如今全球已邁入以知識為基礎的「知識經濟時代」，而當前教育界在面對知識經濟時代的變化，勢必也面臨著衝擊與改革，才能因應接踵而來的挑戰。以現有教學過程之中，「教師如何教的有效，學生如何真正學到？」是引人深思的課題，往往老師教學過程，常常有一些是屬於個人學習思考與經驗，而無法以結構化的方式適當地表達出來，使學生了解。在資訊科技蓬勃發展的今日，若教學過程中能引用知識管理、知識地圖，使教師將教材知識予以整理並繪製成知識地圖後，強化知識分享、意見回饋等活動，讓課程教材知識不斷地累積，並使得課程教材品質得以日益提升。本研究試圖以知識管理、知識地圖與概念構圖分析進行課程教材知識地圖之建構探討。
本研究將以系統展示法，結合知識管理的整合性策略、知識地圖與概念構圖分析建構一整合性課程教材知識地圖管理系統。同時，為確認本研究所開發的雛形系統的實用性，將利用個案實證的方式，透過系統實行驗證本研究在研究成效上的效度與信度，並透過個案訪談得到五項結論：(1) 知識地圖能夠有效地呈現課程教材知識概念構圖; (2) 知識地圖提供主動的知識搜尋能夠有效地縮短搜尋的時間; (3) 知識地圖管理系統能夠有效提升課程教材知識的品質; (4) 知識地圖管理系統能夠做為組織記憶，促進組織學習的進行; (5) 知識地圖管理系統能輔助教師對課程教材知識的整理與建構。
本研究根據結論給予實務界的建議：(1) 直接將知識地圖內的知識內容單元連結到教學網站當教材使用；(2) 透過系統各項統計資訊，擬定相關知識管理策略； (3) 知識地圖管理系統與工作績效結合。而對未來研究者的建議有四點：(1) 將知識地圖管理系統完整呈現出概念構圖；(2) 將知識地圖管理系統應用於合科課程；(3) 擴大研究對象，將研究對象逐步擴大至全校師生、歷屆校友、校外人士等；(4) 延長實驗時間，由於知識的累積與應用需要更久的時間方能更有所成效，故建議將研究實施時間延長，以發掘系統各方面更完整的效益，並真正發揮出知識地圖之功能。

Nowadays the whole world has already marched toward the era of “knowledge-driven economy”, the education not only rethinks the feasible schema to deal with the pound but make teaching knowledge working. In the recent teaching processes, it is to be in deep thought that “how teach effectively and how learn effectively?” Now, there is a problem that some personal learning experiences can not be expressed to students properly using oral way during the teaching processes.This study use the Knowledge Map to organize knowledge through sharing and feedbacks, but also the teaching quality will be improved. This study intends to exploit the teaching material knowledge map by analyzing “Knowledge management”, “Knowledge map” and “Concept map”.
This study integrates the holistic conceptual with the KM strategy、the Knowledge Map to develop a Knowledge Map system (K_Map system). To test our framework, the case study is applied. The findings of case study indicate that: (1) Knowledge Map can effectively present the map of teaching materials knowledge; (2) Knowledge Map offers initiative knowledge to searched and the searching time can be effectively shortened; (3) K_Map system can improve the quality of the teaching materials knowledge of course effectively ; (4) Knowledge map can be used as organization memory to approve organization learning; (5) K_Map system can help teachers to arrange and develop the teaching materials of knowledge.
This study has three suggestions to practice are: (1) For teachers, they can put the knowledge units into their materials; (2) Developing the strategies of knowledge management through statistical information of the K_Map system; (3) Use the system to strength the completeness of instructional evaluation.

