為了在高度競爭的業務環境下維持競爭力，企業必須發展完善的企業學習，以提高員工的專業能力。在以智慧型行動裝置為主要工作設備的情況下，企業線上學習系統的重要性便日漸提高，而對於業務人員而言，高度個人化及彈性的自主學習方式最符合其需求。
本研究以業務人員為研究對象，以修正後之整合型科技接受與使用模式(Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, UTAUT)為基礎，並加入人口統計變項為調節變項，希望能進一步探討業務人員對於線上自主學習意願之相關因子，並以效能支持此新興企業學習工具之特性，假設性探討業務人員對此學習方式的接受程度，以期能做為企業訓練學習相關政策之參考依據。研究問卷經由公司內部系統進行發放，共回收1019份有效問卷，以迴歸分析方法檢定本研究架構之關係假設及人口統計變項之調節效果。
實證分析後發現: (1)修正後之整合型科技接受與使用模式能有效預測業務人員使用線上課程系統之使用意圖，亦即「績效期望」、「努力期望」、「社會影響」、與「促成條件」此四大構面可用來解釋業務人員影響線上自主學習意願之因素。(2)年齡及年資對四大構面件與使用意圖之間具有影響，以高年齡及高年資使用者之影響較為顯著。(3)職級對努力期望與使用意圖及社會影響與使用意圖之間具有影響，以高職級使用者之影響較為顯著。(4)業務人員對於效能支持此一新興學習方式接受度高。

In order to maintain competitiveness in business environment, companies must develop completed corporate learning strategies to increase their competence. As smart mobile devices become main working equipment, the importance of online learning systems increasing nowadays. For salespeople, highly personalized and flexible learning way, such as self-directed learning, best fit their work characteristics and demand.
In this study, revised Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, UTAUT) is the basic model theory and combine demographic variables as the adjustable variables to further explore impact of user behavioral intentions towards salespeople’s online self-directed learning. And further explore if salespeople can accept the new emerging learning tool- Performance Support (PS) tool, in order to serve as a reference for set up corporate training and learning policies.
The totals of 1019 valid questionnaires were collected. By employing regression analysis to verify causal relation supposition in the study and to explore moderating effect between factors.
The empirical analysis found that: (1) Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) can predict user intentions in salespeople’s online self-directed learning by five dimensions ,“performance Expectancy”, “effort expectancy”, “social influence” and “facilitating conditions” (2) Age and seniority have impact between the four major dimensions and their behavioral intentions. Salespeople with high arg and seniority especially have more significant influence. (3) Position contributed between factors of effort expectancy and behavioral intentions, and also factors of social influence and behavioral intentions. (4) Salespeople have high acceptance on performance support tool.

Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), pp.204-215.
Artis, A. and Harris, E. (2007). Self-directed learning and sales force performance: an integrated framework. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 27(1), pp.9-24.
Bar-On, R. (2006). The bar-on model of emotional-social intelligence. Psicothema, 18(1), pp.13-25.
Boyer, S. (2008). Self-directed learning: measures and models for salesperson training and development. Graduate Theses and Dissertations.
Boyer, S. and Edmondson, D. (2007). Perceived supervisory support: A meta analytic review. Revolution in Marketing: Market Driving Changes, pp.241-245.
Chen, L., Gillenson, M. and Sherrell, D. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), pp.705-719.
Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp.189-211.
Coulson‐Thomas, C. (2003). Using job support tools to increase individual productivity and improve workgroup performance. Industrial and Commercial Training, 35(4), pp.142-147.
Coulson‐Thomas, C. (2005). Using job support tools to increase workgroup performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(3), pp.206-211.
Cron, W., Marshall, G., Singh, J., Spiro, R. and Sujan, H. (2005). Salesperson selection, training, and development: Trends, implications, and research opportunities. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25(2), pp.123-136.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), p.319.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), pp.982-1003.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), pp.1111-1132.
Dawson, J. (2013). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), pp.1-19.
Dawson, J. (n.d.). Interpreting interaction effects. [online] Available at: http://www.jeremydawson.co.uk/slopes.htm [Accessed 21 Apr. 2018].
Downes, S. (2010). New technology supporting informal learning. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1), pp.27-33.
Dunlap, J. and Lowenthal, P. (2011). Learning, unlearning, and relearning: Using Web 2.0 technologies to support the development of lifelong learning skills. In: G. Magoulas, ed., E-infrastructures and technologies for lifelong learning: Next generation environments. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp.46-52.
Gottfredson, C. and Mosher, B. (2012). Make effective performance Your Reality. Learning Solutions, (September).
Hall, R. (2009). Towards a fusion of formal and informal learning environments: The impact of the read/write web. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7, pp.29-40.
Harrison, D., Mykytyn, P. and Riemenschneider, C. (1997). Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and Empirical Tests. Information Systems Research, 8(2), pp.171-195.
Hauser, C. (2006). Chris's Calculator utility. [online] Chris's calculator V1.2. Available at: https://www.surrey.ac.uk/psychology/current/.../ChrisCalcv1_4.xls [Accessed 21 Apr. 2018].
Hauser, C. (2006). Chris's calculator V1.2. [online] Available at: https://goo.gl/Ooga8T [Accessed 3 Apr. 2018].
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Group & Organization Studies, 2(2), pp.256-257.
Lee, J. and Lee, W. (2008). The relationship of e-Learner’s self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-Learning environmental quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), pp.32-47.
Livingstone, D. (2001). Adults’ informal learning: Definitions, findings, gaps and future research. WALL Working Paper, 21.
Lombardo, M. and Eichinger, R. (2000). The career architect development planner. Minneapolis, MN: Lominger Ltd.
Lucas, M. and Moreira, A. (2009). Bridging formal and informal learning–A case study on students’ perceptions of the use of social networking tools. Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines, 5794, pp.325-337.
Ma, W., Andersson, R. and Streith, K. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), pp.387-395.
Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), pp.192-222.
Ong, C., Lai, J. and Wang, Y. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41(6), pp.795-804.
Pandey, A. (2016). What is performance support and why should you use performance support tools?. e learning industry Magazine, (December).
Pituch, K. and Lee, Y. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), pp.222-244.
Raman, A. and Don, Y. (2013). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model. International Education Studies, 6(7), pp.157-164.
Rosenberg, M. (2013). At the Moment of Need: The Case for Performance Support. The eLearning Guild.
Simonneau, G., Gatzoulis, M., Adatia, I., Celermajer, D., Denton, C., Ghofrani, A., Gomez Sanchez, M., Krishna Kumar, R., Landzberg, M., Machado, R., Olschewski, H., Robbins, I. and Souza, R. (2013). Updated clinical Classification of pulmonary hypertension. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 62(25), pp.D34-D41.
Song, D. and Bonk, C. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1).
Song, D. and Bonk, C. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1).
Song, D. and Lee, J. (2014). Has Web 2.0 revitalized informal learning? The relationship between Web 2.0 and informal learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(6), pp.511-533.
Taylor, S. and Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A Test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), pp.144-176.
Thompson, R., Higgins, C. and Howell, J. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), pp.124-143.
Tomei, L. (2018). Online course management : Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Hershey: Information Resources Management Association.
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis and Davis (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), p.425.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), pp.186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. and Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), pp.157-178.
Wargnier, J. and Jennings, C. (2012). Effective Learning with 70:20:10 – the new frontier for the extended enterprise. [online] CrossKnowledge. Available at: http://www.crossknowledge.net/crossknowledge/whitepapers/effective-learning-with-70_20_10-whitepaper.pdf [Accessed 2 Apr. 2018].
吳萬益 (2011). 企業研究方法。台北: 華泰文化.
郭倉義、呂宗翰、蔡憲唐 (2008). User Acceptance of E-learning System: A Self-Directed Learning. 電子商務學報, 10(4), pp.963-987