隨著新科技發展的興起，像是大數據分析、人工智慧甚至量子電腦等，這些新科技發展同時伴隨著市場環境的新需求以及期待，在這樣的市場環境底下，企業組織必須學習市場環境的專業知識以及需求，加以調整內部策略以發展對應的服務及產品，以獲得且提升自身之競爭優勢及持續發展。因此，本研究藉由組織敏捷性與吸收能力之搭配，來表達企業組織至外部市場學習吸收，進而立即地重塑內部能力與目標，並且根據學習吸收後的結果加上內部能力與階段性目標之配適，以利用模組化之方式發展階段性IT-Artifact。然而，本研究將這些各個環節與理論加以整合發展出『敏捷重塑能力』，用以表示企業組織透過該能力以影響所處的商業生態系統及市場環境。除此之外，本研究透過個案研究之研究法蒐集與訪談相關的資料，加以深入分析且探討現象，最後再依據研究之結果後即提出一套『敏捷重塑能力』的研究架構說明其對於企業組織之重要性。
　　本研究探討個案對象-優拓資訊公司，本研究將其發展歷程分為四階段，分別為成立時期階段、策略轉換階段、目標確立階段、企業核心產品發展階段，接著以組織敏捷性與吸收能力之三面向(識別、吸收同化、知識商品化)搭配，探討企業組織如何至外部市場環境學習專業知識與需求，進而重塑概念探討企業如何調整內部能力與訂定階段性目標，最後藉兩者配適決定透過模組化之方式快速地發展出階段性IT-Artifact，這些環節經本研究整合且發展出『敏捷重塑能力』之概念架構，且進而說明企業組織如何培養該能力以及藉此能力提升自身競爭優勢與持續生存，最後以該架構供其他企業組作為生存發展之參考依據。

　　With the rise of new technologies, such as big data analysis, artificial intelligence and even quantum computers, these new technologies are accompanied by new demands and expectations of the market environment. The business organization must learn professional knowledge and needs of market environment, and adjust internal strategies to develop corresponding services and products to gain and enhance their competitive advantage and sustainable development. Therefore, this study uses the combination of organizational agility and absorptive capacity to express the absorption of business organization to the external market, immediately reconfigure internal capabilities and goals, and based on the results of learning absorption and fit of internal and stage goals. Dominate to develop a phased IT-Artifact with modularity method. However, this study integrates these various theories to develop an “Agile Reconfiguration Capability” to indicate that the organization can be influence on the corresponding business ecosystem and market environment through this capability. In addition, this study collects and interviews relevant data through case study methods, and conducts in-depth analysis and discussion of phenomena. Finally, based on the results of the research, a set of research framework for "Agile Reconfiguration Capability" is proposed to describe the importance of corporate organization.

　　This study explores the case - Yoctol Information Inc., which divides its development process into four stages, namely, the establishment period, the strategy conversion stage, the goal establishment stage, and the enterprise core product development stage. the combination of organizational agility and absorptive capacity, the three aspects of the absorptive capacity (identification, absorption assimilation, knowledge commercialization) to explore how the organization can learn professional knowledge and needs in the external market environment, and then reconfigure the concept to explore how the company adjusts its internal capabilities and sets phase objectives. The adaptation decision quickly develops a phased IT-Artifact through modularity, which is integrated into the research and develops the conceptual structure of “Agile Reconfiguration Capability”, and further explains how the organization can develop this capability and its ability. Improve their competitive advantage and sustainable survival, and finally use this structure for other enterprise as a reference for survival and development.

中文部分
1.陳萬淇（1981）。個案研究法。台北市：華泰書局出版。
2.胡幼慧 (1996b)。質性研究的分析與寫成。載於胡幼慧 (主編)，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例 (頁159-170)。台北：巨流。
3.文崇一、楊國樞（2000）。訪問調查法。社會及行為科學研究法下冊。台北：東 華。
4.萬文隆（2004）。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊，37（4），17-23。
5.陳向明(2002) 社會科學質的研究。台北:五南圖書
6.葉至誠、葉立誠(1999)，研究方法與論文寫作。台北：商鼎文化出版社

英文部分
1.Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
2.Atuahene-Gima, K. (1992). Inward technology licensing as an alternative to internal R&D in new product development: A conceptual framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(2), 156-167.
3.Baldwin, C. Y. & Clark, K. (1997). Management in Age of Modularity. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 84-93.
4.Benbasat, I. & Zmud, R. W.(2003). The identity crisis within he information systems discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. Minformation systems Quarterly, 27(2), 183-194.
5.Carlsson, S.A. (2006). Towards an Information System Design Research Freamwork: A Creitical Realist Perspective.
6.Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1994). Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management science, 40(2), 227-251.
7.Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal , D.A.(1990), Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective On Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1) , 128-152.
8.Danuta, K. M. & Swierczek, A.(2009). The Agile Capabilites of Polish Companies in the Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 217-224.
9.Creswell, J. W. (1998), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.Delmas, M. A. (2001). Stakeholders and competitive advantage: The case of ISO 14001. Production and Operation Management, 10, 343-358.
11.Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal, 21(101):1105-1121.
12.Glaser, B. G., (1978), Theoretical Sensitivity, Sociology Press, Mill Valley.
13.Guansekaran, A. (1999). Agile Manufacturing: A Framework for Research and Development. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2), 87-105.
14.Guimaraes Tor , Thielman Bruce, Guimaraes Valerie C. & Cornick, Michael(2016) “Absorptive Capacity as Moderator for Company Innovation Success.”, International Journal of the Academic Business World. Fall2016, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p1-18. 18p.
15.Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P., & Ortinau, D. J. (2000). Marketing research: A practical approach for the new millennium. Irwin Professional Publishing.
16.Hevner, Alan R., March, Salvatore T., Park, Jinsoo, & Ram, Sudhs. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, (28:1)
17.Iansiti, M. and Levien, R. (2004). The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation and Sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, 255.
18.Itami, H. (1987) Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19.J. Zubin, R.S. Feldman, S. Salzinger.(1991). A developmental model for the etiology of schizophrenia, 2, 410-429.
20.Kim, L. (1998). Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning. Capability Building in Catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science,506-521.
21.Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
22.L. Scott Mills Michael E. Soulé Daniel F. Doak.(1993). The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and Conservation: Management and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems.BioScience, 43(4), 219-224.
23.Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477.
24.Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863.
25.Leonard-Barton,Dorothy(1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
26.Levitt, B., & March, J.G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review Sociology, 14, 319-340.
27.Lin, C. T., Chiu, H., & Chu, P. Y.(2006). Agility Index in the Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 285-299.
28.M. K. Starr. (1965). Modular-production: a new concept. Harvard Business Review, 43(6), 131-142.
29.March, S. T. & G. F. Smith.(1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. In Decision support systems, 251-266.
30.Mariano, N. & Pilar, Q. (2005). Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort,Technovation, 25(10), 1141-1157.
31.Markus, M. L. & Silver, M. S.(2008). A foundation for the study of information technology effects: a ner look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concept of structural features and spirit. Journal of Assocation for Information Systems, 9(10/11), 609-632.
32.Merriam, S.B. (1988) Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. Jossey-Bass, San Francis-co.
33.Miller, T. D. & Elgard P. (1998). Define modules,modularity and modularisation. Design for Integration in Manufacturing, Proceedings of the 13th IPS Reaearch Seminar, Fugsloe, Aalborg University.
34.Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995). In-depth Interviewing, (2nd ed.), South Melbourne: Longman.
35.Molin, M. J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities, how can we make them work? Working paper.
36.Moore J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-96.
37.Nadler, D. & Tushman, M. (1986). Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review, 28, 74-92.
38.Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 532.
39.Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual Teams: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. SIGMIS Database, 35(1), 6-36.
40.Sanchez, R. & Mahoney, T. (1996). Modularity, Flexibility, amd Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design. Stragtgic Management Journal, 17, 63-76.
41.Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and ites application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Journal, 25(2), 312-334.
42.Senge, P. M. (1992). Building laerning organzation. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 15(2), 30-39.
43.Seamidass, P. M. (2002). Innovations in Competitive Manufacturing, NY: AMACOM.
44.Spearman, M. L. & Hopp, W.J. (1996). Factory Physics: Foundations of Manufacturing Management. Irwin, Chicago, IL
45.Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research,49-68.
46.Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1990), Basics of qualitative research : grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications
47.Teece, D. J. & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction: introduction and corporate change, 5(3), 537-556.
48.Teece, D. J., Pisano G. & Shuen, A.(1997). Dymamic capabilities and strategic management. Stratrgic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
49.Teece, D. J., Pisano G. & Shuen, A.(2007).MANAGEMENT, 18(7), 509-533.
50.Todorova, G. and Durisin, B. (2007) Absorptive Capacity: Valuing a Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32, 774-786.
51.Vorhies, D. W. & Morgan, D. A. (2003). A configuration theory assessment of marketing organization fit with business strategy and its relationship with marketing performance. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 100-115.
52.Wang, C. L. & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
53.Winter, S. G.(2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991-995.
54.Williams M.(1997), Social Surveys: Design to Analysis. In: T. May (ed.) Social Research Issues, Methods and Process, Buckingham: Open University Press.
55.Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousands Oaks. Interational Educational and Professional Publisher.
56.Yin, Robert K. (1987), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, California: Sage Publication.
57.Youssef, M. A. (1992). Agile Manufacturing:S Neccesary Condition for competing In Global Market. Industrial Engineering, 24, 18-20.
58.Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.
59.Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate Learning and Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-251.
 
網站部分
1.優拓資訊官網 https://www.yoctol.com/
2.優拓資訊以資料科學實踐商業智慧，結合Microsoft Azure與新科技，讓分析及預測更快速更精準 https://reurl.cc/vdd7N
3.優拓資訊快攻AI 商務機器人為你服務 https://reurl.cc/Yvvex
4.精誠集團AI加乘器 新創機器人也懂氣噗噗、森77 https://reurl.cc/rDD5y
5.Rule-based vs. NLU：聊天機器人如何聽懂人類的自然語言？ https://reurl.cc/55516
6.【2018關鍵趨勢6：Chatbot】自然語言理解技術成熟，Chatbot成企業搶客新競爭力 https://reurl.cc/1ZZGQ
7.人工智慧與大數據（上）：用數據解決問題的「老方法」和「新手段」 https://reurl.cc/b22lE
8.人工智慧與大數據（下）：大數據允許我們在思維方式上「抄捷徑」 https://reurl.cc/Err11