臺灣政府規劃2025年離岸風電累計設置量達5.7GW，藉此促進能源多元化及自主供應。由於臺灣海峽風場條件特殊、環境險峻，所以水下基礎工程品質良窳是離岸風場建置成敗的重要關鍵。而世界上多數的離岸風機水下基礎製造基地均位於歐洲港口，若由歐洲製造後再運回臺灣不符合經濟效益，所以自主發展水下基礎在地製造是必然的趨勢。
目前離岸風電水下基礎產業供應鏈中，鮮少有公司能夠獨立完成基礎結構製造、運送及施工安裝之服務，因此如何慎選夥伴廠商組成統包團隊共同合作參與市場競標，是臺灣發展風電產業本土化亟需解決的重要課題。
然而在投標時，存在潛在競爭者，因此在組成夥伴團隊時，不能只單獨考慮自身情況，亦需考量各競爭者在此專案目標之競爭能力。如能在投標前，通過預測競爭者的競標策略，將有助我方選擇適合的投標策略，以提升贏得標案之機率。
有鑒於此，本研究建構「專案夥伴關係遴選競標決策模式」，協助水下基礎製造商依照專案特性，評估分析各施工廠商，作為組成夥伴團隊之參考。本模式透過夥伴關係整合度雙矩陣，評量不同夥伴組合對於專案所要求工程目標之貢獻度，分析各夥伴在專案工期、成本和品質之目標下之關係整合度；再分別擬定工期/成本/品質策略的競爭模式，以不同夥伴組合對各競爭者進行賽局分析，找出最適策略；最後藉由各賽局結果，以及各夥伴關係整合度之評分權重加總，計算出各夥伴組合對不同競爭者的綜合評選排序。據此協助廠商在競標前，能就各競爭者的能力及自身團隊合作夥伴整合度，評估找出該專案最適夥伴關係之統包團隊，以及其最佳的競標策略，從而提升夥伴團隊於該專案得標之優勢與機率。

The Taiwan government plans to install 5.7GW of offshore wind power by 2025 to promote energy diversification and independent supply. Due to the special conditions and the dangerous environment of the Taiwan Strait wind farm, the quality of the underwater infrastructure is the key to the success or failure of the offshore wind farm construction. Most of the world's offshore wind underwater foundation manufacturing bases are located in European ports, so it is not economically efficient to have them manufactured in Europe and then transported back to Taiwan.
At present, few companies in the supply chain of offshore wind power underwater foundation industry are able to provide independent services of foundation structure manufacturing, transportation and construction and installation. Therefore, how to carefully select partners to form teams to participate in the market bidding is an important issue that needs to be solved for the localization of wind power industry in Taiwan.
However, there are potential competitors in the bidding process, so when forming a partner team, we should not only consider our own situation, but also consider the competitiveness of each competitor in this project. If we can predict the bidding strategy of our competitors before bidding, it will help us to choose a suitable bidding strategy to increase the chance of winning the bid.
In view of this, this study constructs the "Contractor Partnership Selection for Bidding Decision Model" to assist underwater infrastructure manufacturers in evaluating and analyzing various construction companies according to project characteristics as a reference for forming partner teams. This model uses a double matrix of partnership integration to evaluate the contribution of different partner combinations to the required project objectives, and analyze the integration of each partner's relationship under the project schedule, cost, and quality objectives; then develop a competition model of schedule/cost/quality strategies, and conduct a competition analysis of each partner combination against each competitor to find the most appropriate strategy. Then, by adding up the results of each game and the weight of each partner's relationship integration score, we can calculate the overall ranking of each partner combination against different competitors. This helps manufacturers to identify the most suitable turnkey team and the best bid strategy for the project, based on the competitor's ability and integration of their own team, before bidding, thus enhancing the advantage and chance of winning the bid.

伍顯陽（2016）。觸控面板製造商對強化玻璃基板供應商評選模糊多準則評估之研究。國立雲林科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文，雲林縣。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8yrpkw
江允智、簡連貴、蕭松山、許朝敏、廖建明、邱淑宜、曾文謙（2012）。離岸風力發電海事工程施工規範規劃之研究。第34屆海洋工程研討會論文集（619-624頁）。台灣海洋工程學會，台南。
行政院（2019）。全力推動離岸風電—打造台灣成為亞洲離岸風電技術產業聚落。取自https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/9eebb9b8-490b-4357-963f-a48a981852a7
吳秉叡（2014）。考慮顧客需求之模糊供應商遴選模式。崑山科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，台南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gt9p55
吳俊明（2001）。公共工程統包制度效益評估模式之研究。國立成功大學建築學系碩士論文，台南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d48b88
李金會（2015）。電子零組件供應商評選關鍵因素之探討-以通訊產品製造商為例。中華大學工業管理學系碩士班碩士論文，新竹市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tz3rsk
李潔玟（2017）。公共工程統包爭議之研究 -以臺灣臺北地方法院訴訟案為例。國立交通大學土木工程系所碩士論文，新竹市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4twyh6
李鎔傑（2018）。軍事統包營建工程工期遲延關鍵因素之探討。大同大學工程管理碩士在職專班碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6e3q65
柯千禾（1999）。山坡地社區防災體系之研究與建立。國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/946393
范素玲（2021）。IPD應用議題探討—以首次應用IPD之業主為例。土木水利，48(1)，43-49。 取自https://doi.org/10.6653/MoCICHE.202102_48(1).0008
曹婷婷（2018）。離岸風力發電海事工程之採購發包策略模式建立－以台灣為例。國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a8zbb7
船舶暨海洋產業研發中心（2015）。離岸風場作業安全評估技術開發計畫。經濟部研究機構能源科技專案執行報告。（編號：103-D0106）取自https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ecw/business/content/wHandResearchPlan_File.ashx?file_id=1176
陳永昇（2016）。我國離岸風場發展現況之初探。臺船月刊，476期。取自https://www.csbcnet.com.tw/monthly_pub/476.html
陳桂蘭（2010）。業主執行公共工程統包契約常見問題與因應措施之研究。中華大學營建管理研究所碩士論文，新竹市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u23nj2
陳章安（2019）。參與以統包方式辦理公共工程之經驗。中國工程師學會「工程」會刊，92(3)，43-52。 取自http://www.cie.org.tw/cms/JournalFiles/10809_all.pdf
勞動部職業安全衛生署（2019）。離岸風電海域作業安全指引。取自https://file.motcmpb.gov.tw/files/201901/54910e5b-a7fc-4b5e-b5f5-decab751e538.pdf
曾柏融（2013）。定期海運業供應鏈環境合作之研究。國立高雄海洋科技大學航運管理研究所碩士論文，高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qk7p9h
馮建棨、彭媁琳（2019）。2025後離岸風電年增1GW。工商時報。取自https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20190426000292-260202?chdtv
黃志民（2006）。工程顧問機構知識管理導向企業流程再造模式之研究。國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/cnsjr5
經濟部能源局（2021）。離岸風力發電規劃場址容量分配作業要點。取自https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/Law/Content.aspx?menu_id=5841
潘藝方（2011）。加盟商選擇供應商發展夥伴關係關鍵成功因素之探索性研究-以台灣茶飲業為例。文藻外語學院國際事業暨文化交流研究所碩士論文，高雄市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/uz6r6f
龍竹茂（2011）。MCPM應用於營造業遴選分包商決策之研究。國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g6trjw
蘇慶豐（2005）。臺北市公有閒置空間委外經營模式之研究-以臺北市政府文化局所屬藝文館所為例。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，新北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5uhvtq
Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto, J. L. (2000). A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis. Management Science, 46(11), 1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1485.12086
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply Chain Collaboration: Impact on Collaborative Advantage and Firm Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008.
Chen, C.-T., Lin, C.-T., & Huang, S.-F. (2006). A Fuzzy Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009
Cheng, M.-Y., & Ko, C.-H. (2003). Automated Safety Monitoring and Diagnosis System for Unstable Slopes. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 18(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8667.t01-1-00300
Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., & Herrera-viedma, E. (2001). Integrating Multiplicative Preference Relations in a Multipurpose Decision-Making Model Based on Fuzzy Preference Relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 122(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00004-X
Duisters, D., Duysters, G., & de Man, A-P. (2011). The Partner Selection Process: Steps, Effectiveness, Governance. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances, 2(1/2), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSBA.2011.038131
Herrera-viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., & Luque, E. (2004). Some Issues on Consistency of Fuzzy Preference Relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1974). On the Psychology of Prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Kamath, B. G., Naik, R., & Prasad, S. H. C. (2016). A Vendor’s Evaluation–Using AHP for an Indian Steel Pipe Manufacturing Company. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 8(3), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v8i3.460
Lambropoulos, S. (2013). Objective Construction Contract Award Using Cost, Time and Durability Utility. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 74, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.052
Lee, A. H. I. (2009). A Fuzzy Supplier Selection Model with the Consideration of Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2879–2893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045.
Maloni, M. J., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power Influences in the Supply Chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 21, 16-36. http://www.chainlinkresearch.com/parallaxview/articles/powerinfluences.pdf
McCain, R. A. (2010). Game Theory: A Non-Technical Introduction to the Analysis of Strategy (2nd ed.). World Scientific Publishing Corp. Inc. https://doi.org/10.1142/7517
Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150205
Nash, J. (1951). Non-Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529
Prelec, D. (1998). The Probability Weighting Function. Econometrica, 66(3), 497–528. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998573
Tahriri, F., Osman, M. rasid, Ali, A., Yusuff, R., & Esfandiary, A. (2008). AHP Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in a Steel Manufacturing Company. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 1(2), 163–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem..v1n2.p54-76
Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E. K., & Šileikaitė, I. (2017). A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach for Complicated Supply Chain Management Problems in Construction. Procedia Engineering, 172, 1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.168
Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty’s Priority Theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1–3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
Von Neumann, J. (1928). Zur Theorie Der Gesellschaftsspiele. Mathematische Annalen, 100, 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01448847
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2004). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (6th ed.). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829460
Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1996). Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function. Management Science, 42(12), 1676–1690. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634546
Yadav, V., & Sharma, M. K. (2014). Multi-Criteria Supplier Selection Model Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(1), 326–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-06-2014-0052