簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: Elok Pitaloka
Elok Pitaloka
論文名稱: 單期訂購問題中的決策偏誤:比較管理者和學生之差異以及決策支持系統的修正效果
Decision Bias in the Newsvendor Problem: on the Comparison of Managers and Students as Newsvendors with Decision Support System as Debiasing Strategy
指導教授: 林希偉
Shi-Woei Lin
口試委員: 林久翔
Chiu-Hsiang Lin
楊朝龍
Chao-Lung Yang
林希偉
Shi-Woei Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業管理系
Department of Industrial Management
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 97
中文關鍵詞: 行為作業單期訂購模型決策偏誤決策支援系統(DSS)報童問題
外文關鍵詞: Newsvendor Inventory Decisions
相關次數: 點閱:254下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報


Master’s Thesis Recommendation Form ii Qualification Form by Master’s Degree Examination Committee iii 摘要 iv ABSTRACT v ACKNOWLEDGMENT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF NOTATIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Research Questions 3 1.3. Objectives 4 1.4. Research Benefit 4 1.5. Limitations and Assumptions 5 1.6. Organization of the Thesis 5 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1. The Experimental Studies of the Newsvendor Problem 7 2.2. The Strategy of Improving Decision in Newsvendor Problem 8 2.2.1. Separate Forecasting Task from The Inventory Decision Task 8 2.2.2. Change Managerial Incentives 11 2.2.3. Design Employee Training Program 11 2.2.4. Control the Availability of Information 11 2.2.5. Design Decision Support System 12 2.3. Decision Support System in Inventory Planning 13 2.4. Research Position 15 2.4.1. Experimental Studies to Observe Order Decision 15 2.4.2. Debiasing Strategy to Improve Order Decision 16 CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 18 3.1. Behavioral Theories and Biases in Newsvendor Decision Making 18 3.2. The Basic Model of Newsvendor Problem 21 3.3. The Extended Model of Newsvendor Problem 22 3.3.1. Penalty Cost for Excess Inventory (Overage Condition) 23 3.3.2. Penalty Cost for Stock-out (Underage Condition) 24 CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 27 4.1. Research Hypotheses 27 4.1.1. Subjects’ Order Quantity 27 4.1.2. Order Behavior Comparison between Managers and Students 28 4.1.3. Effect of DSS to Subjects’ Order Decision 28 4.2. Research Design 28 4.2.1. Experimental Design 28 4.2.2. Research Subjects 30 4.2.3. Experimental Setup and Details 31 4.3. Research Tools 33 4.4. Research Procedures 34 4.4.1. The Procedure for Testing the 1st Hypothesis 39 4.4.2. The Procedure for Testing the 2nd Hypothesis 41 4.4.3. The Procedure for Testing the 3rd Hypothesis 43 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 46 5.1. Analysis of Managers’ Order Behavior 46 5.1.1. High-Profit Scenario 46 5.1.2. Low-Profit Scenario 48 5.1.3. Summary and Discussion of Managers’ Order Decision 49 5.2. Analysis of Students’ Order Behavior 50 5.2.1. High-Profit Scenario 50 5.2.2. Low-Profit Scenario 52 5.2.3. Summary and Discussion of Students’ Order Decision 54 5.3. Performance Comparison between Manager and Student as Newsvendor 54 5.3.1. Order Quantity and Order Behavior Comparison 54 5.3.2. Frequency and Magnitude of Adjustment Comparison 56 5.3.3. Profit Comparison 57 5.3.4. Summary of Performance Comparison 61 5.4. Decision Support System Design for Experiment 2 61 5.4.1. The Availability of Information 62 5.4.2. System Interface for Experiment 2 64 5.5. Analysis of Order Behavior with DSS Presentation (Experimental Evidence of DSS Implementation) 65 5.5.1. High-Profit Scenario 65 5.5.2. Low-Profit Scenario 66 5.5.3. Summary and Discussion of Order Decision Observation 67 5.6. Performance Comparison Before and After DSS implementation 68 5.6.1. Frequency of Adjustment 68 5.6.2. Order Variance Comparison 69 5.6.3. Deviation from Optimal Order Quantity 69 5.6.4. Profit Comparison 70 5.6.5. Summary of Performance Comparison & Managerial Implication 71 5.7. Decision Support System Prototyping for Future Use 73 5.7.1. System Architecture 74 5.7.2. System Interface 75 5.7.3. Numerical Example 78 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 80 6.1. Conclusions 80 6.2. Managerial Implication 80 6.3. Recommendations for Future Research 81 REFERENCES 82

Abdel-aal, M. A. M., & Selim, S. Z. (2017). Risk-averse multi-product selective newsvendor problem with different market entry scenarios under CVaR criterion. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 103, 250–261.
Adelman, A., Barnes-Schuster, D., Eisenstein, D. (1999). The Operations Quadrangle: Business Process Fundamentals, Graduate School of Business - The University of Chicago, Chicago.
Agrawal, V., & Seshadri, S. (2000). Impact of Uncertainty and Risk Aversion on Price and Order Quantity in the Newsvendor Problem. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2(4), 410–423.
Anderson, E. T., Fitzsimons, G. J., Simester, D. (2006). Measuring and mitigating the costs of stockouts. Management Science, 52(11):1751–1763.
Arikan, E., & Fichtinger, J. (2017). The risk-averse newsvendor problem under spectral risk measures : A classification with extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 256, 116–125.
Arkes, H. R. (1996). The Psychology of Waste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 9, 213 -224.
Beatty S. (199). Some Burger Kings Fall Short On Free 'Toy Story' Giveaways. Wall Street Journal November 25 B1.
Becker-peth, M., Katok, E., Thonemann, U. W. ( 2013). Designing Buyback Contracts for Irrational but Predictable Newsvendors. Management Science, 1–32.
Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research, Volume 30, 961-981.
Bell, D. E. (1985). Disappointment in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research, Volume 33, 1-27.
Benzion, U., Cohen, Y., Peled, R., & Shavit, T. (2008). Decision-making and the newsvendor problem: An experimental study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(9), 1281–1287.
Bolton, G. E., & Katok, E. (2008). Learning by Doing in the Newsvendor Problem: A Laboratory Investigation of the Role of Experience and Feedback. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(3), 519–538.
Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., Thonemann, U. W. (2012). Managers and Students as Newsvendors. Management Science, 58(12):2225-2233.
Bostian, A. A., Holt, C. A., & Smith, A. M. (2008). Newsvendor “Pull-to-Center” Effect: Adaptive Learning in a Laboratory Experiment. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 590–608.
Breugelmans, E., Campo, K., & Gijsbrechts, E. (2006). Opportunities for active stock-out management in online stores : The impact of the stock-out policy on online stock-out reactions. Journal of Retailing Vol. 82, 215–228.
Choi, S., Ruszczy, A., Zhao, Y., & Choi, S. (2011). A Multiproduct Risk-Averse Newsvendor with Law- Invariant Coherent Measures of Risk. Operations Research, 59(2):346-364.
Choi, S., & Ruszczyn, A. (2011). A multi-product risk-averse newsvendor with exponential utility function. European Journal of Operational Research, 214 (2011) 78–84.
Dellino, G., Laudadio, T., Mari, R., Mastronardi, N. (2017). A reliable decision support system for fresh food supply chain management, International Journal of Production Research, 7543, 1–29.
Dupont, L., Bernard, C., Hamdi, F., Masmoudi, F. (2018). Supplier selection under risk of delivery failure : a decision-support model considering managers ’ risk sensitivity, International Journal of Production Research, 7543, 1–16.
Eeckhoudt, L., Gollier, C., & Schlesinger, H. (1995). The Risk-Averse ( and Prudent ) Newsboy. Management Science, 41(5):786-794.
Fildes, R., Goodwin, P., Lawrence, M., Nikolopoulos, K. (2009). Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning. International Journal of Forecasting 25(1), 3–23.
Gavirneni, S., & Xia, Y. (2009). Anchor Selection and Group Dynamics in Newsvendor Decisions--A Note. Decision Analysis, 6(2), 87–97.
Gavirneni, S., & Isen, A. M. (2010). Anatomy of a Newsvendor Decision: Observations from a Verbal Protocol Analysis. Production and Operation Management, 19(4), 453–462.
Hill. A. V. (2017). The Newsvendor Problem, Clamshell Beach Press, USA.
Hossain, N., King., R., Kelbert, A. (2013). Highlights from Life in a Time of Food Price, Joint Agency Research Report Summary, (May), 1–15.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty - Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, Vol. 47(2), pp. 263-292.
Käki, A., Liesiö, J., Salo, A., & Talluri, S. (2015). Newsvendor decisions under supply uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 53(5), 1544–1560.
Katok, E., & Wu, D. Y. (2009). Contracting in Supply Chains: A Laboratory Investigation. Management Science, 55(12), 1953–1968.
Keren, B., & Pliskin, J. S. (2006). A benchmark solution for the risk-averse newsvendor problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 1643–1650.
Kremer, M., & Minner, S. (2008). The human element in inventory decision making under uncertainty: A review of experimental evidence in the newsvendor model. Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaft (Journal of Business Administration), 4(January), 83–97.
Kremer, M., Minner, S., Wassenhove, L. N. V. (2010). Do Random Errors Explain Newsvendor Behavior ?, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 12(4), 673-681.
Lau, N. & Bearden, J. N. (2013). Newsvendor Demand Chasing Revisited, Management Science 59(5),1245-1249
Lee, Y. S., & Siemsen, E. (2017). Task Decomposition and Newsvendor Decision Making Task Decomposition and Newsvendor Decision Making, Management Science 63(10):3226-3245.
Liu, J., Wu, C., & Su, T. (2017). The reference effect in newsvendor model with strategic customers. Management Decision, 55(5), 1006–1021.
Lurie, N. H., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2009). Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 315–329.
Loch, C. H., & Wu, Y. (2005). Behavioral operations management. Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 1(3), pp. 121-232.
Mitchell, M.L., Jolley, J.M. (2010). Research Design Explained. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston, USA.
Moritz, B. B., Hill, A. V., & Donohue, K. L. (2013). Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: Behavior and cognitive reflection. Journal of Operations Management, 31(1–2), 72–85.
Narayanan, A., & Moritz, B. B. (2015). Decision making and cognition in multi- echelon supply chains: An experimental study. Production and Operations Management, 24(8), 1216–1234.
Price, P.C., Jhangiani, R.S., Chiang, I. A. (2015). Research Methods in Psychology 2nd Canadian Edition. BC Open Textbooks, Canada.
Pitaloka E. (2018). The Effect of Decision Maker’s Risk Attitude on Inventory Policy: An Empirical Studies. Undergraduate Thesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Rudi, N., & Drake, D. (2014). Observation Bias: The Impact of Demand Censoring on Newsvendor Level and Adjustment Behavior. Management Science, 60(5), 1334–1345.
Schweitzer, M., & Cachon, G. (2000). Decision Bias in The Newsvendor Problem With A Known Demand Distribution: Experimental Evidence, Management Science, Vol. 46(3): 404–420.
Sharma, A., Nandi, S. (2018). A Review of Behavioral Decision Making in the Newsvendor Problem. Operations and Supply Chain Management, Vol. 11 (4), pp. 200 - 213.
Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., dan Simchi-Levi, E. (2003). Designing & Managing The Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies & Case Studies, 2nd. Mc Graw Hill, USA.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), pp. 99-118.
Udoh, L., & Inuwa, I. (2016). Implementation of a Data Driven Transaction Processing System for the AUN ’ s Restaurant, Yola – Nigeria, International Journal of Computer Application, Vol. 149(6), 9–20.
Uppari, B. S., & Hasija, S. (2018). Modeling Newsvendor Behavior : A Prospect Theory Approach. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, pp. 1–20
Wang, C. X., Webster, S., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). Would a risk-averse newsvendor order less at a higher selling price? European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 544–553.
Whitin, T. M. (1955). Inventory Control and Price Theory. Management Science, 2(1), 61–68.
Zhang, Y., & Siemsen, E. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of Newsvendor Experiments: Revisiting the Pull-to-Center Asymmetry. Production and Operations Management, 28(1), 140–156.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2024/06/17 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 2024/06/17 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 2024/06/17 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE