The main problem of incorporation has been hard to innovate like the way of its startup phase. The human resource is hard to re-deploy. The content of each occupation stay the same for a long time. Those are parts of the essential reasons that incorporation is hard to innovate. The aim of this research is to absorb the Human Resource Management knowledge from the case study of SafeSync for Enterprise product team in Trend Micro. For this purpose, this research collected the observation data from 2010 to 2016 and the formal and informal interviews in 2016 then applied Qualitative Interview and Coding technique of Grounded Theory to achieve the purpose. Teece proposed the concept of Dynamic Capability in the year of 1997. It is a conceptualized approach in order to stress exploitation existing internal and external firm-specific competence to address how firm reacts, adapt and respond to the changing environments. Henderson and Clark proposed the concept of Resource Reconfiguration in the year of 1990. It is one way to achieve Architectural Innovation. This research combined both of their concepts to focus more specific on Dynamic Reconfiguration Capability. It generates the result of Contextual Ambidexterity in the firm who owns this capability because the data collection shows that Trend Micro has the phenomenon of Dynamic Reconfiguration Capability and achieves the state of Contextual Ambidexterity. This research categorized the informal and formal interview to match the evidences with the proposed theory model in the forth and the fifth chapter.

The main problem of incorporation has been hard to innovate like the way of its startup phase. The human resource is hard to re-deploy. The content of each occupation stay the same for a long time. Those are parts of the essential reasons that incorporation is hard to innovate. The aim of this research is to absorb the Human Resource Management knowledge from the case study of SafeSync for Enterprise product team in Trend Micro. For this purpose, this research collected the observation data from 2010 to 2016 and the formal and informal interviews in 2016 then applied Qualitative Interview and Coding technique of Grounded Theory to achieve the purpose. Teece proposed the concept of Dynamic Capability in the year of 1997. It is a conceptualized approach in order to stress exploitation existing internal and external firm-specific competence to address how firm reacts, adapt and respond to the changing environments. Henderson and Clark proposed the concept of Resource Reconfiguration in the year of 1990. It is one way to achieve Architectural Innovation. This research combined both of their concepts to focus more specific on Dynamic Reconfiguration Capability. It generates the result of Contextual Ambidexterity in the firm who owns this capability because the data collection shows that Trend Micro has the phenomenon of Dynamic Reconfiguration Capability and achieves the state of Contextual Ambidexterity. This research categorized the informal and formal interview to match the evidences with the proposed theory model in the forth and the fifth chapter.

David J. Teece, Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18:7, 509-533,
S.L. Pan, Gary Pan, Adela J.W. Chen (2007), and Ming H. Hsieh, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.54, No. 4., 271-272
Rebecca M. Henderson and Kim B. Clark (1990), “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 9-35
F. Salvador, C. Forza and M. Rungtusanatham (2002), “Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions”, Journal of Operations Management 20, 549-575
K. Ulrich (1995), “The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm”, Research Policy 24 (3), 419–440.
V. Higgins and W. Larner (2010), “ From Standardization to Standardizing Work”, “Calculating the Social--Standards and the Reconfiguration of Governing”, Ch. 12, P205-217, 2010
R. Duymedjian and C. Rüling (2010), “Towards a Foundation of Bricolage in Organization and Management Theory”, Organization Studies 31(2), 133–151(ISSN 0170–8406)
D. Cotou (2002), “How Resilience Works”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, No.5
Karl E. Weick (1993), “The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Pg.628
Tor Hernes (2008), “Understanding Organization as Process”, Theory for a tangled world, Ch6, P110-112
Ian P. McCarthy and Brian R. Gordon (2011), “Achieving contextual ambidexterity in R&D organizations: a management control system approach”, R&D Management, Vol. 41, Issue 3, pp. 240-258, (ISSN 1467-9310)
S. Raisch and J. Birkinshaw (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, Vol. 34, P375-409.
C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark (2000). Design rules, Volume 1: The power of modularity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
R. Bledow, M. Frese, N. Anderson, M. Erez, and J. Farr (2009)., “A dialectic perspective on inn ovation: conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity,” Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2(3). P.305-337
Hedrick, T. E., L. Bickman, and D. J. Rog. (1993), “Applied research design: a practical guide,” Sage, Newbury Park, California, USA.
R. K.Yin (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
F. Cizgenakad (2010, June 11), ”Trend Micro Acquires humyo for Premium Consumer and Small Business Next-Generation Online Storage,” London, Trend Micro UK News Press. Retrieved May 21, 2017, from http://www.trendmicro.co.uk/newsroom/pr/trend-micro-acquires-humyo-for-premium-consumer-and-small-business-next-generation-online-storage/index.html
陳怡蓁(2013)., “創趨勢,我們不做Me Too,” Taipei City, 遠流出版社.