簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曹妤綺
Yu-Chi Tsao
論文名稱: 償債能力因子與證券報酬率之實證研究—以台灣股市為例
Empirical Study on Solvency Factor and Stock Returns in Taiwan Stock Market
指導教授: 郭啟賢
Chii-Shyan Kuo
口試委員: 呂志豪
Shih‐Hao Lu
陳崇文
Chung-Wen Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 55
中文關鍵詞: 投資組合三因子模型風險因子流動性
外文關鍵詞: Portfolio, 3-factor model, Risk factors, Liquidity
相關次數: 點閱:266下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究主要探討償債能力因子是否可作為解釋台灣股市證券報酬的有效資訊。由於企業的償債能力會因行業而有所不同,本文將依據不同行業來探討償債能力因子的有效性。過去有關投資因子的文獻較多是以獲利能力和成長率作為主要探討的對象,因為通常成長性因子和盈利因子對於股票報酬率具有較佳的預測效果,但當經濟衰退時期,償債能力因子便被視為衡量企業經營能力的重要指標,本研究希望針對償債能力這方面的文獻缺口進行實證研究,提供各產業的研究資訊給投資者做參考。

本文利用信息比率 (Information Ratio) 衡量償債能力因子的有效性,並利用Fama and French (1993) 三因子模型分析投資組合報酬率,觀察償債能力因子是否顯著影響投資組合的報酬率。研究結果發現,汽車工業的償債能力因子與證券報酬率間具有較強的相關性,且由償債能力因子所建構的投資組合當中,汽車工業和電子零組件皆有顯著的超額報酬,結果證實償債能力因子對部分產業的證券報酬率具有可解釋能力。


This study focuses on whether the solvency factor can explain the return of securities in the Taiwan stock market. Since the solvency of a company varies from industry to industry, this study examine the effectiveness of the solvency factor across different industries. Generally, growth and profit factors can better predict stock returns. However, during economic recession period, the solvency factor is considered as an incremental important indicator of the company’s ability to operate. To the best of my knowledge, this study is one of the very few paper to examine whether solvency factors are related to future stock returns and can be used to explain stock returns.

We use Information Ratio (IR) to test the effectiveness of the solvency factor and Fama and French (1993) three-factor model to test the relation between solvency factor and portfolio returns, to examine whether the portfolio selected by the solvency factor has significant excess returns. Our results find that the solvency factor has a strong correlation with the rate of return of securities in the samples of the automobile industry. In addition, in the investment portfolio constructed by the solvency factor, for both the automobile and the electronics component industries have significant excess returns. The results confirm that the solvency factor can explain the returns of securities of some industries.

摘要 II ABSTRACT III 第一章、緒論 6 壹、研究背景 6 貳、研究動機和目的 8 第二章、文獻回顧 9 壹、企業的償債能力與股票報酬相關文獻 9 貳、因子模型與驗證方法的相關文獻 10 第三章、研究設計與研究方法 12 壹、數據來源及說明 13 貳、因子的研究架構 14 參、投資組合的回測架構 19 第四章、實證結果 24 壹、償債能力因子於各產業有效性表現 24 貳、投資組合回測結果 30 第五章、結論及建議 36 壹、研究結論 36 貳、未來研究建議 38 第六章、參考文獻 39 附錄 42

中文文獻
洪瑞泰(2004)。巴菲特選股魔法書。台灣:Smart智富。
吳紫菱(2008)。企業償債能力與信用風險關係之研究─KMV模型的再探討。國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文,高雄市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s9xaug
姜彥汝(2011)。股價報酬與償債能力相關性研究-以建設營造業為例。國立交通大學管理科學系所碩士論文,新竹市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dx77kf

英文文獻
Asness, C., Porter, B., & Stevens, R. (2000). Predicting Stock Returns Using Industry-Relative Firm Characteristics. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.213872
Berkin, A. L., & Swedroe, L. E. (2015). Is Investing a Science? The Journal of Investing, 24(3), 39-45. doi:10.3905/joi.2015.24.3.039
Berkin, A. L., & Swedroe, L. E. (2016). Your Complete Guide to Factor-Based Investing: The Way Smart Money Invests Today. Buckingham.
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82. doi:10.2307/2329556
Chen, C.-M., & Lee, H.-H. (2013). Default Risk, Liquidity Risk, and Equity Returns: Evidence from the Taiwan Market. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 49, 101-129. doi:10.2307/23437617
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). COMMON RISK-FACTORS IN THE RETURNS ON STOCKS AND BONDS. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56. doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5
Garlappi, L., & Yan, H. (2011). Financial Distress and the Cross-section of Equity Returns. Journal of Finance, 66(3), 789-822. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01652.x
Grinold, R. C. (1989). THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF ACTIVE MANAGEMENT. Journal of Portfolio Management, 15(3), 30-37. doi:10.3905/jpm.1989.409211
Grinold, R. C. and Kahn, R.N. (2000). Active Portfolio Management: A Quantitative Approach for Producing Superior Returns and Controlling Risk. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Harvey, C., Liu, Y., & Zhu, H. (2013). …and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns. Review of Financial Studies, 29. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2249314
Ilmanen, A., & Kizer, J. (2012). The Death of Diversification Has Been Greatly Exaggerated. Journal of Portfolio Management, 38(3), 15-+. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000303431800003
Kritzman, M. (1986). How to detect skill in management performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 12(2), 16-20. doi:10.3905/jpm.1986.409038
Lischewski, J., & Voronkova, S. (2012). Size, value and liquidity. Do They Really Matter on an Emerging Stock Market? Emerging Markets Review, 13(1), 8-25. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2011.09.002
Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value: The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 1-28. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.003
Podkaminer, E. (2017). Smart Beta is the Gateway Drug to Risk Factor Investing. Journal of Portfolio Management, 43(5), 130-134. doi:10.3905/jpm.2017.43.5.130
Qian, E., & Hua, R. (2004). Active Risk and Information Ratio. Journal of Investment Management, 2. doi:10.1142/9789812700865_0007
Sharpe, W. (1964). CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:19:y:1964:i:3:p:425-442
Wang, M.-S. (2012). Idiosyncratic volatility, illiquidity and the expected stock returns: Exploring the relationship with quantile regression. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 9, 104-112.
Zalewska, J., & Nehrebecka, N. (2020). Liquidity and solvency of a company and the rate of return – an analysis of the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Central European Economic Journal, 6(53), 199-220. doi:doi:10.2478/ceej-2019-0013

無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2024/06/23 (校內網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
QR CODE