根據交通部公路總局統計，全台機動車輛的登記數累計高達14,44.6萬輛，平均每兩位國民就擁有一輛機車，近年更因大型重機開放與普及機車旅遊的風氣也更加盛行。當需要移動到不熟悉的地方，導航軟體目前已是行車不可或缺的產品，市面上已有了許多不同的導航軟體供大眾選擇，從免費的Google Maps到專用的導航機，目標都是提供使用者一個快速、安全並可預期路況的旅程。二輪載具相較四輪載具在使用導航軟體上有更多的限制，包含安全帽造成的感官缺失、只能單手使用、每次使用時間短與手套使用需求，目前市面上的導航軟體的介面設計並未對機車騎士進行專門的優化。因此本研究目的為了解機車騎士與機車用導航軟體的互動模式並找出此族群專有的介面需求。研究先由相關文獻的探討開始，透過認知心理學與心智模式來了解騎士如何使用導航軟體、並了解介面設計的相關準則與人機互動介面設計相關知識，並透過觀察法與訪談法來深入了解使用者，並對市面上現有的導航軟體介面進行操作分析。將上述研究結果作為參考，設計了行駛前操作模式與行駛中操作模式兩階段不同的驗證實驗樣本，透過雙因子實驗進行驗證，因子包含「字級與圖示尺寸」與騎乘前的「搜尋型式」搭配騎乘中「顯示模式」，了解此兩因子在機車用導航軟體系統介面操作上的影響程度，本研究成果為：(1)介面規劃階段建議先依據介面使用時機點分類為行駛前與行駛中，將行駛中使用介面的字級與圖示尺寸進行放大，(2)單一圖示搜尋可以持續讓搜尋功能出現在主要畫面且畫面不會受到太大的影響，也能讓整個搜尋方塊被統一整合，另外其點擊後拉長的動畫也讓使用者可以更清楚目前的操作階段，(3)機車騎士在佩戴上安全帽與手套後，觸覺與視覺都受到了一些限制，因此點擊後的動畫回饋可以讓受測者清楚確認已點擊了正確的按鈕，(4)明確的路口標示方案，透過添加路口照片的形式，可以大幅提升使用者的滿意度，照片相對於3D圖示或Icon圖示可以更好的讓使用者去與現實路況配對，減少精神上的負擔。

Motorcycle tourism is growing rapidly, and mobile navigation is essential for riders when exploring unfamiliar places. However, existing mobile navigation interfaces lack optimization for motorcycle riders, who face unique challenges such as sensory limitations due to helmets, one-handed operation, short usage durations, and the need for gloves. This study aims to investigate rider-navigation interaction and identify specific interface requirements. A literature review examines the theories of cognitive psychology and mental models to understand how riders use navigation software and explore guidelines for interface design and human-computer interaction. Observation, interviews, and operational analysis of existing navigation interfaces deepen user understanding. Two-way ANOVA method experiment is conducted to validate the impact of factors including "font size and graphic size" and before riding "search style" combined with during riding "display modes " on the operation of motorcycle mobile navigation Application interfaces. Findings suggest that: (1) Classify interface usage scenarios as pre-driving and during driving. Increase font size and graphic size during driving to enhance visibility. (2) Integrate a continuous single-icon search function on the main screen without affecting the overall layout. An elongation animation upon clicking helps users understand the current stage of operation. (3) Animated feedback upon button clicks helps riders confirm their selections despite touch and vision limitations caused by helmets and gloves. (4) Clear intersection marking schemes, incorporating intersection photos, greatly enhance user satisfaction. Photos are preferable to 3D graphics or icons, as they facilitate matching the interface with real road conditions, reducing cognitive load.

中文文獻：
[1] Google Trends(2021)。關鍵字：機車 手機架。Google。https://trends.google.com.tw/trends/explore?date=all&geo=TW&q=%E6%A9%9F%E8%BB%8A%20%E6%89%8B%E6%A9%9F%E6%9E%B6
[2] Google Trends(2021)。關鍵字：Uber Eats。Google。https://trends.google.com.tw/trends/explore?date=all&geo=TW&q=%2Fg%2F11ckq_1t0s
[3] Norman, D. A.（2014）。設計的心理學：人性化的產品設計如何改變世界（陳宜秀譯）。遠流出版。（原著出版年：2013）
[4] 中華民國交通部（2021年12月 29日）。110年1-10月道路交通事故統計分析。交通新聞稿。https://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/app/data/view?module=news&id=14&serno=202112280003
[5] 安守中（2003）。GPS全球衛星定位系統入門。全華科技圖書股份有限公司。
[6] 交通部統計處（2019）。自用小客車使用狀況調查報告。中華民國交通部。https://www.motc.gov.tw/uploaddowndoc?file=survey/201910301030260.pdf&filedisplay=201910301030260.pdf&flag=doc
[7] 交通部公路總局（2023）。機動車輛登記數。交通部公路總局統計查詢網。https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=220&ym=10201&ymt=11205&kind=21&type=1&funid=b330101&cycle=41&outmode=0&compmode=0&outkind=1&fldspc=0,1,3,4,8,8,17,4,22,10,&rdm=hLpnoceW
[8] 辛向阳（2015）。 交互设计从物理逻辑到行为逻辑。装饰，1，5。
[9] 道路交通管理處罰條例。第31-1條。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawSingle.aspx?pcode=K0040012&flno=31-1
[10] 陳建雄（2012）。智慧型手機影音播放功能之使用者介面設計開發，中國工程師學會會刊， 85(6)，56-66。
[11] 梁融淩、李劍(2014)。駕駛安全預警與導航系統介面設計。福建師大福清分校學報，2014(02)，25–28。
[12] 维基百科（2022）。Google地圖。维基百科。https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Google%E5%9C%B0%E5%9B%BE&oldid=71604755
[13] 譚笑、郭進利（2021）。基於感性工學的車載導航介面設計研究。智慧電腦與應用，2021(04)，131–134。

英文文獻：
[1] Apple Developer (2023). Typography. Apple.
https://developer.APPle.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/typography#Specifications
[2] Babbie, E. R. (2021). The practice of social research. Cengage.
[3] Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Elsevier.
[4] Brooke, J. (1986). System usability scale (SUS): a quick-and-dirty method of system evaluation user information. Reading, UK: Digital equipment co ltd, 43, 1-7.
[5] Bryden, K. J., Charlton, J. L., Oxley, J. A., & Lowndes, G. J. (2014). Acceptance of navigation systems by older drivers. Gerontechnology, 13(1), 21–28.
[6] Chao, C.-J., Lin, C.-H., & Hsu, S.-H. (2014). An Assessment of the Effects of Navigation Maps on Drivers’ Mental Workloads. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 118(3), 709–731.
[7] Constantine, L. L., & Lockwood, L. A. D. (1999). Software for use: A practical guide to the models and methods of usage-centered design. Addison Wesley.
[8] Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation (Vol. 445). CUP Archive.
[9] Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139-183). North-Holland.
[10] Michell, G., & Dewdney, P. (1998). Mental Models Theory: Applications for Library and Information Science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39(4), 275.
[11] Michon, J. A. (Ed.). (1993). Generic Intelligent Driver Support. Taylor & Francis.
[12] Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM, 33(3), 338–348.
[13] Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology (1st ed.). Psychology Press.
[14] Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Celebrating Interdependence - CHI ’94, 152–158.
[15] Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. L. (1994). Usability inspection methods. Wiley.
[16] Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Empowering People - CHI ’90, 249–256.
[17] Norman, D. A. (1986). User centered system design. New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Erlbaum.
[18] Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
[19] Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction (3rd ed). Wiley.
[20] Stinchcombe, A., Gagnon, S., Kateb, M., Curtis, M., Porter, M. M., Polgar, J., & Bédard, M. (2017). Letting in-vehicle navigation lead the way: Older drivers’ perceptions of and ability to follow a GPS navigation system. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106, 515–520.
[21] Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D., & Wonsiewicz, S. A. (1985). How to tell people where to go: Comparing navigational aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(5), 549–562.
[22] Tabary, M., Ahmadi, S., Amirzade-Iranaq, M. H., Shojaei, M., Sohrabi Asl, M., Ghodsi, Z., Azarhomayoun, A., Ansari-Moghaddam, A., Atlasi, R., Araghi, F., Shafieian, M., Heydari, S. T., Sharif-Alhoseini, M., O’Reilly, G., & Rahimi-Movaghar, V. (2021). The effectiveness of different types of motorcycle helmets – A scoping review. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 154, 106065.
[23] Volpe, J. (2012, December 17). Google Maps notches over 10 million downloads on iOS APP Store. Engadget.
https://www.engadget.com/2012-12-17-google-maps-10-millions-downloads-ios-APP-store.html
[24] Yared, T., & Patterson, P. (2020). The impact of navigation system display size and environmental illumination on young driver mental workload. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 74, 330–344.