簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝抒晏
Shu-yen Hsieh
論文名稱: 分析師監理對公司市場價值的影響--金融海嘯前後之比較
The Impact of Analysts' Monitoring on Market Value of Firms – The Difference Between Before Financial Crisis And After Financial Crisis
指導教授: 張琬喻
Woan-Yuh, Jang
口試委員: 陳俊男
Chun-Nan, Chen
李美杏
Mei-Hsing, Lee
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 52
中文關鍵詞: 分析師監理公司市場價值金融海嘯前後
外文關鍵詞: Analysts' Monitoring, Market Value of Firms, Financial Crisis
相關次數: 點閱:248下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要目的在於探討分析師的監理功能對於公司市場價值的影響,亦即探討不同分析師報導公司的數量,是否可激勵公司管理者、降低代理成本,進而使公司市場價值上升。除此之外,本研究所探討分析師對公司價值的影響關係在金融風暴前及金融風暴後是否有差異。本研究之對象為台灣證券交易所之掛牌上市公司與中華民國櫃檯買賣中心之上櫃公司,資料期間為2005年1月1日到2007年12月31日及2009年1月1日到2011年12月31日。藉由迴歸分析結果發現,分析師的監理功能對於公司市場價值有顯著正面影響,亦即不同分析師報導公司的數量,可以激勵公司管理者、降低代理成本,進而使公司市場價值上升。此外,投資人在投資之前,可以根據本研究之研究結果,觀察使用金融海嘯前後作用相同之指標,作為投資高市場價值公司之參考。


    The main purpose of this study is to explore the influence of the Supervision function of the analyst for the market value of company. That is to explore whether the number of companies different analyst reports would encourage company managers to reduce agency costs, thereby enabling the company's market value to rise or not. Besides, this research probes the relationship between the value of the
    company and analysts and whether there are differences before and after the economic crisis. In this study, the object is the TWSE and GTSM Listed Companies. Data time is from 2005/01/01 to 2011/12/31.
    By using regression analysis, it is found that the supervision function of the analyst have a significant positive effect on the company's market value. That is, the amount of reports that different analysts publish could encourage company managers and reduce agency costs,
    thereby enabling the company's market value to rise. What’s more, according to the findings of this study, investors can observe before and after the financial crisis of the same indicators as a reference before investing high market value companies.

    第一章 緒論................................................................................................................. 1 第一節 研究背景與動機......................................................................................1 第二節 研究目的與貢獻..................................................................................... 2 第三節 研究架構與研究流程..............................................................................3 第二章 文獻探討......................................................................................................... 4 第一節 分析師監理與公司價值......................................................................... 4 第二節 公司價值................................................................................................. 7 第三節 金融風暴前後的經濟環境差異............................................................. 9 第三章 研究方法....................................................................................................... 10 第一節 研究期間、研究對象與資料來源......................................................... 11 第二節 研究變數之操作性定義....................................................................... 13 第三節 資料分析與研究模型........................................................................... 20 第四章 研究結果與分析........................................................................................... 27 第一節 敘述性統計分析................................................................................... 27 第二節 相關性分析........................................................................................... 31 第三節 迴歸分析................................................................................................36 第五章 結論與建議................................................................................................... 46 第一節 研究結論............................................................................................... 46 第二節 研究限制與建議................................................................................... 48

    中文文獻
    1. 郭秋榮,(2009),「全球金融風暴之成因、對我國影響及因應對策之探討」,經濟研究,第9期,台北。
    2. 蔡曜如,(2009),「金融危機對金融體系與總體經濟之影響」,全球金融危機專輯,第二章,臺北,臺灣。
    1. Bhushan, R., (1989) “Firm Characteristics and Analyst Following”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 11, pp.255-274.
    2. Bowen, R. M., Q. Cheng, and X. Chen, (2007) “Analyst coverage and the cost of raising equity capital: Evidence from underpricing of seasoned equity offerings”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.657-668.
    3. Brennan, M., and P. Hughes, (1991) “Stock Prices and the Supply of Information”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, pp. 1665-1691.
    4. Chen, C. Y., (2003) “Investment Opportunities and the Relation between Equity Value and Employees’ Bonus”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 30-7, pp. 941-973.
    5. Cheng, M. and K. R. Subramanyam, (2007) “Analyst Following and Credit Ratings”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 1007–1044.
    6. Chung K. H., and Jo, H., (1996) “The Impact of Security Analysts' Monitoring and Marketing Functions on the Market Value of Firms”, Journal Of Financial And Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 31. No. 4, pp.493-511.
    7. Chung K. H. and S. W. Pruitt, (1994) “A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s q”, Financial Management, Vol. 23, pp. 70-74.
    8. Dhiensiri, N. and A. Sayrak, (2010) “The value impact of analyst coverage”, Review of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 306-331.
    9. Douka, J. A., C. Kim, and C.Pantzalis, (2005) “The two faces of analyst coverage”, Financial Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 99-125.
    10. Estrin, S. and N. Wilson, (1986) “The Microeconomic Effects of Profit Sharing: The British Experience,” Center for Labor Economics, London School of Economics, London.
    11. Irani A. J., and I. Karamanou, (2003) “Regulation Fair Disclosure, analyst following and analyst forecast dispersion”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 17 pp. 15-29.
    12. Lang, M. H., and R. J. Lundholm, (1996) “Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 71 (4), pp. 467-492.
    13. McConnell J. J., H.and Servaes, (1990) “Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 595-612.

    14. Mehran H., and S. Peristiani, (2009) “Financial Visibility and the Decision to Go Private”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports no. 376.
    15. Merton, R. C., (1987) “A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, pp. 483-510.
    16. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, (1988) “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 293-315.
    17. Patton, A. and J. C. Baker, (1987) “Why Won’t Directors Rock the Boat?”, Harvard Business Review, 10-18.
    18. Perry, T., (1999) “Incentive Compensation for Outside Directors and CEO Turnover”, Working Paper, Arizona State University.
    19. Spence, M., (1973) “Job Market Signaling”, Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 87, pp. 355-374.
    20. Wiersema M. F. and Y. Zhang, “CEO Dismissal: The Role of Investment Analysts”, Stratgic Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 1161-1182 (2011)
    21. Yermack, D., “Higher Marker Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, pp. 185-211 (1996)
    22. Yermack, D.,” Remuneration, Retention, and Reputation Incentives for Outside Directors”, The Journal of Finance, Lix(5) (2004)

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2017/08/03 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE