). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14): An ACI standard: commentary on building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318R-14), an ACI report.

    Bjerrum, I. (1963). “Allowable Settlement of Structures.” Proceedings of European Conferences on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Weisbaden, Germany, Vol. 2, pp. 35-137

    Budhu, M. (2007). “Soil Mechanics and Foundations.” New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Clough, G. W., & O'Rourke, T. D. (1990). “Construction-induced Movements In-situ Walls, Design, and Performance of Earth Retaining Structure.” ASCE Special Publication, 25, 439-470.

    Dang, H.P., Lin, H.D., Kung, H.S.J., and Wang, C.C. (2011). “Analyses of excavation induced ground settlement with existing building.” Proc., International Conference on Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, Perth, Australia, 737-742.

    Dang, H.P., Lin, H.D., Kung, J.H.S., and Wang, C.C. (2012). “Deformation behavior analyses of braced excavation considering adjacent structure by user-defined soil models.” Journal of GeoEngineering, 7(1), 13-20.

    Dang, H.P. (2014). “Study of Three-dimensional Excavation Behavior and Adjacent Structure Responses Using Advanced Soil Model and Inverse Analysis Technique.” Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.

    Hsieh, P. G., & Ou, C. Y. (1998). “Shape of Ground Surface Settlement Profiles Cause by Excavation.” Can. Geotech, J., 35(6), 1000-1017.

    Hwang, R. N., & Moh, Z. C. (2007). “Deflection Paths and Reference Envelopes for Diaphragm Walls in The Taipei Basin.” Journal of GeoEngineering, 2(1), 1-12.

    Juang, C.H., Schuster, M., Ou, C.Y., and Phoon, K.K. (2011). “Fully-probabilistic framework for evaluating excavation induced damage potential of adjacent buildings.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 137(2), 130-139.

    Kung, G. T.-C. (2003). “Surface Settlement Induced by Excavation with Consideration of Small Strain Behavior of Taipei Silty Clay.” Ph.D. dissertation, National Taiwan Univ. of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan (in Mandarin).

    Kung, G.T.C., Equipment and testing procedures for small strain triaxial tests. Journal of the Chinese
    Institute of Engineers, 30(4):579-591.2007.
    Kung, G.T.C., Equipment and testing procedures for small strain triaxial tests. Journal of the Chinese
    Institute of Engineers, 30(4):579-591.2007.
    Kung, G.T.C., Equipment and testing procedures for small strain triaxial tests. Journal of the Chinese
    Institute of Engineers, 30(4):579-591.2007.
    Kung, G.T.C., Equipment and testing procedures for small strain triaxial tests. Journal of the Chinese
    Institute of Engineers, 30(4):579-591.2007
    Kung, G.T.C., Equipment and testing procedures for small strain triaxial tests. Journal of the Chinese
    Institute of Engineers, 30(4):579-591.2007
    Kung, G.T.C. (2007). “Equipment and Testing Procedures for Small Strain Triaxial Tests.” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 30(4):579-591.

    Kung, G. T.-C., Ou, C.-Y., and Juang, C. H. (2009). “Modelling Small Strain Behavior of Taipei Clays for Finite Element Analysis of Braced Excavations.” Comput. Geotech., 36(1–2), 304–319.

    Lee, S. H. (1996). “Engineering Geological Zonation for the Taipei City.” Sino-Geotechnics, 54 (in Chinese).

    Lim, A., Ou, C. Y., & Hsieh, P. G. (2010). “Evaluation of Clay Constitutive Models for Analysis of Deep Excavation Under Undrained Conditions.” Journal of GeoEngineering, 5(1), 9-20.

    Lin, H.D., Mendy, S., Dang, H.P., Hsieh, Y.M., and Chen, C.C. (2015). “Responses of adjacent ground and building induced by excavation using 3D decoupled simulation.” Proc., 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Kyushu, Japan.

