目前世界能源主要面臨能源消費量快速增加、能源蘊藏量有限等問題，各國已陸續建構環境永續節能的目標，故，如何提高能源效率和節約能源，乃各國現今重要研究議題之ㄧ。全球最大的最終能源使用範疇為建築領域，而住宅部門占其能源耗用的75%，又為我國近年來，用電成長率最高的主要部門，故有效的降低住宅部門電力消費有其必要性。本研究以建立節電行動架構為主軸，期望提供我國能源相關單位推動節電政策時之依據。本文架構內容採文獻分析法，將各方多元數據，經分析後歸納統整，並選擇設計架構矩陣作為流程設定之工具。綜合上述文獻資料，結合項目制定方法以及各國相關能源策略架構之探討，訂定通用性住宅節電行動架構之流程，依序為：問題探討、數據分析、識別問題、解決方案以及成本效益評估。最後以我國彰化縣進行個案實例探討，驗證住宅節電行動架構用於真實案例之可行性，希冀提供國內住宅部門未來研擬節能決策之參考資訊。

World energy is currently facing a rapid increase in energy consumption and limited energy reserves. Countries are successively establishing the goal of sustainable energy conservation in the environment. Therefore, how to improve energy efficiency and save energy is an important research topic today. The building sector has the largest global final energy consumption, with the residential sub-sector accounting for 75% of its energy consumption. The residential sector is also the main sector with the highest electricity consumption rate in recent years in Taiwan, so its power consumption needs to be decreased. This investigation takes the establishment of an energy-saving action framework as the main axis, and expects to promote appropriate energy-saving policies for the energy-related authority in Taiwan. The schema content of this study is based on the literature analysis method. The various data of each country are analyzed and integrated using a design architecture matrix as the process setting tool. Based on the literature, project formulation method and the discussion of relevant energy strategy frameworks in various countries, the process of the general residential energy-saving action framework is defined in the following order: problem discussion, data analysis, problem identification, solution generation and cost-benefit evaluation. Finally, a case study is conducted in Changhua County in Taiwan to verify the feasibility of the residential energy-saving action framework for real cases, with the aim of providing reference information for the future development of energy-saving decisions in the domestic residential sector.

[1]Asia Pacific Energy Research Center, Compendium of Energy Efficiency Policies of APEC Economies Japan, 2017.
[2]U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 2018, Washington, DC 2018.
[3]British Petroleum, BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2018, London, England, United Kingdom, 2018.
[4]經濟部能源局, 能源統計手冊, 台灣, 2018.
[5]International Energy Agency, Market Report Series : Energy Efficiency 2018, French, 2018.
[6]J.C. Cramer, B. Hackett, P.P. Craig, E. Vine, M. Levine, T.M. Dietz, D. Kowalczyk, Structural-behavioral determinants of residential energy use: Summer electricity use in Davis, Energy 9 (3) 1984 1984/03/01/ 207-216.
[7]E. Hirst, R. Goeltz, J. Carney, Residential energy use: Analysis of disaggregate data, Energy Economics 4 (2) 1982 1982/04/01/ 74-82.
[8]L. Pérez-Lombard, J. Ortiz, C. Pout, A review on buildings energy consumption information, Energy and Buildings 40 (3) 2008 2008/01/01/ 394-398.
[9]B. Halvorsen, B.M. Larsen, Possibility for hedging from price increases in residential energy demand, 2003
[10]廖惠珠, 影響台灣地區住宅部門能源消費要因之探討, 能源季刊 31 (2) 2005 14-27.
[11]林素琴, 林志勳, 我國住宅部門電力使用研究, 台灣能源期刊 第四卷 第三期 第285-302頁 2017
[12]B. Liddle, Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: evidence from macro-level, cross-country analyses, Population and Environment 35 (3) 2014 2014/03/01 286-304.
[13]W. Chung, M.S. Kam, C.Y. Ip, A study of residential energy use in Hong Kong by decomposition analysis, 1990–2007, Applied Energy 88 (12) 2011 2011/12/01/ 5180-5187.
[14]S. Kelly, Do homes that are more energy efficient consume less energy?: A structural equation model of the English residential sector, Energy 36 (9) 2011 2011/09/01/ 5610-5620.
[15]Y.-T. Chen, The Factors Affecting Electricity Consumption and the Consumption Characteristics in the Residential Sector—A Case Example of Taiwan, 2017.
[16]European Union, Understanding Variation in Energy Consumption- Methodological Report., 2017.
[17]A. Tiangket, B. Chullabodhi, K. Eam-O-Pas, S. Watechagit, The Energy Saving Calculation for a Residential Sector in Thailand with Top-Down Methodology, Energy Procedia 79 2015 2015/11/01/ 415-422.
[18]K. Huan, Y. Zhu, H. Shen, A new evaluation system for energy-saving effect based on extended energy consumption and extended energy efficiency, 2012 China International Conference on Electricity Distribution, 2012, pp. 1-8.
[19]R. Dalimi, The Calculation Method and Potential of Energy Saving in Energy Labeling Program for Indonesia, in: P. Bertoldi, A. Ricci, A. de Almeida (Eds.), Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001, pp. 679-684.
[20]J. McMahon, S. Wiel, Energy-efficiency labels and standards: A guidebook for appliances, equipment and lighting, 2019.
[21]L. Zhang, Q. Qin, Y.-M. Wei, China's distributed energy policies: Evolution, instruments and recommendation, Energy Policy 125 2019 2019/02/01/ 55-64.
[22]A.M. Husen, Principles of Environmental Economics, 2004
[23]朱振豪, 住宅部門節電措施及CO2減量之探討-以冷氣空調為例, 自然資源與環境管理研究所 國立台北大學, 2007.
[24]S. Nadel, The future of standards, Energy and Buildings 26 (1) 1997 1997/01/01/ 119-128.
[25]S. Lee, Y. Kim, W.K. Chong, A Statistical Analysis of Effectiveness of Energy Policy in the United States: Incentives vs. Regulations, Procedia Engineering 118 2015 2015/01/01/ 1282-1287.
[26]H. Blum, B. Atkinson, A.B. Lekov, A methodological framework for comparative assessments of equipment energy efficiency policy measures, Energy Efficiency 6 (1) 2013 2013/02/01 65-90.
[27]關西電力公司, 省電獎勵制度, 關西, 日本, 2012.
[28]東京電力公司, 合約類型價格計算公式, 東京, 日本, 2016.
[29]日本經濟產業省資源與能源廳, エネルギー革新戦略中間とりまとめ, 日本, 2016.
[30]S. Hinson, N. Sutherland, T. Rutherford, Energy Efficiency and the Clean Growth Strategy, 2018
[31]Department of Energy and Climate Change, Which energy efficiency improvements qualify for Green Deal Finance, London, 2012.
[32]San Diego Gas & Electric, Time-of-Use Pricing Plans, San Diego, California, United States, 2019.
[33]Southern California Edison, Time-Of-Use (TOU) Rate Plans, Southern California, 2019.
[34]Energy Austalia, Electricity and Gas Plans, Austalia, 2019.
[35]Energy Australia, Sydney Water, Newington smart home, Sydney, Australia, 2011.
[36]W. Neuman, Social Research Methods, 2000.
[37]R. Müller, S. Pemsel, J. Shao, Organizational enablers for governance and governmentality of projects: A literature review, International Journal of Project Management 32 (8) 2014 2014/11/01/ 1309-1320.
[38]A. Yassine, D. Falkenburg, K. Chelst, Engineering design management: an information structure approach, International Journal of production research 37 (13) 1999 2957-2975.
[39]A. Kusiak, J. Wang, D.W. He, C.-X. Feng, A structured approach for analysis of design processes, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology: Part A 18 (3) 1995 664-673.
[40]J. Malmstrdm, P. Pikosz, J. Malmqvist, Complementary Roles of IDEFO and DSM for the Modeling of Information Management Processes, Concurrent Engineering 7 (2) 1999 95-103.
[41]D. Steward, The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems, 1981.
[42]L. Crawford, J. Pollack, Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis, International Journal of Project Management 22 (8) 2004 2004/11/01/ 645-653.
[43]C.-C. Chen, An analytical framework for energy policy evaluation, Renewable Energy 36 (10) 2011 2011/10/01/ 2694-2702.
[44]彭姿瑄, 落實永續校園節電目標與執行策略之探討---以交通大學為例, 土木工程系所, 國立交通大學, 2013.
[45]UN Environment, Accelerating the Global Adoption of ENERGY-EFFICIENT LIGHTING, Paris, France, 2016.
[46]蘇梓靖, 建築動態耗能密度指標之研究, 建築研究所, 國立成功大學, 2014.
[47]陳瑞鈴, 林憲德, 建築物節能減碳標示制度規畫之研究(二)-建築能源證照耗能分級基準之研究, 內政部建築研究所期中報告 2010