簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Ima Kristanti
Ima Kristanti
論文名稱: A Comparative Study of the Determinants of Bank Profitability in South Korea and Indonesia
A Comparative Study of the Determinants of Bank Profitability in South Korea and Indonesia
指導教授: 劉代洋
Day-Yang Liu
口試委員: 張光弟
Gordon Chang
許馨方
Xin-fang Xu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: bank profitabilitybank sizecredit riskefficiency managementcapital managementinflationmarket capitalizationSouth KoreaIndonesia
外文關鍵詞: bank profitability, bank size, credit risk, efficiency management, capital management, inflation, market capitalization, South Korea, Indonesia
相關次數: 點閱:270下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

The banking sector is an integral part of the economic system in a country. Moreover, banking industry performance is significant to the economic growth of a nation. Then, each tries to improve its financial performance by inspecting all banks that exist. Bank profitability is one way to measure bank performance. Previous research examined these determinants of bank profitability. Follow previous research by Sufian and Chong (2008) this research purpose is to find out how bank size, credit risk, the efficiency of management, capital management, inflation and market capitalization could affect bank profitability in South Korea and Indonesia.
This research collect data and provide the empirical results of the determinant of bank profitability in South Korea and Indonesia in 2000-2017. The sample consists of 30 and 29 commercial banks in South Korea and Indonesia respectively. Some banks merged or acquired by another bank and some banks established in the middle of the period studied make unbalance panel data.
The author applies the OLS regression process from E-Views 8 statistical package. In order to keep the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) of the coefficients, we do classical assumption tests for panel data. The empirical result analysis consists of T-test, F-Test and adjusted R-squared. Based on the model, the independent variables employed could explain around twenty percent of bank profitability.
The findings show a positive relationship between bank size and bank profitability in both countries. A Larger bank may earn more Return on Asset and Net Interest Margin than the small one. Because bank size is related to market power, a large bank may pay less for the inputs. Besides, the increasing returns through the allocation of fixed costs over high volume services. However, bank size negatively related to Return on Equity because it is related to the capital structure of a bank. The result shows banks in both countries have strong capital structure. It will provide additional strength to face financial turmoil. As a result, it may rise trust level from depositors.
In line with the previous study, management banks already anticipate the inflation changes. They monitor its changes and prepare many things in advance before it officially happened to make this variable is positively related to bank profitability at all measures. Low bank profitability can be explained by higher credit risk and low efficiency. Meantime, market capitalization result varies. The stock market in South Korea is quite developed and offer substitution possibility. On the other hand, Indonesia stock market still underdevelop makes not significant results.


The banking sector is an integral part of the economic system in a country. Moreover, banking industry performance is significant to the economic growth of a nation. Then, each tries to improve its financial performance by inspecting all banks that exist. Bank profitability is one way to measure bank performance. Previous research examined these determinants of bank profitability. Follow previous research by Sufian and Chong (2008) this research purpose is to find out how bank size, credit risk, the efficiency of management, capital management, inflation and market capitalization could affect bank profitability in South Korea and Indonesia.
This research collect data and provide the empirical results of the determinant of bank profitability in South Korea and Indonesia in 2000-2017. The sample consists of 30 and 29 commercial banks in South Korea and Indonesia respectively. Some banks merged or acquired by another bank and some banks established in the middle of the period studied make unbalance panel data.
The author applies the OLS regression process from E-Views 8 statistical package. In order to keep the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) of the coefficients, we do classical assumption tests for panel data. The empirical result analysis consists of T-test, F-Test and adjusted R-squared. Based on the model, the independent variables employed could explain around twenty percent of bank profitability.
The findings show a positive relationship between bank size and bank profitability in both countries. A Larger bank may earn more Return on Asset and Net Interest Margin than the small one. Because bank size is related to market power, a large bank may pay less for the inputs. Besides, the increasing returns through the allocation of fixed costs over high volume services. However, bank size negatively related to Return on Equity because it is related to the capital structure of a bank. The result shows banks in both countries have strong capital structure. It will provide additional strength to face financial turmoil. As a result, it may rise trust level from depositors.
In line with the previous study, management banks already anticipate the inflation changes. They monitor its changes and prepare many things in advance before it officially happened to make this variable is positively related to bank profitability at all measures. Low bank profitability can be explained by higher credit risk and low efficiency. Meantime, market capitalization result varies. The stock market in South Korea is quite developed and offer substitution possibility. On the other hand, Indonesia stock market still underdevelop makes not significant results.

