台灣高濕度環境與人體健康問題密切相關，控制濕度的質量是非常重要環節之一，以達到室內健康舒適的環境。然而，台灣多數人忽略了此問題，因而在室內最潮濕的廁所衛浴空間增生了許多微生物細菌危害人體健康，導致生活在室內環境的人們長期過敏生病。本研究建立BHQ評估系統(Bathroom Healthy Quality)評估室內住宅浴廁空間的健康品質，針對室內浴廁空間的通風環境、衛生排水系統、人為定期維護清潔、衛生設備的維護狀況等影響環境因子作為檢討，並制定評估表給予浴廁空間評分。透過BHQ評估可以針對室內衛浴空間進行評估考核，得知分數後之較低數據的項目進行改善行為，也提供了檢驗廁所環境可靠性的評估系統，使室內環境健康指數提升，有效降低衛浴空間的細菌滋生對於人體的危害。本研究以BHQ評估系統調查30間浴廁空間，建立案例中住宅浴廁環境的現況調查數據及歸納環境問題，並實際採集調查住宅廁所空間，衛浴設備的微生物細菌採集培養檢測，驗證BHQ評估系統的可行性。透過文獻蒐集之黴菌發芽模型圖，實際以儀器蒐集浴廁空間之溫溼度數據，驗證BHQ評估系統所評估之風險等級的可靠性。

The high humidity environment in Taiwan is closely related to human health issues, therefore, humidity level control is an important aspect in the creation of a healthy and comfortable indoor environment. As most people in Taiwan have neglected this issue, it has led to the growth of many bacteria in the bathroom which is the most humid indoor environment. This is hazardous to human health and has caused people who live in this environment to suffer from long-term allergies and illnesses. This study will establish a Bathroom Healthy Quality (BHQ) Evaluation System to assess the healthy quality of the indoor residential bathroom. The review will focus on environmental factors like openings for ventilation of the bathroom, equipment, regular maintenance cleaning, etc. and develop an evaluation form to evaluate the indoor bathroom. Improvement can be carried out for items with low ratings after the evaluation to improve the indoor environmental health index and to minimize the growth of bacteria in the bathroom that is hazardous to human health. This study serves as a basis and a real case review to establish survey data on the current state of the bathroom environment in northern Taiwan. The ventilation environment factor of the BHQ evaluation system is analyzed to predict the future temperature and humidity changes of the bathroom toilet environment.

A.中文文獻
[A-1]內政部建築研究所，中華民國內政部建築研究所，綠建築評估手冊-住宿類，2015。
[A-2]嚴佳茹，高層集合住宅排水通氣系統空氣汙染傳播風險工之研究，國立台灣科技大學建築系環境科技研究所，2009，p39~ p50。
[A-3]曾筱婷，居家衛浴空間問題調查與改善設計之研究，國立臺中科技大學，2018，P15-P54。
[A-4]朱哲萱，室內建築材料黴菌生長模式之研究，國立宜蘭大學土木工程學系研究所碩士倫文。2009。
[A-5]龔紹慈，廁所意味感知系統設計模式之探討，中華科技大學智慧化住宅專題設計，2010。
[A-6]紀碧芳，受黴菌汙染建材上之黴菌種類研究，國立成功大學環境醫學研究所碩士倫文，2003。
[A-7]葉育君、蔡耀賢，以黴菌發芽預測模型評估住宅條師建材之設計策略，臺灣建築學會建築學報第89期，2014。p57- p74。
[A-8]黃秀中，集合式存水彎於預測使用之性能與應用研究，國立臺灣科技大學建築系環境科技研究所，2016。
[A-9]鄭光宏，以通用設計觀點探討沐浴行為與沐浴空間設計，東海大學工業設計學系碩士論文，2007。
[A-10]廖慧萍，「公有閒置空間再利用評估模式之研究」，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所碩士論文，2003。
[A-11]簡志郎，「模糊理論與TOPSIS法於失效模式之研究」，逢甲大學工業工程學所，2003。
[A-12]顏瑞鴻，黃胤喜，鍾仲純，黃郁雯，鍾麗琴，陳金亮。人類手指甲中麴菌種類之初步調查研究。醫護科技學刊，1999，p85- p91。
[A-13]何昆錡，高層建築排水通氣系統設計決策程序與性能評估模式之研究，國立臺灣科技大學建築系環境科技研究所碩士論文，2006。
[A-14]謝錦煌，建築排水橫主管污物搬送距離推估模式之研究，臺灣科技大學建築系環境科技研究所碩士論文，2011。
[A-15]齊祖同，麴黴屬及其相關有性型。載於中國科學研究院編，中國孢子植物誌之中國真菌誌。1997。
[A-16]小野寺勝重，「實踐FMEA手法」，張書文譯，2001。
[A-17]陳聰亨、上圓聯合建築師事務所，「好宅；集合住宅規劃設計」，2011。
 
B.英文文獻
[B-1] Huibo Zhang. Hiroshi Yoshino. Analysis of indoor humidity environment in Chinese residential buildings. ScienceDirect, Building and Environment. Volume 45, Issue 10, October 2010, p2132-p2140.
[B-2] C.L. Cheng, C.J. Yen, W.H. Lu, K.C. Ho, An EmpiricalApproach to Peak Air Pressure on 2-Pipes Vertical Drainage Stac,Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers,2008, p199-p213.
[B-3] Jennifer L. Nguyen, Joel Schwartz, Douglas W. Dockery. The relationship between indoor and outdoor temperature, apparent temperature, relative humidity, and absolute humidity. Wiley Online Library. Volume24, Issue1. 2014. p103-p112.
[B-4] Smith, G. Aspergillus restrictus. Journal of the Textile Research Institute, 1931.
[B-5] Abe, S. Studies on the classification of the Penicillia. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology Tokyo,1956. 2(1-2), p1-p194.
[B-6] Itabashi, T. Hosoe, T. Toyasaki, N. Imai, T. Adachi, M. & Kawai, K. Allergen activity of xerophilic fungus, Aspergillus restrictus. Europe PMC, 2007. 56(2). p101-p108.
[B-7] Sébastien Vacher, Catalina Hernandez, Claire Bärtschi, Nathalie Poussereau. Impact of paint and wall-paper on mould growth on plasterboards and aluminum. ScienceDirect, Building and Environment. Volume 45, Issue 4. 2010. p916-p921.
[B-8] Pernilla Johansson, Annika Ekstrand-Tobin, Gunilla Bok. An innovative test method for evaluating the critical moisture level for mould growth on building materials. Building and Environment. ScienceDirect, Building and Environment. Volume 81. 2014. p404-p409.
[B-9] Andrea Polo, Francesca Cappitelli, Federica Villa, Flavia Pinzari. Biological invasion in the indoor environment: the spread of Eurotium halophilicum on library materials. ScienceDirect, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2016. p34-p44.
[B-10] Chi P. Hoang, Kerry A. Kinney, Richard L. Corsi, Paul J. Szaniszlo. Resistance of green building materials to fungal growth. ScienceDirect, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. Volume 64, Issue 2. 2009. p104-p113.
[B-11] A,A, Haleem Khan, S,Mohan Karuppayil. Fungal pollution of indoor environments and its management.Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. ScienceDirect, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. Volume 19, Issue 4. 2012. p405-p426.
[B-12] Judith A. Crawford, Paula F. Rosenbaum, Susan E. Anagnost, AndrewHunt, Jerrold L. Abraham. Indicators of airborne fungal concentrations in urban homes: Understanding the conditions that affect indoor fungal exposures. ScienceDirect, Science of The Total Environment. Volume 517, 1. 2015. p113-p124.
[B-13] Thomas Verdier, Marie Coutand, Alexandra Bertron, Christine Roques. A review of indoor microbial growth across building materials and sampling and analysis methods. ScienceDirect, Building and Environment. Volume 80. 2014. p136-p149.
[B-14] Memarzadeh Farhad. Literature Review of the Effect of Temperature and Humidity on Viruses. ASHRAE Transactions . Vol. 118 Issue 1, 2012. p1049-p1060.
[B-15] Moon, Hyeun Jun. Assessing Mold Risk in Buildings under Uncertainty. Georgia Tech Theses and Dissertations, College of Design Theses and Dissertations. 2005.