簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 梁博凱
Po-Kai Liang
論文名稱: 數位健身產品之服務設計研究 - 以跑步活動為例
Research on Service Design of Digital Fitness Products - Take Running as an Example
指導教授: 董芳武
Fang-Wu Tung
口試委員: 陳建雄
Chien-Hsiung Chen
林廷宜
Ting-Yi Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 設計系
Department of Design
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 113
中文關鍵詞: 使用者經驗研究健身應用程式智慧產品服務系統探針工具
外文關鍵詞: Research of User Experience, Fitness Applications, Smart Product-Service Systems, Probes
相關次數: 點閱:238下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

隨數位科技的進展、人口老化、疫情蔓延等議題的影響,皆成為加深人們自身保健意識的因素。因此許多企業將目光投入於發展數位健身相關之智慧產品服務系統,來滿足顧客個人化且多元的需求,然而多變的使用者需求也成為開發方須面對的一大課題;而探針工具則是能協助我們由使用者經驗中,了解顧客想法的工具之一,且在數位化的時代下,結合科技及媒體的方式也為其在執行上帶來新的可能。
因此本研究旨在探討數位健身產品之使用者經驗研究,並開發以聊天機器人為基底之探針工具,並經由使用者們對於使用數位健身產品的經驗與持續性作為分群依據,將使用者們分為初階型數位健身產品跑者與經驗型數位健身產品跑者兩類群,並進一步邀請參與者於線上填寫“我的運動日記”,以互動方式蒐集使用者經驗等相關資訊;依此進一步的開發共創工具包,來更深入探索用戶使用數位健身產品與服務之需求與想法,並以此提出數位健身產品相關洞見及未來發展方向,同時也針對本次研究工具及研究方法之成效進行探討。
彙整研究結果發現,初階型數位健身產品跑者更重視運動過程中的資訊回饋,反之經驗型數位健身產品跑者則是更在意運動結束後更實際的結果與指導,而兩類群於裝置上的共同訴求則是期望未來裝置的型態能以減少異物感和輕便的模式為主。對於本次研究所開發之共創工具則是發現,時間軸的啟發方式確實能夠協助參與者在過程中進行更有條理的思考;此外,也建議未來能導入相關設計人員進入工作坊中,來更直接且實際的針對痛點提出解決方案。


Nowadays, with the advancement of digital technology, aging population, and the impact of pandemic spread, these issues have become factors that deepen people's awareness of personal health. Therefore, companies are focusing on developing smart products and service systems related to digital fitness to meet customers' personalized and diverse needs. However, the ever-changing user demands also pose a significant challenge for developers. Probe tools serve as one of the tools to help us understand customer perspectives from user experiences, and in the digital age, combining technology and media brings new possibilities for their implementation.
Therefore, this study aims to explore the user experience of digital fitness product users and develop a chatbot-based probe tool. Participants are invited to interactively fill out "My Running Diary" online to collect user experience and relevant information. Subsequently, a co-creation toolkit will be developed to investigate users' experiences with digital fitness products and services, thereby presenting insights and future development directions for digital fitness products. Additionally, the effectiveness of the research tools and methods used in this study will also be discussed.
The research findings indicate that beginner-level digital fitness product runners place more emphasis on real-time feedback during exercise, whereas experienced-level digital fitness product runners are more concerned about practical results and guidance after the workout. Both groups share a common demand for future devices to be less intrusive and lightweight. Regarding the co-creation tool developed in this study, it was found that the timeline-inspired approach indeed helps participants to think more systematically. Additionally, it is recommended to involve relevant design professionals directly in the workshops to propose practical solutions for identified pain points.

