簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張格鳴
Ke-Ming Chang
論文名稱: 探討影響閱聽者觀看或購買臉書直播銷售之研究
Factors that Affect Watching and Bidding on Facebook Live Auction
指導教授: 董芳武
Fang-Wu Tung
口試委員: 陳建雄
Chien-Hsiung Chen
衛萬里
Wan-Li Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學院 - 設計系
Department of Design
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 130
中文關鍵詞: 網路民族誌使用與滿足理論資訊系統持續使用模式持續觀看意圖持續 購買意圖
外文關鍵詞: Netnography, Uses and gratifications theory, Information systems continuance model, Watching intentions, Bidding intentions
相關次數: 點閱:387下載:61
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   隨著網路技術的更迭及行動裝置的普及,「直播」(Live broadcast)技術讓網路使用者的溝通不再僅限於圖文之間,而是讓訊息製造者能夠以影音的方式與閱聽者做即時互動。在臉書於2016 年開放直播功能後,部分業者看準了臉書社群廣大的使用者,利用臉書直播留言與聊天功能,經營貣臉書直播銷售的模式。在Facebook 社群平台分享功能的快速擴散下,吸引了網路購物愛好者的目光,進而成為多家業者爭相參與的直播銷售熱潮。因此,本研究便以臉書直播銷售作為研究題材,探討臉書直播銷售中影響閱聽者持續觀看與持續購買之因素,研究過程從「網路民族誌」(Netnography)著手資料蒐集與分析。並以「使用與滿足理論」 (Uses and Gratifications)、「資訊系統持續使用模式」(Information Systems Continuance Model)為基礎,繪製研究架構及設計量化問卷,並藉由迴歸分析探討影響閱聽者持續觀看與購買之意圖。

      本研究以臉書直播銷售閱聽者作為研究對象,研究結果顯示:影響閱聽者持續觀看與持續購買意圖的最大因素是「滿意度」,而在「娛樂性」、「互動性」與「資訊收集」等三項滿足感均是影響閱聽者「持續觀看意圖」的因素;「互動性」與「資訊收集」則是影響閱聽者「持續購買意圖」的因素。因此,臉書直播銷售業者除了應提供優質的產品與服務外,更應於直播過程提供「娛樂性」、「互動性」與「資訊收集」的內容,以增加閱聽者持續觀看意圖;並藉由提升「互動性」與「資訊收集」,吸引消費者持續購買意圖。


    Due to the change of internet technology and popularization of mobile devices, the technology of “Live Broadcast” allows the communication of internet users goes beyond images and articles. Messengers can instantly interact with audience by audio and films. After Facebook launching the function of live broadcast in 2016, some merchants have targeted the large amount of Facebook users and started running Facebook live auction. With the fast spreading by sharing from Facebook communities, live broadcast catches the eyes of online shoppers, and results in the boom of live broadcast auction that many companies are competing with. Therefore, this study takes live broadcast auction as the subject, discussing the factors that influence audiences’ watching intentions and budding intentions. The study first adopted Netnography to collect data. Then, the research frame was developed based on “Uses and Gratifications” theory and “Information Systems Continuance Model” and an on-line survey was conducted with live broadcast auction participants. Regression analysis was used to investigate the audiences’ watching intentions and bidding intentions on Facebook live auction.

    The results of this study show that “satisfaction” is the main factor that influences the intention of audiences’ continuation of watching and bidding on Facebook live auction. The factors of “Entertainment”, “Social Interaction”, and “Information-seeking” influence audiences’ watching intentions, while “Social Interaction” and “Information-seeking” are the ones that influence audiences’ bidding intentions. Thus, the merchants of Facebook live auction should provide contents of entertainment, social interaction, and information-seeking in addition to high quality products and services in order to enhance audiences’ watching intentions, and increase social interaction and information-seeking to attract consumers for their bidding intentions.