中文部份
1. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L., Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know, Boston: Harvard business school press, 1998. 胡瑋珊譯，中國生產力中心，1999。
2. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995. 楊子江、江美音譯，創新求勝：智價企業論，台北：遠流出版社，1997。
3. 王港弘，「知識管理績效驅動因素評估系統之研究」，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，2002。
4. 丘聖光，「階層式超媒體概念圖系統在課程呈現上的應用」，國立台灣師範大學資訊研究所碩士論文，2000。
5. 李大偉，技職教育測量與評鑑，台北：三民，1989。
6. 李永吟，認知教學理論與策略，台北：心理，2000。
7. 李昇暾、蕭碧玉、莊淑琳，”建構基於本體論鎂合金二次加工技術知識地圖之研究”，第十五屆國際資訊管理學術研討會，台北，2004/5/29。
8. 余民寧，有意義的學習—概念構圖之研究，台北：商鼎文化出版社，1997。
9. 何治鈴，「概念構圖與合作學習應用於綜合高中會計科目教學成效之研究」，中原大學會計研究所碩士論文，2002。
10. 林東清、許孟祥，「資訊管理調查研究方法探討」，資訊管理學報資訊管理實證研究方法研討會特刊，第四卷，第一期，第21~40頁，1997。
11. 吳琮璠，「資訊管理個案研究方法」，資訊管理學報資訊管理實證研究方法研討會特刊，第四卷，第一期，第7~17頁，1997。
12. 季延平、郭鴻志，系統分析與設計，台北：華泰文化事業有限公司，1995。
13. 范錚強，「資訊管理的實驗研究方法」，資訊管理學報資訊管理實證研究方法研討會特刊，第四卷，第一期，第43~51頁，1997。
14. 孫邦正，教育概論，台北：台灣商務，1990。
15. 孫春在、朱俊豪、徐愛蒂，超媒體教材建構研究，資訊與教育雜誌，第67期，第16頁，1998。
16. 賴奕存，「知識地圖建構之研究－以研究方法的知識為例」，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，2003。
17. 陳昭雄，工業職業教育，台北：三民，1985。
18. 陳淑芬、張國恩，「概念構圖式學習系統」，國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，1997。
19. 梁定澎，「資訊管理研究方法總論」，資訊管理學報資訊管理實證研究方法研討會特刊，第四卷，第一期，第1~6頁，1997。
20. 梁定澎、洪新原，「資訊管理之彙總研究方法」，資訊管理學報資訊管理實證研究方法研討會特刊，第四卷，第一期，第54~67頁，1997。
21. 張添洲，教材教法－發展與革新，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2000。
22. 黃華山、游于仙、陳琨義、周華貞，「網路教材建構方法之探討」，彰化師範大學資訊管理研究所所碩士論文，2004。
23. 薛智名，「虛擬實踐社群之知識圖發掘」，國立中山大學，資訊管理研究所碩士論文，2001。
24. 蕭建嘉，「以概念構圖的動態評量(CMDA)探討國小高年級學童的概念改變－以－地球的運動單元為例」，台北師範學院碩士論文，2001。
25. 譚大純、汪昭芬，「評估知識管理績效的八大類指標」，會計研究月刊，185期，2001。
26. 譚克平，「遠距離教學效用評估」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，1997/8/1-1998/7/31。
27. 羅文基，技職教育的探索，台灣省教育廳：職業教育叢書編輯小組，1988。
28. 蘇政宏，「知識管理績效指標之建構與衡量：跨功能之量表設計與實證研究」，義守大學管理研究所碩士論文，2002。
英文部分
1. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E., “Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No.1, pp.107-136(2001).
2. Augier, M. and Vendelo, M.T., “Networks, cognition and management of tacit knowledge,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.252-261(1999).
3. Binney, B., “The knowledge management spectrum－understanding the KM landscape,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol.5, No.1, pp. 33-42(2001).
4. Birchall, D.W. and Tovstiga, G., “Accessing the firm’s strategic knowledge portfolio: a framework and methodology”, Int. J. Technology management, Vol.24, No.4, pp. 419-434(2002).
5. Brady, L., Curriculum development. Sydney: Prentice Hall(1990).
6. Bryce, L.A., “Boolean browsing in an information system: an experimental test”, Information technology and libraries, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 12-20(2001).
7. Chou, C. and Lin, H., “The effects of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners’ performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system”, Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia , Vol.7, pp. 151-176(1998).
8. Davenport, T.H., “Some principles of knowledge management,” http://www.bus.utexas.edu/kam/kmprin.htm (1995).
9. De Long, D.W. & Fahey, L., “Diagnosing culture barriers to knowledge management,” Academy of management executive, Vol.14, No.4, pp.113-127(2001).
10. Edmond F.V.IIII, “Knowledge mapping: getting started with knowledge management,” Information system management, Vol.4, No.16, Fall, pp.16-23(1999).
11. Eisenhardt, K., “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp.532-550(1989).
12. Frey, R.S.,” Knowledge management, proposal development, and small businesses,” Journal of management development, Vol.20, No.1, pp. 38-54(2001).
13. Galup, S.D., Dattero, R. and Hicks, R.C., “knowledge management systems: an architecture for active and passive knowledge,” Information resource management journal, Vol.15, No.1, pp. 22-27(Jan-Mar 2002).
14. Galusha, J. M., “Barriers to Learning in Distance Education,” University of Southern Mississippi, http://www3.ncsu.edu/dox/NBE/galusha.html (1998).
15. Gordon, J., L., “Creating knowledge maps by exploiting dependent relationships,” knowledge-based systems, Vol.13, pp. 71-79(2000).
16. Hansen, M.T., “The search-transfer problem: the roles of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits,” Administrative science quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 82-111(1999).
17. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T., “What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?” Harvard business review, Mar/Apr, pp.106-116(1999).
