簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Waraporn Lertsakkongkul
Waraporn - Lertsakkongkul
論文名稱: The Influence of Online Consumer Review on Purchase Intention: A Double Study of Thailand and Taiwan Beauty Blogs
The Influence of Online Consumer Review on Purchase Intention: A Double Study of Thailand and Taiwan Beauty Blogs
指導教授: 林孟彥
Tom M. Y. Lin
口試委員: 蔡瑤昇
Y. S. Tsai
張琬喻
Woan-Yuh Jang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 62
中文關鍵詞: eWOMBlogArgument qualitySource credibilityConsumer purchase intention
外文關鍵詞: eWOM, Blog, Argument quality, Source credibility, Consumer purchase intention
相關次數: 點閱:314下載:26
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

With the prosperous growth of the Internet, online consumer reviews have become the important source of information for consumers who seek to discover the product quality. This easily accessible information could greatly affect the consumer purchase intention. The objective of this study is to investigate the factors that influence the online consumer review credibility and the affect of the latter on consumer purchase intention.
Based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model – ELM, the research model was developed to examine the relationship among argument quality, source credibility, perceived online review credibility and consumer’s purchase intention. The model was tested empirically using two samples of 130 (Thailand) and 120 (Taiwan) respondents who had experience reading beauty blog review.
After various analyses, this research found that argument quality and source credibility have the significant effect on perceived online review credibility and consumer’s purchase intention. In addition, mediator analysis was applied to explain the role of perceived online review credibility in this model. The results drawn from this research will generate insights on people’s use of blog reviews and provide the practitioners with a guideline on the design and management blog reviews to facilitate reader credibility evaluation. The limitation and suggestion for future research are also discussed.


With the prosperous growth of the Internet, online consumer reviews have become the important source of information for consumers who seek to discover the product quality. This easily accessible information could greatly affect the consumer purchase intention. The objective of this study is to investigate the factors that influence the online consumer review credibility and the affect of the latter on consumer purchase intention.
Based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model – ELM, the research model was developed to examine the relationship among argument quality, source credibility, perceived online review credibility and consumer’s purchase intention. The model was tested empirically using two samples of 130 (Thailand) and 120 (Taiwan) respondents who had experience reading beauty blog review.
After various analyses, this research found that argument quality and source credibility have the significant effect on perceived online review credibility and consumer’s purchase intention. In addition, mediator analysis was applied to explain the role of perceived online review credibility in this model. The results drawn from this research will generate insights on people’s use of blog reviews and provide the practitioners with a guideline on the design and management blog reviews to facilitate reader credibility evaluation. The limitation and suggestion for future research are also discussed.

ABSTRACT i TABLE OF CONTENT ii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES v Chapter 1 : INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background and Motive 1 1.2 Research Objective 4 1.3 Research Procedure 5 Chapter 2 : LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.1 Blog Defined 6 2.2 Online Consumer Review 8 2.3 Online Review on Beauty Blogs 9 2.4 Elaboration Likelihood Model - ELM 10 2.5 Argument Quality and Source Credibility 11 2.6 Purchase Intention 12 Chapter 3 : RESEARCH MODEL AND HYPOTHESES 14 3.1 Research Model 14 3.2 Argument Quality 15 3.2.1 Relevence (Hypothesis 1) 15 3.2.2 Timeliness (Hypothesis 2)16 3.2.3 Usefulness (Hypothesis 3)16 3.2.4 Comprehensiveness (Hypothesis 4)16 3.3 Source Credibility 17 3.3.1 Expertise (Hypothesis 5) 17 3.3.2 Trustworthiness (Hypothesis 6) 18 3.3.3 Attractiveness (Hypothesis 7) 18 3.4 Perceived Online Review Credibility and Purchase Intention (Hypothesis 8) 19 Chapter 4 : RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 20 4.1 Questionnaire Design 20 4.2 Scale and Measurement 21 4.3 Data Collection 24 Chapter 5 : DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 25 5.1 Demographic Data 25 5.2 General Attitude toward Blog Review 31 5.3 Reliability Analysis 32 5.4 Correlation Analysis 33 5.5 Regression Analysis 35 5.6 Hypothesis Results 39 Chapter 6 : DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATION 41 6.1 Discussion and Implication 41 6.2 Limitation and Suggestion for Future Research 44 REFERENCES 47 APPENDIX 51 Appendix 1 Formal Questionnaire (Thailand) 51 Appendix 2 Formal Questionnaire (Taiwan) 55 LIST OF TABLES Table 4.2.1 Questions under Argument Quality Construct 21 Table 4.2.2 Questions under Source Credibility Construct 22 Table 4.2.3 Questions evaluated Perceived Online Review Credibility 23 Table 4.2.4 Questions evaluated Consumer’s Purchase Intention 23 Table 5.1.1 Demographic Data (Thailand) 26 Table 5.1.2 Demographic Data (Taiwan) 27 Table 5.1.3 Cosmetic Consumption Behavior (Thailand) 28 Table 5.1.4 Cosmetic Consumption Behavior (Taiwan) 29 Table 5.2 General Attitude toward Blog Review 31 Table 5.3 Variables’ Reliability Analysis (Thailand and Taiwan) 32 Table 5.4.1 Correlation Analysis (Thailand) 33 Table 5.4.2 Correlation Analysis (Taiwan) 34 Table 5.5.1 Model 1: Argument Quality, Blog Review Credibility and Purchase Intention 36 Table 5.5.2 Model 2: Source Credibility, Blog Review Credibility and Purchase Intention 37 Table 5.5.3 Model 1: Argument Quality, Blog Review Credibility and Purchase Intention 38 Table 5.5.4 Model 2: Source Credibility, Blog Review Credibility and Purchase Intention 38 Table 5.6 Hypothesis Result (Thailand and Taiwan) 40 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.2 Research Procedure 3 Figure 3.1 Research Model 12 Figure 5.5.1 Mediation affect diagram 35 Figure 5.5.2 The four step regression analysis for testing mediation effect 36

REFERENCE
Bailey, J.E. and S.W. Pearson (1983), “Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction,” Management Science, 29(5), 530–545.
Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173 –1182.
Bhattacherjee, A. and Sanford C. (2006), “Influence Process for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model,” MIS Quarterly, 30 (4), 805 –825.
Chaiken, S. (1987), “The Heuristic Model of Persuasion” in Social influence: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 5, M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, and C. P. Herman eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 3–39.
Cheung, M., Luo C., Sia C. and Chen H. (2009), “Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9.
Citrin, A.V. (2001), “Information Quality Perceptions: The Role of Communication Media Characteristics,” Information and Learning, 17, 1–143.
Dellarocas, Chrysanthos (2003), “The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms,” Management Science, 49 (10), 1401–1424.
DeLone, W.H. and E.R. McLean (2003), “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-year Update”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19 (4), 9 –30.
Dunk, A.S. (2004), “Product Life Cycle Cost Analysis: The Impact of Customer Profiling, Competitive Advantage, and Quality of IS Information,” Management Accounting Research, 15 (4), 401– 414.
Eisend, M (2006), “Source Credibility Dimensions in Marketing Communication - A Generalized Solution”, Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 10(2).
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gumbrecht, M. (2004), “Blogs as Protected Space,” paper presented at the Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem: Aggregation, Analysis, and Dynamics, New York, NY
Harmon, Amy (2004), “Amazon Glitch Unmasks War of Reviewers,” The New York Times, (February 14), (accessed November 12, 2009)
Henning-Thurau, T. and Walsh G. (2004), “Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Motives for and Consequences of Reading Customer Articulations on the Internet,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8 (2), 51–74.
Herring, S., Scheidt L., Bonus S. and Wright E. (2004), “Bridging the Gap: A Genre Analysis of Weblogs,” paper presented at the 37th Annual HICSS Conference, Big Island, HI.
Hsu, S.C. (1987), English of Management. Tunghua Publishing, Taiwan.
Kaye, B. K. (2005), “It's a Blog, Blog, Blog, Blog world,” Atlantic Journal of Communication, 13(2), 73–95.
Lee, M.K.O., Lim C.K.H. and Sia C.L. (2006), “Understanding Customer Knowledge Sharing in Web-Based Discussion Boards,” Internet Research, 16, 1066–2243.
Liu, Yong (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (July), 74–89.
Madu, C.N. and Madu A.A. (2002), “Dimensions of E-Quality,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,” 19 (13), 246–258.
Marlow, C. (2004), “Audience, Structure and Authority in the Weblog Community,” paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
McKinney, V., Yoon K. and Zahedi F.M. (2002), “The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach,” Information Systems Research, 13 (3), 296–315.
Miura, A. and Yamashita K. (2007), “Psychological and Social Influences on Blog Writing: An Online Survey of Blog Authors in Japan”, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 12, 1452–1471.
Negash, S., Ryan T. and Igbaria M. (2002), “Quality and Effectiveness in Web-Based Customer Support Systems,” Information & Management, 40 (8), 757–768.
Ohanian, Roobina (1990), “Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorser’s Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness and Attractiveness,” Journal of Advertising,” No.19.
Olshavsky, R.W. (1985), “Perceived Quality in Consumer Decision Making: An Integrated Theoretical Perspective,” in Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, Jacoby J. and Olson J.C. eds. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 3–29.
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo J.T. (1984), “The Effects of Involvement on Response to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (1), 69–81.
________________ (1986), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 12 –205.
Philip, Nelson (1970), “Information and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, 78 (2), 311–329.
Ratchford, B.T., Talukdar D. and Lee M.S. (2001), “A Model of Consumer Choice of the Internet as an Information Source,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5 (3), 7–22.
Schiffman, L.G. and Kanuk L.L. (2000), Consumer Behavior 7th ed. Wisconsin: Prentice Hall.
Trammell, K. and Keshelashvili A. (2005), “Examining New Influencers: A Self-Presentation Study of A-List Blogs,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82 (4), 968–982.
Trammell, K. D., Tarkowski A., Hofmokl J., and Sapp (2006), “Republic of Blog: Examining Polish Bloggers through Content Analysis,” Computer-Mediated Communication, 11.
Wathen, C.N. and Burkell J. (2002), “Believe it or Not: Factors Influencing Credibility on the Web,” Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (2), 134–144.
Wixom, B.H. and P.A. Todd (2005), “A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance,” Information System Research, 16(1), 85–102.
Wu, C. and Shaffer D. (1987), “Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experience with the Attitude Object,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 677–688.
Yang, S.U. and Lim J. S. (2009), “The Effects of Blog-Mediated Public Relations (BMPR) on Relational Trust,” Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(3), 34 –359.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52, 2–22.

QR CODE