    Lin, H.D., Truong, H.M., Dang, H.P., and Chen, C.C. (2014). “Assessment of 3D excavation and adjacent building’s reponses with consideration of excavation-structure interaction.” Tunneling and Underground Construction, ASCE, GSP 242, 256-265.

    Liu, C. C., Chen, S. H., and Cheng, W. L. (1998). “Undrained Behavior of Taipei Silty Clay Under Simple Shear Condition.” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 627-637 (in Chinese).

    Mana, A. I. and Clough, G. W. (1981). “Prediction of Movements for Braced Cut in Clay.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. 6, pp. 223-241.

    Mendy, S. (2014). “Study of Excavation Behaviour and Adjacent Building Response using 3D Decoupled Analysis.” Master thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.

    Moh, Z. C., Chin, C. T., Liu, C. J., and Woo, S. M. (1989). “Engineering Correlations for Soil Deposits in Taipei.” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 271-283.

    Nicholson, D. P. (1987). “The design and Performance of the Retaining Wall at Newton Station.” Proceeding of Singapore Mass Rapid Transit Conference, Singapore, pp. 147-154.

    Ou, C. Y., Hsieh, P. G., & Chiou, D. C. (1993). “Characteristics of Ground Surface Settlement During Excavation.” Can. Geotech, J., 30, 758-767.

    Ou, C. Y. and Lai, C. H. (1994). “Finite Element Analysis of Deep Excavation in Layered Sandy and Clayey Soil Deposits.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31, 204-214.

    Ou, C. Y., Liao, J. T., and Lin, H. D. (1998). “Performance of Diaphragm Wall Constructed Using Top-down Method.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124, 798-808.

    Ou, C. Y., Liao, J. T., and Cheng, W. L. (2000). “Building Response and Ground Movements Induced by a Deep Excavation.” Geotechnique, 50, 209-220.

    Ou, C. Y. and Hsieh, P. G. (2000). “Prediction of Ground Surface Settlement Induced by Deep Excavation.” Geotechnical Research Report No. GT200008, Department of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.

    Ou, C. Y., Shiau, B. Y., and Wang, I. W. (2000). “Three-dimensional Deformation Behavior of the TNEC Excavation Case History.”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37, 438-448.

    Ou, C. Y., Hsieh, P. G., and Duan, S. M. (2005). “A Simplified Method to Estimate the Ground Surface Settlement Induced by Deep Excavation.”, Geotechnical Research Report No. GT200502, Department of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.

    Ou, C. Y. (2006). “Deep Excavation, Theory and Practice.”

    Potts D, Addenbrooke T. A. (1997). “Structure's Influence on Tunnelling-induced Ground Movements.” Proceedings of the ICE-Geotechnical Engineering, 125(2):109-125.

    Schuster, M., Kung, G.T.C., Juang, C.H., and Hashash, Y.M.A. (2009). “Simplified model for evaluating damage potential of buildings adjacent to a braced excavation.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 135(12), 1823-1835.

    Son M. and Cording E.J. (2005). “Estimation of building damage due to excavation-induced ground movements.” J. Geotechnical & Geoenv. Engrg., Vol 131 (2): 162-177.

    Teng, F. C. (2010). Personal file.

    Teng, F.C., Ou, C. Y. and Hsieh, P. G. (2014). “Measurements and Numerical Simulations of Inherent Stiffness Anisotropy in Soft Taipei Clay.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 140, No. 1, pp.237-250. (SCI).

    Truong, H. M. (2013). “Study of Excavation Behaviour and Adjacent Building Response with 3D Simulation.” Master thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.

    Wahls, H. E. (1981). “Tolerable Settlement of Building.” Journal of the Geotechnical Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. 11, pp. 1489-1504.

    Woo, S. M. and Moh, Z. C. (1991). “Geotechnical Characteristics of Soils in the Taipei Basin.” Proc., 10th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, 2, Taipei, Taiwan, 51−65.

    QR CODE