18. Jeffrey A. Fromm and Todd V. Kern, “Education Industry Offers World lf Investment Opportunity,” Venture Capital Journal, Wellesley Hills, pp.36-38(2001).
19. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H., Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Cambridge University Press, New York (1993).
20. Kenyon, J. and Briggs, P., “Network map: visualizing telecommunications service,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 56-54(2000).
21. Koehn, O. and Abecker, A., “Corporate memories for knowledge management in industrial practice: prospects and challenges,” Journal of universal computer science, Vol.3, No.8, pp. 929-954(1997).
22. Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L. and Zytkow, J.M., Scientific discovery: computational exploration of the creative processes, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (1987).
23. Lin, F. -R. and Hsueh, C. -M., “Knowledge map creation and maintenancefor virtual communities of practice,” Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii InternationalConference on System Sciences, pp. 1-10(2003).
24. McDermott, R., “Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management,” California management review, Vol.5, No.4, pp.103-117(Summer 1999).
25. Mentzas, G., Apostolou, D., Young, R. and Abecker, A., “knowledge networking: a holistic solution for leveraging corporate knowledge,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 94-106(2001).
26. Mintzberg, H. and Heyden, L.V.D., “Organigraph: Drawing how company really work,” Harvard business review, Vol. 77, No. 7, pp. 87-95(Mar-Apr 1999).
27. Nakhleh, M. B. & Krajcik, J. S., “The effect of level of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base and ph concepts,” Presentation at the 64th annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, April, pp. 7-10(1991).
28. Novak, J.D., and Gowin, D. B., Learning how to learn. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press (1984).
29. Novak, J.D., & Musonda, D., A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Education Research Journal, 28, pp. 117-153(1991).
30. Novak, J.D., Concept mapping: A tool for improving science teaching and learning. In D.F. Treagust, R.Duit, & B.J.Fraser(Eds.),Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics, pp.32-43, New York: Teachers College Press(1996).
31. O’Dell, C. and Grayson, C.J., “If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices,” California management review, Vol. 40, No.3, pp.154-174(1998).
32. O’Donnell, A., “Searching for information in knowledge maps and texts,” Contemporary educational psychology, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 222-239(1993).
33. Offsey, S., “knowledge management: linking people to knowledge for bottom line results,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 113-122(1997).
34. Paolucci, R., “The effects of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system,” Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia, Vol.7, pp. 123-150(1998).
35. Parikh, M., “knowledge management framework for high-tech research and development,” Engineering management journal, Vol.13, No.3, pp. 27-33(2001).
36. Pfeffer, J.A. and Sutton, R.I., “Knowing what to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action,” California management review, Vol. 42, No. 1, (Fall 1999).
37. Rao, R. and Sprague, R.H.,” Natural technologies for knowledge work: information visualization and knowledge extraction,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 70-80(1998).
38. Rewey, K.L., Dansereau, D.F. and Peel, J.L., “Knowledge maps and information processing strategies,” contemporary educational psychology, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 203-214(1991).
39. Ritchie D and Volkl C, “Effectiveness of two generative learning strategies in the science classroom,” School Science and Mathematics, 100 (2), pp.83-89(2000).
40. Ruggles, R., “The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice,” California Management Review, Vol. 40, No.3, pp.80-89(1998).
41. Sarvary, M., “Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry,” California management review, Vol.41, No.4, pp.95-107 (Winter 1999).
42. Satyadas, A., Harigopal, M. and Cassaigne, N.P.,” Knowledge management tutorial: an editorial overview,” IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics—part c: applications and reviews, Vol.31, No.4, pp. 429-437(2001).
43. Soliman, F. and Spooner, K., “Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resources management,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 337-345(2000).
44. Swan, J., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H. and Hislop, D., “knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 262-275(1999).
45. Teece, D.J., “Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, market for know-how, and intangible assets,” California management review, Vol.40, No.3, pp.55-79(Spring 1998).
46. Tsai, W.P, “Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of networks position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance,” Academy of management journal, Vol. 44, pp. 996-1004(2001).
47. Tuomi, I. “Data is more than knowledge: implications of the reversed hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory,” Proceeding of the 32nd Hawaii International conference on systems Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.
48. Wexler, M., ”The who, what and why of knowledge mapping,” Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 249-263(2001)
49. Zack, M.H., “Developing a knowledge strategy,” California management review, Vol.41, No.3, pp. 125-145(Spring 1999).
50. Zeilik, M., Schau, C., Mattern, N., Hall, S., Teague, K. W., and Bisard, W., “Conceptual Astronomy: A Novel Approach for Teaching Postsecondary Science Courses,” American Journal of Physics, Vol.10, No.65, p.987 (1997).