議題探究之可體驗推測設計—以虛擬實境之降溫座椅創作為例

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	王培懿 Pei-Yi Wang
論文名稱：	議題探究之可體驗推測設計—以虛擬實境之降溫座椅創作為例 Issued-Probe for Empirical Speculative Design—Taking VR Calm Down Chair as an Example
指導教授：	林銘煌 Ming-Huang Lin
口試委員:	梁容輝 Rung-Huei Liang 許峻誠 Chun-Cheng Hsu
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	設計學院 - 設計系 Department of Design
論文出版年：	2023
畢業學年度：	111
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	122
中文關鍵詞：	文化探針、推測設計、虛擬實境
外文關鍵詞：	Cultural Probe, Speculative Design, Virtual Reality
相關次數：	點閱：387 下載：5
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

上一筆

推測設計被譽為引領社會、政治、倫理，與文化等邁向革新的媒介，透過虛構世界觀的建立與人造物的設計，激起人們討論、反思，乃至於以行動改變。然而無法產生共鳴是現有推測設計作品的普遍存在的問題。因此，本研究以可體驗的推測設計為初衷，建構具推測意涵的文化探針法，一方面循序漸進地搜集人們對於主題的觀點，一方面不斷開展虛構世界多元的可能性。本研究過程中運用兩次不同的文化探針法蒐集體驗者的質性經驗進行關鍵詞彙摘要後，以VR推測設計作為成果呈現。具體研究流程為：文化探針的解構與再定位、設計具推測意涵的文化探針、探針結果的簡易編碼與意義創造、AI輔助文字具象化，最後，統整上述的洞察進行VR互動體驗的創作並根據體驗訪談內容探討成果。本研究對於設計研究的貢獻有二：(1)以文化探針作為推測設計創作之脈絡、(2)透過沉浸式感官體驗的創作激發觀者對推測設計作品的共鳴。

Speculative Design has been considered the media of leading society, politics, ethics, and culture toward innovation. Through the construction of a fictional world and artifacts, it is expected to provoke discussion and reflections around people. However, most speculative designs or artworks don’t work, it’s hard for people to comprehend or relate to. Hence, this study aims to construct speculative-oriented probes to create empirical speculation, not only collecting the perspectives of people about the topic but also keeps developing the multiple possibilities of the fictional world. This study conducts two cultural probes for collecting empirical “glimpses” from participants and makes those probe returns to the final present, VR speculative design, by analyzing the information in a non-systematic way. The process went from the “redefinition of the Cultural Probe”, “speculative-oriented probe design”, and “encoding and construction of probe returns”, to “AI-lead words to images”. Last but not least, this study integrates all the research insights into a VR interactive design and discusses the results through the participants’ interviews. This study makes two contributions to design research: (1) Develop a unique method and context of creating speculative design with Cultural Probe. (2) Resonate with viewers and make more connections of speculative design by the sensory immersive interactive design.

摘要 .......................................................................................................................... i
Abstract ................................................................................................................. ii
目錄 ........................................................................................................................ iv
圖目錄 .................................................................................................................. vii
表目錄 ..................................................................................................................... x
第一章、緒論 ......................................................................................................... 1
1 研究背景與動機 .......................................................................................... 1
2 研究問題 ...................................................................................................... 4
3 研究目的 ...................................................................................................... 4
4 研究架構 ...................................................................................................... 4
第二章、文獻探討 ................................................................................................. 7
1 推測設計 ...................................................................................................... 7
1.1 可能世界理論 ......................................................................................... 10
1.2 推測、設幻、批判 ................................................................................. 12
1.3 可能世界的主宰 ..................................................................................... 19
1.3 非現實美學 ............................................................................................. 20
2 虛擬實境 .................................................................................................... 21
2.1 虛擬實境於設計的應用 .......................................................................... 22
2.2 互動式沈浸體驗：新媒體藝術 .............................................................. 23
2.4 人機互動第三派典之後 .......................................................................... 26
2.4 小結 .......................................................................................................... 28
3 文化探針 .................................................................................................... 29
第三章、研究方法 ............................................................................................... 33
1 建構型設計研究與文化探針法 ................................................................. 33
2 文化探針 .................................................................................................... 34
3 處境方法與思想實驗 ................................................................................ 35
4 訪談法：半結構訪談 ................................................................................ 36
第四章、研究過程 ............................................................................................... 37
1.1 推測探針1：主題式探針 ....................................................................... 38
1.2 研究動機與探針設計 .............................................................................. 39
1.3 訪綱 ......................................................................................................... 44
1.4 處境推測實作與初步結果整理 ............................................................. 45
1.5 文本推測實作與初步結果整理 ............................................................. 46
1.6 小結 ......................................................................................................... 48
2.1 議題式探究 ............................................................................................. 50
2.2 設計動機與議題 ..................................................................................... 51
2.3 議題式探針設計與參與者 ..................................................................... 51
2.4 探針現場：任務內容規劃＆DISCORD伺服器架設 .............................. 52
2.5 探針成果 ................................................................................................. 57
2.6 討論與發展 .............................................................................................. 61
3 AI生成藝術 ................................................................................................ 63
4 討論與重整 ................................................................................................. 72
第五章、設計創作 ............................................................................................... 74
1 創作內容概述 ............................................................................................ 74
2 議題探究結果詮釋到推測設計概念 ......................................................... 75
2.1 人造物設計（三張座椅、偵測貼片） ................................................. 76
2.2 體驗流程規劃（影片、貼片、VR、實體座椅） ................................ 83
3 VR技術整合 .............................................................................................. 86
4 體驗實測與參與者回饋 ............................................................................. 95
第六章、結論與討論 ......................................................................................... 101
1.1 文化探針作為推測設計研究創作方法之成果評估 ............................ 101
1.2 互動設計成果評估 ................................................................................ 103
2 可體驗推測設計的未來 ........................................................................... 104
參考文獻 ............................................................................................................. 106
附錄 ..................................................................................................................... 113

                                

1. Brassier, R., Grant, I. H., Harman, G., & Meillassoux, Q. (2007). Speculative realism. In R. Mackay (Ed.), Collapse: Volume 3 (pp. 306-449). Falmouth: Urbanomic Press.

2. Bill Gaver, T. D., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: cultural probes: Interactions.

3. Connor Graham, M. R., Martin Gibbs, Frank Vetere, Keith Cheverst. (2007). How Probes Work. doi:10.1145/1324892.1324899

4. Desjardins, A., Key, C., Biggs, H. R., & Aschenbeck, K. (2019). Bespoke Booklets: A Method for Situated Co-Speculation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, San Diego, CA, USA.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322311

5. Elsden, C., Chatting, D., Durrant, A. C., Garbett, A., Nissen, B., Vines, J., & Kirk, D. S. (2017). On Speculative Enactments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025503
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3025453.3025503

6. Elsden C, Chatting D, Durrant AC, et al (2017) On speculative enactments. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI‘17). p. 5386–5399

7. Gaver, W. W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. interactions, 11(5), 53–56. doi:10.1145/1015530.1015555

8. Gordon Calleja, Revising Immersion: A Conceptual Model for the Analysis of Digital Game Involvement

9. Hsu, Y.-Y., Tsai, W.-C., Lee, W.-C., & Liang, R.-H. (2018). Botanical Printer: An Exploration on Interaction Design with Plantness. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Hong Kong, China.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196809

10. Ilpo Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redstrom, and Stephan Wensveen(2013), Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom

11. Joseph Voros (2001). A Primer on Futures Studies, Foresight and the Use of Scenarios, Swinburne University of Technology.

12. Leong, T. W., Wright, P., Vetere, F., & Howard, S. (2010). Understanding experience using dialogical methods: the case of serendipity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, Brisbane, Australia.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952278

13. Lewis, David. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.

14. Lewis, David. (1986a). On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.

15. Light, A. (2006). Adding method to meaning: A technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 175-187.
doi:10.1080/01449290500331172

16. Lowe, E. J. (2002). A Survey of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.

17. Mattelmäki, T. (2006). Design Probes. University of Art and Design Helsinki.

18. Mccarthy, J. & Wright, Peter. (2004). Technology as Experience.
10.1145/1015530.1015549.

19. McVeigh-Schultz, J., Kreminski, M., Prasad, K., Hoberman, P., & Fisher, S. S. (2018). Immersive Design Fiction: Using VR to Prototype Speculative Interfaces and Interaction Rituals within a Virtual Storyworld. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Hong Kong, China.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196793

20. Michael Heim(1993). The Metaphpysics of Virtual Reality (New York: Oxford University Press, p. 109-128.

21. Oogjes, D., Odom, W., & Fung, P. (2018). Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Hong Kong, China. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196810

22. Sengers, P., Liesendahi, R., Magar, W., Seibert, C., Müller, B., Joachims, T., . . . Höök, K. (2002). The enigmatics of affect. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, London, England. https://doi.org/10.1145/778712.778728

23. Stephen Wilson (2010). Art + Science Now: How scientific research and technological innovation are becoming key to 21st-century aesthetics(London: Thames & Hudson)

24. Stuart Candy(2017). Designing an experiential scenario: The People Who Vanished

25. Takashi Yagisawa. 2014. Possible Objects.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
(Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/possible-objects/.

26. Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F. F., Pedell, S., . . . Bunyan, M. (2005). Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055038

27. Wallace, J., McCarthy, J., Wright, P. C., & Olivier, P. (2013). Making design probes work. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466473

28. Wong,R., Wyk,E.,Pierce,J. (2017) Real-Fictional Entanglements: Using Science Fiction and Design Fiction to Interrogate Sensing Technologies. In Proc. DIS '17 on Designing Interactive SystemsJune 2017 Pages 567–579

29. Anthony Dunne, Fiona Raby（2019）。推測設計（Speculative Everything）。（洪世民譯）何樵暐工作室有限公司。（原著出版年：2003）

30. 林珂莆（2011）存在感：探討書本互動脈絡. (碩士). 國立交通大學, 新竹市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r5d79s

31. 李婉貞（2019）「事物中心」設計之推測潛能—透過物本體視野的互動研究（設計學報第 25 卷第 1 期 2020 年 3 月）

32. 鈕文英（2014）。質性研究方法與論文寫作。雙葉書廊。

33. 蘇志昇、梁容輝（2014）。用喚起情感的物件來設計以引起共嗚－一個體驗式互動設計方法。實踐設計學報，(8)，42-54。

34. 曾綉珍（2020）。居家物件之處境共同推測: 利用已有的App推測居家物件的三種方法。國立臺灣科技大學設計系碩士論文，台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r47ywt

網路資料：
1. Dubose, K. (2010). Ethnographic vs Phenomenological Research Designs. Retrieved from https://kellydubose.wordpress.com/2010/04/06/ethnographic-vs-phenomenologicalresearch-designs/

2. 設幻師的能力3/5：「幻象策略」. (2018). Retrieved from https://medium.com/speculatizen/%E8%A8%AD%E5%B9%BB%E5%B8%AB%E7%9A%84%E8%83%BD%E5%8A%9B3-5-%E5%B9%BB%E8%B1%A1%E7%AD%96%E7%95%A5-8c09ff78108c

3. 朱家安. (2008). 可能世界作為一個工具概念. Retrieved from https://phiphicake.blogspot.com/2008/05/blog-post_7826.html

4. 李婉貞, 梁容輝. (2020). 「事物中心」設計之推測潛能: 透過物本體視野的互動研究. 設計學報, 7.

5. 陳芳毓, 許鈺屏, 李鈺淇. (2022). 什麼是永續發展目標 SDGs? 17項目標一次掌握. Retrieved from https://futurecity.cw.com.tw/article/1867

6. 陶亞倫. (2018). 超真實世界 Hyperreality World. In.

7. 鈕文英. (2014). 質性研究方法與論文寫作. 台灣: 雙葉書廊有限公司.

8. 黃宇慈, 劉愷潔, 林長緯, 練德. (2021). 無以名狀. Retrieved from
https://www.behance.net/gallery/144752549/-The-Unseen-Presence-%28-%29

9. 黃采媛, 鍾秉紘. (2021). 星河遺產 Galaxy of Memory. Retrieved from
http://designedpossibleworld.com/2021/06/14/galaxy-of-memory/

10. 黃祥昀. (2020). CLABO 實驗波. 沉浸式藝術是Buzzword，還是不可不知的「創新概念」？. Retrieved from https://mag.clab.org.tw/clabo-article/immersive-art/

11. 鄧敦民. (2019). 可能性與必然性. Retrieved from
https://mephilosophy.ccu.edu.tw/entry.php?entry_name=%E5%8F%AF%E8%83%BD%E6%80%A7%E8%88%87%E5%BF%85%E7%84%B6%E6%80%A7

12. 鄭宇婷. (2018). 設幻師的能力3/5：「幻象策略」. Retrieved from
https://medium.com/speculatizen/%E8%A8%AD%E5%B9%BB%E5%B8%AB%E7%9A%84%E8%83%BD%E5%8A%9B3-5-%E5%B9%BB%E8%B1%A1%E7%AD%96%E7%95%A5-8c09ff78108c

13. Anthony Dunne, F. R. (2019). 推測設計——設計、想像與社會夢想 (洪世民, Trans. 林慧美 Ed.). 台灣: 何樵暐工作室.

14. Bey, J. (2006). Slow Car. In (pp. The campus is where the world of work is developing and the Slow Car is part of a series of rethought infrastructures that speculate about the way we make places to work. The Slow Car suggests mobility at the scale of the largest city, but not the scale of a country. The city is the Slow Car’s field of operation. As a result, it is liberated from aesthetic conventions that dramatize mobility. It is clearly free from aerodynamics, for example. It has another purpose. It is more like a small building, a shelter that allows us to experience public spaces at a much larger scale. A very fast office chair or a slow car.). STUDIO MAKKINK & BEY: Vitra.

15. Bill Gaver, T. D., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: cultural probes: Interactions.

16. Bruce M. Tharp, S. M. T. (2021). 論述設計：批判、推測及另類事物 (池思親,
Trans.): digital medicine tshut-pán-siā

17. Ilpo Koskinen, J. Z., Thomas Binder, Johan Redström, Stephan Wensveen. (2011). 建構型設計研究——從實驗室、現場到展示廳. 北京: 機械工業出版社.

18. Midjourney. Midjourney Documentation. Retrieved from https://midjourney.gitbook.io/docs/

19. Norman, N. A. (2016). 設計的心理學——人性化的設計產品如何改變世界 (陳宜秀, Trans.). 台北市: 遠流出版事業股份有限公司.

20. Oogjes, D., Odom, W., & Fung, P. (2018). Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Hong Kong, China. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196810

21. Wallace, J., McCarthy, J., Wright, P. C., & Olivier, P. (2013). Making design probes work. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466473

22. Wong, R. Y., Wyk, E. V., & Pierce, J. (2017). Real-Fictional Entanglements: Using
Science Fiction and Design Fiction to Interrogate Sensing Technologies. Paper
presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064682

23. Zimmerman, M. (2013). Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 56(3), 262-263.
doi:10.1109/tpc.2013.2274109

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文