近年來，手機、穿戴式裝置已經是不可或缺的隨身物品，隨著無線網路的發展和基地台普及，5G 網路通訊是繼 4G LTE 之後的新一代行動網路，相較於 4GLTE 網路，5G 提升了性能、傳輸速度以及降低了通訊的延遲時間，不過在這些優點下面，伴隨著的是能源消耗的增加，所以能源議題引起了大家的重視。基於各種應用於無線網路的新興產業和網路服務 (直播、車載網路、物聯網等) 對於網路需求的不同，國際標準化組織 (3GPP) 定義了 5G 的三大應用場景 mMTC 、URLLC、eMBB，其中 mMTC 指大規模物聯網通訊、URLLC 指高可靠低延遲通訊、eMBB 指增強型移動寬頻通訊。除了上述三種單獨存在的場景，可能會有設備或網路服務同時存在兩種甚至三種互相混和的場景，但還沒有相關論文討論混和情境的不連續接收機制。本論文研究不同混和情境可能的的封包抵達情形，並提出在單一或各種不同混和場景的情況下，透過觀察 UE 的封包抵達時間，以此對混和場景分類，並且找出適合的睡眠時間，在符合延遲限制的同時達到省電的效果。

In recent years, mobile phones and wearable devices have become indispensable personal items. With the development of wireless networks and the popularization of base stations, 5G network communication is a new generation of mobile networks after 4G LTE. Network, 5G improves performance, transmission speed and reduces the delay time of communication, but these advantages are accompanied by an increase in energy consumption, so the energy issue has attracted everyone’s attention. Based on the different network requirements of various emerging industries and network services (live broadcast, in-vehicle network, Internet of Things, etc.) applied to wireless networks, the International Organization for Standardization (3GPP) has defined three major application scenarios of 5G: mMTC, URLLC, eMBB, where mMTC refers to large-scale IoT communication, URLLC refers to high-reliability and low-latency communication, and eMBB refers to enhanced mobile broadband communication. In addition to the above three separate scenarios, there may be two or even three mixed scenarios for devices or network services at the same time, but there is no relevant paper discussing the discontinuous reception mechanism in mixed scenarios. This paper studies the possible packet arrival situations in different hybrid scenarios, and proposes to classify the hybrid scenarios by observing the packet arrival time of the UE in the case of a single or various hybrid scenarios, and find out the appropriate sleep time. It can save power while complying with the delay limit.

[1] M. K. Maheshwari, M. Agiwal, N. Saxena, and A. Roy, “Hybrid directional discontinuous reception (hd-drx) for 5g communication,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1421–1424, 2017.
[2] F. Moradi, E. Fitzgerald, and B. Landfeldt, “Modeling drx for d2d communication,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2574–2584, 2021.
[3] S. Rostami, S. Lagen, M. Costa, P. Dini, and M. Valkama, “Optimized wake-up scheme with bounded delay for energy-efficient mtc,” in 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6, 2019.
[4] B. Cai, Y. Chen, and I. Darwazeh, “Analyzing energy efficiency for iot devices with drx capability and poisson arrivals,” in 2019 26th International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT), pp. 254–259, 2019.
[5] P. Jörke, R. Falkenberg, and C. Wietfeld, “Power consumption analysis of nb-iot and emtc in challenging smart city environments,” in 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pp. 1–6, 2018.
[6] S. Huang, G. Feng, L. Liang, and S. Qin, “Power-saving coercive sleep mode for machine type communications,” in 2017 23rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), pp. 1–6, 2017.
[7] S. Rostami, K. Heiska, O. Puchko, K. Leppanen, and M. Valkama, “Pre-grant signaling for energy-efficient 5g and beyond mobile devices: Method and analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 418–432,
2019.
[8] E. Rastogi, M. K. Maheshwari, A. Roy, N. Saxena, and D. R. Shin, “Machine learning-based drx mechanism in nr-unlicensed,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1052–1056, 2022.
[9] P. Bruhn and G. Bassi, “Machine learning based c-drx configuration optimization for 5g,” in Mobile Communication - Technologies and Applications; 25th ITG-Symposium, pp. 1–6, 2021.
[10] A. Mukherjee, “Energy efficiency and delay in 5g ultra-reliable low-latency communications system architectures,” IEEE Network, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 55–61, 2018.
[11] H.-L. Chang and M.-H. Tsai, “Optimistic drx for machine-type communications in lte-a network,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 9887–9897, 2018.
[12] K. Xiao, X. Liu, X. Han, P. Hao, J. Zhang, D. Zhou, and X. Wei, “Flexible multiplexing mechanism for coexistence of urllc and embb services in 5g networks,” in 2020 ITU Kaleidoscope: Industry-Driven Digital Transformation (ITU K), pp. 1–9, 2020.
[13] Y.-N. R. Li, M. Chen, J. Xu, L. Tian, and K. Huang, “Power saving techniques for 5g and beyond,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 108675–108690, 2020.