簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李韋廷
Wei-Ting Li
論文名稱: 以學習概念、學習態度與學習自我效能探討高中生學習化學之初探
High school students’ conceptions of, attitudes toward, and self-efficacy of learning chemistry
指導教授: 蔡今中
Chin-Chung Tsai
口試委員: 蔡孟蓉
Meng-Jung Tsai
梁至中
Jyh-Chong Liang
邱國力
Guo-Li Chiou
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 數位學習與教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 87
中文關鍵詞: 學習概念學習態度學習自我效能
外文關鍵詞: conceptions of learning, attitude toward learning, learning self-efficacy
相關次數: 點閱:502下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究旨在探討高中生對於化學的學習概念(conceptions of learning)、學習態度(attitude toward learning)與學習自我效能(learning self-efficacy) 的表現因素,並藉由學習概念、學習態度與學習自我效能的交互關係來探討高中生如何學習化學。
研究對象為台北市四所高中學生,男生177人、女生121人,共298位學生。本研究使用化學學習概念問卷、化學學習態度量表以及化學學習自我效能分別探討了在不同性別、不同年級以及不同組別,高中生對於化學的學習概念、學習態度以及學習自我效能的差異。
研究結果顯示,在性別方面,男生在高階學習概念、學習態度以及學習自我效能上的表現總是傾向高於女生。
年級方面,高三學生在高階學習概念、學習態度以及學習自我效能的表現皆高於其他年級的學生。
組別方面,自然組學生在高階學習概念、學習態度以及學習自我效能的表現皆高於社會組的學生。
此外,藉由路徑分析的檢驗,本研究主要研究結果顯示,在三種構面組成的關係中,藉由過往文獻將學習概念視為自變項,學習自我效能為依變項的,而透過路徑分析,可證明學習態度可視為中介變項,主要研究結論為,高中生若傾向認同高階的學習概念,則傾向擁有較為正面且積極的學習態度,進而達到良好的學習自我效能。
最後,本研究根據研究結果進行討論,並提出教師在教育現場的應用與後續研究之相關建議。


The purpose of this study was to identify the high school students’ conceptions of learning chemistry, attitude toward chemistry learning, and chemistry learning self-efficacy, and to examine the differences with all the relationships among conceptions of learning chemistry, attitude toward chemistry learning, and chemistry learning self-efficacy.
There were 298 students (177 males and 121 females) of four different high schools from Taipei. Three questionnaires, conceptions of learning chemistry (COLC), attitude toward chemistry learning (ATCL), and chemistry learning self-efficacy (CLSE), were conducted to explore gender difference, grade difference, and group difference in the high school students’ conceptions of learning chemistry, attitude toward chemistry learning, and chemistry learning self-efficacy.
First, it was found that male students tended to express more agreement with higher-level COLC, ATCL, and CLSE than those in female students. Second, it was found that students in 12th grade tended to score the highest in higher-level COLC, ATCL, and CLSE than other graders. Final, it was found that science-major students tended to hold higher tendency toward higher-level COLC, ATCL, and CLSE than those major in social science
Moreover, the results of the path analysis indicated that the ATCL could be viewed as the mediating variable between the COLC and CLSE. Further, the path analyses, in general, revealed that the students who expressed higher-level COLC, that is, learning chemistry by transforming, tended to hold positive and active attitude, then tended to hence their learning self-efficacy.
Finally, according to the results of this study, implications and recommendation for teachers teaching in school and future study were provided

INDEX Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background of this study 1 1.2 Purposes of this study 4 1.3 Research questions 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 6 2.1 Conceptions of learning 6 2.2 Attitudes toward learning 11 2.3 Learning self-efficacy 14 2.4 How the conception of learning associates with attitude toward learning and learning self-efficacy 16 Chapter 3 Methodology 19 3.1 Research design 18 3.2 Subjects 21 3.3 The instruments of this study 22 3.4 The data analysis for the study 28 Chapter 4 Results and Discussion 31 4.1 Factor analysis of Conceptions of Learning Chemistry (COLC) 31 4.2 Factor analysis of Attitudes toward Chemistry Learning (ATCL) 33 4.3 Factor analysis of Chemistry Learning Self-efficacy (CLSE) 35 4.4 The confirmatory factor analysis of COLC survey 37 4.5 The confirmatory factor analysis of ATCL survey 40 4.6 The confirmatory factor analysis of CLSE survey 42 4.7 Gender differences in COLC, ATCL, and CLSE 44 4.8 Grade differences in COLC, ATCL, and CLSE 49 4.9 Group differences in COLC, ATCL, and CLSE 53 4.10 Correlations among the COLC, ATCL, and CLSE 57 4.11 Path analysis of students’ COLC, ATCL, and CLSE 60 Chapter 5 Implications in this study 64 References 68 Appendix 1. The Questionnaire Items on the COLC 78 Appendix 2. The Questionnaire Items on the ATCL 80 Appendix 3. The Questionnaire Items on the CLSE 81 Appendix 4. The Cheineese Version of Original Questionnaire 83

Adesoji, F. A., & Raimi, S. M. (2004). Effects of enhanced laboratory instructional technique on senior secondary students’ attitude toward chemistry in Oyo Township, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 377–385.
Abubakar, R.B & Ejimaji, E.U. (2010). Gender differences in academic and enrolment gaps of college chemistry students. International Journal of Economics and development Issues, 2, 38.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Barnes .G., Mclnerney D. M. and Marsh H. W. (2005): Exploring sex differences on science enrolment intentions: An application of the general model of academic choice. Australian Educational Researcher. 32(2): 1-23.
Baldwin, J., Ebert-May, D. & Burns, D. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for non-majors. Science Education, 83, 397–408.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370.
Bennett, J., Rollnick, M., Green, G., & White, M. (2001). The development and use of an instrument to assess students’ attitude to the study of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 833–845.
Brigido, M., Borrachero, A. B., Bermejo, M. L., & Mellado, V. (2013). Prospective primary teachers' self-efficacy and emotions in science teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 200-217.
Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,107, 238–246.
Bayraktar, S. (2011). Turkish preservice primary school teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs and attitudes toward science: The effect of a primary teacher education program. School Science and Mathematics, 111(3), 83-92.
Britner, S.L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 271–285.
Britner, S. L. & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 486–499.
Cousins, A. (2007). Gender inclusivity in secondary chemistry: A study of male and female participation in secondary school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 711–730.
Cheung, D. (2009). Developing a scale to measure students’ attitudes toward chemistry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 16 (1), 2185-2203.
Chiou, G.-L. & Liang, J.-C. (2012). Exploring the structure of science self-efficacy: A model built on high school students’ conceptions of learning and approaches to learning in science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 83–91.
Chiou, G.-L., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning in biology: A study of their structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 167-195.
Chan, K.-W. (2011). Pre-service teacher education students’ epistemological beliefs and conceptions about learning. Instructional Science, 39 (1), 87-108.
Capa Aydin, Y. & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2009). Development and psychometric evaluation of the high school chemistry self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 868–880.
Dawson, C. & O’Connor, P. (1991). Gender differences when choosing school subjects: Parental push and career pull. Some tentative hypotheses. Research in Science Education, 21, 55–64.
Dalgety, J., & Coll, R. K. (2006). Exploring first-year science students’ chemistry self-efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 97-116.
Dalgety, J., Coll, R. K., & Jones, A. (2003). Development of chemistry attitudes and experience questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 649–668.
DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245-55.
Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509–515.
Fraser, B. J. (1979). Evaluation of a science-based curriculum. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Educational environments and effects: Evaluation, policy, and productivity (pp. 218 234). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science-related attitudes. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Gabel, D. L. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 550-554.
Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.
Gentry, J. W. (1990). “What Is Experiential Learning?” in James W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to Business Gaming and Experiential Learning, East Brunswick, CN:Nichols/GP Publishing, 9-20.
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracin, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 778-822.
Hofstein, A., Ben-Zvi, R., Samuel, D., & Tamir, P. (1977). Attitudes of Israeli high-school students toward chemistry and physics: A comparative study. Science Education, 61(2), 259–268.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London: Sage.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
Henderleiter, J., & Pringle, D. L. (1999). Effects of context-based laboratory experiments on attitudes of analytical chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(1), 100–106.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Hill, O.W., Pettus,W.C.,&Hedin, B.A. (1990). Three studies of factors affecting the attitudes of blacks and females toward the pursuit of science and science-related careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 289–314.
Joyce, B. A., & Farenga, S. J. (1999). Informal science experience, attitudes, future interest in science, and gender of high-ability students: An exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 431–437.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide (2nd ed.). Lincolnwood, IL: SSI.
Kelly, A. (1981). The missing half: girls and science education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kaya, E., & Erduran, E. (2013). Integrating epistemological perspectives on chemistry in chemical education: the cases of concept duality, chemical language and structural explanations. Science & Education, 22, 1741-1755.
Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kupermintz, H. (2002). Affective and conative factors as aptitude resources in high school science achievement. Education Assessment, 8, 123–137.
Kurbanoğlu, N., & Akin, A. (2010). The relationships between university students' chemistry laboratory anxiety, attitudes, and self-efficacy beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(8), 48-59.
Kurbanoğlu, N., & Akin, A. (2012). The relationships between university students' organic chemistry anxiety, chemistry attitudes, and self-efficacy: a structural equation model. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(4), 347-356.
Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92, 191-220.
Lin, C,-L., Tsai, C-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2012). An investigation of two profiles within conceptions of learning science: An examination of confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 499-521.
Lin, H,-M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). College students’ conceptions of learning management: the difference between traditional (face-to-face) instruction and Web-based learning environments. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(4), 437-452.
Lang, Q. C., Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Student perceptions of chemistry laboratory learning environments, student–teacher interactions and attitudes in secondary school gifted education classes in Singapore. Research in Science Education, 35, 299–321.
Lau, S., & Roeser, R.W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students’ situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 8, 139–162.
Liem, A. D., Lau, S. & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.
Lin, T. -J., & Tsai, C. C. (2013a). A multi-dimensional instrument for evaluating Taiwanese high school students’ science learning self-efficacy in relation to their approaches to learning science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1275-1301.
Lin, T. -J., & Tsai, C. C. (2013b). An investigation of Taiwanese high school students’ science learning self-efficacy in relation to their conceptions of learning science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(3), 308-323.
Li, W. -T., Liang, J, -C. & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Relational analysis of college chemistry-major students' conceptions of and approaches to learning chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 555- 565.
Marshall, D., Summer, M., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Students’ conceptions of learning in an engineering context. Higher Education, 38, 291-309.
Martin, E. and Ramsden, P. (1987). Learning Skills or Skill in Learning, in M. W. Eysenk, and D. W. Piper (eds) Student Learning Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277-299.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
Menis, J. (1989). Attitudes towards school, chemistry and science among upper secondary chemistry students in the United States. Research in Science & Technological Education, 7(2), 183–190.
Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291-309.
Malinen, O., Savolainen, H., & Xu, J. (2012). Beijing in-service teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes towards inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 526e534.
Mellado, V., Bermejo, M. L., Blanco, L. J., & Ruiz, C. (2007). The classroom practice of a prospective secondary biology teacher and his conceptions of the nature of science and of teaching and learning science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 37-62.
Ministry of Education [MOE] (2013). The Twelve-Year Public Education Program Curriculum Standards, Ministry of Education, Taiwan.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
Oskamp, S., & Schultz, P. W. (2005). Attitudes and opinions (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pajares, F., Britner, S.L.,&Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and selfbeliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406–422.
Pintrich, P.R. & De Groot E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), pp. 33-50.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. B. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.
Paakkari, L., Tynjala, P., & Kannas, L. (2011). Critical aspects of student teachers’ conceptions of learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 705-714.
Pintrich, P., R., & Schunk, D., H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847–862.
Scerri, E. (2003). Philosophical confusion in chemical education research. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(5), 468-474.
Sinatra, G., M. (2005). The “Warming Trend” in conceptual change reasearch: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107–115.
Smist, J. M., Archambault, F. X., & Owen, S. V. (1994). Gender differences in attitude toward science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Steinkamp, M. W., & Maehr, M. L. (1984). Gender differences in motivational orientations toward achievement in school science: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 39-59.
Saljo, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective I: Some commonsense conceptions. Gothenburg, Sweden: Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg.
Sungur, S. (2007). Modeling the relationships among students’ motivational beliefs, metacognitive strategy use, and effort regulation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 315–326.
Tsai, C.-C. (1998). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eighth graders. Science Education, 82, 473-489.
Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1733-1750.
Tsai, C.-C., Ho, H.-N., Liang, J.-C., & Lin, H.-M. (2011). Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students. Learning and Instruction, 21, 757-769.
Thompson, J., & Soyibo, K. (2002). Effects of lecture, teacher demonstrations, discussion and practical work on 10th graders’ attitudes to chemistry and understanding of electrolysis. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(1), 25–37.
Taiwan College Entrance Examination Center. (2013). Item analysis of DRT chemistry 2013. Taipei: Author.
Uzuntiryaki, E. & Capa Aydin, Y. (2009). Development and validation of chemistry selfefficacy scale for college student. Research in Science Education, 39, 539–551.
Usher, E. L. & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 125–141.
van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 73-83.
Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2010). University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science, 38(4), 355-370.
Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(1), 91–102.
Weisgram, E. S. & Bigler, R.S. (2007). Effects on learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls’ attitudes toward and interest in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(3), 262-269.
White, J. A. R., & Richardson, G.D. (1993). Comparison of science attitudes among middle and junior high school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Wyer, M. (2003). Intending to stay: Images of scientists, attitudes toward women and gender asinfluences on persistence among science and engineering majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 1–16.
Wiedenfeld, S. A., O'Leary, A., Bandura, A., Brown, S., Levine, S., & Raska, K. (1990). Impact of perceived self-efficacy in coping with stressors on components of the immune system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1082- 1094.
Yang, S. -H. (2012). Exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11 (4), 148 – 154.
Yazachew, A. T. (2013). Relationship between self-efficacy, academic achievement and gender in alalytical chesmistry at Debre Mrakos college of teacher education. African Journal Online, 3 (1), 3-28.

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2019/08/07 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE