泗水住房的主要問題是適當和適用住房數量不足，這個現象是因為貧民窟的散布，而造成住房品質的下降。
公共租賃住房是由泗水市人民政府管理。它被認為是為低收入人群提供足夠的住房和防止貧民窟面積擴大了可靠的解決方案之一。
其中它的管理方案起到極大的作用，建築物狀態的監測和居民反饋提供定期改善的重要價值。
這項研究的目的是就此方案進行評估審查其執行目前的充分性和優化，以創造適當的住房。根據不同群體的價格區間，選取三種不同的情況，有90為受訪者，使用此方案的居民，採用問卷進行了審查。該研究強調需要考慮從學習泗水公共住房改善和發展的居民（用戶）發出響應的相關因素。

The main issue of housings and settlement in Surabaya is the low fullfilment of adequate and affordable housings. It leads to settlement quality degradation because of the existance of a vary area of slums in the city.
Rusunawa is a rental public housing which is totally managed by Surabaya City Government. It is believed to be one of the reliable solutions in providing adequate housings for the low income people and preventing slum area expansion. As the aims of rusunawa development are to provide adequate housings and to decrese slums, the management programs of rusunawa plays an important role to achieve this aim, that is to fulfill the need of adequate housings, which are comfortable and healthful for its inhabitants. Therefore, the building condition monitoring and inhabitants feedback are important values to be regularly noticed for improvement.
The objective of this study is to conduct a post-occupancy evaluation of the management programs on rusunawa to examine the current sufficiency and optimization of its implementation in order to create adequate housing. Three different cases of rusunawa were selected based on the different group of price range and there are 90 respondents, who are the inhabitants of the observed rusunawa, were reviewed using questionnaire. The study underscores the need to consider relevant factors emanating from studying the inhabitants (users) response for public housing improvement and development in Surabaya.

Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Cipta Karya. Profil Kabupaten/ Kota Surabaya, Jawa Timur. Ciptakarya.pu.go.id.
http://ciptakarya.pu.go.id/profil/profil/barat/jatim/surabaya.pdf (Accessed 2015-08-20)
Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Cipta Karya dan Tata Ruang Propinsi Jawa Timur . Data Kekurangan Rumah Jatim. Jatimprov. 2014-04-30.
http://www.pucktr.jatimprov.go.id/uploads/informasi/informasi%20sertamerta/data%20kekurangan%20rumah%20jatim/data%20kekurangan%20rumah%20jatim.pdf (Accessed 2015-08-20)
Fatoye, E.O., Odusami, K.T., 2009. Occupants0 satisfaction approach to housing performance evaluation: the case of Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the RICS COBRA Research Conference, University of Cape Town, 10–11 September, 2009. Available from: /http://www.rics.org/cobraS. (Accessed 2010-02-22).
Gupta, R., Chandiwala, S., 2010. Integrating an occupant-centred building performance evaluation approach to achieve wholehouse and low-carbon retrofitting of UK homes. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 9–11 April, 2010. London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings. Available from: /http://nceub.org.ukS. (Accessed 2012-09-10)
Hermanto, Setiawan and Yusie, Daniel. Analisa Evaluasi Pasca-huni Gedung P Universitas Kristen Petra Surabaya. B.Eng., Petra Christian University,. 2000.
Ibem, Eziyi O., Opoko, Akunnaya P., Adeboye, Albert B., Amole, Dolapo. Performance evaluation of residential buildings in public housing estates in Ogun State, Nigeria : User’s satisfaction perspective. Science Direct : Frontiers of Architectural Research 2, no.2 (2013): 178-190
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S2095263513000150/1-s2.0-S2095263513000150-main.pdf?_tid=29c2f1d8-1aa1-11e6-8cd5-00000aacb35d&acdnat=1463319210_95b3a07eda8b78a47768d9088017391c (Accessed 2015-12-04)
Jaafar, Mastura, Hasan, Noor L., Mohamad, Osman, Ramayah, T . The Determinants of Housing Satisfaction Level : A Study on Residential Development Project by Penang Development Corporation (PDC). Jurnal Kemanusiaan no.6 (2005) : 73-93.
http://www.management.utm.my/download/jurnal-kemanusiaan/bil-06-dis-2005/73-the-determinants-of-housing-satisfaction-level-a-study-on-residential-development-project-by-penang/file.html (Accessed 2015-12-03)
Jiboye, Adesoji D. Evaluating Public Housing Performance : Providing a Basis for Residential Quality Improvement in Nigeria. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 9, no.2 ( 2011): 225-232.
http://www.idosi.org/mejsr/mejsr9(2)11/15.pdf (Accesed 2015-12-03)
Jiboye, Adesoji D. Post-occupancy evaluation of residential satisfaction in Lagos, Nigeria : Feedback for residential improvement. . Science Direct : Frontiers of Architectural Research 1, no.3 (2012) : 236-243.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263512000489 (Accesed 2015-12-03)
Kaitilla, S., 1993. Satisfaction with public housing in Papua New Guinea: the case of West Taraka housing scheme. Environment and Behavior 25 (4), 514–545.
Kian, P.S., Feriadi, H., Sulistio, W., Seng, K.C., 2001. A case study on total building performance evaluation of an ‘‘intelligent’’ office building in Singapore. Dimensi Teknik Sipil 3 (1), 9–15.
Khair, N., Ali, H.M., Wilson, A.J., Juhari, N.H., 2012. Physical environment for post occupancy evaluation in public low-cost housing. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Business and Economic Research (ICBER). Available from: / www.internationalconference.com.mvS. (accessed 2012-11-12).
Kim, S., Yang, I., Yeo, M., Kim, K., 2005. Development of a housing performance evaluation model for multi-family residential building in Korea. Building and Environment 40 (2005), 1103–1116.
Liu, A.M.M., 1999. Residential satisfaction in housing estates: a Hong Kong perspective. Automation in Construction 8, 511–524
Meir, I.A., Garb, Y., Jiao, D., Cicelsky, A., 2009. Post-occupancy evaluation: an inevitable step toward sustainability. Advances In Building Energy Research 3, 189–220.
Mitterer, C., Kunzel, H.M., Herkel, S., Holm, A., 2012. Optimizing energy efficiency and occupant comfort with climate specific design of the building. Frontiers of Architectural Research 1, 229–235.
Nawawi, A.H., Khalil, N., 2008. Post-occupancy evaluation correlated with building occupants0 satisfaction: an approach to performance evaluation of government and public buildings. Journal of Building Appraisal 4, 59–69.
Parker, C., Mathews, B.P., 2001. Customer satisfaction: contrasting academic and consumers0 interpretations. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 19 (1), 38–46.
Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. 2012. Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 15 Tahun 2012. Jdih.surabaya.go.id.
http://peraturan.go.id/inc/view/11e56c92c20f0a1682bf303832383438.html (Accessed 2015-08-20)
Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. 2012. Peraturan Menteri Negara Perumahan Rakyat Nomor : 14/PERMEN/M/2007 tentang Pengelolaan Rumah Susun Sederhana Sewa. Jdih.surabaya.go.id.
http://storage.jak-stik.ac.id/ProdukHukum/PerumahanRakyat/Permen%2014%20Tahun%202007.pdf (Accessed 2015-08-20)
Pemkot Surabaya akan bangun 78 blok rusunawa di 11 lokasi. Kabar Bisnis. 2015-10-02.
http://www.kabarbisnis.com/read/2861310/pemkot-surabaya-akan-bangun-78-blok-rusunawa-di-11-lokasi (Accessed 2015-11-24)
Preiser, W.F.E., 1995. Post-occupancy evaluation: how to make Buildings work better. Facilities 13 (11), 19–28.
Prihantono, Gentur. Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Cipta Karya dan Tata Ruang Propinsi Jawa Timur . (2014). Rencana Strategis (Renstra) Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Cipta Karya dan Tata Ruang Propinsi Jawa Timur Tahun Anggaran 2015-2019. Jatimprov. 2014-04-30.
http://pucktr.jatimprov.go.id/uploads/lakip_baru/10_RENSRA%20PUCKTR%202015.pdf (Accessed 2015-10-22)
Rachmawati, Farida, Soemitro, Ria A.A., Adi, Tri J., Susilawati, Connie. Lowcost apartment program implementation in Surabaya metropolitan area. Science Direct : Procedia Engineering 125 (2015) : 75-82.
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877705815033299/1-s2.0-S1877705815033299-main.pdf?_tid=d70341fc-1aa8-11e6-9f1b-00000aacb361&acdnat=1463322494_d14870b2a5fe3a9f01b0208fbaa74413 (Accesed 2015-12-20)
Rolalisasi, Andarita. Community Participation in Slum Upgrading Programme : A Case Study in Surabaya, East Java. B. Eng., Institute of Technology Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), 2007.
Taufiq, Fatkhurrohman. Jawa Timur kekurangan 600 ribu rumah layak huni. Tempo. 2011-04-28.
https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/news/2011/04/28/090330722/jawa-timur-kekurangan-600-ribu-rumah-layak-huni (Accessed 2016-02-01)
Ukoha, O.M., Beamish, J.O., 1997. Assessment of residents0 satisfaction with public housing in Abuja, Nigeria. Habitat International 21 (4), 445–460.
van der Voordt, T.J.M., Maarleveld, M., 2006. Performance of office buildings from a user0 s perspective. Ambiente Construido 6 (3), 7–20.
Vischer, J.C., 2002. Post occupancy evaluation: a multi-faced tool for building improvement. Federal Facilities Council, Chapter 3, pp. 23–34.
Yuwono, Budi. Rusunawa untuk mengurangi, bukan menambah kekumuhan. Buletin Cipta Karya. 2010-12-01.
http://ciptakarya.pu.go.id/dok/bulletin/bulletinCK_des10.pdf (Accessed 2015-08-20)
Zeiler, W., Boxem, G., 2008. Sustainable schools: better than traditional schools? In: Proceedings of the Indoor Air 2008 Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 17–22 August, Paper ID: 10.