    摘要 I 致謝 II 目錄 IV 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 VIII 壹、緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究流程 4 1.4 研究對象與範圍 5 貳、文獻探討 6 2.1 消費者決策 6 2.2 網路互動性形成 9 2.3 使用與滿足理論與資訊系統持續使用模式 10 2.3.1 使用與滿足理論 10 2.3.2 使用與滿足理論發展過程 10 2.3.3 使用與滿足理論於網路媒體影響因素、態度與行為分析 12 2.3.4 資訊系統持續使用模式 14 2.3.5 小結 15 2.4 網路民族誌 17 参、研究方法 19 3.1 網路民族誌 19 3.2 研究架構與假設 20 3.2.1 娛樂性對持續觀看、持續購買的關係 21 3.2.2 互動性對持續觀看、持續購買的關係 21 3.2.3 資訊收集對持續觀看、持續購買的關係 22 3.2.4 滿意度對持續觀看、持續購買的關係 22 3.2.5 持續觀看對持續購買的關係 23 3.3 研究變數 23 3.3.1 娛樂性 25 3.3.2 互動性 25 3.3.3 資訊收集 25 3.3.4 商品與服務滿意度 25 3.3.5 持續觀看意圖 25 3.3.6 資料蒐集 26 3.3.7 抽樣方式 26 3.3.8 資料分析法 27 肆、網路民族誌研究分析結果 28 4.1 臉書直播銷售觀察分析 28 4.1.1 直播銷售於臉書介面功能之應用、定義 28 4.1.2 臉書直播銷售流程與類型 30 4.2 臉書直播銷售觀看與購買影響因素分析 31 4.2.1 觀察訪談資料分析結果 32 4.2.2 使用與滿足構面 32 4.2.3 滿意度 37 4.2.4 其他因素 39 4.2.5 小結 41 伍、問卷研究結果分析 42 5.1 臉書直播銷售閱聽者樣本資料 42 5.1.1 全體受測者樣本資料 42 5.1.2 臉書直播銷售閱聽者人口統計資料 43 5.1.3 閱聽者觀看直播類型 44 5.2 信度分析 45 5.3 問卷研究結果 45 5.3.1 只觀看閱聽者各影響因素與行為分析 46 5.3.2 有購買消費者各影響因素與行為分析 46 5.4 閱聽者差異 48 5.5 各因素與行為對持續觀看購買影響程度與差異 49 5.5.1 三項滿足感因素與持續觀看意圖 49 5.5.2 三項滿足因素與持續購買意圖 50 5.5.3 滿意度與持續觀看意圖 51 5.5.4 滿意度與持續購買意圖 52 5.5.5 持續觀看意圖與持續購買意圖 53 5.5.6 假設檢定 54 陸、研究結論與建議 55 6.1 研究結論 55 6.1.1 臉書直播銷售閱聽者的觀看與購買影響因素 55 6.1.2 各項因素對閱聽者的影響差異及程度 56 6.1.3 提供相關業者作為臉書直播的經營策略 58 6.2 研究限制 59 6.3 未來研究建議 60 參考文獻 62 英文文獻 62 中文文獻 65 碩博士論文 65 網路資料 66 附錄一、深入訪談逐字稿 67 一、訪談人基本資料 67 二、各訪談者逐字稿內容 67 附錄二、問卷內容 116

    英文文獻

    1. Abdullah, N.S.D., & Zolkepli, I.A. (2017). Sentiment analysis of online crowd input towards brand provocation in facebook, twitter, and instagram. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Thing,67-74.
    2. Ariely, D. (1998). Combining experiences over time: The effects of duration, intensity changes and on‐line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11(1), 19-45.
    3. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 351-370.
    4. Blumler, J.G., & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (Vol. 1974). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
    5. Cao, H., Jiang, J., Oh, L.-B., Li, H., Liao, X., & Chen, Z. (2013). A maslow's hierarchy of needs analysis of social networking services continuance. Journal of Service Management, 24(2), 170-190.
    6. Cheung, C.M., & Lee, M.K. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: Model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science, 35(3), 279-298.
    7. Cheung, G., & Huang, J. (2011). Starcraft from the stands: Understanding the game spectator. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,763-772
    8. Correll, S. (1995). The ethnography of an electronic bar: The lesbian cafe. Journal of contemporary ethnography, 24(3), 270-298.
    9. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
    10. Diddi, A., & LaRose, R. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 193-210.
    11. Hamilton, W.A., Garretson, O., & Kerne, A. (2014). Streaming on twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,1315-1324
    12. Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with youtube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317-335.
    13. Hausman, A.V., & Siekpe, J.S. (2009). The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 5-13.
    14. Hellier, P.K., Geursen, G.M., Carr, R.A., & Rickard, J.A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European journal of marketing, 37(11/12), 1762-1800.
    15. Herzog, H. (1942). What do we really know about daytime serial listeners. Radio research, 1943, 3-33.
    16. Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J.T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58-67.
    17. Hine, C. (2007). Connective ethnography for the exploration of e-science. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 618-634.
    18. Hong, S.-J., & Tam, K.Y. (2006). Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Information systems research, 17(2), 162-179.
    19. Huang, E. (2008). Use and gratification in e-consumers. Internet Research, 18(4), 405-426.
    20. Hunt, D., Atkin, D., & Krishnan, A. (2012). The influence of computer-mediated communication apprehension on motives for facebook use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(2), 187-202.
    21. Ihtiyar, A., Ahmad, F.S., & Baroto, M.B. (2013). Impact of intercultural competence on service reliability and customer satisfaction in the grocery retailing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 373-381.
    22. Izogo, E.E., & Jayawardhena, C. (2018). Online shopping experience in an emerging e-retailing market. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(2), 193-214.
    23. James, M.L., Wotring, C.E., & Forrest, E.J. (1995). An exploratory study of the perceived benefits of electronic bulletin board use and their impact on other communication activities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(1), 30-50.
    24. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., & Chervany, N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS quarterly, 183-213.
    25. Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The public opinion quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.
    26. Kaye, B.K., & Johnson, T.J. (2004). A web for all reasons: Uses and gratifications of internet components for political information. Telematics and informatics, 21(3), 197-223.
    27. Kim, C., Galliers, R.D., Shin, N., Ryoo, J.-H., & Kim, J. (2012). Factors influencing internet shopping value and customer repurchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(4), 374-387.
    28. Ko, H., Cho, C.-H., & Roberts, M.S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of advertising, 34(2), 57-70.
    29. Kozinets, R.V. (1997). ''I want to believe'': A netnography of the x-philes' subculture of consumption. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL XXIV, 24, 470-475.
    30. Kozinets, R.V., Dolbec, P.-Y., & Earley, A. (2014). Netnographic analysis: Understanding culture through social media data. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 262-276.
    31. Krause, A.E., North, A.C., & Heritage, B. (2014). The uses and gratifications of using facebook music listening applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 71-77.
    32. Krumm, J., Davies, N., & Narayanaswami, C. (2008). User-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(4), 10-11.
    33. Lee, C.S., Goh, D.H.L., Chua, A.Y., & Ang, R.P. (2010). Indagator: Investigating perceived gratifications of an application that blends mobile content sharing with gameplay. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(6), 1244-1257.
    34. Lim, W.M., & Ting, D.H. (2012). E-shopping: An analysis of the uses and gratifications theory. Modern Applied Science, 6(5), 48.
    35. Lin, C., & Jeffres, L. (1998). Predicting adoption of multimedia cable service. Journalism Quarterly, 75(2), 251-275.
    36. Liu, I.L., Cheung, C.M., & Lee, M.K. (2010). Understanding twitter usage: What drive people continue to tweet. Paper presented at the Pacis,928-939.
    37. Luo, X. (2002). Uses and gratifications theory and e-consumer behaviors: A structural equation modeling study. Journal of Interactive advertising, 2(2), 34-41.
    38. McLeod, J.M., & Becker, L.B. (1981). The uses and gratifications approach. Handbook of political communication, 67-99.
    39. Oliver, R.L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research, 460-469.
    40. Palmgreen, P. (1984). Uses and gratifications: A theoretical perspective. Annals of the International Communication Association, 8(1), 20-55.
    41. Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A.M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 44(2), 175-196.
    42. Park, N., Kee, K.F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733.
    43. Phang, C.W., Kankanhalli, A., & Sabherwal, R. (2009). Usability and sociability in online communities: A comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(10), 2.
    44. Rayburn, J.D. (1996). Uses and gratifications. An integrated approach to communication theory and research, 145-163.
    45. Rubin, A.M. (1986). Uses, gratifications, and media effects research. Perspectives on media effects, 281-301.
    46. Ruggiero, T.E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass communication & society, 3(1), 3-37.
    47. Sabia, T. (2018). Managing the popularity of streams in the twitch. Tv gatekeeping network,Unpublished master dissertation,University of Tampere, Tampere
    48. Safko, L. (2010). The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
    49. Schiffman, L.G., & Kanuk, L.L. (2000). Consumer behavior, 7th. New York: Prentice Hall.
    50. Shu, W. (2011). Why do people make online group purchases? Risk avoidance, sociability, conformity, and perceived playfulness. Management Information Systems Review, 17(1), 63-88.
    51. Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2017). Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of twitch users. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 985-996.
    52. Stafford, T.F., Stafford, M.R., & Schkade, L.L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259-288.
    53. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4), 73-93.
    54. Tulloch, J., & Jenkins, H. (1995). Science fiction audiences: Watching dr. Who and Star Trek, 261.
    55. West, R.L., & Turner, L.H. (2010). Uses and gratifications theory. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application, 392-398.
    56. Windahl, S. (1981). Uses and gratifications at the crossroads. Mass communication review yearbook, 2(2), 174-185.
    57. Windahl, S., & McQuail, D. (1993). Communication models for the study of mass communications. Harlow: Longman.
    58. Xu, J.D., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R.T. (2013). Integrating service quality with system and information quality: An empirical test in the e-service context. Mis Quarterly, 37(3), 777-794.
    59. Yen, C.-H., & Lu, H.-P. (2008). Effects of e-service quality on loyalty intention: An empirical study in online auction. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 18(2), 127-146.

    中文文獻

    1.丁國章,曾相榮和潘昭儀(2010)。網路購物行為之消費者知覺風險研究。行銷評論,7(3),381-410
    2.李啟誠和李羽喬(2010)。網路口碑對消費者購買決策之影響── 以產品涉入及品牌形象為干擾變項。中華管理評論學報,第十三卷一期,1-23
    3.卜玉梅(2012)。虚拟民族志: 田野,方法与伦理。社会学研究, 6,217-236
    4.陳志萍(2008)。精進網路研究方法-網路民族誌. 圖書資訊學研究,2(2),1-15
    5.陳建文,吳紹榮,余姵歆和袁綾 (2015)。Facebook 粉絲專頁對網路持續使用行為意圖之影響: 以使用與滿足理論與社會影響觀點。朝陽商管評論,14(S),19-38
    6.陳淑娟,楊珮綺和林永順(2009)。產品涉入, 知覺風險與資訊傳播影響消費者購買果醋意願的研究。美和學報,28 (1),87-104
    7.吳明隆(2013)。Spss 統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。新北市:易習圖書
    8.邱皓政(2013)。量化研究與統計分析: Spss (pasw) 資料分析範例解析 (第五版 ed.)。臺北市: 五南圖書
    9.林東泰(1997)。大眾傳播理論。臺北市: 師大書苑
    10.翁秀琪(1998)。大眾傳播理論與實證 (修訂三版 ed.)。臺北市: 三民書局股份有限公司
    11.蕭文龍(2007)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書: Spss+ lisreal (sem)。臺北市: 碁峰資訊
    12.陳智凱(譯)(2003)。消費者行為(原作者:Eric Arnould, L.P., George Zinkhan.)。臺北市: 麥格羅‧希爾.(原出版年:2002)
    13.白滌清(譯)(2012)。消費者行為(原作者: Blackwell, M., Engel, Pai, Norjaya, Wan Jooria.)。臺北市: 華泰文化

    碩博士論文

    1. 陳銘慧(2002)。溝通策略、消費者衝動性特質、產品特質對衝動性消費行為之影響,國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文
    2. 方立安(2017)。閱聽人觀看直播行為之分析:以 facebook 直播為例,國立臺灣大學國際企業學系碩士論文
    3. 王之廷(2014)。以體驗行銷觀點探討網路商店促成購買衝動之影響因素,大同大學資訊經營學系碩士論文
    4. 王怡翔(2016)。以使用與滿足理論探討社交媒體在班級經營上的使用:檢視facebook 和line 的使用,國立交通大學理學院科技與數位學習學程碩士論文
    5. 李宜璟(2012)。使用者持續使用網路團購行為意圖之研究, 逢甲大學企業管理系碩士論文
    6. 林燕秓(2009)。自我的線上舞台--影音分享網站之閱聽人研究,元智大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文
    7. 柯達(2004)。網路購物使用與滿足之研究,世新大學傳播管理學系碩士論文
    8. 高妮霠(2007)。Web2.0 應用服務之使用與滿足研究-以線上影音分享網站為例,國立臺灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文
    9. 張簡郁庭 (2017)。臉書直播拍賣下標衝動意圖之研究,國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文
    10. 連詵萱(2017)。直播操作對銷售績效的影響 - 以新竹地區某古董藝品店為例,中華大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    11. 陳仁智(2015)。自我一致性、品牌認同及顧客滿意度對再購意願之影響─以臉書打卡為例,靜宜大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    12. 陳佳瑩(2015)。觀光工廠diy 體驗對消費者情緒與購買行為的影響,國立高雄師範大學工業設計學系碩士論文
    13. 黃麗婷(2003)。產品情感與自我認同對衝動性購買之影響,國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    14. 鄭佳興(2017)。臉書直播主的互動模式與印象管理之研究,世新大學公共關係暨廣告學系碩士論文
    15. 蘇品伃(2016)。Youtuber 對美妝消費者購買決策影響之研究,國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所碩士論文

    QR CODE