一、 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 2 1.3 研究目的 3 1.4 研究範圍與限制 3 1.5 研究流程 4 二、 文獻探討 6 2.1 智慧產品服務系統(Smart Product-Service Systems, SPSS) 6 2.1.1 產品服務系統的演進 6 2.1.2 以使用者為中心的Smart PSS (User-Centric SPSS, UC-SPSS) 8 2.1.3 Smart PSS的設計特徵 9 2.2 數位健身趨勢 10 2.2.1 運動產業的數位轉型 10 2.2.2 運動動機理論與量表 11 2.3 服務設計(Service Design) 12 2.3.1 服務設計定義 12 2.3.2 服務設計流程 14 2.3.3 服務設計工具 15 2.3.4 共同創造 (Co-creation) 18 2.3.5 設計探針 (Cultural Probes) 20 2.4 使用者經驗研究 (User Experience, UX) 21 2.4.1 使用者經驗定義 21 2.4.2 使用者經驗之執行方法 22 2.5 小結 24 三、 研究方法 25 3.1 研究架構 25 3.2 研究設計與步驟 26 3.2.1 探索階段 (Discover): 27 3.2.2 定義階段 (Define): 27 3.2.3 發展執行階段 (Develop & Deliver): 28 3.2.4 彙整階段: 28 3.3 實驗工具規劃與開發 28 3.3.1 問卷量表設計與規劃 28 3.3.2 探針工具結合互動聊天機器人開發 29 3.3.3 共創工具包開發 33 3.3.4 “我的運動日記計畫”共創工具包內容 38 3.4 共創工作坊的規劃與設計 40 3.4.1 參與者招募 40 3.4.2 “我的運動日記計畫”共創工作坊 41 3.5 共創工具使用性訪談分析 46 3.5.1 參與者工具使用回饋 46 3.5.1 小結 58 四、 研究結果分析 59 4.1 參與者招募問卷資料分析 59 4.2 運動日記資料彙整 62 4.3 數位健身產品使用者需求分析 65 4.3.1 參與者基本資料 66 4.3.2 數位健身產品使用者需求編碼 68 4.3.3 各類群使用者需求分析 72 4.3.4 運動旅程地圖分析 77 4.3.5 共創成果需求發展性彙整 81 4.3.6 小結 84 五、 結論與建議 85 5.1 研究工具之使用性與應用 85 5.1.1 平台設計建議 85 5.1.2 共創工具設計建議與結論 87 5.2 數位健身產品使用者需求彙整與發展建議 89 5.3 研究限制與後續研究建議 91 5.3.1 使用者細分 91 5.3.2 未來研究建議 93 參考文獻 95

英文文獻
Arisawa, R., Siriaraya, P., Li, D., Sumiya, K., Kawai, Y., & Nakajima, S. (2021, December). A Rival Recommendation Approach for Acoustic AR Running Support System Considering the Athletic Ability of Users. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 3500-3502). IEEE.
Blandford, A., Furniss, D., & Makri, S. (2016). Qualitative HCI research: Going behind the scenes. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Bu, L., Chen, C. H., Ng, K. K., Zheng, P., Dong, G., & Liu, H. (2021). A user-centric design approach for smart product-service systems using virtual reality: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124413.
Chen, Z., Lu, M., Ming, X., Zhang, X., & Zhou, T. (2020). Explore and evaluate innovative value propositions for smart product service system: A novel graphics-based rough-fuzzy DEMATEL method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118672.
Celikoglu, O. M., Ogut, S. T., & Krippendorff, K. (2017). How do user stories inspire design? A study of cultural probes. Design Issues, 33(2), 84-98.
Eyck, A., Geerlings, K., Karimova, D., Meerbeek, B., Wang, L., IJsselsteijn, W., ... & Westerink, J. (2006, May). Effect of a virtual coach on athletes’ motivation. In International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp. 158-161). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 41(2), 133-150.
Hall, G., Laddu, D. R., Phillips, S. A., Lavie, C. J., & Arena, R. (2021). A tale of two pandemics: How will COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect one another?. Progress in cardiovascular diseases, 64, 108.
Hamilton, M., Kaltcheva, V. D., & Rohm, A. J. (2016). Social media and value creation: The role of interaction satisfaction and interaction immersion. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36, 121-133.
Janssen, M., Walravens, R., Thibaut, E., Scheerder, J., Brombacher, A., & Vos, S. (2020). Understanding different types of recreational runners and how they use running-related technology. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(7), 2276.
Kahle, L. R., & Close, A. G. (Eds.). (2011). Consumer behavior knowledge for effective sports and event marketing. Routledge.
Karahanoğlu, A., Gouveia, R., Reenalda, J., & Ludden, G. (2021). How are sports-trackers used by runners? Running-related data, personal goals, and self-tracking in running. Sensors, 21(11), 3687.
Kiriu, T., Siriaraya, P., Kawai, Y., & Nakajima, S. (2018, October). Gamifications to Support Running Related Activities Based on Collaboration and Competition. In 2018 IEEE 7th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE) (pp. 359-360). IEEE.
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2014). Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability. Cognitive processing, 15(4), 491-501.
Lei, L., & Zeng, E. (2020). Research on the relationship between perceived social support and exercise behavior of user in social network. IEEE Access, 8, 75630-75645.
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of marketing, 80(6), 69-96.
Liu, Z., Ming, X., Song, W., Qiu, S., & Qu, Y. (2018). A perspective on value co-creation-oriented framework for smart product-service system. Procedia Cirp, 73, 155-160.
Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health, 11(3), 256-270.
Mager, B. (2008). Service design. In Wörterbuch Design (pp. 361-364). Birkhäuser Basel.
Plante, T. G., Madden, M., Mann, S., & Lee, G. (2010). Effects of perceived fitness level of exercise partner on intensity of exertion.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Ramaswamy, V. (2009). Co-creation of value—towards an expanded paradigm of value creation. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 26(6), 11-17.
Ramaswamy, V. (2009). Leading the transformation to co‐creation of value. Strategy & Leadership.
Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co‐production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic management journal, 20(1), 49-65.
Saco, R. M., & Goncalves, A. P. (2008). Service design: An appraisal. Design management review, 19(1), 10-19.
Samendinger, S., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Feltz, D. L. (2018). Testing group dynamics with a virtual partner to increase physical activity motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 168-175.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5-14.
Stickdorn, M., & Schwarzenberger, K. (2016). Service design in tourism. Entrepreneurship und Tourismus: Unternehmerisches Denken und Erfolgskonzepte aus der Praxis, 2261, 835-848.
Stickdorn, M., Schneider, J., Andrews, K., & Lawrence, A. (2011). This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases (Vol. 1). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Valencia, A., Mugge, R., Schoormans, J., & Schifferstein, H. (2015). The design of smart product-service systems (PSSs): An exploration of design characteristics. International Journal of Design, 9(1).
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
Vega-Vazquez, M., Revilla-Camacho, M. Á., & Cossío-Silva, F. J. (2013). The value co-creation process as a determinant of customer satisfaction. Management Decision.
Zeithaml, V. A. (2013). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm.
Zheng, P., Chen, C. H., & Shang, S. (2019). Towards an automatic engineering change management in smart product-service systems–A DSM-based learning approach. Advanced engineering informatics, 39, 203-213.
Zheng, P., Wang, Z., & Chen, C. H. (2019). Industrial smart product-service systems solution design via hybrid concerns. Procedia Cirp, 83, 187-192.
中文文獻
Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. 設計的心理學:人性化的產品設計如何改變世界.
Stickdorn, M.、Hormess, ME、Lawrence, A. 和 Schneider, J.(2018 年)。這就是服務設計!服務設計工作者的實踐指南.
何舒軒 & 宋同正. (2014). 綜論服務設計學術研究發展. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 19(2).
網路文獻
Becker, S., Berg, A., Kohli, S., & Thiel, A. (2022, January 24). Sporting Goods 2022: The New Normal Is Here. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/sporting-goods-2022-the-new-normal-is-here
Frost & Sullivan Explores the Growing Impact of the Digital Front Door on Healthcare. (2022, September 22). Frost & Sullivan. https://www.frost.com/news/press-releases/healthcare/frost-sullivan-explores-the-growing-impact-of-the-digital-front-door-on-healthcare/
Global Views on Sports: 58% Globally Would like to Practice More. (2021, August 3). IPSOS. https://www.ipsos.com/en/global-views-to-sports-2021
Physical Activity - Statistics & Facts. (2022, February 23). Statista Research Department. https://www.statista.com/topics/1749/physical-activity/#topicHeader__wrapper
Sports Equipment and Apparel Market Research, 2031. (2022, January). Allied Market Research. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/sporting-goods-2022-the-new-normal-is-here

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2025/08/07 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 2025/08/07 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 2025/08/07 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE