都市更新為促進都市土地有計畫之再開發利用，復甦都市機能，改善居住環境，增進公共利益。都市更新的目標，主要在改造城市空間，營造安居樂業及有文化的活力城市。使居民得以擁有適居、文化、健康、活力的生活空間，創造一個永續、愉悅的生活環境。
研究調查結果顯示，台北市許多公告選定都市更新實施地區範圍內之土地及建築物，尚未能達到執行層面之需求，仍待投資開發業者與都市更新實施者，加強努力整合土地、建築物所有權人及違章建築使用人，高度配合都市更新投資者實施都市更新事業。都市更新事業是否能為相關之土地、建築物所有權人及違章建築使用人，帶來居住品質之提昇及鄰近周邊環境之改善；對於原有之居住空間使用面積需求，是否提供更具有利的權利變換條件，確實需要政府、投資業者、土地、建築物所有權人及違章建築使用人，共同努力改善之課題與尋求解決之對策；同時了解都市更新之行政程序與審議制度，對於房地產開發投資之意願與影響層面。
本研究係以都市更新容積獎勵項目機制為主體，以台北市完成都更審議施工中與完成案件20件案例為主軸，作為彙整、統計、分析與評估，同時透過問卷調查及訪談結果作整理評析，得到相關之課題，並提出相應之解決對策，對相關之法制面、社會面、經濟面與執行面，提出適宜之改善方案與法令修正之建議。經由前述之調查研究分析，將本研究聚焦在台北市都市更新容積獎勵完成審查之案例及相關的配套措施對房地產開發投資之影響。
故研究目的為：（一）如何增加容積獎勵項目之彈性與多樣性，使獎勵機制具彈性，以誘使投資開發業者加速都市更新標的開發之意願。（二）獎勵項目內容授權地方政府及審議委員會，對於開發業者開發時，提供更具體多元之公益設施，給予實質之獎勵內容。（三）為配合政府選定都市更新實施地區範圍作業之推動進展，落實獎勵私人或團體投資興辦都市更新事業。（四）提出容積獎勵具體可行之法理面，整合性執行面之課題與解決之對策。透過本研究之調查分析與統計，可以得到以下結論：
1.都市更新最困難就是人心、獎勵機制及財務協助等，兼顧公共與私人權益，將是推動都市更新永續的政策。
2.最為困難面對的就是違章建築問題及產權複雜整合的問題，民眾對於政府或投資者缺乏信任感與權益之保障。
3.容積獎勵之項目，應從獎勵之表列項目增列多樣性，導入社會人文、經濟產業、文化藝術及景觀生態，具有都市更新內涵之容積獎勵。
4.都市更新所引進之經濟效益，會較未有容積獎勵時之情況為高，與未取得容積獎勵前之法定容積比較，可帶來經濟效益的影響。
5.都市更新之行政程序與審議機制應予簡化，加速行政效率，公部門應加強宣傳、教育與協助實施者及民眾，彼此權利義務之整合問題。

Urban renewal is the planned redevelopment and utilization of promoting urban land, reviving urban functions, improving the living environment, and promoting the public interest. The goals of urban renewal mainly focus on transforming urban space, building a cultural and vibrant cities to live in peace and enjoy one’s work. It makes the residents own a livable, cultural, healthy, and vital living space and creates a sustainable and pleasant living environment.
The results show that many lands and buildings within the urban renewal area selected by Taipei’s notices still cannot reach the demand of implementative level yet. The entrepreneurs of investment and development and urban renewal executors still need to strengthen to integrate owners of lands and buildings and users of illegal buildings to highly cooperate with urban renewal investors to implement urban renewal business. We wonder if urban renewal business can bring upgrading of living quality and improvement of nearby surrounding environment to owners of related lands and buildings and users of illegal buildings. We also wonder if it provides more favorable conditions of right transfer to the area use demand of the original living space. It really needs the government, investors, owners of lands and buildings, and users of illegal buildings to work together to improve the topic and find a solution to the problem. Meanwhile, we have to understand how the administrative procedures and deliberative system of urban renewal affect the investment will and impact level of real estate development.
This study takes the item mechanism urban renewal floor area bonus as the main object and takes the 20 cases finished and being under consideration of Taipei’s urban renewal deliberation as the spindle to be categorized, compiled statistics, analyzed and assessed. At the same time, through a questionnaire survey and interviews, there is a collation and assessment to get related issues and propose the corresponding countermeasures in this study. As for the related faces of legal system, society, economy, and implementations, there are appropriate improved programs and suggestion of amendments to laws and decrees proposed. Through the foregoing investigation and analysis, this study focuses on the cases passed the examination of Taipei's urban renewal floor area bonus and the effects of the relevant matching measures on the real estate development and investment.
Therefore, the purposes of the study are: (1) how to increase the flexibility and diversity of capacity reward items, so that incentive mechanism is flexible to induce investors of the industry to accelerate the development will of urban renewal? (2) The contents of incentive items are authorized to local governments and the Committee. When the developers develop the industry, they will be provided more specific and diverse welfare facilities abd given substantive incentive contents. (3) To cooperate with the government’s promoting progress to select the operation areas of implementing urban renewal, we have to implement the incentives to private individuals or groups to invest in setting up the urban renewal business. (4) We have to propose the specific and practicable legal face of floor area bonus, the issues of integrative implementative face, and countermeasures of solution. Through the survey and statistical analysis of this study, the following conclusions are drawn:
1.The most difficult parts of urban renewal are people’s hearts, incentive mechanism, and financial assistance. The balance between public and private interests will be the sustainable policy to promote urban renewal.
2.The most difficult parts to face are the problems of illegal buildings and complex integration of property right. The public lack a sense of trust and security of rights and interests on the government or investors.
3.The capacity reward items should be inducted from the added diversity of incentive listed items into social humanities, economic industries, arts and culture, and landscape ecology, which have the floor area bonus of urban renewal connotations.
4.The economic efficiency introduced by urban renewal is higher than the circumstances without floor area bonus. To compare with the legal volume before gaining zoning bouns, it can bring the impact of economic benefits.
5.The administrative procedures and deliberative mechanism of urban renewal should be simplified to speed up the administrative efficiency. The public sector should reinforce to propogate, educate, and assist the executors and the general public the integrative issues of each other's rights and obligations.Urban renewal is the planned redevelopment and utilization of promoting urban land, reviving urban functions, improving the living environment, and promoting the public interest. The goals of urban renewal mainly focus on transforming urban space, building a cultural and vibrant cities to live in peace and enjoy one’s work. It makes the residents own a livable, cultural, healthy, and vital living space and creates a sustainable and pleasant living environment.
The results show that many lands and buildings within the urban renewal area selected by Taipei’s notices still cannot reach the demand of implementative level yet. The entrepreneurs of investment and development and urban renewal executors still need to strengthen to integrate owners of lands and buildings and users of illegal buildings to highly cooperate with urban renewal investors to implement urban renewal business. We wonder if urban renewal business can bring upgrading of living quality and improvement of nearby surrounding environment to owners of related lands and buildings and users of illegal buildings. We also wonder if it provides more favorable conditions of right transfer to the area use demand of the original living space. It really needs the government, investors, owners of lands and buildings, and users of illegal buildings to work together to improve the topic and find a solution to the problem. Meanwhile, we have to understand how the administrative procedures and deliberative system of urban renewal affect the investment will and impact level of real estate development.
This study takes the item mechanism urban renewal floor area bonus as the main object and takes the 20 cases finished and being under consideration of Taipei’s urban renewal deliberation as the spindle to be categorized, compiled statistics, analyzed and assessed. At the same time, through a questionnaire survey and interviews, there is a collation and assessment to get related issues and propose the corresponding countermeasures in this study. As for the related faces of legal system, society, economy, and implementations, there are appropriate improved programs and suggestion of amendments to laws and decrees proposed. Through the foregoing investigation and analysis, this study focuses on the cases passed the examination of Taipei's urban renewal floor area bonus and the effects of the relevant matching measures on the real estate development and investment.
Therefore, the purposes of the study are: (1) how to increase the flexibility and diversity of capacity reward items, so that incentive mechanism is flexible to induce investors of the industry to accelerate the development will of urban renewal? (2) The contents of incentive items are authorized to local governments and the Committee. When the developers develop the industry, they will be provided more specific and diverse welfare facilities abd given substantive incentive contents. (3) To cooperate with the government’s promoting progress to select the operation areas of implementing urban renewal, we have to implement the incentives to private individuals or groups to invest in setting up the urban renewal business. (4) We have to propose the specific and practicable legal face of floor area bonus, the issues of integrative implementative face, and countermeasures of solution. Through the survey and statistical analysis of this study, the following conclusions are drawn:
1.The most difficult parts of urban renewal are people’s hearts, incentive mechanism, and financial assistance. The balance between public and private interests will be the sustainable policy to promote urban renewal.
2.The most difficult parts to face are the problems of illegal buildings and complex integration of property right. The public lack a sense of trust and security of rights and interests on the government or investors.
3.The capacity reward items should be inducted from the added diversity of incentive listed items into social humanities, economic industries, arts and culture, and landscape ecology, which have the floor area bonus of urban renewal connotations.
4.The economic efficiency introduced by urban renewal is higher than the circumstances without floor area bonus. To compare with the legal volume before gaining zoning bouns, it can bring the impact of economic benefits.
5.The administrative procedures and deliberative mechanism of urban renewal should be simplified to speed up the administrative efficiency. The public sector should reinforce to propogate, educate, and assist the executors and the general public the integrative issues of each other's rights and obligations.

參考文獻

一、中文部分
（一）博碩士論文
1.孫維潔，都市更新容積獎勵對公共設施衝擊之研究，碩士論文，國立政治大學地政研究所，台北，1991。
2.陳威成，民間參與都市更新開發評估模式研究，碩士論文，國立成功大學建築工程學系，台南，1997。
3.蘇英瑋，民間參與都市更新災區重建－兼論容積獎勵迷思，碩士論文，國立政治大學地政研究所，台北，2000。
4.蔡馥竹，都市住宅鄰里服務設施便利性之調查－以台北市國宅為例，碩士論文，私立中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所，台北，2000。
5.吳俊煒，都市更新容積獎勵對開發時機的影響，碩士論文，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所，台南，2001。
6.張義權，都市更新容積獎勵實施後對地區環境影響之調查研究以臺北市為例，碩士論文，私立中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所，台北，2001。
7.高平洲，建築容積對居住品質影響之研究，碩士論文，國立政治大學地政研究所，台北，2001。
8.莊育傑，就獎勵性政策機制觀點探討臺北市建築物增設室內公用停車空間鼓勵要點，碩士論文，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所，台南，2001。
9.吳秉蓁，都市更新容積獎勵對開發時機的影響碩士論文，國立政治大學地政研究所，台北，2002。
10.林啟達、我國都市更新權利變換中產權變換機制問題之研究、碩士論文，私立中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所，台北，2002。
11.謝文娟，都市更新獎助誘因財務模擬之研究，碩士論文，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所，台南，2004。
12.陳全勝，論都市更新容積獎勵對房地產投資報酬率影響之研究－以臺北市中山區長安段三小段709、717地號都市更新案為例，碩士論文，國立臺灣科技大學，台北，2004。
13.簡俊卿，民間自辦都市更新設置公益設施使用成效之研究－以台北市更新設置活動中心案為例，碩士論文，私立中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所，台北，2004。
14.楊智瑤，台北市都市更新設置公益設施成效之研究－以戶外公共空間為例，碩士論文，國立台北科技大學，台北，2005。
15.羅榮華，探討獎勵建築基地增設公共開放空間成效之研究—以臺北市為例。國立臺灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文，臺北，2004。
16.李奕樵,實施容積率管制地區更新重建與容積獎勵機制初評以台北市為例，中華民國都市計畫學會年會論文，1998。
17.鄧梅姬,都市更新容積獎勵公益設施認定基準之研究－以臺北市為例，臺北，2002。
18.黃聖偉，公私合夥參與都市更新開發財務風險評估模式之研究，碩士論文，朝陽科技大學，2002。
19.黃定國、彭光輝，都市老舊住宅社區更新規劃及開發原則之研究，臺北，1998。
（二）期刊與研討會論文
1.周素卿，再造老台北：台北市都市更新政策的分析，地理學報第二十五期，國立台灣大學理學院地理學系，台北，1999。
2.陳鵬元，臺北市都市更新容積獎勵實施案例之檢討，2001第四屆青年環境共生論壇論文發表研討會論文集，私立中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所，2001。
3.劉小蘭,高平洲（2000）「容積獎勵對都市發展影響之研究—以臺北市為例」，2000年中華民國住宅學會第九屆年會論文集，頁175-190。
（三）書籍與規劃研究報告
1.黃健二，都市更新之研究，大佳出版社，台北，1984。
2.錢學陶，都市計畫學導論，茂榮圖書公司，台北，1987。
3.台北市政府都市發展局，台北市都市更新實施辦法，台北市政府都市發展局，台北，1994。
4.林森田，土地經濟學理論與實務，三民書局，台北，1996。
5.黃定國，都市住宅社區公共設施調查與設置準則之研究－以台北市及高雄市住宅社區為例，內政部建築研究所專題研究計畫成果報告，台北，1997。
6.王海山主編，科學方法百科，恩楷股份有限公司，台北，1998。
7.財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會，「都市更新條例」闡釋與思考，空間，1998。
8.黃定國，都市更新有關更新地區劃設及更新獎勵準則之研究，內政部建築研究所專題研究計畫成果報告，台北，1999。
9.台北市政府，都市計劃法，都市計畫法規彙編，台北市政府都市發展局，台北，2000。
10.台北市政府，都市計劃法臺北市施行細則，都市計畫法規彙編，台北市政府都市發展局，台北，2000。
11.台北市政府，都市更新條例施行細則，都市計畫法規彙編，台北市政府都市發展局，台北，2000。
12.台北市政府，台北市土地使用分區管制規則，都市計畫法規彙編，台北市政府都市發展局，台北，2000。
13.台北市政府，台北市社區參與實施辦法，都市計畫法規彙編，台北市政府都市發展局，台北，2000。
14.內政部營建署，都市更新作業手冊，營建雜誌社，台北，2001。
15.台北市政府，台北市都市更新自治條例，都市計畫法規彙編，台北市政府都市發展局，台北，2002。
16.台北市政府，台北市都市更新基金收支保管運用自治條例，都市計畫法規彙編，台北市政府都市發展局，台北，2000。
17.台北市政府，都市更新建築容積獎勵辦法，都市更新相關法規彙編，台北市政府都市更新處，台北，2005。
18.台北市政府，都市更新權利變換實施辦法，都市更新相關法規彙編，台北市政府都市更新處，台北，2005。
19.台北市建築師公會，台北市都市計畫參考圖集，台北市建築師公會，台北，1994~1999。
20.財團法人都市更新研究發展基金會，日本都市更新在生密碼-都市更新的案例與制度，臺北，2006。
二、外文部分
1.C Theodore Koebel，Ph.D.，Urban redevelopment displacement and the future of the American City ，Virgina Polytechnic Institute and University ，American， April 15, 1996。
2.Jerome G. Rose ,Transfer Of Development Rights：A New Technique Of Land Use Regulation,1975。
3.Fainstein S. S. Urban redevelopment and Public Policy in London and New York. The New Urban Context. Managing Cities. Edited by Healey, P., Cameron S., Davoudi S.,Graham S.,and Ali Madami Pour（New York，NY：JOHN WILEY &SONS）, pp.127-143（1993）。
4.Doe, Improving Urban Area －Good Practice in Urban Regeneration, HMSO, London, 1988。
5.社團法人全囯市街地開發協会，日本の都市再開發4－－市街地在開事業の全紀錄，1995。
三、網站資料
1.臺北市政府法規委員會（2006）臺北市現行法規查詢系統http://www.law.taipei.gov.tw/taipei/lawsystem/news.jsp
2.國家政策網路資料庫
http://thinktank.nat.gov.tw/
3.內政部營建署
http://ur.cabc.org.tw/index.asp