研究生: |
許子揚 Tzu-Yang Hsu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
隨機衝擊下具自我恢復力退化系統之最佳置換門檻 Optimal Replacement Threshold for Deteriorating System with Resilience under Random Shocks |
指導教授: |
葉瑞徽
Ruey-Huei Yeh |
口試委員: |
曾世賢
Shih-Hsien Tseng 林希偉 Shi-Woei Lin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業管理系 Department of Industrial Management |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 66 |
中文關鍵詞: | 自我恢復力 、置換門檻 、期望成本率 |
外文關鍵詞: | expected cost rate |
相關次數: | 點閱:195 下載:1 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自我恢復力之概念為當生物或系統受到外力衝擊時,能夠有承受衝擊的容受力以及短時間內恢復至較健康狀態之恢復力。隨著時間的推進,自我恢復力之概念已被實際應用至不同領域中,包括材料、電機、交通運輸等領域。過往文獻中,對於系統的失效較多著重於失效函數及外在衝擊的描寫,較少有文獻針對系統在具備有恢復力下的描寫。本文將自我恢復力納入考量並建構含有恢復力之系統狀態,且在受外在衝擊的情況下討論不同內部退化速率及恢復量變動下的置換策略、期望成本率以及恢復力之價值。系統除了自身內部退化外,也會受到外在衝擊影響,導致系統效能越來越差。在系統狀態逐漸增加的同時,運營成本也會逐步提升。為了達到最低的期望成本率以避免不必要的支出,當系統達某特定門檻時即進行系統置換。在以期望成本率作為績效指標下,本論文將找出不同系統的最佳置換門檻,並更進一步探討恢復力在系統中的價值。
Resilience means a system has tolerance to resist shocks and can heal itself to a healthier state after suffering from exterior shocks. Resilience, or “self-healing”, is increasingly being applied to practice in different fields such as material field, electrical engineering field and transportation field and so on. In the past literatures, system failures have been more focused on failure rate and exterior shocks, yet few literatures have considered resilience capability into the model. Therefore, this paper takes resilience capability into account by constructing a system status with embedded resilience capability and discusses its replacing strategy, expected cost rate and the worth of resilience capability under the circumstances of suffering from exterior shocks, different deterioration rate and changing resilience value. In this model, the system performance is not only affected by interior deterioration but also exterior shocks, both leading to a poorer system performance. As the system performance worsen, the operation cost also rises. In order to have the lowest expected cost rate and avoid unnecessary expenditures, systems are recommended to be replaced while reaching the replacing threshold. Finally, some numerical examples are given to analyze the replacing thresholds of different systems and evaluate the worth of resilience capability.
[1] Holling, C. S. “Resilience and stability of ecological systems”, Annual review of ecology and systematics, 4(1), 1-23, 1973.
[2] Amaro, R. I., Martins, R. C., Seabra, J. O., Renevier, N. M., & Teer, D. G. “Molybdenum disulphide/titanium low friction coating for gears application.” Tribology International, 38(4), 423-434, 2005.
[3] 柯以諾,災害下運輸路網恢復力最佳化模式建立與分析. 2014. PhD Thesis.
[4] Gardner, J. S., & Dekens, J. “Mountain hazards and the resilience of social–ecological systems: lessons learned in India and Canada.” Natural Hazards, 41(2), 317-336, 2007.
[5] Yang, L., Sun, Q., & Ye, Z. S. “Designing mission abort strategies based on early-warning information: Application to UAV.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(1), 277-287, 2019.
[6] 黃馨玫,在隨機衝擊下之可自我恢復線性退化系統之最佳置換時機,國立臺灣科技大學碩士論文,2021。
[7] Zhang, Z., Si, X., Hu, C., & Lei, Y. “Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods.” European Journal of Operational Research, 271(3), 775-796, 2018.
[8] Rafiee, K., Feng, Q., & Coit, D. W. “Reliability modeling for dependent competing failure processes with changing degradation rate.” IIE transactions, 46(5), 483-496, 2014.
[9] Liu, H., Yeh, R. H., & Cai, B. “Reliability modeling for dependent competing failure processes of damage self-healing systems.” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 55-62, 2017.
[10] Zhao, X., Guo, X., & Wang, X. “Reliability and maintenance policies for a two-stage shock model with self-healing mechanism.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 172, 185-194, 2018.
[11] Lin, J., Liao, G., Chen, M., & Yin, H. “Two-phase degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction using nonlinear wiener process.” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 160, 107533, 2021.
[12] Bouvard, K., Artus, S., Bérenguer, C., & Cocquempot, V. “Maintenance cost study for deteriorating systems: age-replacement policy vs. condition-based maintenance policy.” Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, 1, 2018.
[13] Eryilmaz, S. “Computing optimal replacement time and mean residual life in reliability shock models.” Computers & industrial engineering, 103, 40-45, 2017.
[14] Montoro‐Cazorla, D., & Pérez‐Ocón, R. “System availability in a shock model under preventive repair and phase‐type distributions.” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 26(6), 689-704, 2010.
[15] Huynh, K. T. “An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 213, 107695, 2021.
[16] Nakagawa, T. “Shock and damage models in reliability theory.” Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
[17] Nakagawa, T., & Mizutani, S. “A summary of maintenance policies for a finite interval.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(1), 89-96, 2009.
[18] Chien, Y. H., & Sheu, S. H. “Extended optimal age-replacement policy with minimal repair of a system subject to shocks.” European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 169-181, 2006.
[19] Qiu, Q., Cui, L., & Wu, B. “Dynamic mission abort policy for systems operating in a controllable environment with self-healing mechanism.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 203, 107069, 2020.
[20] Ling, M. H., Ng, H. K. T., & Tsui, K. L. “Bayesian and likelihood inferences on remaining useful life in two-phase degradation models under gamma process.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 184, 77-85, 2019.