Abstract iv Acknowledegment v List of Tables viii List of figures ix List of Appendix x Chapter 1 1 Introduction 1 Research Background 1 1.1 Research Purposes 3 1.2 Research Organization 3 1.3 Research Flowchart 4 Chapter 2 5 Literature Review 5 2.1 Financial Performance Management 5 2.2 The Determinants of Bank Profitability 6 Chapter 3 9 Methodology 9 3.1 Object of Research 9 3.2 Data Collection Method 9 3.3 Sample 10 3.4 The Variables 10 3.4.1 Independent Variables 10 3.4.2 Dependent Variables 12 3.5 The Descriptive Statistics 13 3.6 Regression Panel Data 13 3.7 Choosing panel data regression model 14 3.8 Classical Assumption Test on Panel Data 14 3.9 Significance test 15 3.10 Research Methodology Flowchart 15 Chapter 4 17 The result, Data Analysis and Discussion 17 4.1 Descriptive Statistic 17 4.2 Panel Data Estimation Method 19 4.2.1 ROA 19 4.2.2 ROE 22 4.4.3 NIM 24 4.3 Summary of the Empirical Findings 27 Chapter 5 30 Conclusion and Limitation 30 5.1 Conclusion 30 5.2 Limitation 30 5.3 Recommendation 31 Appendix 32 References 65

Ali, K., Akhtar, M.F., Ahmed, H.Z. 2011. Bank-Specific and Macroeconomy Indicators of Profitability – Empirical Evidence from the Commercial Banks of Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol 2 no 6
Almarzoqi, Raja and Sami Ben Naceur. 2015. Determinants of Bank Interest Margins in the Caucasus and Central Asia. International Monetary Fund
Alper, Deger and Adem Anbar. 2011. Bank Specific and Macroeconomy Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal 2, 139-152
Athanasglow, P., Brissimis, S., Delis, M., 2008. Bank-specific, Industry-specific and macroeconomy determinants of bank profitability. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Moey 18,121-136
Banker, Rajiv D, Chang, Hsihui, Lee, Seok-Young. 2010. Differential impact of Korean Banking system reforms on bank productivity. Journal of Banking and Finance 34, 1450-1460
Bennaceur, Sami and Mohamed Goaied. 2008. The Determinants of Commercial Bank Interest Margin and Profitability: Evidence from Tunisia. Frontiers in Finance and Economics 1, 106-130
Berger, Allen N. & Leora F. Klapper & Rima Turk-Ariss. 2009. Bank Competition and Financial Stability. Journal Finance Service Research 35,99–118
Dietrich, Andreas and Wanzenried, Gabrielle. 2011. Determinants of bank Profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of international financial markets, institutions and money 21, 307-327
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli and Huizinga, Harry. 2000. Financial Structure and Bank Profitability. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2430.
Gunter, Ulrich., Krenn Gerald., and Sigmund, Michael. 2013. Macroeconomy, Market and bank Specific Determinants of the Net Interest Margin in Austria. Financial Stability Report 25, 87-101
Guru, Balachandher K., Staunton, J and Shanmugam, B. 2000. Determinants of Commercial bank Profitability in Malaysia.
Islam, Md. Sahidul and Shin-Ichi Nishiyama. 2016. The Determinants of Bank Net Interest Margins: A Panel Evidence from South Asian Countries. Research in International Business and Finance 37,501-514
Nasserinia, Ali, M. Ariff and Cheng Fan-Fah. 2014. Key Determinants of Japanese Commercial Banks Performance. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 22, 17-38
Pasiouras, Fotios and Kosmidou, Kyriaki. 2007. Factors influencing the profitability of domestic and foreign commercial banks n the European Union. Research in International Business and Finance 21, 222-237
Plakalovic, Novo and Alihodzic, Almir. 2015. Determinants of the Net interest margin in BH Banks. Industrija 43(1), 133-153
Radelet, Steven and Sachs, Jeffrey. 1998. The Onset of the East Asian Financial Crisis. National Bureau of Economy Research Working Paper.
Saunders, Anthony and Liliana Schumacher. 2000. The Determinants of Bank Interest Rate Margins: An International Study. Journal of International Money and Finance 19, 813-832
Setiawan, Andy and Bambang Hermanto. 2016. Comparative Study: Determinant of Banking Profitability between Buku 4 and Buku 3 Bank in Indonesia. Benefit Journal management and Business 92-101
Smirlock, Michael. 1985. Evidence on the (Non) Relationship between Concentration and Profitability in Banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 17(1), 69-83
Sufian, Fadzlan. 2011. Profitability of the Korean Banking Sector: panel Evidence on Bank-Specific and Macroeconomy Determinants. Journal of Economics and Management 1,43-72.
Sufian, Fadzlan and Royfaizal Razali Chong. 2008. Determinants of Bank Profitability in A Developing Economy: Empirical Evidence From the Philippines. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance 2, 91-112
Suteja, J. and Ginting, G. (2014) Determination Profitabilitas Bank: Suatu Studi pada Bank yang Terdaftar di BEI. Trikonomika 13(1), 62-77
Suzuki, Yasushi. 2014. International Research Symposium in Service Management, 588-597
Tan, Yong Aaron and Floros, Christos. 2012. Bank Profitability and Inflation: The Case of China. Journal of Economic Studies
Wong, Jim., Fong, Tom Pak-Wing., Wong, Eric Tak-Chuen and Choi, Ka-Fai. 2008. Determinants of the Performance of Banks in Hong Kong. Palgrave Macmillan 4, 50-65
Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, Fifth Edition.

IMF Worldbank http://www.imf.org/en/Data
Indonesia Central bank https://www.bi.go.id/en/Default.aspx
South Korea Central Bank http://efisis.fss.or.kr/fss/fsiview/indexw.html

無法下載圖示
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE