簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳盈庭
Ying-Ting Chen
論文名稱: 智慧感測裝置結合可見光通訊技術於室內定位之應用
Indoor Positioning Application Using Smart Sensor Devices with Visible Light Communication Technology
指導教授: 陳俊良
Jiann-Liang Chen
口試委員: 陳俊良
Jiann-Liang Chen
黎碧煌
Bih-Hwang Lee
郭耀煌
Yao-Huang Kuo
楊士萱
Shih-Hsuan Yang
林宗男
Tsung-Nan Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電資學院 - 電機工程系
Department of Electrical Engineering
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 79
中文關鍵詞: 光通訊室內定位色溫輝度子區域定位指紋比較法
外文關鍵詞: Visible Light Communication, Indoor Positioning, Color Temperature, Luminance, Subspace Positioning, Fingerprint
相關次數: 點閱:233下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 為迎合未來物聯網(internet of thing, IoT)智慧化時代,資通訊技術串聯了許多感測裝置來提供更多樣性之服務,亦促成室內適地性服務(indoor location based service, Indoor LBS)的快速發展,其中室內定位為Indoor LBS之重要基礎。目前常見之室內定位方法以RFID、藍牙、地磁或Wi-Fi為主,其定位精準為公尺等級。為使定位系統可以提供更多元服務以符合更多應用情境,關鍵在於精準度之等級,如何有效降低平均錯誤距離並提高精準度儼然成為室內定位之關注議題。

    基於可見光通訊(visible light communication, VLC)技術之室內定位解決方案,不僅可使平均錯誤距離降低為公寸等級,也能克服基於射頻(radio frequency, RF)技術因信號浮動而降低定位準確度之問題。本研究提出一創新VLC室內定位系統,使用發光二極體(light-emitting diode, LED)為信號傳送端並佈署於室內,目標接收端以智慧感測器來負責接收LED之頻率、色溫與輝度。先透過辨別LED之頻率來選擇定位子區域,以縮小定位範圍,並以混合式指紋比較法(Fingerprint)來運算目標物之位置。有別於一般Fingerprint使用RSSI做為特徵參數,容易受信號折射或繞射之干擾,本研究以光之直線性作為定位基礎,提供更高精準度之室內定位系統。

    本研究之混合式演算機制,其平均錯誤距離為2.55公分,最大錯誤距離為32.25公分,定位精準度為99.87%。本研究亦針對另外五種方法進行比較:使用歐基里德距離(Euclidean distance)、曼哈頓距離(Manhattan distance)、基於子區域之歐基里德距離、基於子區域之曼哈頓距離以及基於子區域之權重機制。歐基里德距離之平均錯誤距離為14.65公分,最大錯誤距離為114.26公分,定位精準度為95.3%;曼哈頓距離法之平均錯誤距離為14.06公,最大錯誤距離為116.29公分,定位精準度為95.7%;基於子區域之歐基里德距離之平均錯誤距離為2.95公分,最大錯誤距離為33.67公分,定位精準度為99.83%;基於子區域之曼哈頓距離其平均錯誤距離為2.73公分,最大錯誤距離為32.81公分,定位精準度為99.85%;基於子區域之權重機制其平均錯誤距離為2.78公分,最大錯誤距離為34.06公分,定位精準度為99.85%。因此本研究之演算機制不僅降低平均錯誤距離82.59%,且有效降低最大錯誤距離71.77%,整體定位系統之精準度提升4.57%。


    To have a generation for internet of things, technologies combine sensors for providing multiple services. It makes indoor location based service (LBS) develop rapidly. Indoor positioning is the important base of location-based and widely discussed and applied. Many radio frequency technologies have been developed for indoor positioning systems for multiple scenarios. Common indoor positioning technologies are RFID, Bluetooth, geomagnetic and Wi-Fi etc. The average error distances in these technologies are at the meter level. With the need for more accurate positioning, how to reduce average and maximum error distances and increase accuracy is the key issue in indoor positioning systems.

    The indoor positioning solution based on visible light communication (VLC) not only can reduce the average error distance to the decimeter level, but also solve the instability problem of RSSI values based on radio frequency. This study proposes a novel indoor positioning system with a hybrid algorithm. In the proposed system, the LEDs are signal transmitters and deployed on a ceiling. The target receiver is a smart sensor and responsible for receiving the frequency, color temperature and luminance of the lights. First, the system identifies the frequency of LEDs to select the subspace that narrows down the positioning area and compute the position of the target based on hybrid fingerprint. The proposed fingerprint is different from the typical fingerprint that is based on RSSI values. RSSI signals are easily disturbed by refraction or diffraction. This research is based on line-of-sight light emission, which provides higher accuracy for indoor positioning.

    In the proposed system, the average and maximum error distances and the accuracy are 2.55 cm, 32.25 cm and 99.87%. This study also compared the hybrid fingerprint with five types of fingerprints, i.e. fingerprint with Euclidean distance, fingerprint with Manhattan distance, subspace-based fingerprint with Euclidean distance, fingerprint with Manhattan distance, fingerprint with weighting mechanism and fingerprint with hybrid mechanism. The average and maximum error distances and accuracy were 14.65 cm, 114.26 cm and 95.3% for fingerprint with Euclidean distance; 14.06 cm, 116.29 cm and 95.7% for fingerprint with Manhattan distance; 2.95 cm, 33.67 cm and 99.83% for the subspace-based fingerprint with Euclidean distance; 2.73 cm, 32.81 cm and 99.85% for the subspace-based fingerprint with Manhattan distance; and 2.78 cm, 34.06 cm and 99.85% for the subspace-base fingerprint with weighting mechanism. The max error distance was effectively reduced by the subspace selection. The proposed system reduced the average and maximum error distances by 82.59% and 71.77% and increased the accuracy by 4.57%.

    摘要I AbstractIII 致謝V ContentsVI List of FiguresVIII List of TableX Chapter 1Introduction1 1.1Motivation1 1.2Contributions2 1.3Organization4 Chapter 2Background Knowledge5 2.1Localization Concept5 2.2Indoor Positioning System with Visible Light Communication7 2.2.1Parameters8 2.2.2Rolling Shutter Effect10 2.2.3Frequency Identification10 2.3Positioning Algorithm11 Chapter 3Indoor Positioning System13 3.1System Overview13 3.2Offline Phase15 3.2.1Indoor Positioning Algorithms17 3.2.2Indoor Positioning Process Sequence19 3.3Online Phase20 3.3.1Indoor Positioning Algorithm21 3.3.2Indoor Positioning Process Sequence26 Chapter 4System Performance Analysis28 4.1Experimental Environment28 4.2Different Case Comparison29 4.2.1Case 1: Variable K and Same Color Temperature (VKSC)36 4.2.2Case 2: Variable K and Different Color Temperature (VKDC)40 4.2.3Case 3: Variable Nits and Same Brightness (VNSB)45 4.2.4Case 4: Variable Nits and Different Brightness (VNDB)49 4.2.5Additional Case: The Best of VKSC and VKDC Turn into VNSB53 4.3Summary58 Chapter 5Conclusion and Future Work61 5.1Conclusion61 5.2Future Work62 References63

    [1] S. Khruahong, X. Kong, K. Sandrasegaran and L. Liu, ‘‘Multi-level indoor navigation ontology for high assurance location-based services,’’ Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering (HASE), pp. 128-131, 2017.
    [2] Q. Wei and L. Duan, ‘‘Research and implementation of mobile advertising system based on location service,’’ Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), pp. 407-411, 2017.
    [3] G. H. Flores, T. D. Griffin and D. Jadav, ‘‘An iBeacon training app for indoor fingerprinting,’’ Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering, pp. 173-176, 2017.
    [4] J. Pelant, Z. Tlamsa, V. Benes, L. Polak, O. Kaller, L. Bolecek, J. Kufa, J. Sebesta and T. Kratochvil, ‘‘BLE device indoor localization based on RSS fingerprinting mapped by propagation modes,’’ Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA), pp. 1-5, 2017.
    [5] X. Ge and Z. Qu, ‘‘Optimization WIFI indoor positioning KNN algorithm location-based fingerprint,’’ Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), pp. 135-137, 2016.
    [6] A. H. Ismail, H. Kitagawa, R. Tasaki and K. Terashima, ‘‘WiFi RSS fingerprint database construction for mobile robot indoor positioning system,’’ Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 1561-1566, 2016.
    [7] Ł. Januszkiewicz, J. Kawecki, R. Kawecki and P. Oleksy, ‘‘Wireless indoor positioning system with inertial sensors and infrared beacons,’’ Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), pp. 1-3, 2016.
    [8] W. Lee, ‘‘Dynamic KNN mechanism with adaptive weighting scheme for beacon-based indoor positioning system,’’ National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 2015.
    [9] Y.M. Ma, J.L. Chen, F.S. Chang and C.L. Tang, ‘‘Novel fingerprinting mechanisms for indoor positioning: novel fingerprinting mechanisms for indoor positioning,’’ International Journal of Communication Systems, 2015.
    [10] S. Yoshizawa, S. Handa and F. Sasamori, “A simple but effective approach for visible light beacon-based positioning systems with smartphone,” Proceedings of the IEEE 12th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA), pp. 32-35, 2016.
    [11] S.H. Chang and C.Y. Lin, ‘‘A visible light communication positioning mechanism in industrial logistics management,’’ Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), pp. 878-882, 2016.
    [12] M. E. Rusli, M. Ali, N. Jamil and M. M. Din, “An improved indoor positioning algorithm based on RSSI-trilateration technique for internet of things (IOT),’’ Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), pp. 72-77, 2016.
    [13] Z. Ma, S. Poslad, J. Bigham, X. Zhang and L. Men, “A BLE RSSI ranking based indoor positioning system for generic smartphones,’’ Proceedings of the Conference on Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS), pp. 1-8, 2017.
    [14] L. Khalil and P. Jung, “Scaled unscented Kalman filter for RSSI-based indoor positioning and tracking,’’ Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies, pp. 132-137, 2015.
    [15] Y.S. Kuo, P. Pannuto, K.J. Hsiao and P. Dutta, “Luxapose: indoor positioning with mobile phones and visible light,’’ Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 447-458, 2014
    [16] K. Moriya, M. Fujimoto, Y. Arakawa and K. Yasumoto, “Indoor localization based on distance-illuminance model and active control of lighting devices,’’ Proceedings of the International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), pp. 1-6, 2016.
    [17] D. Li, C. Gong and Z. Xu, “A RSSI-based indoor visible light positioning approach,’’ Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP), pp. 1-6, 2016.
    [18] J. Herrnsdorf, M.J. Strain, Erdan Gu, R.K. Henderson and M.D. Dawson, “Positioning and space-division multiple access enabled by structured illumination with light-emitting diodes,’’ Journal of Lightwave Technology, pp. 2339-2345, 2017.
    [19] Y.H. Wu, Y.L. Chen and S.T. Sheu, “Indoor location estimation using virtual fingerprint construction and zone-based remedy algorithm,’’ Proceedings of the International Conference On Communication Problem-Solving (ICCP), pp. 1-3, 2016.
    [20] H. Aida, H. Ichikawa, M. Okada and M. Miki, “Indoor relative positioning scheme using illuminance and color temperature,’’ Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks (MSN), pp. 207-212, 2014.
    [21] X. ChenN, Q. Chen and W. Wei, “An indoor positioning scheme for visible light using fingerprint database with multi-parameters,’’ ZTE communications, 2017
    [22] B. Xie, K. Chen, G. Tan, M. Lu, Y. Liu, J. Wu and T. He, “LIPS: A light intensity–based positioning system for indoor environments,’’ ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 2016.
    [23] P. Luo, Z. Ghassemlooy, H.L. Minh, A. Khalighi, X. Zhang, M. Zhang and C. Yu, “Experimental demonstration of an indoor visible light communication positioning system using dual-tone multi-frequency technique,’’ Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop in Optical Wireless Communications (IWOW), pp. 55-59, 2014.
    [24] J. Yao, X. Huang, B. Sheng, R. Shen and P. Li, “Rolling shutter effect compensation with global waves analysis,’’ Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Big Data, pp. 330-336, 2015.
    [25] J. F. Lahuerta, D.C. Mur and J.P. Aspas, “A reliable asynchronous protocol for VLC communications based on the rolling shutter effect,’’ Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1-6, 2015.
    [26] C. Danakis, M. Afgani, G. Povey, I. Underwood and H. Haas, “Using a CMOS camera sensor for visible light communication,’’ Proceedings of the IEEE Globecom Workshops, pp. 1244-1248, 2012.
    [27] S. Suzuki, “Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following,’’ Computer vision, graphics, and image processing, pp. 32-46, 1985.
    [28] S. He and S.H.G. Chan, “Wi-Fi fingerprint-based indoor positioning: recent advances and comparisons,’’ IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, pp. 466-490, 2016.
    [29] N. Etemadyrad and J.K. Nelson, “A sequential detection approach to indoor positioning using RSS-based fingerprinting,’’ Proceedings of the IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), pp. 1127-1131, 2016.
    [30] Q. Lu, X. Liao, S. Xu and W. Zhu, “A hybrid indoor positioning algorithm based on WiFi fingerprinting and pedestrian dead reckoning,’’ Proceedings of the IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 1-6, 2016.
    [31] K.I. Gettapola, R.R.W.M.H.D. Ranaweera, G.M.R.I Godaliyadda and M.N.F. Imara, “Location based fingerprinting techniques for indoor positioning,’’ Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Technology and Management (NCTM), pp. 175-180, 2017.
    [32] M. D'Souza, B. Schoots and M. Ros, “Indoor position tracking using received signal strength-based fingerprint context aware partitioning,’’ IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, pp. 1347-1355, 2016.
    [33] S. Liu and J. Chai, “Research of location fingerprint based on three-dimensional indoor positioning system,’’ Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), pp. 584-588, 2016.
    [34] Y. B. Bai, T. Gu and A. Hu, “Integrating Wi-Fi and magnetic field for fingerprinting based indoor positioning system,’’ Proceedings of the International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), pp. 1-6, 2016.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2022/07/15 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE