研究生: |
鄧雯玲 WEN-LIN DENG |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
LED動態點陣式光源閃爍與眩光閾值之研究 Study of Flicker and Glare Threshold for LED Dynamic Pixel Array Light Source |
指導教授: |
李宗憲
Tsung-Xian Lee |
口試委員: |
彭保仁
none 溫照華 Chao-Hua Wen 孫沛立 Pei-Li Sun |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
應用科技學院 - 色彩與照明科技研究所 Graduate Institute of Color and Illumination Technology |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 88 |
中文關鍵詞: | 光汙染 、眩光 、閃爍 、閾值 、LED動態陣列式光源 |
外文關鍵詞: | light pollution, glare, flicker, threshold, LED dynamic pixel array light source |
相關次數: | 點閱:284 下載:2 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
為了了解人眼視覺對於光汙染源當中的閃爍危害及眩光危害,本研究對LED動態點陣式光源進行人眼「閃爍」及「眩光」人因實驗主觀評價實驗,透過數據分析找出人眼視覺對於光汙染中的閃爍及眩光可辨識及可接受之亮度與頻率之閾值,並提出LED動態點陣式光源類型的閃爍與眩光預測模型,作為未來有關LED點陣式光源亮度及閃爍頻率研究方向的建議與參考。
實驗結果顯示影響閃爍感知最主要的因子為LED動態陣列式光源中的頻率因素,可辨識之閃爍感知之頻率閾值為1Hz以下,可接受閃爍感知之頻率閾值則為2Hz~4.5Hz之間;而影響眩光感知的主成分因子為LED陣列式光源中的亮度,可辨識眩光的綠光單一封裝亮度為331 cd/㎡,可接受眩光之綠光單一封裝亮度閾值須低於54750 cd/㎡。
LED (Light Emitting Diode)has been widely used in our daily life. Higher brightness will cause glare and visual discomfort. Many researches focus on the environmental of light pollution in recent years. The abuse of LED dynamic pixel array light source is a rigorous problem in Taiwan.
The main purpose of this study is to investigate flicker and glare threshold for LED dynamic pixel array light source. The aim of this study was to determine 50% perceptibility threshold (PT) and 50% acceptability threshold (AT) of frequency and luminance for LED dynamic pixel array light source.
The results showed that influence of perception of flicker is frequency of LED dynamic pixel array light source. The 50% perceptibility threshold of frequency is under 1Hz, the 50% acceptability threshold of frequency is 2Hz~4.5Hz, and the influence of glare is luminance for LED dynamic pixel array light source. The 50% perceptibility threshold of luminance is about 331 cd/㎡, the 50% acceptability threshold of luminance is lower 54750 cd/㎡.
[1] 中華民國國家標準,「CNS 15015 戶外景觀照明燈具」,中華民國國家標準局(2006)。
[2]中華民國國家標準,CNS 14546 發光二極體交通號誌燈燈面及燈箱(民96)。
[3]林憲德、趙又嬋,「光污染現況調查與案例分析」,中華民國行政院環境保護署EPA98F10502209計畫期末報告(民98)。
[4]鄭森皓、彭保仁,「新興物理性公害之調查及研究」中華民國行政院環境保護署EPA100U1F102106計畫期末報告(民100)。
[5]鄭森皓、彭保仁、溫照華、賴鵬宇、陳怡君、謝品萱,「新興物理性公害之調查及研究」,中華民國行政院環境保護署EPA101U1F102106計畫期末報告(民101)。
[6]鄭森皓、彭保仁、溫照華、陳建宇、徐紹維、鍾宗穎、洪紹棠,「光污染防制專案工作計畫」,中華民國行政院環境保護署EPA102U1F102106計畫期末報告(民102)。
[7]鄭森皓、彭保仁、溫照華、徐紹維、黃育信、王韻婷,「光污染影響及民眾感受認知研究」,中華民國行政院環境保護署EPA102F10502207計畫期末報告(民102)。
[8]鄭森皓、彭保仁、溫照華2014。「光污染影響及民眾感受認知研究」,中華民國行政院環境保護署EPA103U1F102106(民103)。
[9]彭保仁、溫照華、徐紹維、洪紹棠、李宗憲、林雅俐,「光污染感受調查及量測指標與改善措施研究」,中華民國行政院環境保護署 EPA104U1F102106(民104)。
[10]刁繼寬,「LED廣告電視牆輝度及光害評價研究」逢甲大學碩士論文(2012)。
[11]王志毅.傳統心理物理學方法與信號檢測論.遼寧師專學報(2003)。
[12]遊旭群.實驗心理學.北京市.中國醫藥科技出版社(2005)。
[13]賴鵬宇,「夜間LED廣告看板之眩光硏究」,台灣科技大學碩士論文
(2013)。
[14]王韻婷,「夜間多媒體LED看板之眩光與閃爍感知研究」,台灣科技大學碩士論文(2014)。
[15]王乙如,「LED 看板動態影像閃爍式光汙染之研究」,台灣科技大學碩士論文(2015)。
[16]中國大陸上海市地方標準,「DB31/T316-2012 城市環境(裝飾)照明規範」(2012)。
[17]中國大陸北京市地方標準,「DB11/T388.3-2015 城市景觀照明技術規範,第3部分:干擾光限制」(2015)。
[18]澳門特別行政區廣告招牌、建築物裝飾燈和戶外電子顯示屏光污染控制指引(2014)。
[19]CIE 150-2003 “Guide on the limitation of the effects of obtrusive light from outdoor lighting installations”
[20]Gustav Theodor Fechner,「心理物理學綱要」,中國人民大學出版社(2015)。
[21]Robert Sessions Woodworth, Harold Schlosberg,「Experimental Psychology」,Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd (2010)
[22]J. D. Bullough, J. A. Brons, R. Qi, and M. S. Rea, “Predicting discomfort glarefrom outdoor lighting installations,” Lighting Research and Technology, 40(3),pp. 225-242 (2008).
[23] “Handbook of Optics”, vol. III, ch. 2, Ed. 3, Michael Bass Editor-in-Chief,Optical Society of America (2010).
[24] R. Granit and P. Harper, “Comparative studies on the peripheral and centralretina: II. Synaptic reactions in the eye,” Amer. J. Physiol., 95, pp. 211-227(1930).
[25] S. Hecht and S. Shlaer, “Intermittent stimulation by light. V. The relationbetween intensity and critical frequency for different parts of the spectrum,” J.Gen. Phyisol. 19, pp. 965-979 (1936).
[26] S. Hecht and C. D. Verrijp, ”Intermittent stimulation by light. III. The relationbetween intensity and critical frequency for different retinal locations,” Journalof General Physiology, 17, pp.251-265 (1933).
[27] W. M. Hart Jr, The temporal responsiveness of vision. In: Moses, R. A. and Hart,W. M. (ed) Adler’s Physiology of the eye, Clinical Application. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company (1987).
[28] S. H. Bartley and T. M. Nelson, “Afurther study of pulse-to-cycle fraction andcritical flicker frequency. A decisive theoretical test. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 51, pp.44-45 (1961).
[26]J. D. Bullough, K. Sweater Hickcox, T. R. Klein, and N. Narendran “Effects offlicker characteristics from solid-state lighting on detection, acceptability andcomfort,” Lighting Research and Technology, 43(3), pp. 337-348 (2011).
[29] Y. Ishiguro, H. Takada, K. Watanabe, A. Okumura, K. Aso, T. Ishikawa, “AFollow-up Survey on Seizures Induced by Animated Cartoon TV Program
‘Pocket Monster’”, Epilepsia , 45(4), 377-383, (2004).
[30] “A Review of the Literature on Light Flicker: Ergonomics, Biological Attributes,Potential Health Effects, and Methods in Which Some LED Lighting MayIntroduce Flicker”, IEEE Standard P1789 (2010).
[31] Einhorn HD:Discomform glare:a formula to bridge differences:Lighting Researchand Technology 1979;11(2):90-94
[32] CIE 112-1994, “Glare evaluation system for use within outdoor sports and arealighting” (1994)
[33] Petherbridge P, Hopkinson RG: Discomfort Glare and the Lighting of Buildings: Transaction of Illuminating Engineering Society 1950;15(39).
[34]IESNA Lighting Handbook Ed. 9 (2000).
[35] T. Irikura, Y. Toyofuku and Y. Aoki, “Borderline between Comfort and
Discomfort of Blinking Light,”Journal of Light & Visual Environment, 22(2), pp.12-15 (1998).
[36] Chauvel P, Collins JB, Dogniaux R, Longmore J: Glare from windows: current views of the problem: Lighting Research and Technology 1982;14(1):31-46.
[37] Hopkinson RG: Glare from daylighting in buildings: Applied Ergonomics 1972; 3(4):206-215.
[38] 袁惟文,「LED 動態廣告招牌對人掩飾絕不舒適度感受研析」,台灣科技大學碩士論文(2016)。