C 銀行，是國內一家已有百年歷史的商業銀行，主要經營的業務範圍有一般 存放款業務、貿易融資、國際金融、基金理財、保險、財富管理、信用卡等業務， 1989 年個案銀行為拓展海外市場，在美國紐約開設了第一家海外分行，提供跨 國間的金融服務，在當時的外匯金融圈，C 銀行可說是數一數二的一家本國銀行， 而隨著業務的不斷拓展，C 銀行也積極的向其它海外進行營業據點的開拓，先後 陸陸續續成立了洛杉磯、東京、倫敦、香港及新加坡等海外分行。C 銀行的海外 分行，在分行設立時採購建置資訊系統，然而採購的系統主要以各地套裝軟體為 主，一方面每家分行各別投資建置，造成資源虛耗且管理不易，一方面隨著時間 的推延與時代的變遷以及國際的發展趨勢，各海外分行所採購的系統，面臨到系 統無法符合業務需求，需面臨系統汰換的議題。
本論文以哈佛式個案論文撰寫法進行寫作，包含個案本文及個案教學指引 等，個案教學指引對個案中的討論內容詳做說明，主要採用模組化、資源整合、 組織靈巧及成長策略理論與管理議題，並依照理論學說及個案內容進行分析探 討，期透過實務與理論的結合，瞭解個案銀行海外分行如何運用集中建置的策略 建置系統，與如何提升個案銀行的人員素質及核心競爭力，以實現拓展海外經營 版圖之目標。

C bank, the case of this thesis, is a historical commercial bank. Its main business content includes credit business, trade finance, international finance, fund management, insurance, wealth management, and credit card. In 1989, C Bank established its first overseas branch which provided international financial service in New York in order to explore overseas markets. C Bank is an outstanding local bank in exchange market, it keeps expanding their business scope with across countries aggressively via establishing overseas branches in Los Angeles, Tokyo, London, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc. As branches founded, they purchased and adopted local software package as their business system respectively. Nevertheless, with this scenario, it causes few shortages, first, it makes the difficulty for C bank to manage the software package resource centrally as each branch use its own system. Second, it wastes the overall resource to manage with each branch system. Last, with the ever-changing society and technology, it faces the issue that system cannot satisfied with current business need and needs upgrade with their systems.
This thesis uses Harvard Business Study (HBS) case as study method, which involves C bank case study and case method. The case method includes modularity, resource integration, ambidexterity and growth strategy. In this thesis, we analyzed the theory and C bank case practice separately. With the combination of theory and practice, we anticipate the strategy improvement with oversees branch business system on system integration and the enhancement of human resource ability with core competitiveness to achieve the goal of expanding the overseas operation.

中文文獻
1.洪世章、譚丹琪、廖曉青(2007)，企業成長、策略選擇與策略改變，中山管理評論 2007 年三月號第十五卷第一期 p.11-35。
2.徐敏嘉(2013)，集團 IT 資源模組化管理-以慈濟醫院為例，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士學位論文。
3.翁順裕(2017)，擺盪在技術的深耕與探索之間:雙元性組織，管理學報 2017 年，34 卷，2 期，189-214。

英文文獻
1.Capron, L. (1999). The long-term performance of horizontal acquisition, StrategicManagement Journal, 29(11): 987-1018.
2.Duncan, R. (1976). The Ambidextrous Organization: Depning Dual Structures for Innovation. In R. H. Killman, L. R. Pondy and D. Sleven (Eds.), The Management of Organization, New York: North Holland, 1(1), 167-188.
3.Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents,consequences and mediating role of organizationalambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal,47(2): 209- 226.
4.Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks, Strategic ManagementJournal, 21(3): 203-215.
5.Karim, S. and Mitchell, W. (2000). Path-dependent and path-breaking change: reconfiguringbusiness resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978-1995,Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11): 1061-1081.
6.Mahoney, J. and Pandian, J. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation ofstrategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 13: 363-380.
7.Miller, T.D.,& Elgård, P. (1998). “Defining Modules, Modularity andModularization,”Design for Integration in Manufacturing. Proceedings of the13th IPS Research Seminar, Fuglsoe, Aalborg University.
8.O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4): 324-338.
9. Pahl, G. & Beitz, W. (1996). “Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach”, Edition: 2nd, SpringerVerlag
10.Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York, Wiley. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336.
11.Slater, M. (1980). The managerial limitations to the growth of firms, Economic Journal, 8:520-528.
12.Schilling, M.A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and itsapplication to interfirm product modularity, Academy of Management Journal,Vol. 25, No.2, pp. 312-334.

網路部分
1.MBALib(MBA 智庫網)