簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 盧振宇
Cheng-Yu Lu
論文名稱: 運用動態貝氏網路架構營建專案成本超支預測系統之研究
Study of Using Dynamic Bayesian Network Construct Construction Project Cost Prediction Model
指導教授: 呂守陞
Sou-Sen Leu
口試委員: 楊亦東
I-Tung Yang
王裕仁
none
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工程學院 - 營建工程系
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 116
中文關鍵詞: 專案成本管理貝氏網路預測動態模擬
外文關鍵詞: Project cost, Bayesian network, Prediction, Dynamic simulation
相關次數: 點閱:273下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 營建產業工程技術隨著科技不斷進步,然而營建專案成本管理的技術與手段卻時常拘泥於傳統的書面作業程序,大部分的成本管理手段著重於事後的查核與管制,而並未以整體的角度分析專案成本的趨勢與走向。因此本研究利用動態貝氏網路建置專案成本超支預測模型,將成本管理中成本估算的概念融入成本控制的技術中,亦即藉由對未來成本狀態的預測,評估當下可能造成影響的因子,並隨時彈性的調整管理的重點,達到提前預防的效果,並可提升整體專案管理的效益。
    本研究探討靜態貝氏網路機率推理的模式,並運用動態模擬的方式,建構動態貝氏網路,藉由各種不同的運算架構,找出最精確的預測效果,以供管理者提早採取措施,降低成本超支發生的機率。


    The technologies using in construction engineering industry progress with the development of science and technology. However, most of the management methods used for cost control in constructional projects are rigidly conventional written operating procedures, which focus only on checking and control as an afterthought instead of analyzing the tendency of the constructional project cost with an integrated view.
    As a result, the purpose of this study is to establish a model that is cable to estimate the overhead possibility of project cost using a dynamic Bayesian network and integrating the concept of cost estimating into the technologies of cost control Moreover, by estimating the future cost tendency, evaluating possible influential factors, and adjusting the focus of management, the efficiency of project management and avoidance of overhead in project cost will be increased.
    This study focuses on discussing the theory of static Bayesian network, and establishing dynamic Bayesian network by using dynamic simulation. According to different calculation processes, a precise result of the estimation of project cost can be found, and that offers managers more information to reduce the possibility of cost overruns.

    中 文 摘 要 I ABSTRACT II 致謝 IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究範圍與內容 2 1.3 研究方法與步驟 3 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 專案成本管理概述 7 2.2 營建專案工程成本影響因子 9 2.3 模擬過程相關文獻 14 2.4 貝氏網路 16 2.4.1 貝氏網路的性質與優勢 16 2.4.2 貝氏網路相關文獻 18 2.4.3 貝氏網路的建構 19 2.5本章小結 21 第三章 研究方法之探討與應用 23 3.1 貝氏網路基本原理 23 3.1.1 貝氏機率理論 23 3.1.2 類圖理論 26 3.2 動態貝氏網路 27 3.3貝氏網路的推論 29 3.4 貝氏網路的學習模式 30 3.5 隨機模擬方法在成本超支預測之應用 31 3.5.1蒙地卡羅模擬法 33 3.5.2重要性取樣法 34 3.5.3樣本重要性重取樣 34 3.5.4馬可夫鏈蒙地卡羅模擬 35 3.5.5 顆粒濾波演算法 37 3.6 隱式馬可夫鏈(Hidden Markov Model) 38 3.7 本章小結 40 第四章 貝氏網路運算系統 41 4.1 貝氏網路機率的傳遞 41 4.2 鏈型網路 44 4.3 樹型網路 48 4.4 複樹型網路 51 4.5 環型網路 57 4.6 基本型態綜合測試 59 4.7 近似值推理演算 62 4.8 動態模擬 64 4.9 本章小結 69 第五章 營建專案成本超支預測系統建立 71 5.1 研究界定 71 5.2 成本超支因子辨識 73 5.3 專家問卷設計 80 5.4專家知識的整合 82 5.5 建構專家系統貝氏網路 85 5.5.1 靜態網圖影響因子敏感度分析 89 5.6 動態模型轉換 91 5.6.1 影響因子敏感度分析 93 5.6.2案例驗證: 96 5.6.3 動態靜態預測比較 101 5.7 本章小節 102 第六章 結論與建議 103 6.1 結論 103 6.2 建議 104 參考文獻 106 附錄一 專家知識因果關係問卷 110 附錄二 範例五MATLAB程式碼 114 附錄三 範例六MATLAB程式碼 115

    中文部份
    1. 吳柏林,時間數列分析導論,華泰書局,臺北 (1995)。
    2. 陳宏彬,「基於水工元件的檢查資料估算水工閘門的生命週期並即時更新可靠度」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學,臺北 (2007)。
    3. 張結雄,「使用主成分分析及貝氏網路方法於離子植入製程之錯誤偵測與診斷」,碩士論文,國立交通大學,新竹 (2001)。
    4. 張原豪,「應用貝氏網路於製程績效評估與預測-以奈米碳管背光模組陰極板為例」,碩士論文,東海大學,臺中 (2004)。
    5. 傅彥霖,「貝氏理論於水庫設施可靠度之探討」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學,臺北 (2007)。
    6. 楊國樺,「結合隱藏式馬可夫模型與簡單貝氏網路分類器應用於入侵偵測系統」,碩士論文,國立臺灣科技大學,臺北 (2006)。
    7. 蔡易達,「運用貝氏網路建立台灣地區高風險上市公司之偵測模型」,碩士論文,元智大學,桃園 (2000)。
    8. 潘家琳,「利用動態貝氏網分析基因網路的調控」,碩士論文,慈濟大學,花蓮 (2005)。
    9. 蘇祐萱,「貝氏網路於輔助盈餘預估分析之研究」,碩士論文,元智大學,桃園 (2000)。
    10. 蘇俊和,「貝氏網路的建構與學習機制之研究-以航太產業績效管理為例」,碩士論文,東海大學,臺中 (2002)。
    11. 蘇俊豪,「建置貝氏網路於工程品質缺失及其應用之研究」,碩士論文,國立中興大學,臺中 (2006)。

    英文部份
    1. Akinci, B., and Fischer, M., “Factors affecting contractors risk of cost overburden”, ASCE:Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 67-76 (1998).
    2. Cooper, N.J., Lambert, P.C., Abrams, K.R., and Sutton, A.J., “Predicting the cost of illness over time using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods: An application to early inflammatory polyarthritis”, Medical Statistics Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK (2004).
    3. Dissanayaka, S.M., and Kumaraswamy, M.M., “Evaluation of factors affecting time and cost performance in Hong Kong building project”, Engineering Construction Architect Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 287–298 (1999).
    4. Elinwa, A., and Buba, S., “Construction cost factors in Nigeria”. ASCE:Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 119, No. 4, pp. 698–713 (1993).
    5. Elhag, T.M.S., Boussabaine, A.H., and Ballal, T.M.A., “Critical determinants of construction tendering costs: Quantity surveyors’ standpoint”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 23, pp. 538–545 (2005).
    6. Enrique, C., Jose, M.G., and Ali, S.H., Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models, Springer-Verlag, NY (1997).
    7. Pearl, J., Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Network of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA (1988).
    8. Friendman, N., Murphy, K., and Russell, S., “Learning the structure of dynamic probabilistic networks”, In UAI (1998).
    9. Heckerman, D., “A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks”, Technical Report MSR-TR-95-06, Microsoft Research, March, 1995 (revised November, 1996).
    10. Hu, X.X., Wang, H., and Wang, S., “Using Expert’s Knowledge to Build Bayesian Networks”, International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), pp. 220-223 (2007).
    11. Kaming, P., Olomolaiye, P., Holt, G., and Harris, F., “Factors influencing construction time and cost overruns on high-rise projects in Indonesia”, Journal Construction Management & Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 83–94 (1997).
    12. Kevin Patrick Murphy, “Dynamic Bayesian Networks: Representation, Inference and Learning”, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 268 (2002).
    13. Jenny, “Applied Real-time Bayesian Analysis in Forecasting Project Cost Overrun” , Ph.D dissertation, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan (2008).
    14. Lauritzen, S., Thiesson, B., and Spiegelhalter, D., Diagonstic systems created by model selection methods: A case study, In Cheeseman, P. and Oldford, R., editors, AI and Statistics IV, vol. 89, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 143-152. (1994).
    15. Nassar, K.M., Gunnarsson, H.G., and Hegab, M.Y., “Using weibull analysis for evaluation of cost and schedule performance”, ASCE:Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 12, pp. 1257–1262 (2005).
    16. Okpala, D.C., and Aniekwu, A.N., “Causes of high costs of construction in Nigeria”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 233 - 244 (1988).
    17. Yeo, K.T., “Risks, classification of estimates and contingency management”. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 458-470 (1990).
    18. Robert K. Wysocki & Rudd McGary, Effective Project Management 3e, (2005).
    19. Schervish, M., Probabilistic inference and inference diagrams, Operations Research, Vol. 36, pp. 589-604 (1995).

    QR CODE